A parent in New York asked me to recognize the wisdom and courage of the district’s teachers.
I am glad to do so and to place the Corning Teachers’ Association on the honor roll of this blog for supporting the rights of parents and the interests of students.
Here is her letter:
“The Corning Teachers’ Association sent the following position statement to all members. As a parent in the Corning-Painted Post School District, I am grateful for their courage to share facts regarding NYS Grades 3-8 standardized testing.
“The CTA memorandum is an example of what needs to happen across NYS if teachers want REAL change instead of relying on empty promises outlined in the NYSED “tool kits”, flyers, and rhetoric from Commissioner Elia.
“Until there is REAL change in NYS classrooms, the opt outs MUST continue. Teachers supporting parents who are refusing the NYS standardized tests are supporting children and the future of public education.
“Will you please consider posting the CTA Position Statement on your blog? It is with hope that teacher associations in other school districts across NYS will have the courage to do the same.
“THANK YOU for all that you do every day to support children and educators!
“Kind regards,
“Lynn Leonard
“M E M O R A N D U M
“TO: Members of the Corning Teachers’ Association
FROM: CTA Executive Council
DATE: March 18, 2016
RE: New York State grades 3-8 Testing Position Statement
“We, the members of the Corning Teachers’ Association believe in academic rigor supported by engagement and the enchantment of learning. We believe that it is our responsibility to provide sound educational practices for our students, and we are to be held accountable to these practices.
“We believe that a strong curriculum provides time and resources for social and emotional development, practical skills, project-based and authentic learning opportunities, deep exploration of subject matters as well as a focus on social and cultural concerns. Our ultimate goal is to foster a high-quality public education system that prepares all students for college, careers, citizenship and lifelong learning, thus strengthening our social and economic well-being.
“We believe that the large amount of learning time that is lost through administration of these high-stakes test is not what is best for children. Mandated New York State standardized testing is an inadequate, limited and often unreliable measure for student learning. While we acknowledge that the test results are currently not tied to a teacher’s evaluation, teachers are still not given the professional freedom to design or score such tests. The delayed results are not available for use to drive further instruction or give meaningful feedback to the stakeholders.
“We believe that New York’s children belong to their families. We support the right of parents and guardians to choose to absent their children from any or all state and federal-mandated testing. We support the right of teachers to discuss freely with parents and guardians their rights and responsibilities with respect to such testing.
“The Corning Teachers’ Association will, to the best of its ability, protect and support members who may suffer the negative consequences as a result of speaking about their views of such testing or about the rights and obligations of parents and guardians with respect to such testing.”
Why doesn’t the UFT do the same thing instead of telling its members to remain silent?
Can’t if you’re in bed with the Cuomo and Hillary. Wow there’s an image for ya!
Unity Caucus, which controls the UFT (and AFT, as well), is too busy accepting the premises of the so-called reformers, functioning as their “assets” (as the 2009 Broad Foundation annual report described Randi Weingarten) and taking on the role of co-managing the labor force.
What many teachers call betrayal, Randi calls ” having a seat at the table.”
My question was really rhetorical. UFT leaders must have jumped with joy when Scalia died. Agency fees have made union leaders totally unresponsive to its members.
“…a seat at the table” huh?
Yeah, while the rest of us are forced to eat in the other room at the “kiddie table”, not allowed to join the adults.
Our “seat at the table”
LOL!
RageAgainstTheTestocracy
This is sick
Rage,
Ha! Pointed. That chair looks “transformative”.
Raj,
Lighten up.
Excellent model for all teachers. Corporations have more speech rights than teachers.
In my view, opt-out is an expression of free speech put into action.
I trust Diane Will see the latest corporate scam: Testbetter.org. from the Center for American Progress.
Testing is the only thing ed reformers care about in public schools.
If you read on the reform side and you want to see what they have planned for PUBLIC schools, 95% of it is assessment- pushing tests, scolding people on tests, planning “next generation” tests, exploring new areas to test, and on and on and on.
Testing has consumed them. There is nothing else.
https://testbetter.org/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/25/nyregion/opt-out-pressuresopen-rift-between-new-york-education-officials.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
On March 7, the teachers at Public School 234 in TriBeCa, where only two students opted out last year, emailed the school’s parents a broadside against the tests. The email said the exams hurt “every single class of students across the school” because of the resources they consumed.
But 10 days later, when dozens of parents showed up for a PTA meeting where they expected to hear more about the tests, the teachers were nowhere to be seen. The school’s principal explained that “it didn’t feel safe” for them to speak, adding that their union had informed them that their email could be considered insubordination. The principal, Lisa Ripperger, introduced an official from the Education Department who was there to “help oversee our meeting.”
“The principal, Lisa Ripperger”
Obviously a perfect example of an adminimal.
Nothing about the NYC DOE’s clampdown on speech about the tests?
FLERP: scheduled