Mitchell Robinson, professor of music education and blogger, ponders whether the education wars are winding down. He thinks not. The contention over policy issues remains profound.
To help explicate the issues, he has compiled a brief guide to the different “sides.” In a recent post by Sam Chaltain, who does think the battles are subsiding and a new convergence is on the horizon, one side is the “practitioners, and the other is the “policymakers.” Robinson says the labels illustrate a clash of views.
Robinson writes:
“Mr. Chaltain’s descriptors for the two sides in the war on education are revealing, in that he sees a clear distinction between those who actually teach (the “practitioners”), and those who establish and enforce the rules and policies that govern that practice (the “policy makers”). Perhaps unintentionally, his labels also highlight a major flaw in our current education enterprise: public education policy is being written and administrated largely by persons who have not themselves attended public schools, have no degrees or certification in education, have never taught, and have spent little time in public schools. Whatever meager educational background that the members of what I term the Deformer “edu-tribe” may have is often accrued through alternative routes to the classroom (i.e., Teach for America, The New Teacher Project, the Michigan Teacher Corps), and their educational credentials are often received via online programs that require little or no actual teaching experience, residencies or interactions with other teachers or professors with actual teaching experience.
“Many of the “foot soldiers” in the Deformer army wind up in high-level positions in state departments of education, policy think-tanks, on school boards and as leaders of high-profile charter school networks. They reach these positions of power and authority with shockingly little experience in classrooms, or working with children, but exert out-sized influence on the shape and nature of public education. These members of the Deformer “advance force” parrot a regressive agenda of union-busting, tenure-smashing, and teacher-demonizing, paired with an obsessive devotion to standardized testing, “data driven decision making”, charter school expansion, and privatization as the “answers” to the “crisis in public education”–while remaining seemingly oblivious to the fact that it was their policies that manufactured the crisis they claim to be addressing, and which are paying off so handsomely for the investors who fund their charter schools and pay their generous salaries.”
On the other side are what Robinson calls “the Guardians of Oublic Education.”
“The members of this army largely consist of teachers, retired teachers, and teacher educators, most of whom have significant experience as classroom teachers, multiple degrees in education, and a career commitment to children, schools and education. Few Guardians entered the profession by alternative routes, instead earning their credentials in traditional colleges and universities, under the tutelage of professors who had themselves been classroom teachers before moving to higher education. Many of these activists earn graduate degrees in their chosen field–even as states now refuse to pay for additional degrees–and seek out weekend and summer professional development opportunities at their own expense in order to remain certified.
“The activism practiced by these Guardians is not their sole focus as professionals–rather, these teachers blog at night after lessons have been planned, and kids put to bed, or on rare quiet weekend mornings and afternoons when a few minutes can be stolen from other tasks and responsibilities. And the conflict in which they are engaged is a non-linear war–they are fighting not just the Deformers, but also their support staff in their underground bunkers, typing away on banks of sleek laptops as they push back against kindergarten teachers furiously hammering out their frustrated rants on the ridiculousness of testing 6 year olds, or 3rd grade teachers pointing out the illogic of retaining 8 year olds who struggle with reading.”
The “Deformers” are well-paid. But the Guardians work not for money but for conviction.
“These writers and activists don’t receive a penny for their efforts, in stark opposition to the Deformers’ forces, who are stunningly well-compensated for their work. Instead, these bloggers often toil away in anonymity, providing a voice for the thousands of teachers that have been silenced for speaking out against the reform agenda.”
He provides a list for each side. My lists would be longer. Make your own lists or additions. I would certainly place ALEC, Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, John Kasich, Rick Scott, Rick Snyder, and a number of academics and philanthropists on the Deformer list.
To riff on a turn of phrase used by Bill Gates many years ago, in which he derisively put down some business competitors for only having “finite greed,” the so-called reformers unfortunately aren’t going anywhere, since their greed and will to power are infinite, and are enabled by the elected officials they purchase and use as ventriloquist dummies.
So-called reformers trumpet their “relentlessness,” and that is one of the very few honest statements they ever make. What they don’t mention is that they are relentless in the same way that vampires are, with insatiable appetites for public dollars and the power that follows from it.
This struggle isn’t going anywhere, and is not likely to be resolved by some kind of Grand Bargain. Teachers and supporters of public education aren’t going anywhere until the system is completely privatized, removed from any semblance of democratic control, every child fully monetized, and every teacher turned into an at-will temp. So-called reformers aren’t going anywhere until we drive a stake through their hearts, by repeatedly showing elected officials that there are politically fatal costs to enabling the edu-privateers.
Deception and lies to achieve ones goals. What ever happened to integrity and ethics? You don’t have to go to church every Sunday to see who they realy serve – but it helps.
