This is a delightful article by teacher-historian John Thompson, written with Stanley Hupfeld, a retired hospital executive in Oklahoma City.
They write:
“For over 15 years, the OKCPS has adopted the normative instruction-driven, curriculum-driven approach to school improvement. The key to these policies is holding individuals accountable for measurable increases in student performance. The system has done a respectable job of implementing that game plan, but there is a growing body of research explaining why it simply can’t work with schools facing the challenges in our poorest schools. To turn around schools with extreme concentrations of children from generational poverty who have endured multiple traumas, schooling must become a team effort…
“Dipesh Navsaria, keynote speaker at the Potts Family Foundation Oklahoma Early Childhood Coalition Business Summit, also explains that once every student knows he has a mentor who is “crazy about him,” meaningful learning will follow. Navsaria then reviews the scientific evidence on why schools must make education fun. Research shows that the first 1,000 days of life are the key to closing the achievement gap. As Navsaria explains, we must restore play to its rightful place in elementary schools.
“We know the district teachers love their students. But this is not the point. What has been left out is a culture that promotes and sustains an aura of love and fun. Common sense tells us this is so — but now so does the research. Nothing less than a cultural transformation is necessary — not the program of the month.”

“”What has been left out is a culture that promotes and sustains an aura of love and fun.” we need to go further with this — the title of the book we read in the 60s was. “From learning for love to love of learning.” It doesn’t stop with the child’s gaining love and recognition or rewards … there are further developmental stages. I could give you the case of Ari as he progressed through elementary school to middle school and is now 16. He had difficulty negotiating those developmental stages; the learning for love came naturally with parents, grandparents, and early school but he hit a major road block in middle school when his math and science grades took a “tumble”. He couldn’t quite get into the “love of learning” mode in an academic/cognitive setting… Each case is different but teachers at middle and high school need to know some of the strategies so that formal logic develops and it doesn’t just occur spontaneously.
Be careful how you sell this approach… When we go to legislators with the description a really wonderful, supportive state senator said ‘but this is the whole kitchen sink.” and they couldn’t promise to deliver resources. Then the next set of legislators and newspapers grabbed it. “this is a recess bill” and the mocking came from all directions …
LikeLike
The “first thousand days of life” do not start in school or in kindergarten. They start at birth. In fact, it is arguable that they start in the womb at inception. Case in point, a mother who gets pregnant and she is an alcoholic, smokes, and/or uses drugs, and has a horrible lifestyle that includes nothing but sodas, sweets, and fast food.
With parents like that, the fetus in the womb will not get the nutrition it needs to develop properly.
And after the fetus comes into the world and gets the label child, if those parents also do not read even if they can read, that is another blow against the child.
By the time the first “thousand days of life” ends, the child is not even 3 and has more than 2 years left before starting school.
If those first thousand days of life are the key, then we have already failed before the child reaches kindergarten.
And that is why a 2013 study out of Stanford said this about EVERY country that participates in PISA:
“The report also found:
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/january/test-scores-ranking-011513.html
I agree that a major step in making up for the failures of the first thousand days is “love and fun” but it must also encourage a child’s love for reading. In addition, we can’t wait to start this “love and fun” curriculum in kindergarten but must start as early as age 2 through a national early childhood education system that is not put into the hands of the flawed and often fraudulent private sector. It must be kept in the public sector and it must be kept non-profit and transparent.
LikeLike