Good news from the Education Law Center: Several civil rights groups in New Jersey are suing to stop the state from using PARCC as a high school graduation requirement.
Several New Jersey civil rights and parent advocacy organizations have filed a legal challenge to new high school graduation regulations recently adopted by the State Board of Education. The new rules make passing the controversial PARCC exams a requirement for a New Jersey high school diploma and will also prevent students who opt out from graduating.
The lawsuit was filed in New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, on October 21st on behalf of the Latino Action Network (LAN), the Latino Coalition of New Jersey (LCNJ), the Paterson Education Fund (PEF) and the Education Law Center (ELC). ELC and the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ) are co-counsel.
The lawsuit says the new regulations violate the NJ graduation statute and other applicable laws in several ways:
The state law requiring a graduation test, originally passed in 1979, explicitly requires an 11th grade test that assesses state standards in English Language Arts (ELA) and Math. Instead, the State Board designated the PARCC ELA10, a tenth grade exam, and the PARCC Algebra I test, which is given across a wide range of middle and high school grades, as the primary high school graduation tests.
The new rules undermine important protections established by the Legislature, such as eliminating retesting opportunities required by the graduation statute.
The designation of a 10th grade graduation test deprives English Language Learners (ELLs) of an extra year to develop their language ability.
The use of fee-based tests like the SAT and ACT as “substitute competency tests” through 2020 will restrict low-income students’ access to diplomas. Because NJ’s at-risk students are more likely to be members of racial minority groups or ELLs, use of fee-based assessments will have a negative, disparate impact on these student groups, a violation of their civil rights.
The substitute assessments are also not 11th grade tests and, as the Department has acknowledged, are not aligned with state standards. The lawsuit alleges these provisions violate the state constitution’s Education Clause and state anti-discrimination law.
Under the new rules, the substitute assessments will be eliminated after 2020, and students who do not pass PARCC ELA10 and Algebra 1 will have only one other option to graduate: the NJ Department of Education’s time-consuming “portfolio appeals” process. Access to the portfolio appeal will be restricted to students who took all PARCC exams during their high school years.
If these new rules had been in effect for the class of 2016, more than half of the senior class—50-60,000 students—would have been at risk of not graduating. In 2015, the passing rate on the PARCC ELA10 was 37 percent and on the PARCC Algebra I it was 36 percent. In 2016, the rates were 44 percent and 41 percent, respectively. Passing rates on the previous graduation test, the High School Proficiency Assessment, were above 90 percent.
Preparing tens of thousands of portfolio appeals for seniors who do not pass PARCC would be a major new burden for staff and students, particularly in high needs districts. Last year, about 11,000 seniors needed portfolios to graduate. Students who needed portfolios after multiple rounds of testing faced more lost instructional time, increased stress and disrupted senior plans. Districts using the portfolio process incurred extra costs for staff time, additional test administrations, and after-school and Saturday sessions devoted to preparing portfolios for review.
“Setting high school graduation standards is an important public policy issue,” said Christian Estevez, President of the LAN. “It’s also important to protect the rights of students to the opportunities that a high school diploma represents.”
PEF’s Executive Director Rosie Grant added, “NJ has sustained one of the highest graduation rates in the country, in part because we’ve always had multiple ways for students to earn a high school diploma. We want to make sure students continue to have multiple opportunities to succeed.”
The decision to tie high school diplomas to specific test scores is a state policy decision, not a federal mandate. Currently, fewer than one-third of all states use high school exit tests, and several states have used the transition to new assessment systems to eliminate them. Many states continue to give tests for diagnostic and accountability purposes without using the scores to make graduation decisions for individual students. A bill now pending in the NJ Legislature (S2147/A3849) would allow for that alternative.
“The State Board of Education is going full-steam ahead with a plan that breaks New Jersey law and, more disturbingly, disproportionately harms the most vulnerable students,” said ACLU-NJ Legal Director Ed Barocas. “The state knows about the PARCC’s high failure rates, extreme racial disparities, and deep economic divisions in passing scores, and yet officials decided to use this test as a key criterion for graduation despite the glaring problems. The New Jersey Board of Education has put New Jersey students on the wrong course.”
