I received an email from a teacher who resigned her job at Success Academy. She was very unhappy. She wanted to explain why she couldn’t stay. Like everyone who leaves Success Academy, she requested anonymity. I get these emails from time to time. Occasionally, I meet with the unhappy young people (both women and men). They sound like people leaving a cult. Even after they have left, they still refer to five-year-old children as “scholars.” When they start calling them children, I will know that they are completely de-programmed.
This young woman writes:
I left my job at Success Academy because I couldn’t, in good conscience, be the teacher they wanted me to be. I have a lot of trouble writing and talking about my experience with Success because it truly makes me ill. Thinking about the way teachers spoke to children, with such disgust in their voices, makes my stomach churn. Thinking about the way my leaders spoke to me, with that same disgust, leaves me feeling just as sick.
I was immediately targeted by the leaders at my school for being too soft. I didn’t deliver consequences enough, and I didn’t hold high enough expectations of my four and five-year-olds. I couldn’t get them to walk in two silent, straight, militaristic lines with bubbles in their mouths and their hands glued to their sides. I wasn’t “aggressively scanning” for “defiant” children on the carpet—that is, children not sitting on their bottoms with their backs tall and their hands locked in their laps. I owned up to all of this with my leaders. I admitted to them that I have a hard time with holding such young children to such high expectations. And to build off of that, I found it simply wrong to hold every single scholar to the exact same expectations. You can’t give a fish and a bird the same task and expect the same results.
But that’s precisely what Success does. They don’t care what the circumstances are: you will stand like a soldier, you will sit with a bubble in your mouth and your hands locked, you will do all of your work neatly and silently, you will “silent laugh” and “silent cheer” when you find things funny or exciting, you will transition from your seats to the carpet “swiftly, safely, and silently,” and if you don’t, you’ll do it again until it’s perfect, even if that means missing recess or blocks time. My biggest mistake was admitting to my leaders that I found this system to be too harsh. The moment you speak out at Success, they come after you. They call it a “mindset” issue. They threatened to put me on a performance plan without giving me any examples of what I was doing wrong, instead simply berating me for these same issues week after week until I would slowly break and obey them. I worked tirelessly to please my leaders. I had never quit a job before, and am an incredibly hard worker, so I was determined to make this work. I wrote long reflections on my days and reached out to veteran teachers for help. I was quickly reprimanded for this as well, though, being told that if I needed help, I should just go to leadership—that I should never make my struggle apparent, or talk about it with anyone at school. This is all part of keeping up the facade of Success. The bright classrooms, the stunning bulletin boards, the perfect posture — everything must look perfect. It all boils down to the same principle: these people care about the wrong things. They feel the constant need to prove themselves through their appearance and their high scores, and in turn they don’t allow for any of the genuine elements of childhood and education to take place in their buildings.
I spent much of my time at school crying in the bathroom and the stairwell. I cried from the emotional harassment I faced from my leaders, I cried from simply watching my scholars go through such grueling days and intense ridicule, and I cried because I was exhausted, stressed, and anxious, constantly feeling like I wasn’t enough and that I couldn’t be enough. When I helped my own scholars work through their tears, I would often ask them what they were feeling, and they would say “scared.” They told me they were scared to come to school. I was, too. We all entered that building each morning in fear. This all being said, scholars at my school smiled. There are happy children at Success. When they do well academically, or when they get a prize or a “time-in” for their success, they smile. When they do have recess, they laugh audibly and smile. But the fear, anger, and sadness deeply overshadows these small instances of joy. You can’t structure joy. But leave it to SA to try.
“There are happy children at Success. When they do well academically, or when they get a prize or a “time-in” for their success, they smile. When they do have recess, they laugh audibly and smile.”
I dunno, but I found this to be the most chilling part of the piece. Only the “winners” are allowed to be happy, and they are to be happy specifically for being “winners” – for being obedient, for beating other kids. I would be more reassured if they were sullen even when they were rewarded – it would be healthier.
