An outside auditor of Tennessee’s famed-but-failed Achievement School District found that the group’s finances were a mess.
The Achievement School District was created to prove that ASD could take control of the state’s lowest scoring schools (in the bottom 5% of the state) and move them to the top 25% in only five years. The clock began ticking in 2012, when ASD took over half a dozen schools. An independent study by researchers at Vanderbilt University found no evidence that ASD was on track to meet that goal. Gary Rubinstein analyzed the numbers and concluded that the original schools turned over to charters were still in the bottom 5% (although one rose to the bottom 7%). Of course, they still have a year to go, so let’s not rush to judgment! (Georgia, North Carolina, and Nevada are all planning to create special districts modeled on Tennessee’s ASD, which supposedly knows how to turnaround low-performing schools even though it hasn’t. But when has failure ever deterred corporate-style reformers?)
But it turns out that the ASD’s finances were a mess, according to auditors.
It’s in charge of turning around Tennessee’s failing schools, but the state’s Achievement School District now has its own flunking grade from state Comptroller watchdogs.
The just-released audit by the Division of State Audit provides a blistering critique into what auditors say the agency’s lack of internal financial controls over basic functions.
So just how bad are things at the agency that directly manages five public schools and contracts with private charter groups to operate 24 other schools falling into the bottom five percent of schools statewide in terms of student performance?
Even as Division of State Audit accountants’ examination was still underway this spring, the state Department of Education, which had allowed the ASD to operate independently, informed the Comptroller’s office in April that it had staged an intervention and seized control over the ASD’s “fiscal and federal processes.”
As a result, the functions were transferred from Memphis to Nashville with a turnover of the ASD’s financial staff. Education Commissioner Candice McQueen’s staff told auditors they were hiring a fiscal director, fiscal manager, accountant, account tech, federal programs director and federal programs manager.
Problem areas cited by the Division of State Audit ranged from loose controls over spending, travel and credit cards to insufficient monitoring of the actual schools that ASD runs or contracts out.
Specific findings include:
1) The Achievement School District’s management did not establish adequate controls over several key human resources and payroll processes
State law directs that it “shall develop written procedures, subject to the approval of the commissioner, for employment and management of personnel as well as the development of compensation and benefit plans.”
“During our audit,” watchdogs wrote, “we found seven key areas where ASD did not establish processes over key human resources and payroll functions, including segregating duties; maintaining personnel files; verifying education credentials; documenting time and attendance; completing performance reviews; documenting approvals of bonuses and pay raises; and exiting employees.
2) The Achievement School District’s management “failed to implement adequate internal controls over its expenditures, travel claims, and purchasing card purchases
“Based on our testwork,” auditors wrote, “we found several deficiencies that indicate that ASD management did not establish adequate internal controls over expenditures and purchasing card purchases. Specifically, we noted that management did not properly approve expenditures, travel claims, and purchasing card purchases, nor did they provide adequate support for some transactions.
3) The Achievement School District’s fiscal management “did not perform sufficient fiscal monitoring of its direct-run schools and charter management organizations
“Considering the problems identified in previous Tennessee Single Audits,” auditors noted, “we inquired with management to determine if ASD management conducted fiscal monitoring of ASD’s Achievement Schools and charter management organizations; we found that ASD’s main office staff do not conduct such monitoring.
In one instance, auditors discovered there were payments of $5,895 to employees who no longer even worked for ASD.
Among other things, auditors also couldn’t find six expenditure transactions for a dental insurance premium, donation, coffee supplies, and accrual calculations, totaling $131,637, and for three travel claims for a flight and expenses involving charter school operators. That totalled $4,734 and, the audit says, “management could not provide supporting documentation.”
