Archives for the year of: 2015

This story is a bit more than a year old, but it remains relevant as an update on the education “reforms” favored by the mammoth Walton Family Foundation.

It has spent more than a billion on its far-right, free-market vision of school reform. The foundation estimates that it has provided funding for one of every four new charters in the country.

Make no mistake. The Waltons, beneficiaries of the Walmart stores, don’t like public schools. They like privately managed schools. They like vouchers. They believe that school choice is the answer to education equality and ultimately to eliminating poverty.

Note that the Walton-funded charters rely on Teach for America for a large chunk of their staff. That explains why the Waltons are the single biggest contributor to TFA.

Since Walmart is known for paying low wages, the Walton family knows a thing or two about poverty. Instead of opening charters, it could probably accomplish more by paying its workers $10 an hour and allowing them to work full-time jobs.

But, no, taking over the public schools of the United States is so much more appealing to a family of billionaires than paying a living wage to their 1.4 million employees. And it costs less.

In 2014, the foundation spent $202 million on education, overwhelmingly in support of charters and vouchers.

In 2013, the Walton foundation spent more than $164 million across the country. According to Marc Sternberg, who was appointed director of K-12 education reform at the Walton Family Foundation last September, Walton has given grants to one in every four charter start-ups in the country, for a total of $335 million.

“The Walton Family Foundation has been deeply committed to a theory of change, which is that we have a moral obligation to provide families with high quality choices,” said Mr. Sternberg. “We believe that in providing choices we are also compelling the other schools in an ecosystem to raise their game.”

The supporters and critics of charter schools, many of them fierce, cannot be easily divided into political camps. Supporters include both Republicans and Democrats, although critics tend to come more from the left. In Washington, where the charter system has strong backing in City Hall, supporters have been more successful than in New York, where opposition from teachers unions and others has kept charter school enrollment to about 6 percent, despite growth in the past decade.

The size of the Walton foundation’s wallet allows it to exert an outsize influence on education policy as well as on which schools flourish and which are forced to fold. With its many tentacles, it has helped fuel some of the fastest growing, and most divisive, trends in public education — including teacher evaluations based on student test scores and publicly funded vouchers for students to attend private schools.

“The influence of philanthropy in terms of the bang for the buck they get is just really kind of shocking,” said Jack Schneider, an assistant professor of education at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass.

A separate Walton foundation that supports higher education bankrolls an academic department at the University of Arkansas in which faculty, one of whom was recruited from conservative think tank, conduct research on charter schools, voucher programs and other policies the foundation supports.

The Walton-funded Department of Education Reform regularly studies vouchers, charters, and choice. What do you think they find? The independent evaluator, chosen by the Republican leaders in Congress, of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program holds as chair in the Walton’s Department of Education Reform.

Is there another country in the world where tax-exempt foundations have decided to destroy their nation’s public education system and replace it with a privatized system?

This study of the Walton Family Foundation was published in 2012 by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy.

It provides a history of the family fortune and a description of the Walton family and its political interests.

Helen Walton, widow of the founder Sam Walton, has supported Planned Parenthood, but otherwise the foundation donations have gone primarily to charters, vouchers, and other conservative causes. The family also donates generously to political campaigns, and most of its donations go to conservative Republican candidates.

Walmart has its admirers, but as the report shows, it has been sued for its treatment of workers, women, and immigrants. It is, of course, nonunion. Furthermore, when it opens a new Walmart in a community, it wipes out family-owned businesses.

One of the most startling statistics in the report is from Iowa, where the opening of a Walmart was soon after followed by the closing of hundreds of local grocery stores, hardware stores, building supply stores, variety stores, shoe stores, and clothing stores.

This is a report worth reading.

This report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy dates from 2007, yet it is still a powerful and important read.

It lists every foundation that gives substantial funding to school privatization. By privatization, the report refers specifically to vouchers and education tax credits. It does not include funding for charters, which have become the main vehicle for promoting school choice and privatization since this report was written.