PARCC, a federally-funded consortium that produced the new tests, once had 25 state members. But today only six remain, and just three use PARCC at the high school level. Only NJ and New Mexico currently use PARCC exams as a high school graduation requirement.
“Ultimately, the legislature needs to revisit NJ’s exit testing policies,” said Stan Karp, Director of ELC’s Secondary Reform Project. “Until then, this lawsuit seeks to safeguard the rights of students and families, particularly in high need districts and schools.”

Yes! Thank goodness for the civil-rights watchdogs. Hopefully the NJ Opt-Out folks are on top of this also. Christie & his ed-reform commish are so far out in left field on this.
My kids went through when we had the HSPA NJ exit exam (math & Eng). It was not easy, it was fair; the only accommodation for my 2 of 3 IEP’r’s was extended testing time. 11th grade was the practice HSPA. My youngest failed it, so in Sr yr he had to forego an elective so as to have back-to-back Math & HSPA-math-prep classes. He wasn’t thrilled, but he passed, & did fine in his college math-for-artsies class.
I was happy with the NJ stds, curricula & assessments my kids got 1992-2010. Have been sad & mad to see curriculum quality lowered by CCSS and learning time truncated & warped by PARCC & Marzano assessments.
LikeLike
Ohio had the OGT, which was poorly written, as a graduation requirement. It was replaced by PARCC, then AIR, now, who knows?
The problem was the state seemed intent on applying some kind of Darwinistic philosophy to high school kids, discarding without consideration those that failed to pass all parts. Then they blamed those nasty teachers. Of course, it remains to be seen if the lawmakers on Mount Olympus could come down and themselves pass the OGT, PARCC, or any other useless standardized test the exalted politicians inflict on the mere mortals. That, I’d like to see.
LikeLike
Vale Math,
That’s the answer: the legislators must take the tests they mandate and publish their scores!
LikeLike
It is past time to kill PARCC. States should follow the lead of colleges/universities that depend on high school GPA and criteria other than standardized tests, including SAT and ACT.
LikeLike
While I believe we should always seek to improve and refine instruction. I see no point to a one size fits all test and punish scheme we continue to see churned out various states. New Jersey’s graduation requirements are unfair to poor, mostly minority students, disabled students and ELLs. New Jersey is misusing testing to create barriers and impossible hurdles for significant numbers of students. Instead of helping students, it will only hurt as it will label large numbers of students as “failures” and limit their options in life. New Jersey’s rules are a political manipulation to promote the ‘failing schools’ narrative to forward privatization, and they are designed by a governor whose goal is to destroy public education.
LikeLike
I hate to think where I would have ended up if I had been defined by my high school performance. I did well in school, but I remember how clueless I really was. To sort and rank kids by how they score on a one size fits all test is cruel and unusual punishment. Life is so much more than how you take tests. Formal education should be a time of discovery. The constant pressure to perform to arbitrary standards ignores what each individual has to offer and how each child will grow if not forced into a predetermined mold.
LikeLike
As an ESL teacher I have seen the damaging impact of standardized tests on diverse students. I have also had “late bloomers” that would have scored poorly in high school, but got their act together later, and made it in the real world.
LikeLike
I thought the whole purpose of PARCC was was a feedback loop. PARCC was supposed to be a resource redistribution tool. Direct more funding to socioeconomic groups passing at low rates. To use it as a graduation requirement before all socioeconomic groups were passing at equal rates, is to add insult to injury. Way to kick the victim.
LikeLike
I have mentioned my experience with the PARCC practice we got in Tennessee before it was replaced by something else. If it was ever meant to channel money in some direction, it was a failure in that respect. There was nothing in that test to show the differences between students. Of course, No test is needed to know that troubled youth and poverty require more resources.
There is nothing wrong with demanding testing in its place. But it’s place is not in the general population.
LikeLike