John Thompson has some good ideas to improve the Democratic party platform, from a teacher’s point of view.
He adds his suggestions to the platform language, in bold:
Democrats will invest in early childhood programs like Early Head Start and provide every family in America with access to high-quality childcare and high-quality pre-K programs. … To close the opportunity gap, we also must find ways to encourage mentoring programs that support students in reaching their full potential and make schooling a collaborative, team effort.
We must renew and expand our commitment to Community Health Centers, as well as … full-service community schools.
Democrats are committed to reforming our criminal justice system and ending mass incarceration. … We need to provide greater investment in jobs and education, and end to the school-to-prison pipeline, by funding Restorative Justice programs and opposing the mass suspension of students from No Excuses charter schools.
Democrats believe that we should not be contracting, outsourcing, or privatizing work that is inherently governmental in nature, including postal services, school services, and traditional public schools.
A major reason for the 40-year decline in the middle class is that the rights of workers to bargain collectively for better wages and benefits have been under attack at all levels. …Democrats believe so-called “right to work” laws are wrong for workers and wrong for America. We will continue to vigorously oppose Vergara v California and the other lawsuits led by Campbell Brown’s The 74, which would strike down laws protecting the due process rights of teachers.
We believe that personnel is policy. We will nominate and appoint regulators and officials who are not beholden to venture philanthropists who would silence the teaching profession and curtail its ability to contribute our professional judgments in debates over education policy.
Large corporations have concentrated their control over markets to a greater degree than Americans have seen in decades—further evidence that the deck is stacked for those at the top. Democrats will take steps to stop corporate concentration in any industry and in public education where it’s unfairly limiting competition by forcing traditional public schools to compete with CMOs, that don’t serve their share of poor and special education students, and English Language Learners, using the unreliable test results as the metric for keeping score.
Public education must engage students to be critical thinkers and civic participants while addressing the wellbeing of the whole child. Democrats believe that all students should be taught to high academic standards. Under no circumstances will we agree to the segregating of poor children of color into second class CMOs that impose soul-killing behaviorism and worksheet-driven instruction in order to jack up test scores and/or to defeat and privatize traditional public schools.

I agree with all that was stated in the blog just would add keep Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy out of any platform decisions
LikeLike
In the interest of clarity and legal enforcability, I think the platform statement should read something like this:
“We solemnly swear on a stack of bibles to keep Dan Malloy out of all decisions that potentially effect the public, especially the public in Connecticut”.
LikeLike
Did he say this was for the Democratic Platform or the Bull Moose Platform . I don’t think the first exists anymore . Feeling Greener by the day. Both ill and the Party. But like I said before ,if Hillary can’t win NY without me heaven help us . The rest of you may have a tougher decision to make and I don’t envy you.
LikeLike
I’m sorry, but the Democrats are no more of a friend to education than the Republicans! Here in Tennessee, most of our problems with VAM and evaluation were the brain-child of Phil Bredesen (D – Governor from 2003 to 2011). Kevin Huffman and most of his minions were(are) staunch Democrats hired by Gov. Haslam (R – 2011 – 2019). Both Dem’s and Rep’s were all in on Charter Schools and VAM in Tennessee (although grassroots opposition is growing)!!
[I am the retired Director of Teacher Licensing from Tennessee (2002-2013).]
LikeLike
Some of this language is unfamiliar to the general public, presumably the audience in addition to and including many at the convention. CMO is one example. Campbell Brown’s The 74, is another.
The “opportunity gap” will never be closed without addressing poverty, state cuts in budgets for education, and so on. Volunteerism in the form of mentoring is nice, should be encouraged, but not a substitute for hiring school counselors, school social workers, and routine availability of medical care in schools. It is not an idea suitable for a platform. (I think it is really a referece to continued funding for AmeriCorps, part of the pipeline for TFA recruits).
I think a fresh start would be great. I do not have the stamina.
LikeLike
John Thompson states his additions articulately. I agree with Linda to downgrade the jargon & some of the intricate details only ed professionals or wonks know.
In addition to that I would depersonalize the principles. State the platform sensibly & not mention names.