At the top of the funders of vouchers and education tax credits: The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation (Wis), Sarah Scaife Foundation (PA), Annenberg Foundation (PA), Jacqueline Hume Foundation (CA), Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation (OK), Lilly Endowment (IND), Mathile Family Foundation (OH), the Roe Foundation (SC), the Carthage Foundation (PA), ExxonMobil Foundation (TX).

And it lists the organizations that receive the most funding to promote school privatization. At the top: the Heritage Foundation, the Hoover Institution, the American Enterprise Institute, the Manhattan Institute, CATO Institute, Parents Advancing Choice in Education (PACE), Focus on the Family, Institute for Justice, National Center for Policy Analysis, and the Oklahoma Council for Public Affairs.

Another list contains the names of the foundations that give the most money to advocates for privatization, in this order: The Walton Family Foundation, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, John Templeton Foundation, Herrick Foundation, etc. There are many more on this list.

These lists would certainly have changed in the past 8 years, with new entries and substantially more funding for privatization.

It is interesting to watch the changes in the three reports on the same subject by the NCRP. The first and second see privatization as a distinct threat not only to our public schools, but to our democracy.

The third, published in 2015, is generally complimentary towards the Walton Family Foundation’s effort to increase equity by expanding privatization.

Let us hope that the NCRP soon returns to advocating for the common good rather than for a strategy that will increase segregation, enrich entrepreneurs, and eliminate unions.

The Los Angeles school board voted to terminate famed teacher Rafe Esquith.
The Los Angeles Board of Education voted this week to fire nationally recognized teacher Rafe Esquith, following a misconduct investigation that included allegations he made an improper joke to students and inappropriately touched minors, according to sources with knowledge of the decision.


The longtime educator at Hobart Avenue Elementary School, who has received national acclaim for his teaching and his bestselling books, has denied wrongdoing.

Acting on the recommendation of senior administrators, the school board voted unanimously behind closed doors Tuesday to begin termination proceedings against Esquith, according to sources who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about the matter.
Esquith, 61, was removed from the classroom in April after another educator complained about a joke he made to students relating to nudity. The complaint prompted an investigation, which quickly grew to include other allegations of misconduct.

Chicago has some serious problems. Homicides have increased. The indictment of the Mayor’s hand-picked CEO by his hand-picked school board is bad news.

But crime and corruption have taken a back seat to the Chicago Cubs. The city is crazy for its baseball team. And Rahm is front and center at Cub games, keeping his distance from the scandals.

“Is Rahm Emanuel just about the luckiest big-city mayor in the world, or what? It’s all Cubs all the time, and the perfect look-over-there moment for a mayor with some serious issues….

“It was a blatant conflict-of-interest contract approved by Rahm’s hand-picked board of education. He’s fighting not to release all the documents — including his emails — but if Rahm didn’t OK this deal, I’ll eat my White Sox cap with sport peppers and yellow mustard.”

The Detroit News reports that investigators are reviewing contracts made during Barbara Byrd-Bennett’s time as chief academic auditor for the Detroit public schools under Robert Bobb.

“Barbara Byrd-Bennett, who was the chief academic and accountability auditor for DPS from 2009-11, was convicted of one count of fraud in federal court. Federal authorities alleged that as CEO of the Chicago Public Schools, she steered $23 million in no-bid contracts to two education firms in return for $2.3 million in bribes and kickbacks.

“One of those firms, Synesi Associates LLC, which trains principals and school administrators, was awarded contracts with DPS while Byrd-Bennett was working for the district, according to records posted on the DPS’ website….

“According to six-month expenditure reports from May and November 2011, DPS paid $1,487,654.08 to Synesi for “Consultant Services/Curriculum/Office of Accountability.”