This is about: The HAVES and the HAVE NOTS. This is the SIC GAME spawned by the deformers. Our students are definitely AT RISK in this kind of moronic, Nazi environment. But then, that is the purpose of this kind of GAME.
Two words:
dysfunctional family
On the outside, everything looks perfect … too perfect … as underneath that facade, there’s a dark side of abuse and suffering.
a chilling and abusive environment.
leaves me speechless
“Excess Academy”
Excess tests
Excess fears
Excess preps
Excess tears
Excess silence
Excess goals
Excess violence
For the souls
What does “a bubble in their mouths” mean?
Puff out your cheeks and hold air in your mouth. It forces you to keep your mouth shut.
wow. just wow.
Put you hand on your hip catch a bubble. They put air in there checks and finger over there lips. When they walk the halls it helps remind them to he quite. It honestly cute seeing all of them. I am a mother of a student there and I love it there.
The control is so perverse. When your ideology requires complete control of their bodies; their movement, facial expressions, automatic thought; it’s not education–it’s something you’d read about in a sci-fi novel’s ideation of a dystopian future.
My little one starts pre-k next year and I sat here picturing in my mind, him being in that environment and I was overwhelmed with a sick feeling. He’s a sharp little guy who they would love to break and then mold into an obedient little test-taker.
Success Academy, where silence is golden . . . for Eva.
Grim.
Child abuse.. Developing ” Eva’s youth” movement
The Brown Shirts punish poor children for being poor & because they accidentally’ picked poor parents’ at birth. The new goose stepping education deformsters gladly inflict pain on millions of poor children – because of their own pathology, while America looks away, takes the Gates & Co. $M pay offs. Civil Rights organizations also take the Gates & Co. $M, spouting the propaganda that harsh inhumane treatment will be the ticket to equality, success and grit. I honestly do not think they believe this. I hope not. Their own children are not being treated this way, they enjoy Black Priviledge while unlucky poor kids get abused.
How long will this treatment continue? Is this unrelated to Detroit, Flint, Katrina….no way!
Two things: when the results of these measures come in in future years, will we go back and hold these martinets accountable? ……….. and how do these measures reflect a particular mentality and will we fearlessly identify that mentality or “mindset” for what it is? I am sick of liberals pussyfooting around. We need to look to the British Parliament as a model of how to treat people like this, how to treat the ISIS types in our own society. These reformistas are vicious and malicious, and in the face of all the evidence against them their intransigent insistence on continuing makes it clear they have no good will among them. Is Koch money involved in any of these reform movements?
The most brilliant part of Success Academy’s “success” is that are very good at making students and their parents who don’t do well under their system believe that it is all about them. Those students and parents internalize their failure and are too embarrassed at their own failures to speak out. This e-mail makes it clear that this system can work with young and inexperienced teachers, too.
One reason that their suspension rates in schools with high number of college educated parents are very low, and the parents in those Success Academy schools can deny the abuse of children is because their own children are treated very differently. Sure, there may be more discipline than the typical public schools, but not nearly the same as you see in the description above and there is far more kindness towards the students in Success’ middle and high income schools (with a large % of white students) who may not get it right away at age 5.
I am waiting for two researchers who sit in the first 3 months of Kindergarten at Upper West and Harlem 1 to see if the two Kindergarten classes (one primarily poor and one primarily upper middle class) are treated the same. My bet is that the kids are not.
What you describe in your first paragraph is called “gaslighting”.
I ask again: how is this not considered child abuse? Why does anyone permit, let alone encourage, this kind of treatment of small children?
Because the kids are minority and low income.
Why do parents keep sending their children to the school? Any mother would know her child is miserable. This is what I don not understand about these places.