LikeLike
I’d stay start with an affirmative endorsement and defense of neighborhood schools. Charter schools of any kind are antithetical to this bedrock institution of our society.
LikeLike
“On Ensuring Public School Choice & Supporting High-Quality Public Charters: “Democrats are also committed to providing parents with high-quality public school options and expanding these options for low-income youth. We support great neighborhood public schools and high-quality public charter schools, and we will help them disseminate best practices to other school leaders and educators.”
How do DEMOCRATS “support great neighborhood schools”, specifically?
Maybe they can draw up a list.
They shouldn’t include the stimulus funding- any politician or political Party would have kept public schools operating after during the financial collapse. National politicians could hardly allow tens of thousands of public schools to stop operating. Any President would have done the stimulus funding of public school- they wouldn’t have any choice.
So, besides the stimulus funding, can anyone tell me how Democrats “support” public schools? Race to the Top? 4 billion dollars on consultants and experts designing testing systems and teacher rankings?
Democrats may need to show their work. Assertions that they “support” public schools won’t fly forever.
LikeLike
No one can provide such evidence, there isn’t any. Their policies are hostile to neighborhood schools but friendly to the commodification of all aspects of pubic education.
LikeLike
Democrats need to show a lot of things .I am not sure they can or have any desire to do so. They will see an election victory against Trump as a validation of their neo liberal shift . The benefits of friends with money. That is assuming they win. If they lose they will blame it on culture wars, on low information voters . on low waged whites . Never will they see their policy was the problem. Why should they there is a lot of money to be made representing Wall Street instead of Main street.
LikeLike
The DNC take the teacher vote for granted. They believe the AFT and NEA endorsements put the teachers’ vote in the bag. This assumption is wrong. The endorsement is only as strong as each teacher’s vote, and there is lots of dissension among public school teachers. A leadership endorsement carries less weight today because the level of trust among teachers is at an all time low, both for the unions and the DNC. Hillary must become more specific in her support for public education, and lawyer double speak will be construed as disingenuous. Otherwise, many teachers are looking at Jill Stein or a write in candidate, and this could cost the democratic party the election.
LikeLike
“If they lose they will blame it on culture wars, on low information voters . on low waged whites .”
Actually, Joel, if Clinton loses, Democrats will without a shadow of a doubt blame it on Sanders and Sanders’ supporters.
They will have especially nice words for people like you and me and Duane Swacker who suggested that people vote for Jill Stein and thereby brought on Armageddon.
LikeLike
To this I would add a renewal and expansion of Even Start. It should not be limited to urban day care centers, but should also include settings of rural poverty. With its features of early home educational intervention for both parents and children, parenting education, and employment prep, this was a terrific comprehensive approach and complements by reaches beyond Head Start by getting into home help and both parent and child support. Why it got choked off remains a mystery to me.
LikeLike
Hillary is scheduled to address the representative assembly of the NEA today. Of course, she will make her canned speech probably based on the insipid DNC platform, but she should also take the time to listen to the concerns of those that do the hard work of teaching our young people. It is important work as our young people are our greatest asset. They are our future.
LikeLike
“. . . but she should also take the time to listen to the concerns of those that do the hard work of teaching our young people.”
What makes you think that the teachers themselves would be given that chance???
LikeLike
“It is important work as our young people are our greatest asset. They are our future.”
God, I can’t stand that meme!
LikeLike
I am sorry you can’t stand the meme, but I believe what we do today has a direct impact on the tomorrow we will have as a nation. Corny, maybe, but I guess I’m corny! In a recent poll teachers were asked why they chose teaching, and the #1 answer: TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
LikeLike
No sleight is meant to retired teacher and others who genuinely believe in young people, but i think what Duane is getting at is that what many people actually mean when they say that
“Young people are our greatest asset”
is that “today’s young people are the ones who will be financing our social security, now that we baby boomers have partied it up, thrown down a rat hole (Iraq and Afghanistan), and otherwise burned through all the money that was supposed to be set aside for that purpose.”