“The report from November 2011 also lists an invoice of $128,698.77 to Synesi as “disapproved.”
In a statement Tuesday, a DPS spokeswoman said the district is cooperating with authorities.”

Yesterday, the ex-CEO of Chicago Public Schools, Barbara Byrd-Bennett, pleaded guilty to a kickback scheme involving SUPES Academy. She is facing serious jail time. The owners of SUPES Academy, who made an agreement to pay BBB, have yet to be judged. Mayor Rahm Emanuel would like to pin the guilt squarely on BBB, but the Chicago Tribune revealed yesterday that the owner of SUPES is an ally of Emanuel and recommended first J.C. Blizzard as CEO, then BBB.

Jonathan Pelto, master blogger of Connecticut, sees connections that go beyond what we know so far. He sees Paul Vallas as a player in the Chicago drama. If you like to read truth-is-stranger-than-fiction stories, read his post.

Pelto writes:

Charges were also filed against The SUPES Academy LLC and Synesi Associates LLC, as well as against the owners of those two companies, Gary Solomon and Thomas Vranas. According to the indictment, their role in the kick-back scheme includes charges of bribery and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

A third company owned by the two individuals, PROACT Search, a superintendent search firm that provided New Haven with Superintendent Garth Harris and Norwalk with Superintendent Steven Adamowski has also been caught up in the FBI’s investigation into the Chicago scandal….

Prior to being hand-picked by Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel to run Chicago’s Public Schools, Byrd-Bennett worked as a consultant and lead teacher for The Supes Academy, worked as a consultant for Synesi Associates and was listed as a part of the management team at PROACT Search.

While many key actors in the Corporate Education Reform Industry have been involved with Gary Solomon and his companies, one of the most prominent names on Solomon’s list of close colleagues is the Great Paul Vallas, the Education Reform Guru and former CEO of the Chicago, Philadelphia and New Orleans public school systems.

More recently, Democratic Governor and education reform disciple Dannel Malloy brought Vallas to Bridgeport, Connecticut and then twisted Connecticut law in knots so that Vallas could stay for two years until local residents had finally had enough and forced Vallas to leave the job and return to Illinois.

As for the situation in Chicago, it could certainly be said that Gary Solomon’s ability to build such a “successful” corporate education reform company is due, in no small part, to his close relationship with Paul Vallas.

Vallas not only hired Solomon and his companies when he worked in Philadelphia, but brought Solomon with him to New Orleans.

And Vallas worked to bring other business to Solomon and his companies as well.

While Vallas has publicly claimed that he has no financial interest in any of Solomon’s consulting activities, in Vallas’ Philadelphia days Solomon’s consulting company advertised that it had “the exclusive rights to Paul Vallas’ model of education reform….”

The story gets weirder and weirder, as Vallas and Solomon play tag team:

When Paul Vallas moved on to New Orleans to head the Louisiana Recovery School District, Solomon picked up even more lucrative contracts.

But it is a story out of Illinois that provides a true snap-shot and insider’s view into how Vallas and the Corporate Education Reform Industry works;

While Gary Solomon and his companies profited greatly via Vallas in Philadelphia and New Orleans, it is the somewhat more hidden story surrounding the Rockford School District (PSD 150) in Illinois the provides telling evidence about how Vallas and the Corporate Education Reform Industry works.

More consulting contracts. Follow the story. Pelto is an amazing investigative reporter.

Stop marketing in schools. open this link to see all the links in the press release that follows.

Contact: ​​​​​​​​Embargoed for release:
Kara Kaufman, (617) 695-2525​​​​​​​
October 14, 2015
Josh Golin, (617) 896-9368
MEDIA RELEASE

3 million teachers to McDonald’s: We’re not lovin’ it

Adding to corporation’s woes, nation’s largest teachers union rejects McTeacher’s Nights, marketing in schools

BOSTON, MA –Today, the National Education Association (NEA) and more than 50 state and local teachers unions challenged McDonald’s CEO Steve Easterbrook to end McTeacher’s Nights, the corporation’s most exploitative form of kid-targeted marketing.

