Eva Moskowitz is a very powerful woman. She has 11,000 students in her 34 Success Academy charter schools, which get extraordinarily high test scores. She might be universally admired but she picks fights. She usually wins, because she is tougher than anyone else, and she has the backing of the moguls on Wall Street whose financial help Governor Cuomo enjoys.
But now she has picked a fight that is almost incomprehensible. Mayor Bill de Blasio wanted “universal pre-k,” and he invited charter schools to offer pre-K classes. Every school, public or charter, that agreed to provide pre-K signed a contract with the city. But not Eva. She said it was illegal for the city to demand that she sign a contract. She expects to be paid $720,000 by the city without signing the contract that all public schools and other charters have signed. She threatened to cancel her pre-K programs unless she is paid without signing the city contract.
Why? Because no one can tell her what to do. Certainly not the city.
Now Eva has appealed to state officials to force the city to back off and pay her, so she can run the pre-K program without signing a contract like other schools.
A Success Academy spokesman said the network has received applications from 1,800 families for 126 pre-K seats for 2016-17.
Success Academy operates 34 charter schools that enroll roughly 11,000 kids in total. The schools outperform traditional public schools on state exams.
Despite the reportedly high level of demand for Success Academy pre-K seats, city Education Department spokeswoman Devora Kaye said Moskowitz must sign on the dotted line to get paid.
“There is simply no basis to conclude that requiring Success to comply with these requirements of program quality would somehow result in Success’ inability to operate its pre-K programs,” Kaye said.
Each of the other 277 pre-K providers — including nine other charter school operators — have already signed the contracts, Kaye said.
City Controller Scott Stringer has also urged Moskowitz to sign the contract, saying in October that “there is no conceivable reason for one charter school to be held to a different standard than every other charter school.”
Eva is counting on the state to defend her right not to sign.
Meanwhile I received a copy of this letter from a teacher at Success Academy, which includes the letter that Eva sent to the teaching staff, urging them to support her defiant stand:
Dear Dr. Ravitch,
The staff of Success Academy received an email from our fearless CEO that I thought might interest you. She addresses the current conflict with the de Blasio administration over pre-k funding, and urges her staff to complain to the mayor and our local officials. It’s still incredible to me how she believes that she can use her staff as political capital without presenting a complete picture of an issue. I haven’t read the contract that she refuses to sign, but by all reports it seems benevolent enough. The funding comes from taxpayer money after all, so it seems fair that the city would oversee the programs it supports. And yet, from her email, Eva would like us to believe that this is nothing more than an attack on her schools. She is obviously using this as way to stoke fear that there is a “larger war on Success Academy and charter schools.” It’s simply ironic to me that someone who is running a school system, where we are supposed to value critical thinking, would present such a one-sided and manipulative take of this conflict.
I’ve copied the text of the email below. I also have screenshots of the email if you’d like further verification.
Best,
XXXX
This is the letter that Eva sent to members of the staff of her charters:
Team Success:
I am writing to update you about Success Academy pre-k for next year. This first year has been one of tremendous growth for our youngest scholars — and for Success as well, as we challenged ourselves to develop a magical curriculum that engaged and delighted 4-year-olds. The response from families has been so positive that we made plans to expand our pre-k to our Union Square and Bensonhurst schools.
Unfortunately, in the case of Success Academy, Mayor de Blasio does not truly support pre-k for all. The mayor and the Department of Education have again thrown up a roadblock. He has refused to pay us the pre-k funding to which we are entitled under the law unless we allow him to dictate how we run our pre-k program. A critical aspect of charter schools is that we are not subject to the control of the city government. That is what enables a high-quality program.
Success Academy and 24 parents of students in our pre-k program have brought a legal action against the city but it is unclear how long it will take to get a decision. Unfortunately, unless we get a result or persuade Mayor de Blasio to do the right thing within the next two weeks, we will be forced to cancel our pre-k program for the coming year!