LikeLike
You’re right. We have mortgaged the future of our youth with wasteful, needless war and lies. It’s no wonder they’re “mad as hell.”
LikeLike
I agree
LikeLike
The ed reform echo chamber are piling on NPR for critical coverage of Rocketship:
Any negative coverage of charter schools is disallowed, apparently. They had to the same response to the NYTimes piece on Detroit charters. It’s funny they didn’t pay any attention to the Michigan charter problems before this, because the Detroit Free Press has been covering Michigan charter system problems for 2 years. The Free Press did an entire critical series on Michigan charters and they did it well prior to the NYTimes piece.
It only “mattered” when it made the NYTimes. The disconnect between the national ed reform “movement” and local coverage of their agenda is jarring. They didn’t know the Michigan charter sector was a chaotic mess until the NYTimes covered it?
LikeLike
“I think the education reform community has at times over-promised on what charter schools can do, and this opens charters up to criticism when they don’t meet these promises, even if they are performing better than the traditional system.
Emotionally, I think reporters (rightfully) empathize with plight of students stuck in failing schools – and this sometimes bleeds over to empathy with the adults working in the failing schools – adults who might lose their jobs if charters expand.
While charter schools are generally educator led non-profit organizations, many billionaires support charter schools, and I think this support creates a suspicion that charter will increase educational inequality, akin to how the economy has seen a spike in inequality over the past two decades.”
Michigan charters are not, actually, “generally educator-led non-profits”. Michigan charters are, in fact, 80% for-profits. 80%.
They can’t keep insisting the entire country consists of NYC and Boston. That is not the ed reform reality in states like Michigan, or Ohio, or Pennsylvania. They really haven’t noticed the privatization effort isn’t going well in such large part of the country?
Eli Broad JUST REFORMED Detroit charters. In 2012. They pushed a privatization effort thru the Michigan legislature and created a new charter district in Detroit. 4 years ago. Why is this ignored? Arne Duncan was there, Michelle Rhee, Eli Broad wrote editorials in Detroit papers- it’s like it didn’t happen.
Amazing. That whole episode has been removed from ed reform history.
https://relinquishment.org/2016/07/04/who-is-the-villain-why/
LikeLike
The Democratic Party platform (mostly meaningless) and the party’s eventual policies (most likely under a Hillary Clinton administration) will expand charters and continue to make space for privatizers.
Weingarten and the rest of union leadership have helped enable this.
This is the unfortunate choice we have to make to avoid a Trump presidency. Can’t sit it out, but inevitably we will have to see our profession further recede.
None of our voices will make it into a platform or actual policies. Opt-out didnt do it and at this point there is little hope that we can muster a noise loud enough for them to not ignore.
LikeLike
How do market-based ed reformers explain the unmitigated disaster of for-profit colleges?
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chicagoinc/ct-durbin-for-profit-schools-20160630-story.html
Is this a market failure, or is it wholly attributable to corruption and capture?
They’re aware that the people who got screwed by this policy are the poorest and most vulnerable, right? How did that happen? Why won’t it happen in K-12 privatization? I am correct to be alarmed at the fact that Ohio is flooded by for-profit charter operators and they have purchased my legislature? Because this looks mighty familiar- it looks exactly like for-profit college chains buying Congress.
LikeLike
It is much easier to ignore a debacle when you are getting paid to do so. Too many politicians are amoral.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For profit colleges (even the ones that have gone belly up) have not been an unmitigated disaster for the people who started them.
They have been an unmitigated boon.
They have made some people very rich indeed.
That’s the way you do it.
LikeLike
Yes. So many people seem to miss that point: Educational reform has turned into a game much like that of Wall Street pre 2008: Make Myself Rich Very Quickly And Get Out.
LikeLike
Just wait.
It is only a matter of time before the folks who made a mint on for-profit colleges and charters before they went bankrupt start offering advice (for a fee of course) on how the government should deal with the supernova remnants.
It’s the pattern that was followed with the big banks, where the people who created and profited from the problem directed the government on how to “resolve” it.
There is no reason to believe that it will not also be the pattern going forward.
Making money coming and going is the best game in town.
LikeLike