If you have a well-behaved, compliant child with no learning issues, and your choice is a severely underfunded public school with all the charter school rejects and an extremely well-funded charter school offering all the bells and whistles that rich kids get but that poor schools can’t afford, of course you would choose a charter. That is why the privatization folks are so obsessed with cutting funds for public schools and saying that they are wasting money. You need to underfund public schools enough so that charter schools look better.
That is also why those charter schools get so many applications. The parents believe they are choosing a better educational opportunity for their kids. The problem is that unbeknownst to many of those at-risk families, the charter school has absolutely no interest in educating their child because he isn’t getting it fast enough. That’s why I find it ironic when people say that a charter schools with huge attrition rates is “popular” simply because their marketing machine convinces many parents to sign up for the lottery. I always know those people have an agenda. Charters should be judged by how many students LEAVE, and by that I mean how many AT-RISK students leave. (I am not impressed when a charter educates lots of middle class students with college-educated parents, especially when that is not what they are supposed to be doing.)
NYC public school parent: I would only add two points.
1), How is what has been described and explained here and elsewhere not a “command-and-compliance” scheme that is (in general) all about the convenience and benefit of a few adults at the expense of most students, parents and communities?
2), I added “(in general)” because [as you also mention] what folks like Bill Gates ensures for HIS OWN CHILDREN at Lakeside School is diametrically opposed to what he is attempting to ram down the throats of OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN.
Thank you for your comments.
😎
Look to the most obvious explanations: perhaps the climate and behavorial expectations at the schools in reality aren’t as bad as what is being depicted by a handful of ex-employees and the parents of former students. Maybe different people make different choices for their own child than you would.
Or even if the picture being painted regarding school discipline is wholly or partially accurate, the parents of children who attend Success schools have determined that a Success school is a better option for their child than their local zoned school. In the vast majority of cases, Success students are zoned for district schools that no one who comments here would ever dream of sending their own child; schools that have been foundering since long before there was even such a thing as a charter school. The company line from those who want to force other people’s children to attend district schools is that all the schools need is a lot more money, a little more time, and plenty of parent involvement, and they’ll be just fine. Talk about gaslighting!
When I read replies like the one above by Tim, what I really hear the pro-charter folks saying is that PUBLIC schools should simply divide themselves into the “haves” and “rejects”.
Would the pro-charter folks approve if Mayor de Blasio and Carmen Farina took every “failing” public schools and set up a new school next door that was kept entirely separate from the failing school?
The “new” public schools next door to those failing public schools took any child whose parents wanted it and agreed to very high behavioral and academic standards. So every child at the failing public school is welcome at this “new” school. But here is the kicker that should make the pro-charter folks happy and supportive of such a program if Mayor de Blasio started it: As soon as a child failed to meet those behavioral or academic standards, he was sent back to the old, failing school.
That way, the “new” public schools would have much better results and those schools could be showered with lots of money, resources, and fancy stuff. And the “old” public schools where all the troublesome kids go could be starved of funding because, frankly, as the charter folks have shown, the children in them are just not worth the time and effort to educate.
I think this is what would make the pro-charter folks happy since the public schools would simply model themselves after the charters.
Of course what this does not address is what happens to the children in the “old” public schools, since now they are unwanted by both the charter schools AND the public schools that are now modeling themselves after charter schools. I suppose letting them rot in underfunded schools is the solution the charter folks think is fine, so maybe we should all just embrace their system. They don’t care, so why should we?
NYC public school parent: I don’t know about you, but when I read the following—
“The company line from those who want to force other people’s children to attend district schools is that all the schools need is a lot more money, a little more time, and plenty of parent involvement, and they’ll be just fine”—
I couldn’t help but think that this was a completely and unintentionally hilarious send-up of many of the crucial charter/privatizer sales points and hype.
Chicago. Detroit. New Orleans. Adelanto. Ohio charters en masse. That’s what those leading and enforcing corporate education reform repeat ad nauseam: they keep demanding not just a lot more money but a lot more time and unpaid forced parental involvement—plus starve the local public schools so they look bad by comparison!—and someday sometime somehow charters for the vast majority will be the Centres of Excellence they are touted to be.
