Archives for the month of: January, 2017

This is a very alarming story about a conservative Christian group funded by Betsy DeVos called the “Student Statesmanship Institute.” Open the story to see the video.


A conservative Christian group with ties to Donald Trump education pick Betsy DeVos once released a promotional video that proudly featured a speaker describing how Adolf Hitler and others indoctrinated children.

The undated video by the Student Statesmanship Institute ― which trains Christian kids to bring their “biblical worldview” to politics and media careers ― opens with a speech by Michigan leader Richard Posthumus, who describes how Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin used children to spread their message.

“Sometimes, it seems like it’s very hard to change the world, the world is so big,” Posthumus says in the video, over a dramatic soundtrack. “But what SSI has done is equip young people with the tools to go out and be ready for the competing ideas that’s in this world.”

The video immediately cuts to another comment.

“Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Lenin: They knew one thing, that to change a culture, to change a country, they had to reach the children,” he says.

It’s not clear how Posthumus prefaced those remarks. But the words are included in a montage of SSI’s “favorite and most inspirational moments over the last 20 years,” according to the clip’s YouTube description.”

Kerri O’Grady is a professor of communications at NYU who teaches corporations how to protect their reputations.

But she has the same name as a Secret Service agent who posted in her Facebook page that she would not take a bullet for Trump.

Professor O’Grady soon became the target of hateful Tweets, emails, and Facebook messages.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/27/how-a-secret-service-controversy-turned-an-innocent-professors-life-into-an-online-nightmare/

It is one of those stories that could only happen on our time.

She will be teaching her own experience!

To stop the confirmation of Betsy DeVos, Democrats must find three Republicans to join them in opposition. Senator Al Franken said that no Democrat would vote for her.

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/01/27/opposition-devos-swells-hope-her-rejection-builds

Priceless comment by Indiana Republican:

“A group of Indiana teachers on Thursday held a sit-in at the office of Sen. Ted Young, a Republican who received donations from the DeVos family, who are heirs to the Amway fortune.

“Why would she pay so much, with so much desire to have this job if she were unqualified for it?” they asked.”

Meanwhile Senate phone lines are jammed with anti-DeVos phone calls.

https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/homenews/administration/316321-anti-devos-calls-jam-senate-phone-lines%3Famp?client=safari

If you enjoy the humor of The Onion, this is a good laugh.

 

Lindsey Graham, Senator from South Carolina, has occasionally stood up to Trump. The consequences?

An anonymous person sent a secret recording of a GOP closed-door discussion of repealing Obamacare and the political perils of not having a replacement. A new Congressman from New York worried about defunding Planned Parenthood. Not sure anyone agreed.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/behind-closed-doors-republican-lawmakers-fret-about-how-to-repeal-obamacare/2017/01/27/deabdafa-e491-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html

Trump refuses to believe the reports of the numbers who attended his inauguration. The Washington Post says that the president called the acting director of the National Park Service and put pressure on the agency to validate his belief that the crowd was the largest ever ever ever. Ever!

 

If everyone says so, maybe it will be true. Despite the photographs.

 

Trump has refused to release his tax returns so the public will never know whether he is making decisions to enrich himself and his family. He recently issued an executive order to resume the Dakota Access pipeline, cutting through ancestral lands of the Standing Rock Sioux and endangering the tribe’s water supply. Did he make this decision to enrich himself? Since he refuses to disclose his holdings and refuses to divest ownership of his business, the public has no way of knowing whether he is acting for self-interest.

 

MoveOn.org sent out this petition:

 

 

Dear fellow MoveOn member,

 

President Trump just signed an executive order that could allow work on the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) to proceed—threatening the water of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and 17 million people who live and work along the shore of the Missouri River.1

 

Trump’s team has claimed he has no conflict of interest, but their word is not enough. Will you sign and share this petition urging Congress to require Trump to prove he is not profiting off this executive order?

 

Require President Trump to provide the audit trail of papers proving he is no longer involved in any way, shape, or form with the Dakota Access Pipeline.

 

Sign Roxanne’s petition

 

Federal disclosure forms filed in May of 2016 showed that President Donald Trump held shares in Energy Transfer Partners and Phillips 66, both part of the DAPL entity. A Trump spokesperson announced that he had sold off his shares in Energy Transfer Partners, but the Trump team would not say whether he had sold his stake in Phillips 66.2

 

This presents a clear conflict of interest if he cannot prove he is fully divested of all interest in the pipeline, and was before he signed his executive order.

 

If the President has truly divested, he should easily be able to prove it and put the claim to rest. If he cannot, he has no business signing executive orders that cause conflicts of interest.

 

Click here to add your name to this petition, and then pass it along to your friends.