I wonder if there will be some defectors from the “academics” or professorial ranks as these “innovations” start to reach public colleges and universities. That’s already happening- there is a lively debate in Ohio right now on universities “run like businesses” with top-heavy administrative ranks, funding cuts, lots and lots of outsourcing and privatization and cheap labor policies applied to instructors. “Market based” ed reform might be less appealing when it hits them where they work. The policies they promoted for K-12 public schools will reach colleges and universities, because this is an ideology. I wonder if they’ll continue to back it when it’s applied to them at big state universities.
It’s not that these market driven deforms will hit the universities, it’s that they are hitting the universities as we write.
” . . . because this is an ideology. . . ” Not ideology but idiology*.
*idiology (n.) An ideology based in falsehood and error. The ideology of idiots.
Chiara, there certainly are profs who simply go along with the 21st century way to universities. They get grants from the same actors like Gates, Pearson, and some others like Lumina and ETS, and they are highly motivated to do what they are told to do: they get into deanlet positions, faculty senate, provost, some even make it to president, and then they execute the strategic plan.
Most profs, I believe, don’t approve of the transformations, but profs typically react late, and even when they wake up, they don’t like to organize themselves. It’s below them.
As an example for how privatization is creeping in to public universities, lemme just tell you about one thing that happened just today at my university.
Namely, we just got a notification in the math department that from now on, we have to give credit for people taking some online math courses—14 of them. The issue is that the the online courses are offered by non-accredited private publishing companies like Pearson and Edx.
How did this arrangement come about? Via a $1.89 million grant from the Gates foundation. Were we, profs in the math department, consulted about this? Of course not.
In case anybody is curious, here is the list of courses; in parenthesis, you see the publisher’s name.
Mathematical Concepts
1. ACPE-0013 College Algebra (JumpCourse)
2. ACPE-0014 Statistics (Pearson)
3. ACPE-0015 Calculus I (Saylor Academy)
4. ACPE-0016 College Algebra (Saylor Academy)
5. ACPE-0017 Introduction to Statistics (Saylor Academy)
6. ACPE-0018 College Algebra (StraighterLine)
7. ACPE-0019 Pre-Calculus (StraighterLine)
8. ACPE-0031 Introduction to Differential Equations (edX)
9. ACPE-0032 Introduction to Statistics (JumpCourse)
10. ACPE-0033 College Algebra (Pearson)
11. ACPE-0040 General Calculus I (StraighterLine)
12. ACPE-0041 General Calculus II (StraighterLine)
13. ACPE-0137 Linear Differential Equations (edX)
14. ACPE-0138 Nonlinear Differential Equations: Order and Chaos (edX)
The point is: we, live profs at a PhD granting, 4 year college, got replaced by non-accredited private companies’ online courses, and we had absolutely no saying into this.
Claims about “the education wars” ending are bogus of course; an insider gambit to calm the boiling waters to protect Presidential election season from having to deal with difficult truths. Forcing k-12 wars off the table was enabled by Randi/Lily of AFT/NEA who quickly forced Hillary down the throats of their unions despite H offering no plan or promises to relieve 4 mil union members and the 50 mil kids under attack from billionaires in public schools. Democratic Party agents Randi/Lily earned their seats at the table by forcing k-12 off the table. Parent uproar not likely to stop but Dems now have a year to change the subject and manage Hillary into office, with Biden withdrawing not for family reasons but conveniently just after H “won” the Dem debate where Bernie refused to call her out on her career of voting wrong(joining Bush for Iraq War, for example, when no evidence for WMDs was obvious), and Bernie continues to obey Dem Party rule of never mentioning Hillary by name in his remarks, and Bernie also fails to come up with an education platform equal to the task of rescuing public schools from the private war decimating them. We are witnessing a well-financed media strategy to clear the path for Hillary, and the desperate situation in k-12 can’t be allowed to clutter that yellow brick road.
There is another category of participants in the disasterous policies of early 21st century education in the United States. These participants are the go-along-to-get-along workers in education who have classroom and other relevant experience in addition to advanced degrees in education. These participants are the GAGAs. Some are in teacher education. Many of them are members of professional associations such as those organized around school social workers, school counsellors, math educators, science, educators, early childhood educators, elementary and secondary principals, and up the line with the Council of. Chief State School Officials, CCSSO, among the most eager to be GAGAs.
I think many of these groups have been so infected with the propaganda campaigns, and so eager to go along with absurdity and behind the scenes policy formation groups, and the false prestige of being aligned with a movement backed by billionaires that they have literally lost their minds…meaning critical capacity to say no, this is nonsense, this defies logic, it totally at odds with our collective experience and expertise.
These enablers of nearly two decades of deeply flawed and fraudulent claims help to explain why, for example, the Common Core State Standards, were not stopped dead in their tracks as another version of the three R’s, more spin that substance. The CCSS came with unparalleled rules from a self-appointed group of Washington insiders who said, use these standards verbatim, they are not a menu for picking and choosing.