Assertion by projection is right up there with proof by assertion when it comes to the “thought leaders” peddling self-styled “education reform.”
They will even relabel their own inanities when all else fails.
Thank you again for keeping it real.
Not rheeal.
😎
Tim
I would not begrudge any NYC parent for choosing an alternate to the chronically disrupted and chaotic environments in some neighborhood public schools.
The objection to charter chains like SA however revolves around unfair comparisons made on a very uneven playing field combined with the siphoning of much needed funding and much needed parental support.
Articles like this emphasize the degree to which public school teachers work with their hands tied when it comes to both systemic and parental support regarding student behaviors and their impacts on teaching and learning.
Do charter solutions for struggling schools really come down to masking tape, mouth bubbles, perfect posture, focused, unblinking stares, and straight and silent rows of children turned into automatons?
No wonder SA stops at 8th grade. Moskowitz wouldn’t dream of requiring 16, 17, and 18 year old young adults to follow such humiliating rules.
“No wonder SA stops at 8th grade. Moskowitz wouldn’t dream of requiring 16, 17, and 18 year old young adults to follow such humiliating rules.”
Success doesn’t stop at 8th grade; their oldest class is up to 10th grade now (http://www.successacademies.org/our-approach-high-school/) and there are plans to open several additional high schools as the schools continue to grow and add grades. The vast majority of Success students who’ve completed 8th grade have stayed with the network rather than leave for high school (omg like a cult).
Tim,
I think you mean the survivors of SA. Most drop out before 8th grade
NYS Parent, the problem with public schools is primarily figuring out how to teach all the students that the charter schools don’t want. The charter schools with miraculously high results are almost always the ones where there is a high attrition rate for at-risk kids. Or that have few at-risk kids to begin with.
Charter schools were supposed to address the problem of the kids who were failed by public schools. Instead, they seem to have embraced the idea that they are there to address the education of the kids who are easiest to teach to give them an alternative to the public schools that have to take all comers and keep them.
Charters start with an enormous advantage — the only students who even have a chance of attending must have a parent with the motivation to seek out a better school for their child. Despite this advantage, you aren’t seeing better results, unless a charter school is willing to go even further and get rid of kids who aren’t easily teachable.
Even charter schools recognize this, but they won’t admit it. That is why they are no longer justifying their existence by any pretense of serving ALL at-risk kids better than public schools. Now the pro-charter folks – desperate for some justification for their existence — are now say that their raison d’être is promoting diversity (which means allowing well-behaved poor minority students to attend a school that is at least 30%, and often 50% middle class.) The district the charter school pulls from may have only 15% or 20% white students, but a charter school that has 60% white students and 40% minority students then pats itself on the back for its “diversity”. Charter folks never cared about diversity before, but it is now a convenient rationale to excuse their abject failure to do the job they were supposed to do — show us all how to educate at-risk kids failed by public schools.
Massive advertising, coupled with the poor black and Latino communities’ distrust of the system in this case the DOE.
Among the more affluent white and Asian families I know who send their kids to SA I have noticed the following: 1. At least one parent is extremely uptight, 2. Parents can be socially awkward, and/or 3. Parents attended Catholic schools. Not all children from more affluent, educated families survive at SA. There seems to be a particular subset of families for which this works.
Given the preponderance of published stories from former SA teachers all basically saying the same thing, it can’t be denied that there is something rotten with that organization. Shame on governor cuomo and the suny charter commission for allowing this organization to expand.
With regard to the uniforms there seems to be an exaggerated emphasis on the outfits. The whole costume which I’ve seen in some cases includes a jacket is about keeping up appearances. I saw some teachers on a field trip recently carrying llbean style bags with orange trim. Since SA is so determined to appear to be a private school, I wish they would get the heck out of public school buildings!