The call, issued in a letter written and organized by Corporate Accountability International (CAI) and Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC), comes as McDonald’s struggles to climb out of seven consecutive quarters of nose-diving sales in the US and continues to lose families—its core customer base. The letter builds upon a growing movement of parents and health professionals who are demanding McDonald’s end its kid-targeted marketing, and an increasing number of institutions—most recently the Cleveland Clinic—that are severing ties with the corporation.

On McTeacher’s Nights, McDonald’s recruits teachers to “work” behind the counter and serve burgers, fries, and soda to their students and their students’ families. The corporation heavily brands the events, even going so far as to provide uniforms and branded shirts for teachers to wear behind counters. In return, McDonald’s donates only a small portion of the event’s proceeds. The events take advantage of cash-strapped schools and use teachers to sell junk food directly to their students in order to create brand loyalty.

At McDonald’s most recent shareholders’ meeting, the Chicago Teachers Union denounced the practice on behalf of teachers in the corporation’s own urban school district.

“It is wholly inappropriate for McDonald’s to exploit cash-strapped schools to market its junk food brand, while miring its workers in poverty, effectively hollowing out the tax base for our schools,” said Jesse Sharkey, vice president of the Chicago Teachers Union. “In Chicago we face potentially devastating cuts to our schools, yet one of the world’s richest corporations operating in our backyard is exploiting this situation by eroding the school food environment and our students’ health in the long-run.”

Not only are McTeacher’s Nights harmful for children’s health, they are also chronically poor fundraisers. Schools typically receive only 15 to 20 percent of the event’s proceeds, often amounting to only one to two dollars per student. According to research conducted by CCFC, of 25 schools that participated in McTeacher’s Night events, only five raised more than $1,000.

“Frankly, it’s disrespectful for a multi-billion dollar corporation such as McDonald’s to throw pennies at our schools while it uses our teachers to market its products,” said Melinda Dart, vice president of the California Federation of Teachers and president of the Jefferson Elementary Federation of Teachers. “At a time when we are working hard to help our youth adopt healthy habits, this corporation and its junk food simply have no place in our schools.”

In public statements, executives have waffled around the scope of McDonald’s marketing in schools. For instance, shortly after executives publicly denied putting Ronald McDonald in schools, McDonald’s USA President Mike Andres told investors on a December 2014 investor call that McDonald’s has to be “in the schools.” During that call, Andres also cited a presence in schools as part of the corporation’s “heritage.”

Despite executives’ statements, McDonald’s continues to market directly in schools by sponsoring McTeacher’s Nights and sending Ronald McDonald into schools under the guise of physical education and reading programming. It has also sold branded fast food in school cafeterias.

Today’s call was backed by authorities in the field of education, including Diane Ravitch, Ph.D., Research Professor of Education at New York University; Nancy Carlsson-Paige, Professor Emerita at the Graduate School of Education at Lesley University; and Kevin G. Welner, Professor and Director, National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado Boulder.

Michelle Obama and the USDA have announced new proposals to stop the practice of promoting junk food in schools. The American Academy of Pediatrics and four federal agencies have also recommended restricting junk food marketing to kids.

Since 2013, more than 360 McTeacher’s Night events have been documented in more than 30 states.
###

Institutions calling on McDonald’s to end McTeacher’s Night events include:

● National Education Association
● National Education Association Healthy Futures

● National Education Association state affiliates
○ California
○ Florida
○ Vermont

● National Education Association local affiliates
○ Los Angeles
○ Milwaukee

● American Federation of Teachers state affiliates

○ California
○ Georgia
○ Michigan
○ Missouri
○ Ohio
○ Oklahoma
○ Pennsylvania
○ Utah
○ Vermont
○ West Virginia

● American Federation of Teachers local affiliates

○ Albuquerque
○ Atlanta
○ Birmingham
○ Boston
○ Chicago
○ Houston
○ Los Angeles
○ Savannah

Additional quotes:

Melissa Cropper, President of the Ohio Federation of Teachers

“It’s shameful that McDonald’s is using the tragic underfunding of our public schools as a marketing opportunity. Teachers should never have to sacrifice their students’ health in order to earn a few extra resources for their classrooms. Through McTeacher’s Nights, McDonald’s is exploiting cash-strapped schools to hawk a junk food brand that is making children sick.”