I read this story shortly after finishing a revealing memoir called Sex, Lies, and A Charter School: The Misappropriation of Your Tax Dollars. The author, Dikombi Gite, lives in Houston, where he was born. He became an engineer, but decided that he wanted to try his hand as a teacher and “give back.” He was sure he could connect with kids because he shared their life experiences. He didn’t have any teaching credentials, so he couldn’t be hired by the Houston public schools. He was hired immediately by a charter chain, where he struggled as a teacher. The chain is not identified, but it started in Houston and has (he says) 80 charters. Within months, he was moved into the office to manage the school’s books. What he learned in his brief life at the charter school was that the place appeared swell on the surface, but it was in fact riven by strife, affairs among staff members, fights among students, cronyism, nepotism, missing money, and more chaos than he could manage. Could the same story have been written about a public school? Perhaps. But not as likely because few of the teachers were professionals, and few of the administrators were professionals. People were hired and fired on a moment’s notice, no background checks. The thing that mattered most was attendance, because the flow of money depended on the head count. It is a well-written book (self-published by the author) and very revealing about what happens when there is no supervision, no oversight, no transparency, and no accountability. Funny, another book I was reading last night repeated the reformers’ claim that the key to success was school autonomy: no restraints, no constraints, no unions, no oversight. A grand theory. This book tells a different story. The author’s address is: POB 331753, Houston, TX. 77233. His email: Dikombi@yahoo.com
Mission accomplished!
“But when has failure ever deterred corporate-style reformers?”
That was worth a loud laugh and I did just that.
These corporate frauds/traitors to the U.S. Constitution, its republic and participatory democracy only find failure valuable when they use it along with their trumped-up, failed and flawed high-stakes tests to close community based, democratic, transparent, non-profit public schools, so they can get their greed-slime hands on the public’s money.
It’s not a lot of money at issue, but the politicians who set this scheme up never should have allowed the privatized district to set up their own financial oversight systems. That’s crazy. The solution isn’t going to work either- they can’t regulate schools exclusively at the state level, particularly if they replace hundreds of public schools with private operators which is clearly the goal of this “movement”.
They should be happy. They got off cheap. Money is replaceable. If they end up with a safety issue at one of these schools and it’s traced to this laissez faire approach to regulation those politicians are going to be in a world of hurt.
Regulators were placed close to the schools they oversee for a reason. Schools can’t be regulated from the state capitol. It’s dumb. It won’t work.
Why do we have to learn the same lessons every 100 years? Why don’t they go back and look at WHY schools were regulated at the district or county level? There was a REASON.
A bunch of privately managed splinter schools creates an accountability nightmare. Taxpayers should start demanding more oversight. Public money should be managed. We have already seen millions of dollars of waste and fraud. The local school district should send out their auditors and charge the charters for the service. If they find any unethical use of funds, the charter should pay the district back with interest. A more serious offense should be turned over to law enforcement, and their authorization to operate should be pulled. If the government is unwilling to supervise, then they should not open more charters.
Chiara …”.replace hundreds of public schools with private operators which is clearly the goal of this “movement”.
Yes. The messaging campaign of the day is: The operator does not matter as long as there are “high quality seats” for all students. This is the pitch used to recruit the CEO of our new “accelerator for Cincinnati schools” envisioned as governed by the wealthy founders and token “community members” all unelected members of a board who will focus on outcomes only. VAM will be used to identify “high quality seats.” Of course their double speak also requires personalized learning to be featured , when that phrase means the exact opposite–de-personalized to the nth degree for the purpose of cost reductions and also profits.
That phrase “high quality seats” always makes me stop in my tracks.
I envision a chair. No, two chairs. One is high quality, the other is not. Is the difference apparent to the naked eye? Could we move some of the good ones to the schools with low scores? Who owns those seats? Does it matter who sits in them? Does it matter who teaches? How did that seat get to be high quality?
Donald Trump is climbing aboard the “bash public schools, promote charter schools” bandwagon.
“I”n a Tuesday speech in West Bend, Wisc. tailored for the African-American community, GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump expanded on his brief mention of K-12 at the Republican National Convention by mentioning a few teacher-related policies and his thoughts on charter schools. In fact, since the convention, he seems to be putting a little more emphasis on school choice policy in particular.
Trump first criticized the performance of schools in Milwaukee, which is about 40 miles from West Bend, saying the city has only a 60 percent graduation rate and that 55 city schools are rated as failing.”
I don’t want to let facts get in the way of a political marketing campaign, but doesn’t Milwaukee already have charters and vouchers?
He wants to abolish public schools completely?
Very funny! Milwaukee is the exemplar of school choice. The public schools do better than charters or vouchers.
In today’s visit to the echo chamber:
“New book tells the story of the visionaries who reinvented U.S education”
They’re all promoting a book on the founders of charter schools.