Those perfectly outrageous stipulations should have been greeted with massive professional ridicule and disobediance, but there was not much there there.
Now add the absurdities of “college and career readiness” as the defining purposes of education with only an occasional whisper of attention to life beyond going to college and getting a job.
There was not just silent assent to this truncated view of education, but an easy incorporation of that rhetoric into almost every nook and cranny of. Educational research and practice, as if the phrase had been forwarded by some consensus of experts. Not true at all. There was no distinction between community college to earn a certificate for repair of heating and air conditioning and readiness for Harvard or Yale, or majoring in film versus a language such as Chinese, or heaven forbid, choosing something like a “multidisciplinary” major–which it the first choice for the highest scoring students on the SAT.
In any case, I have been looking at the 1,620 Common Core State Standards, including those for literacy in science,social studies/history, and so called “technical subjects” That is the dumpster category where the framers of this “vision” of world class education placed studies in the arts and what they regarded as career preparation or leftovers including I suppose, the humanities.
As a long time worker on behalf of arts education in school, I have looked in vain for any outrage at that pre-emptive classification of studies in the arts as if they were merely “a technical subject.” None. The GAGA effect allows the arts to become part of the dumping ground for anything that the incompetent framers of the Common Core and mantra of college and career standards decided upon with no rationale and no obvious consultation with persons with some expertise in the arts and education in the arts.
This is the GAGA effect, and as you look across standards in social studies, in science, in the arts, and in social work and in school counseling you will find more evidence of the GAGA effect. The result for social work and school counseling is evident in “standards” thoroughly infected with the vision of education as focused on college and career readiness, and the need for grit, sucess in life portrayed as the result of perseverance, systematic planning, and decisions thoroughly rationalized to produce “intended outcomes.” Counseling and social work has been stripped free of a clinical focus on individual students in favor schemes intended to integrate “social/emotional learning STANDARDS” into the college and career agenda.
New standards in the arts are infused with connections to the Common Core State Standards in addition to the so-called 21st Century Skills offered up as a slogan by a lobbiest for the tech industry.
The swooning enthusiasm for the 21st Century Skills came from the mere I nclusion of the word “creativity,” a not entirely straightforward concept, not really a skill, but almost banned from discussions and policies organized to ensure strictly academic and rigorous instruction along with non-stop testing and the angst-ridden “targets for test scores” introduced through No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top policy makers.
I am 80, and angry, but hopeful that more and more of the the GAGAs in education not only wake up to their role in empowering the ideological control of education by lies, intimidation, and far more spin than substance but also join the growing resistance to the mindlessness promoted as if wise, prudent, and just.
I believe you’re being too kind, Laura, by calling these people GAGAs.
In practice, they are amoral opportunists, and are quite willing to use their colleagues’ throats as rungs on the ladder of career advancement.
With all apologies to Ambrose Bierce, from the Devil’s Dictionary of Education:
Going Along to Get Along (GAGA): Nefarious practice of most educators who implement the edudeformers agenda even though the educators know that those educational malpractices will cause harm to the students and defile the teaching and learning process. The members of the GAGA gang are destined to be greeted by the Karmic Gods of Retribution upon their passing from this realm.
and:
Karmic Gods of Retribution: Those ethereal beings specifically evolved to construct the 21st level in Dante’s Hell. The 21st level signifies the combination of the 4th (greed), 8th (fraud) and 9th (treachery) levels into one mega level reserved especially for the edudeformers and those, who, knowing the negative consequences of the edudeformers agenda, willing implemented it so as to go along to get along. The Karmic Gods of Retribution also personally escort these poor souls, upon their physical death, to the 21st level unless they enlighten themselves, a la one D. Ravitch, to the evil and harm they have caused so many innocent children, and repent and fight against their former fellow deformers. There the edudeformers and GAGAers will lie down on a floor of smashed and broken ipads and ebooks curled in a fetal position alternately sucking their thumbs to the bones while listening to two words-Educational Excellence-repeated without pause for eternity.
“The CCSS came with unparalleled rules from a self-appointed group of Washington insiders who said, use these standards verbatim, they are not a menu for picking and choosing. Those perfectly outrageous stipulations should have been greeted with massive professional ridicule and disobedience, but there was not much there.”
Another red flag that should have stopped this dead in its tracks was the insane provision that the Common Core standards could NEVER be revised and improved.
No feedback mechanism. No chance for change. CC = Cast in Concrete. This was the epitome of arrogance and unthinkable to any experienced teacher. Yet professional educators (esp administrators) just stood in the Kool Aid line lapping it up like thirsty dogs.
I
Laura writes “I am 80, and angry, but hopeful that more and more of the the GAGAs in education not only wake up to their role in empowering the ideological control of education by lies, intimidation, and far more spin than substance but also join the growing resistance to the mindlessness promoted as if wise, prudent, and just.”