Andy Ford, President of the Florida Education Association

“Teachers should never have to choose between funding their classrooms and teaching their students to grow into healthy adults. We are proud to stand with our teachers in promoting our students’ health, not the profits of a multi-billion dollar corporation.”

Eric C. Heins, President of the California Teachers Association

“As educators we care deeply about the well-being and safety of our students. The science on this issue is clear: junk food is not only bad for children’s health, but is one of the leading causes of diseases like obesity and Type 2 diabetes. That is why we urge McDonald’s to stop targeting our children.”

Richard Stutman, President of the Boston Teachers Union

“Though McDonald’s claims McTeacher’s Nights are about fundraising, the truth is they’re about marketing. While McDonald’s reaps the PR benefits, teachers are forced to compromise their values and students are tricked into associating McDonald’s food with healthy eating practices—something that couldn’t be further from the truth.”

Mark Noltner, Teacher and parent

“When my daughter came home from school and told me the teachers were wearing McDonald’s shirts to promote an upcoming McTeacher’s Night, I was outraged. It’s hard enough helping my daughter navigate the minefield of unhealthy marketing; the last thing she needs is her teachers hawking junk food. And as a teacher myself, it infuriates me that McDonald’s would manipulate the trust that teachers develop with their students.”

Josh Golin, Executive Director, Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood

“Of all McDonald’s underhanded tactics to promote its brand to children, using teachers to lure elementary school students is the most unconscionable. Children are uniquely vulnerable to marketing, but when the pitchman for a product is their own teacher, they don’t stand a chance.”

Sriram Madhusoodanan, Director, Value [the] Meal campaign at Corporate Accountability International

“McTeacher’s Nights exploit budget shortfalls, co-opt and manipulate teachers and prey on children. Such a tactic lands McDonald’s squarely in the Hall of Shame, right next to its mentor, Big Tobacco. At a time when the public health community is decrying marketing in schools, this corporation shows it will stop at nothing to target our kids.”

You can stop the privatizers in California by signing a petition for a referendum to repeal the Charter School Act of 1992. Charter schools were supposed to serve only the neediest students, but in California they have spread into affluent districts and serve as publicly funded private schools. Now, Eli Broad has a plan to open charters for half the students in Los Angeles. You can help to stop privatization by getting this initiative onto the ballot.

Here is the website: https://notocharterschools.wordpress.com/

REPEAL Charter School Act of 1992 in CA Ballot Initiative

STOP PRIVATIZING PUBLIC SCHOOLS STOP PRIVATIZING PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Ballot Initiative to REPEAL the CA Charter School Act of 1992

As many of you know the charter school industry is at the heart of the corporate takeover of our public schools.

Charter schools cherry pick students, falsify records, commit enrollment fraud, close down community schools, destroy jobs, bust up unions and segregate students where we now see essentially a three tiered system— charter schools in affluent neighborhoods lacking students with behavior issues, lacking students with special needs and lacking students who are English language learners- these charter schools tend to have highly qualified credential teachers; then there are the charter schools in low income areas where many teachers are unlicensed and the third tier is everyone else in traditional public schools. Charter schools are draining funds from our traditional public school system.

No student should be rejected from our public schools, yet charter schools reject or counsel students out all the time. This is immoral and shameful. These types of severe discriminatory practices need to be abolished now.