Clearly, Tim is paid by Eva or the like to spread the “good news” and anyone who says otherwise is wrong. I get it now.
Kids in unstable homes usually don’t want to rock the boat. They are children, after all, unable to see the bigger picture. They buy in very easily, “like taking candy from a baby”. A child might not want to disappoint her parent. Yes, cults and predators use the same methods. At charter schools, they call it “student engagement”, and it’s constant and unrelenting. After all, the child has to be there all day. Charters often have extended hours and extended days. That’s a lot of pressure, a lot of the time. Kids had meltdowns all the time, everything was always covered up, even suicide threats by some students. The CEO and her minions only cared about the outward appearance of things, just like this teacher said. As a recovering charter school parent, I can say it was very much like a cult.
Tim says:
“The vast majority of Success students who’ve completed 8th grade have stayed with the network rather than leave for high school.”
Exactly how big is that VAST MAJORITY? You think a high school that has 30 students per grade can offer the same range of classes as a bigger school? If any of them leave, you are down to an entire grade of 25.
What Tim didn’t mention is that the upper middle class (mostly white) parents in Success Academy’s newest schools are apparently demanding a special high school so their children (now in 5th grade?) aren’t in the same high school that Tim is referring to. Why would they need their own high school? Especially with such a shrinking cohort of students. Why wouldn’t they attend the same high school as every other Success Academy 5th grader attends? Why would Success Academy not mix the upper middle class parents with their low-income students in high school?
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Another look inside the American gulag dominated by the autocratic, opaque, for profit, corporate charter school world, and OUR children are the targets.
Many of the parents have little choice, there is no other school nearby. They think being selected for S.A. is some sort of boon and opportunity that must be taken. They believe it is their golden ticket to academic success that can not be obtained in the public school. Never mind the fact that kids graduate from public school and go on to productive lives and higher academics.
Sounds as if it is run by Delores Umbridge
I’m perplexed as to why this is allowed to continue. Unbelievably disturbing. I hope this sort of information becomes even more public.
Reads like a “Twilight Zone” script …
Thank you for this heartfelt post. You are wished well wherever you do go to teach. But you must do something. You must refrain from calling 5 and 6 year old children, scholars. When you do that, you will start healing.
I taught at a KIPP school and the experience is just like what this poor lady went through.
WOW. I am shocked and dismayed at her comments. We are already seeing a demise of Pre K and K here in LAUSD. Children who should be exploring their world through dramatic play, concrete learning experiences, art and music are being glued to chairs and asked to read, read, read. As a former Pre K teacher I find that my heart aches for these children. what are we doing to them? Yes, children are suppose to be resilient, but just as those poor Romanian children left in cribs with no human contact now have to work through years of therapy. We continue to experiment on our children and deprive them of those enriching moments of childhood where real learning occurs. I hope there aren’t too many “Success” academies.
I never know exactly how to feel when I read these “goodbye” letters. The word “scholar” troubles me. I agree, when that word is replaced with students, or kids, or children, it’ll likely be healing to the person so programed to speak it/use it.
I have no sympathy, however, for this teacher, or any of them who leave SA or places like it, or particularly for the ones who STAY. Eva is a horrible human being, hiring people who emulate her–she must find that certain “same” quality in those she hires as she does in herself, and extrapolate that by anyone who stays with SA, or TFA. It is that mindset that I just don’t understand, for I am a human being, who treats others, particularly and especially CHILDREN, like human beings.
With all of the negative press out there on Success Academy (and other charters), and TFA, I think people would not bother, would think twice before applying to either. Lets face it….if you stay at a place that treats people as lesser than…either your getting your rocks off being a Commandant and you LOVE treating people like dirt, or you’re so desperate to get a job, and perhaps have no self-esteem, that you’d sell your soul for a time to the devil. Eva SEES this in people and preys on it. OF COURSE, when you fail, you’re to keep it to yourself, and keep up appearances.