Actually, it’s amazing to me that people close to 80 still have the drive to be mad.
As for profs at teacher training programs at universities: my personal experience shows no promise whatsoever, but maybe somebody here can report good news about fighting spirit not concentrated to single individuals.
It would be great to hear about a whole ed department that issued a statement against privatozation, CC and such.
Wierdlmate, I confess that I am 77. Something that Janis Joplin sang about freedom means nothing left to lose. You get that when you get to be old enough that you don’t long for something that someone can give you, like a job, an appointment….
Yeah, Diane, Laura, on the other side of the Ocean, over the Mediterranean, the Cretan poet Kazantzakis said it this way
“I expect nothing, I fear no one, hence I am free.”
Of course, in reality, there’s always something to fear. Kazantzakis knows this and says
“A person needs a little madness, or else they never dare cut the rope and be free.”
(quoting with respect!)
My comment on Robinson’s post:
And there are many more bloggers, activists, parents, students and teachers like Laura Chapman, who is one of the most astute commentators on these educational “wars” around-Peggy Robertson being another. And there are many many more. The “guardians” have the numbers and truth on their side while the “deformers” have the oligarchs-money and media on theirs. The truth will win in the end!
What’s interesting about the “Davids”-the practicioners-in this fight for the future of free, open to all,and democratically run public community schools is that, having met with most of them at the NPE conferences, they are down to earth, down home, humble individuals who have taken it upon themselves to do battle with the “Goliaths” of the edudeformer world. They didn’t start the fight but they surely will help end it in favor of the everyday Joe and Jane students who are suffering mightily under the educational standards and standardized testing malpractices, the quantification and monitization of public education by/of the supposed “elite” policy makers.
I guess there is no room for parents and students in this “war”??? you know, the people who are supposed to just passively accept whatever is dished up in the schools, classrooms cos we dont know what we want/what’s best for our own kids? and of course, kids dont have a clue, do they? (sark)… and then there’s that other group who have no say —- the TAXPAYERS….. you know — me, you and our neighbours who actually PAY for all of this… those people whose hard earned dollars the deatheater deformers are manipulating so hard to siphon off into their own back pockets….
and the final ‘entity’ in this equation is the FUTURE…. which also has contained within it those vexing questions we’ve been avoiding —- just what IS education? what is it FOR? WHO is it for? WHAT should it be accomplishing?
If we want to talk about war (as we should), let’s stop calling the enemy by their sweet preferred name or even by any deformation of it. Let’s call them what they really are: School Take Over Movement Personnel, STOMP. Gates is a STOMP, Duncan is a STOMP, Barbic is a STOMP… They all stomp on our schools, our children, our teachers, our democratic principles.
The “guardians” will hopefully stomp them out soon.
tangentially relevant:
Bill Gates: ‘The Private Sector Is Inept’ – Only Socialism Can Save Our Planet
http://www.liberalamerica.org/2015/10/27/bill-gates-the-private-sector-is-inept-only-socialism-can-save-our-planet/
oh this is rich…. really, really RICH… coming from the RICHEST man on the planet who made his PROFIT in capitalism…. who’s working his arse off to PRIVATISE public education….
as Chomsky said: “a basic principle of modern state capitalism is that costs and risks are socialised to the greatest extent possible, while profit is privatised”
and here is Bill, at this moment of global ecological crisis (which could trigger near term human extinction), STILL trying to make bank by socialising the risk, privatising the profit to be made (by him and his buddies) in saving our habitat/species …. arsehole plutocrat…. the hypocrisy is thick enough to choke us all to death – literally….
Where’s the like button when I need it?
Guess I’ll have to settle for the like button on this blog: TAGO!
Actually, Duane, there *is* a like button. When you go to your profile, and look at notifications, you’ll see it.
There is a distinct distaste among those who want to make their living as an education “reformer” for anger and pointed critique. Most folks who go into education do so with the conviction that they can–through sheer determination and the “right” policy levers– bring us all together.
It’s no surprise that you can put twenty people from divergent foundations and non-profits together in a room and have them come up with a brilliant document about the whole child, opportunity for all, and rich, vibrant curriculum. It’s been done hundreds of times–sometimes brilliantly, like the Bolder, Broader coalition.
The trick is undoing the forces of privilege and habit that are actually running the show.
Here’s my take on the same Chaltain piece Mitch Robinson is commenting on: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teacher_in_a_strange_land/2015/10/are_there_edu-tribes_are_they_at_war_whos_winning.html
I see a connection between the preceding post, “…Southern Hospitality” and this post.
A former TFA State Chair from south of the Mason Dixon line, was interviewed for a magazine article. She described a community member, presumably from a high poverty school in the south as, “…wearing his own suit”. What are the odds that Gates has ever been described as, “wearing his own suit”?