Please feel free to express your concern to the mayor directly and to you local elected officials. This would be a terrible shame for families and for staff who have worked so hard to create a truly amazing pre-k experience. This is just part of a larger war on Success Academy and charter schools. On a daily basis, we are forced to fight for kids’ rights to a world-class, free education.
Thank you for all you do for children.
Warmly,
Eva Moskowitz
Good lord, she talked individual families into filing a suit against the city too??? Using her staff seems pretty typical of her and beyond despicable. Her reign in NY needs to end.
While I don’t support what Eva and her schools represent, there are a alot of parents who do. I doubt her reign is ending any time soon.
I wonder what specific objections she has to the contract.
That’s why I call folks like her “edubullies.”
😡
The mayor has to call her bluff on this. It’s not like saying ” There will be no grade 3 classes next year” !!
I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Mayor de Blasio to call Moskowitz’s bluff. I hope I’m wrong.
Just curious, what would happen if a public school official asked teachers to lobby on behalf of their district? Would that even be legal?
I think it would depend on the issue and how the request for advocacy is worded. Public school administrators and boards can promote advocacy, but not require it.
Signed…Warmly?
Every word should be scrutinized with Eva’s well-selected closing of “Warmly”.
Wow, she is a piece of work.
She’s good!
Her bulldoze tactics catch most off guard, lost for words & confused.
Bingo, she wins again!
Maybe Trump will choose her as his running mate.
Today, NYC, Tomorrow, The World?
Success Academies scattered around the world.
Her selfish sociopathic options are endless.
I think “warmly” is a hint of the hellfire she intends to rain down should she not get her way.
Amazing how easily she paints virtue over her evil deeds & turns her elitist enterprise into a persecuted victim.
“The response from families has been so positive that we made plans to expand our pre-k to our Union Square and Bensonhurst schools….”
Why would Success Academy choose to expand pre-k in two of the whitest and wealthiest schools in her network? Did she already expand them in the schools that are 80 – 90% at-risk kids? Why would her priority be to serve middle class kids — where the limited spots into her pre-k program will be given to siblings of the affluent children who are already in those two schools?
Is she fighting to expand pre-K in her Bronx schools? In her Harlem schools?
She’s mentioned the middle class strategy several times:
“The middle class has been left out of education reform in a way which is destructive to their educational futures and also civically destructive. If we only focus on the most disadvantaged folks, I don’t think the monopoly of public education is going to fall quite as fast. If we want it to fall faster, then we’re going to have to engage middle-income folks in this process as well.”
I’m obviously not a big fan of hers but she’s right about that. They won’t be able to get rid of public schools unless ed reform provides some benefits- some improvement- to a broader group of people.
Right now “ed reform” is pretty much about testing, sanctions, and loss of funding for existing “middle class” public schools. She knows that.
If they want to privatize all public schools (and she does want to do that) they’ll eventually have to move beyond what she calls “the most disadvantaged folks” because they’ll need a much broader base of public support.
http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/topic/k_12_education/mission_possible_how_charter_schools_can_start_up_scale_and_succeed
The monopoly of public Ed.
Kinda like the court’s monopoly on justice? Women’s monopoly on breast feeding? Or the Register of Deeds monopoly in housing public records?
It’s a civic duty. Not a capitalistic market monopoly. But it will be soon. By whatever corporation ends up owning all the charters.
the monopoly of public education ? straight scary wording … how about the monopoly of public libraries, the monopoly of public parks, the monopoly of the fire department, the monopoly of public roads and highways ? Does she want everything a taxpayer pays for put on the auction block so profit can be squeezed from it all ?
Eva’s words mirror those of Governor Cuomo. While the sentiment is scary coming from her, it is even worse from the person that manages the state. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/10/29/cuomo-calls-public-school-system-a-monopoly-he-wants-to-bust/
Don’t expect this to turn out well.
Cuomo will step in to help Eva/Success and to, again, box de Blasio about the face and ears.
