William Doyle won a Fulbright scholarship, which enabled him to live and teach in Finland. His family went with him, and his son enrolled in the local public school. Doyle was bowled over by the happy, joyous spirit of learning in the school. When he returned to the US to tell the story, he frequently encountered the claim that the Finnish model was not right for urban children (children of color).

 

Corporate reformers believe that poor kids, especially African American kids, need a militaristic, no-excuses environment, where they are taught strict obedience.

 

Doyle disagrees. He writes:

 

“Skeptics might claim that the Finnish model would never work in America’s inner-city schools, which instead need boot-camp drilling and discipline, Stakhanovite workloads, relentless standardized test prep and screen-delivered testing.

 
“But what if the opposite is true?

 
“What if high-poverty students are the children most urgently in need of the benefits that, for example, American parents of means obtain for their children in private schools, things that Finland delivers on a national public scale — highly qualified, highly respected and highly professionalized teachers who conduct personalized one-on-one instruction; manageable class sizes; a rich, developmentally correct curriculum; regular physical activity; little or no low-quality standardized tests and the toxic stress and wasted time and energy that accompanies them; daily assessments by teachers; and a classroom atmosphere of safety, collaboration, warmth and respect for children as cherished individuals?”