There’s that extreme humility I’ve come to expect from the Best and The Brightest.
They are “visionaries” who “reinvented public education”, according to….them.
Oh, look, California opened hundreds of charter schools with no regulatory structure to monitor them:
“California needs reasonable, clearly defined and well-enforced rules for charter school oversight, a point driven home by a recent report issued by the Southern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and the nonprofit law firm Public Advocates. The study concluded that 253 California charter schools may have been in violation of state law because of discriminatory admissions policies”
I guess the assumption was the Best and the Brightest would just regulate themselves.
Mere mortals who run public schools require oversight. Visionaries who run charters are so fabulous they can regulate themselves.
ww.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-richmond-charter-school-oversight-20160818-snap-story.html?platform=hootsuite
Making a twist on a famous but horrible movie line:
Being a Professional Education Reformer means never having to say you’re sorry.
I believe I heard today that stock for CCA, one of the large private prison corporations had plummeted due to a study that found that privatizing prisons made them more costly and less safe. Is privatization on the ropes? Are we about to enter a period when the view of government as an agent of administration is no longer an automatic negative?
Seems like that should resonate over to the thinking about Corp-Ed.
The claims of efficiency from privatization are a hoax across the board.
That phrase “high quality seats” always makes me stop in my tracks.
Me too. That is why “high quality seats” in quotes. I have determined that this phrase disguises a game of musical chairs; there are never enough seats for all of the students.The high and low quality seats are determined by the distribution of test scores on all state tests. These approximate a normal curve, so there are never enough high quality seats and always too many low quality seats. Same is true for large districts.
Another word that bugs me is “strivers.” It is another way of rating the grittiness of students, effort and apparent eagerness to learn are in the foreground.
I am also bugged by the mindless proliferation of “great” (students, teachers, schools) and a thoughtless use of the word “talent” as if to assert that this is a well-defined concept and a prerequisite for becoming a teacher, a principal, etc. The word diminishes the role of nuanced judgments that come from experience and well-honed skills. “Chief talent officer” makes me boil, especially when applied to a 5-week wonder from TFA.
Don’t get me started on this. Achievement District? Kindergarten “scholars.” Academies galore everywhere.
It will end with a version of the devil’s dictionary.
Laura etal: Here is a pretty exhaustive article about edreform vocabulary by Nancy Bailey
http://nancyebailey.com/2014/01/12/more-weird-new-words-for-the-school-reform-education-vocabulary-list/
After catching up on your posts from yesterday I read with interest that the Justice Department is mandating the closure or substantial reduction of for profit prisons. Maybe they should shine a light on privatization in public education!
http://wp.me/p25b7q-1xR
The problem is much bigger than for-profit prisons. States and municipalities are using the criminal justice system to fine low income people and collect revenue. It’s been horrifying to watch over the last decade. Go to any municipal court and look for the line of people at the payment window- they’re using low income people as a cash cow.
Once they’re in the system they can’t get out. If they miss a payment they stay in.
It’s like a debtors prison system. It’s Dickensian. Whole families pay these fines and fees and it goes on FOR YEARS based on one minor (original) infraction.
Poor people are funding the (state and local) criminal justice system. They’re literally keeping the system afloat with cash payments. Courts set up payment agreements- 20 dollars a week- it can take years to pay off. They’re like collection agencies.
It has absolutely nothing to do with “criminal justice”. It’s a funding source. They’ve shifted the burden of funding these systems from the public as a whole to the (mostly) poor people who end up in the system.
Wgersen,
I will have posts about that today.
Here’s today’s dispatch from the echo chamber:
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-08-16/charter-networks-are-making-efforts-to-share-success-with-district-schools?src=usn_tw
An editorial about how public schools should collaborate with charter schools.
Except it’s 100% about urging public schools to mimic charter school systems and process. It all goes one way.
This qualifies as “collaboration” in the echo chamber. Every public schools becomes a no excuses charter school.
You really have to read on the ed reform side to understand how slanted it is. These are the people who are running public schools at the federal and state level- people who exist solely in this echo chamber. There are NO positives attributed to public schools. It’s all deficits. They can’t seem to find a single public school in the whole country that is worth retaining.