Really. Cuomo likes charters. He loathes de Blasio. He has made it a hallmark of his administration to jam-up, embarrass, clip, befuddle, and ruin de Blasio (with real success if we allow for honesty).
This has ALL the makings for a Cuomo intervention.
Eva will win this.
de Blasio will lose.
Oh and public education and democracy will lose too.
Eva: Save the drama for your mama…
Her megalomania and sense of entitlement knows no bounds.
“Just give me the money, and butt the-Hell out!”
I have read several stories about this but I have never seen a specific objection to the contract. It seems her objection is to the principle that the city has the right to require a contract, and the contract may include the right to audit finances. She has fought that in court and won. The legislature had to pass a law to permit the state Comptroller to audit her charters. Nothing yet.
I would think there has got to be something specific in the contract that she objects to and she is just crying foul in a vague way as subterfuge. She’s a piece of work.
It is still hard for me to understand why De Blasio backs down to her. Eva can “warmly” veto an elected mayor? De Blasio didn’t win with the support of Wall Street, so why is he not wearing Wall Street’s opposition to him as a badge of honor?
Karen, if a charter school gets high test scores, no questions are asked. Also the three major papers are owned by billionaires or wannabes
” A critical aspect of charter schools is that we are not subject to the control of the city government.”
Pretty much sums it up!
It does, indeed, sum it up, GE. She wants public funds with absolutely no public accountability.
Diane, do you know why Scott Stringer’s audit is taking so long?
There is no excuse I can think of for why it would take 18 months (or is it two years?) to examine what is going on.
The fact that the NY Times got information that Stringer’s staff should have been able to get a year ago makes me wonder what kind of political quid pro quo is going on – especially if Stringer wants to run against de Blasio in the future.
I know nothing about what is delaying Stringer’s audit. He announced it a long time ago.
I hope, like various football players and serial killers, she will volunteer to posthumously donate her brain to science. Non-posthumously might be okay, too…
Perhaps she is a living heart donor?
Does she have a heart to donate?
“On a daily basis, we are forced to fight for kids’ rights to a world-class, free education.”
In light of the recent litigation her charters are facing does anyone see the irony in this statement. It appears several of her students are fighting for a free appropriate public education which they are entitled to under the law. FAPE means providing accommodations and services to students who qualify under the law. IDEA includes the Child Find mandate. If she is offering pre-K programs it will be important for her charters to follow this mandate:http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/child.find.mandate.htm
good point…those with special needs are required under law to receive services…or will she be counseling out four year olds also ?
Chutzpah doesn’t even begin to describe….
Your post is off topic, Tim, but this money might be used to change things a bit in terms of building renovations:
http://m.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/andrew-cuomo-owes-billions-city-schools-report-article-1.2120976
BREAKING: de Blasio, Chancellor Fariña, and NYC DOE attorneys responded late Friday afternoon to US attorney Preet Bharara’s findings that a large number of NYC DOE facilities cannot be accessed by children with physical disabilities, including six entire districts that do not have a single accessible classroom.
http://nytimes.com/2016/01/30/nyregion/new-york-city-rejects-federal-findings-that-many-elementary-schools-defy-disabilities-law.html
The DOE’s response, in a nutshell? It’s an absurd luxury to expect every single school facility to be able to accommodate the needs of every single child. And they contend that the Feds didn’t provide enough concrete examples of children who had been unable to attend an inaccessible school.
Certainly some food for thought here. And in the interim, if you have a child with a disability and live in the zone for an inaccessible school like PS 321, your child can still go there! You’ll just need to drop by a few times a day to carry your child up and down the stairs.
Yeah, with this latest story about access for students with disability, Cuomo will be stepping in very soon on this whole deal to a) make de Blasio look like a fool again, and b) to help out Eva. A 2 for 1 deal if you will.
Complain as you may about Eva’s evilness (which is palpable and seemingly boundless), she will win this and most things because she has $$, the support of entrenched political networks and politicians, and she controls the narrative surrounding charters in the state, brilliantly using the language of the civil rights movement mixed with the “hard nosed” lingo so appealing to the techie/disruptive economy types.