This gives us insight into the psyche of the people SA hires, no?
SA, like a bowl of sugar free jello……it looks delicious, and provides nothing nutritious, with a side of aspartame/poison. Yum.
“I admitted to them that I have a hard time with holding such young children to such high expectations. ” “Cruel and unrealistic” would be more accurate than “high”.
I agree. Referring to appallingly stifling expectations like these as “high” only continues to gaslight teachers into believing the problem is with our mindsets about achievement.
Similar, in its way, to that age-old manipulation that if teachers truly cared about children, we’d do our jobs for free.
One thing that strikes me about a lot of these SA exposes is that they’re often written by people for whom SA was their first teaching job. Had that been my first teaching job, I too probably would have deplored the tight discipline. “Why can’t school just be a big ol’ love fest with a little tough love doled out now and then?”, I might have thought (as many non-teacher commenters here undoubtedly think.) However, having had my share of classes where kids behave atrociously and friendly measures are often seen as weakness that ought to be taken advantage of, I definitely see SA in a different light. It seems too rigid for my taste, but I can fully appreciate their fear of a slippery slope to disorder.
fine line between a slippery slope and creating a control\punishment around every single micro-movement a child makes…it has some serious racial\classist overtones.
ponderosa, were the kids in your classes who “behaved atrociously” 5 years old? 6 years old? Were they young teens or young children experiencing school for the first time?
Do you really think that suspending over 20% of them is the road to “tough love”?
NYC:
Teens. Like you, I used to think that elementary kids must be easier to manage, but I hear more and more horror stories from my colleagues at the elementary level. I know one who quit because of an unruly 2nd grade class.
Students of any age can be extremely unruly, it’s true. I’d argue that intense, extrensic control at the levels SA uses don’t solve the problem. I’m working as a sub right now, in a district just south of Fresno, California. I sub in all the schools, in the regular elementary and secondary schools, and in our two charters, the one that attracts mostly upper-middle class families, and the other one that is more “No Excuses.” Being a sub, you see all the bad behavior: Rigid extrensic rules work pretty well, up through about the fourth grade, then after that, they just don’t anymore. Kids develop this outlook where, if the sub doesn’t notice that your shirt isn’t tucked in, they probably won’t notice when you change your behavior to Excellent, on the card chart, or cheat on your Accelerated Reading test, or [insert bad behavior here]. Yeah, I can send ’em up to the office, or to a partner-teacher. I won’t see them back all day, because Admin supports the subs at that school. Meanwhile though, the kid’s not learning whatever the teacher left me to teach, and meanwhile I am also going to spend the rest of the day dealing with other discipline issues, for every other child whose untucked shirt goes unnoticed. I would rather have the regular Middle School any old day of the week, where I can focus on instruction, and on maintaining an orderly learning environment, instead of a lot of little things.
When you are talking about a group of children being introduced to Kindergarten and formal schooling for the first time, then nope, trying to control every aspect of their behavior is not going to work.
Having classroom rules is one thing, but there will always be children who simply can’t sit on a rug for a long period of time without fidgeting. Figuring out ways to address this is what good teachers and schools do. (Believe me, that’s what private schools that parents are paying $40,000/year do). A belief that you can punish a child into sitting still without fidgeting at age 5 is not having “high expectations”. And just because some kids are capable of doing so easily and you rid yourself of the ones who can’t do it does not prove that your system works.
That is everything that is wrong with charter schools and their extreme dishonesty. It leads to terrible educational practices.
Looks like your comment is leaning towards private school being a better model. “(Believe me, that’s what private schools that parents are paying $40,000/year do).”
Basic education till 10th grade or 8th grade should always be on public model. Look at how children in Europe are faring these days. Less and less Europeans want to move to USA in modern times because the promise for better life or a free life no more holds.
The German model is showing pretty good results which has rewards and consequences embedded in it’s education system.