 

Thanks!

 

—Roxanne Saxton

 

Sources:

 

1. “Trump Pins Keystone, Dakota Pipeline Fate on Renegotiation,” Bloomberg, January 24, 2017
https://act.moveon.org/go/7790?t=5&akid=177043.27327500.4EGWBM

 

2. “Trump Owns Stake In Hotly Disputed $3.8 Billion Oil Pipeline, Conflict Of Interest Looms,” Forbes, November 26, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/7791?t=7&akid=177043.27327500.4EGWBM

Bertis Downs is a public school parent in Athens, Georgia. He is also an activist for public education and a member of the board of Network for Oublic Education. He wrote this column about why he and his wife chose their local public schools, published by Valerie Strauss on the Answer Sheet blog.

 

Downs wonders why elected officials don’t acknowledge the obvious fact that most people choose the local community public schools, not private schools, not charter schools, not religious schools.

 

He writes:

 

“There are excellent schools in every neighborhood in America? After all, the vast majority of America’s schoolchildren attend public schools.

 

“Why aren’t “community schools” — which seek to address the many out-of-school factors that effect achievement — a leading reform choice? Could it be that those are public school models that don’t profit anyone other than the communities of students they educate?

 

“Among the many great things about our country’s public schools is their resilience. Most of our public schools do a good job of educating our nation’s children — despite relentless political and media attacks that blame teachers and schools for poor student performance while ignoring out-of-school factors that affect how children do in school.

 

“My own kids have had caring and committed public school teachers, wonderful extracurricular opportunities, great friends, and bright futures as members of their diverse and challenging school communities (in Georgia in our case). Every student should have that choice. What kids everywhere need is love and support at home and at school, wisdom and inspiration from well-trained teachers, and a rich and diverse curriculum that focuses on them as unique children.

 

“In the era of high-stakes standardized tests — with scores unfairly used to make important decisions about the future of kids, teachers, principals, schools and even districts — many kids have effectively become “testing drones.” Students deserve a curriculum rich in the arts and cultural context. They deserve to attend schools centered in and supported by their community, with enough funding for adequate facilities, reasonable class sizes, and knowledgeable and fulfilled teachers.

 

“These things occur in countries that believe in systemic improvement — and they are possible here too, but only if we have the courage and political will to properly fund school districts, create exciting and smart curriculum and address out-of-school factors that affect student academic performance.”

 

 

Senator Lamar Alexander likes to say that vouchers for religious and private schools are akin to a “GI Bill of Rights for Children,” a transfer of public funds to be spent anywhere.

 

But this reader is a beneficiary of the actual GI Bill and he says the analogy is wrong:

 

 

“I felt compelled to write this today after seeing Senator Alexander’s efforts to normalize Betsy Devos’ extreme ideas about public education.

 

“Dear Senator Lamar Alexander. STOP COMPARING SCHOOL VOUCHERS TO THE GI BILL.

 

“You are defending Betsy Devos and her goal to change public education into a system of private vouchers by saying that school vouchers are just like the GI BILL.

 

“The GI bill was a special benefit to support veterans returning to civilian life. I know, because the GI bill made it possible for me to make it through college after the Vietnam war. This one time benefit for soldiers is far different than our public responsibility to provide for the education of the children in our communities. Each state’s constitution defines this public responsibility to provide for and oversee the compulsory education of the children in their state.

 

“Our public responsibility to educate our youth is not the same thing as going to the grocery store to buy groceries. It is not about consumer choice. It’s about responsibility. Each community has the responsibility to create an equitable, safe, quality education for all of the children in their community. This responsibility includes providing an education that will enable students to become proficient in basic skills as well as to develop the habits and citizenship skills necessary to participate in our diverse democracy.

 

“The entire public contributes to the common good for the children of the state, even if they have no children. Along with this responsibility is the expectation that students will receive a quality public education. I am contributing my public tax dollars to public education, not so a family down the street can feel entitled to send their child to private or religious school because the local school is not to their liking. If they are unhappy with their public schools, they can work with their locally elected officials. They can also choose to provide their own private school or home school their child. That’s their job and responsibility. In my community our school board offers both traditional as well as alternative schools and resources for home school families.

 

 

“The choice movement wants to take away this public responsibility and oversight. All they want from the public is their tax dollars. They want private choice, not public choice, and they want you to pay for it.

 

“Senator Alexander and Betsy Devos do not understand this sacred responsibility.”

Mercedes Schneider reposts a press release announcing that more than 2,750 students and alumni of Calvin College–Betsy DeVos’s alma mater–have signed a letter opposing her nomination as Secretary of Education.

 

The letter gives the reasons and lists the names.