She has never been presented with a loud, sustained, aggressive, public counter-narrative that undermines her charters philosophically, politically, socially, and technically. The counter-narrative is certainly out there (we are on DR’s blog which is central forum for the counter narrative!) but it is inside baseball and tucked away in places the media rarely goes. Also, our side has ignored, firgotten about, negotiated away, and generally removed from the table any political gravitas or leverage we may have had. Hence, an apparatus is needed to bullhorn the counter narrative out there, and to re-engage what political gravity we have……and that used to be the unions. They are done.
Eva will win.
Tim, tim, tim. Deflect, deflect, deflect. You never cease to amaze me, but you have totally ceased to amuse me. Go. Away.
Donna,
Either provide a hyperlink to a comment where I stated that Flint’s water was safe, or retract your defamatory statement.
Tim,
That certainly lets Eva off the hook! If some older buildings are not accessible, then she need not have any accessible buildings, even though she raises millions each year for her tiny charter chain. You have a peculiar rhetorical device of blame shifting, anything to defend Eva. No one but a PR flack would come on this blog every day solely to excuse Eva.
Diane,
You don’t think that this late-Friday-evening DOE bombshell is worth a mention on a site whose mission statement is to discuss better education for all? The DOE is arguing forcefully and unequivocally that it is unrealistic and impossible to expect every individual school to be able to accommodate the entire spectrum of children’s needs.
Many frequent commenters here leave links to developing news as replies. And it’s disheartening to see that you are so threatened by views that diverge from yours that you accuse those who hold such views of being paid PR people (which, for the hundredth tie, I am not–I’m a parent of children attending high-needs traditional NYC DOE public schools and I work in fields entirely unrelated to education.)
Notice how Tim keeps comparing to PS 321 because those are the parents that Success Academy is desperate to get in their schools.
When and if SUNY Charter Institute every examines the very high % of at-risk and minority children who are suspended over and over again and compares that to the very low % of middle class white students who are NOT suspended or punished in Success Academy, there will be grounds not just for a discrimination suit regarding children with disabilities but ALSO a discrimination suit against children of color, especially the low-income students.
There are now enough Success Academy schools that serve primarily middle class and very affluent children in schools districts with some of the largest percentages of white students in NYC. So now the comparison can easily be done — what percentage of middle class white kids get suspended at Success Academy versus the % of students of color? What % of middle class white kids remain at Success Academy after winning the K lottery versus what % of non-white and poor students? If there is any discrepancy, I can’t wait to hear Tim’s rationalization, especially since by law charters were supposed to serve at-risk kids.
By the way, Tim, the DOE is still paying for the education of all disabled students, regardless of whether they are taught at PS 321 or somewhere else. Unlike Eva Moskowitz schools — which can’t get rid of expensive kids who are too much bother to teach fast enough — the DOE still pays for a child who isn’t educated at PS 321.
Are you saying that Eva Moskowitz should be paying $100,000 year for every child who she refuses to send renewal forms home with or suspends or makes feel misery if she can’t accommodate them in her school? Or setting up her own schools for them?
Hey, instead of demanding that she open a pre-k for the affluent parents at Union Square, how about she use that space to accommodate all the many disabled children she has pushed out of her Harlem and other poor schools? She can pay to bus them there. How about it, Tim?
NYC public school parent: your last comment—
Here’s a chance to, as they say in Rheephormish, “put up or shut up.”
Eva M is portrayed as a selfless crusader for children that will go to any lengths ‘for the kids.’ Let her eat the costs (personally and organizationally) of preK & K. And especially for that subset you mention, ceding first place of entry to those terrifying five-year-olds that toss desks from one end of a classroom to another. Throw everything in the book at the difficulties involved such as reducing class sizes to whatever is needed and more experienced & certified staff and social supports of whatever kind are necessary.