Private schools are a scam, the burden of which falls on the general public. They are common offenders on grade inflation, sexual abuse/assault on campus and drug abuse. Many schools have a prison like environment. Also, the price tag and name value leads ultimately to an exclusivist society.
The purpose of educating young minds is to advance our civilization. The only way to assure it is quality education that is free based on merit, rewards, consequences and choices.
this is incredibly sad. these schools are the epitome of educational warfare. they are destroying the minds and spirit of too many vulnerable children. these so-called schools are prisons and they prey on vulnerable populations. where is the civil right attorney who can start the class action lawsuit on behalf of these students?
Sounds like Lowood in Jane Eyre. I hate to think about these children in ten years– it’s hard enough to think about them now.
It’s creepy how the teacher says “leaders”. I was definitely envisioning a cult, or something alien-like. Is Success Academy fiction come-to-life? Invasion of the body snatchers?
((((oo))))
Hugs to the teacher on his/er long journey back home.
In some culture, the term “leaders” is an euphemism for whipping boys in “Slave Academy.”
This is a cult.
yes it is
Commenter Glenn, at Truthout, “How Corporations Have Corrupted the Open Records Law”:
Charter schools and special service districts, in potentially gentrifying zones, are set up as privatized quasi-governmental entities that are “designed to raid the public treasury, but also to avoid public record laws and public scrutiny. The liberal establishment joined with the right wingers to privatize hyper-local government, because of greed. Essentially, an unaccountable corporate/university front group claims government authority to ‘save’ a district being gentrified. Because the district promises to raid public monies, to cut essential services for the working class neighborhoods, and lavish money on zones to be gentrified; these are supported by tiny quisling groups from the gentry, who are ready to eliminate all democratic processes and accept corporate dictatorship. The new localized government, called a special district, is a private entity eliminating all right to know laws. And, the most dysfunctional civic association leaders, or organized group of bullies, is anointed like a colonial war lord to insist that ‘the community’ demands this unaccountable corporate government. The people and institutions of Philadelphia are being destroyed to divert all public money to these corporate entities by calling taxpayer money “grants”, and calling corporate/university dictatorships, good and charitable business.”
It’s hard to believe that many if these students aren’t showing signs of emotional stress outside the classroom. Something tells me these signs are being ignored.
There are no stairwells at success. The school is amazing and they are doing an amazing job with my child. My child comes home with excitement and alot of knowledge.
The teacher seems like she wanted to be lazy and let the kids get away with disrespect. Thank goodness my child didn’t have this teacher.
First off, I don’t believe there any stairwells at Success, and my children finally love school. Sounds like a teacher with a grudge to me. Every school has high expectations for there students, some are trying to make sure that their students succeed, other schools are just trying to get by. I can say that I honestly love the school and am very happy that we moved our kids there. Our oldest is at Career Academy in high school and loves school also.
To Julia and Steve Naragon – there are plenty of stairwells at any Success school. They connect the floors of the co-located schools. What else do you think connects floors of a building?
As far as your thoughts on this teachers’ “laziness,” I can assure you as a former employee of a Success school that this is no hyperbole or being dramatic. Those children are treated like prison inmates. Unless you witness what goes on there behind closed doors, you have no room to talk.
Unfortunately, there is a book and video published called Mission Possible that touts the supposed “benefits” is the Success Academy. When the principal of our new public school showed me the book as a model of what he wants for our new elementary school we decided to move our children to private schools. As Diane Ravich so eloquently states again and again, our community school are being destroyed. We moved to Orlando from NYC, where our eldest enjoyed an exceptional education at P.S. 6, and our little one blossomed under the Reggio Emilio style of preschool she attended. My husband and I both hold advanced degrees and know what solid education looks like. Part of the problem may be that many Americans have lost sight of what great education and great curricula look like. Thank goodness for Diane Ravitch’s books and blog, as they have helped guide us inthe search for a great school.