Read about the ugly racist history of the charter school movement at this link:

http://www.alternet.org/education/racist-history-c…

Charter schools receive public funds but have private, often secret school boards unaccountable to the taxpayers.

The charter school profiteers have essentially stolen our money and destroyed lives. We will never see the huge amounts of money that has been squandered away- it is gone.

Please share the recent report entitled Charter Schools Cheating Communities Out of Millions. See below link:
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/04/29/fraud-…

Enough is enough.

It is time for the people of California to come together and take back our public schools from the profiteers.

A REPEAL is long overdue. The billionaire game is over and we the people are not going to put up with it anymore.

To place a repeal of the charter school act of 1992 on the ballot will require approximately 370,000 signatures. I know more than this number wishes to vote for repeal, but we need to know who you are so we can make this happen.

So, for those of you who are saying YES, it is about time, we need your help and we need to know who you are.
We need to assess that the numbers are there to support this. So, reach out to your friends, your family, your social and/or political groups..and provide us with names, county of voter registration and contact information.

The way this works is that for now we build support, get contact information because once we file the proposed initiative, a clock starts ticking, and we only have 180 days to gather actual signatures. All the signatures must qualify 131 days prior to a statewide election.

So, for November 2016…we must start gathering names now and obtain organizational support…file by December 2015 just to obtain a Title and Summary that allows us to gather signatures and begin gathering actual signatures to qualify for ballot prior to end of May 2016 .

Keep in mind to qualify for ballot is not enough, we need time to promote the initiative before the actual election as well.

Time is of the essence.

So, even if you might not have the time to help spread the word about this, please let us know who we might contact, who might be able to help in this effort. And please at least give us your name and contact information.

Let’s take back our public schools from the profiteers!

The following organizations and individuals have endorsed this petition and this effort to repeal charter school laws in California:

AFT Local 6161 (Palomar Faculty Federation)

North County Labor Alliance

Escondido Public School Advocates

Wellstone Progressive Democrats of Sacramento

Chicano Latino Caucus of the California Democratic Party

Labor Council for Latin American Advancement-Sacramento chapter

Actor and Activist- Danny Glover

Bill Freeman- NEA Board member California

Alita Blanc- United Educators of San Francisco President

Julian Nava- Former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico

Wayne Johnson- Past President of California Teachers Association (CTA)

Francisco Martinez- KPFK Radio Producer (Los Angeles)

Eli Broad already announced his intention to privatize the schools of half the children in the Los Angeles public schools. He will gather $490 million from his billionaire friends to open 260 new charters. Some of these will presumably be housed in empty public schools.

The Broad coalition of Broad-funded organizations has already demanded a role in vetting the new superintendent.

The elected school board has made clear that it wants to hear from many communities, not just the Broad coalition.

But who do you think is in charge of community outreach for the school board? A certified insider in the corporate reform movement!

As Karen Wolfe, a parent activist, details here, Beth Doctor Gibbons has a sparkling “reformster” resume. She was a lobbyist for Michelle Rhee’s anti-teacher, anti-union StudentsFirst for three years; she is an alumna of TFA; she taught in Eva Moskowitz’s Success Academy chain; she worked for Educators for Excellence (E4E), the Gates-funded group that opposes due process rights for teachers. What a resume!

Wolfe notes:

“Now at LAUSD
Since January, 2015, Gibbons has been an external affairs and legislative liaison in LAUSD’s Office of Government Relations, according to her LinkedIn profile. That’s before the new board convened; certainly before new board member Scott Schmerelson vowed not to let Eli Broad bully the school board, before Steve Zimmer was board president, and before he said that Broad’s plan was a “gross perversion” of charters in an NBC television interview.”

This is the person who will lead community discussions of Eli Broad’s hostile takeover and privatization of LA schools. What a clever man he is!

Will the board go along with Eli’s silent coup or will they choose someone to represent the public interest?

Steve Zimmer? Time to stand up and be counted.