After all, she’s not “in it to win it” for her ego or her pocketbook.
Is she?
😏
NYC pcp,
Re: SUNY Charter Institute
It’s puzzling why a public university would work to privatize K-!2 schools.
And, why the Institute would employ people from the capital markets to work on the endeavor.
Wait…I think I see a link.
What’s stopping her from offering Pre-K classes? There are plenty of Pre-K schools that are NOT part of Universal Pre-K. If she cares so much about it, just offer her version of it.
There are completely government-funded PreKs that aren’t part of universal Pre-K?
To Tim:
She doesn’t need government funding to offer Pre-K classes with her non-certified, non-licensed temp “teachers.” U Pre-K is a specific program, with a lot of PD and training. If she wants the government funding, her classes will follow the methods offered by the DOE, which are the same in every school which has signed the contract. She doesn’t make any sense.
Tim, there are completely government-funded pre-Ks that are demanding not to have to follow the same rules? Name one.
And why is Success Academy’s priority opening pre-ks in two schools with the wealthiest parents instead of making it a priority to open a pre-k for the students in her schools where most families are poor?
Never mind, I already know the answer to my question.
Some of that is my money you’re demanding, Eva. I’m not naive enough to say that it’s a perfect system, but if you want it, you’ve got to play by the rules. “Accountability” is the word of the past two decades. That applies to you, too…and not just in the area of test scores.
I don’t think the reason she doesn’t want SA to sign the contract is “incomprehensible.” I believe it’s because the contract purports to give the city some kind of additional oversight authority over the schools.
Is it illegal to condition the disbursement of funds on signing the contract? I don’t know, I haven’t seen it. But it may be, even if no other school refused to sign it.
FLERP, do you think any corporation has a “right” to public funds without accepting accountability?
It may indeed, depending on what the funds are, what the source of the right is, and what conditions are defined as “accountability.” Do you think there are no limits on the executive’s power to withhold funding that has been granted by the legislature?
FLERP, the issue is not whether te executive has the power to withhold funding granted by the legislature but whether a rivate organization has a right to demand government funding without signing a contract that establishes the agreement. I worked in the federa government and no one got federal funds without signing an agreement about the terms of the grant or contract
I’m not sure you’re correct that that’s what the issue is. The issue is what the issue is.
The issue is that Eva doesn’t want to sign a contract with the city. She thinks the rules don’t include her
If you say so. It is your blog.
FLERP, I am not a lawyer
It would seem that “accountability” is only for the “little” people.
Eva wants the city to play by the rules when it comes to equal access of funds. But she does not want to play by the rules when it comes to following the conditions associated with receiving the funds.
The rules for equal access of funds and space were bent in her direction by Albany, despite the fact that she also receives mega bucks from private contributors. She’s obviously trying to pull the same end around in this instance as well.
“I’m not sure you’re correct that that’s what the issue is. The issue is what the issue is.”
Is that similar to, “The sound of one hand clapping is the sound of one hand clapping”?
Zen and the art of non-accountability.
“I believe it’s because the contract purports to give the city some kind of additional oversight authority over the schools…”
BINGO! The SUNY Charter Institute is the only authority that Eva Mowkowitz wants to do any “oversight” — and SUNY does whatever Eva wants. There is video of their October 2014 meeting that demonstrates their oversight (unless SUNY took it down out of embarrassment). In the video, SUNY brings up one of the many charges against Success Academy for which public school parents presented the with documented proof — in this instance, it was of the many empty seats in her schools when Eva was claiming wait lists of “thousands”. It was laughable to see SUNY’s administrator say “we asked Eva and she said it was just a glitch” so no need to do any other oversight beyond that. Truly, those people should lose their jobs.
So FLERP! is absolutely correct that it is all about making sure that no one but SUNY ever may look closely at their schools. How else to continue their lovely got to go lists and refusal to send home renewal forms with the kids they don’t want to come back. Not to mention, I’m sure they will find that their typical 20% of the 4 year olds need suspending too, due to all their violent acts.
If SUNY showed any independence that might be okay. But we know without a doubt that SUNY doesn’t care how many kids are suspended or leave or anything else as long as the kids who remain get good test scores by whatever means necessary. FLERP! knows Success Academy better than any of us and he is right that it is all about keeping anybody from doing oversight, especially the de Blasio administration that isn’t bought and paid for by Success Academy’s billionaire board members.
FLERP! is saying that a non-profit organization can demand funds without signing a contract. That is nonsense. Unless the law that the legislature wrote expressly says names Success Academy as the recipient of those funds with no oversight. And if that was the case, they would have just given it to them directly.
Once you give it to a middle party, that party is responsible for making sure those funds are used properly! Are you really a lawyer and claiming that any organization is given public money as a middle man and forced to give it to a third party without being able to demand oversight? That’s generally called corruption.
I want a front row seat for court testimony, from slick front men, employed by oligarch-funded “philanthropies”, describing pre-K kids as low hanging fruit.
She’s the Ammon Bundy of the charterminator movement.
As a district level administrator over early childhood programs, the contract HOPEFULLY includes the requirements of what a high-quality pre-k includes – and DOESN’T include.
Based on her Success Academy methods of education, they need a lesson on developing the whole child. I fear for young children subjected to even slivers of her espoused methods.
In our state, our public pre-k is state funded. We must operate in accordance with the requirements for our funding. We are funded annually based on compliance.
For the love of children’s young minds, I hope NY does not back down.
Thank you, KVJ, for the necessary dose of sanity from outside NY State.
There is a term often used in less than formal settings that is often associated with women whose behavior is that of hers. Proper decorum prevents me from using it here. Equally offensive, yet apopropos terms could apply to her male counterparts…ie. Eli Broad, Bill Gates, Scott Walker, Mike Pence…
She says: I have my rights to get fed funds without paper because I’m a whip master of Slave Academy.
Hialeah Education Academy . Inc
Slade park is a public city park , The school principal kick me out , this mayoir is the chairman of HEA. Inc
Now thoses guys are corrupts ( tax-payer ) victims . My 11 Years old Daughter was abandoned at slade park for the Scool principal .Why ? This gentilmans is very well know for Carlos Castro ? Law enforcement arasment parents abusing kids and stolen my money as vialotentions ours rights , protect kids abuse is unacceptable , I can’t change the world but I change this sharks plans
Open main menu
Edit
Watch this page
Carlos Hernández (politician)
Carlos Hernández
Carlos Hernandez (mayor).jpg
Mayor of Hialeah, Florida
Incumbent
Assumed office
May 23, 2011
Preceded by Julio Robaina
Personal details
Born March 8, 1961 (age 55)
Camaguey, Cuba
Spouse(s) Nancy Hernández
Children Kayla and Hunter
Residence Hialeah, Florida
Profession Politician, retired police officer
Carlos Hernández (born March 8, 1961 in Camagüey, Cuba) is a Cuban-born American politician. Hernández has served as the Mayor of Hialeah, Florida, since May 23, 2011.[1] He became acting mayor upon the resignation of his predecessor, Julio Robaina, who left the Hialeah mayoral office to pursue an unsuccessful campaign for Mayor of Miami-Dade County.[1]
Hernández was raised in Hialeah. Florida. He received a bachelor’s degree in organizational leadership from St. Thomas University in Miami Gardens.
Hernández was elected to the Hialeah city council in November 2005.[1] He was further elected council president in 2007 and again in 2009 by the members of the council.[1] Under the Hialeah city charter, Hernández, who was still council president in 2011, became Mayor of Hialeah upon the resignation of former Mayor Julio Robaina in 2011.[1]
Carlos Hernández won a full term in the 2011 Hialeah mayoral election.[2]
Ethics Violation
References
Last edited 3 months ago by an anonymous user
Wikipedia®® MobileDesktop
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Terms of UsePrivacy