Grover “Russ” Whitehurst was ousted from his job as head of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution. Whitehurst had previously been research director of the Institute of Education Sciences in the George W. Bush administration. He was, of course, a big supporter of testing and choice. He even created an annual ranking of the districts with the most school choice. He gave Brookings, once known as a liberal think tank, a rightwing gloss.
In 2012, Whitehurst fired me as a Senior Fellow at Brookings, an unpaid position. I had been at Brookings since 1993. From 1993-95, I was in residence and wrote a book there on national standards. I had originally been offered the Brown Chair at Brookings but turned it down because I wanted to return to Néw York City.
Whitehurst said he was removing me from my unpaid position because I was “inactive.” At the time, my book “Death and Life of the Great American School System” was ranked as the #1 social policy book on amazon. Inactive? Hardly.
The day I was terminated, I posted on the Néw York Review of Books blog a piece that was highly critical of Mitt Romney. Whitehurst was a Romney adviser. A few hours later, I received an email from Whitehurst saying I was no longer a Senior Fellow due to my inactivity. He later said there was no connection between my anti-Romney post and his decision to drop me from a post I had held for many years, without any notice or conversation.
It will be interesting to see who replaces Whitehurst, whether liberal, conservative, neoliberal, neoconservative.

What a pity! (snark alert) Now if someone would only remove him as a senior fellow…
LikeLike
jeeze!
LikeLike
We’ll keep our fingers crossed that the next person appointed will be a voice of reason.
Ellen #WhatComesAroundGoesAround
LikeLike
Wait–you were “inactive” when I’ve never even heard of him or am aware of any contribution he’s made IN HIS LIFE to public education?
But it had nothing to do with your anti-Romeny post… I sense he was either lying to you or lying to himself when he told you that. Right before he went to church on Sunday, probably.
LikeLike
His prior scholarship in emergent literacy, oral language development and Dialogic Reading are famous but known primarily amongst Early Childhood Educators because they focus on preschool age children. Some programs based on his work made out like bandits from their use in Early Reading First and adoption by both private programs and school districts. I don’t know if he receives royalties.
LikeLike
Thank you Dr. Ravitch for your earnest story.
This thread has convinced me that MOST of political authority people DO NOT have true CONSCIENCE to serve public interest as they pledge in their platform of election.
i was an electrician in a lab of 18 men, and I was the only Asian female. It was a challenged period of time for me who was set up to be electrical shock or killed as per industrial accident many occasions.
If God and Angels have already saved me from danger twice in ocean, many times on driving on highway for the past 35 Canadian winter weather, then bad people’s intention of harming me will backfire on them indeed. Back2basic.
LikeLike
Ah May, you held a hand up to their sun.
You have to tell me, someday, about that water experience !
LikeLike
Whitehurst is known among early childhood educators for his work in emergent literacy, oral language development, and dialogic reading. He may be less known, however, for his persistent and misguided critique of universal prekindergarten, based, on what he perceives, as its lack of cost-effectiveness. Here’s my response to him: “Russ Whitehurst’s One-Man Crusade Against Early Childhood Education,” at my blog: http://www.ecepolicymatters.com/archives/2026
LikeLike
Exactly. Thanks for the link to your blog post. Whitehurst lost my respect long ago for those very reasons.
LikeLike
A uniquely unconvincing reply. Saying someone doesn’t live in this century doesn’t count as evidence against a fairly common sense point: that one or two tiny and flawed studies from several decades ago, involving enormously expensive programs, in no way prove that a universal program in 2015 is either necessary or cost-effective.
LikeLike
Au contraire, troll WT. Susan’s points were strong.
Preschool should not be seen as an inoculation against the ravages of poverty, especially when there are no booster shots after age 4 for children who are growing up in ghettos and attending under-resourced, segregated schools.
Corporate “reformers” in both parties have no intention of addressing poverty, so they make false promises that education is THE ticket out, while to them, and clearly to you, the less money spent on education the better. “You get what you pay for.”
LikeLike
The tragic irony here is that the very people who are against raising taxes on the rich, which is needed to pay for equitable funding of public education and to redistribute the wealth in our grossly inequitable society that is dominated by only 1% of the population, have exercised the oversized power that they purchased from corrupt politicians in order to redistribute tax dollars that are earmarked for public education to themselves, by way of privatizing public schools with public funds and taking advantage of the New Markets Tax Credit.
What a huge scam is playing out across our country, courtesy of the big government that protects and enables the rich –which those very same people claim to not want. Whitehurst belongs to a small but very powerful army of corrupt, wealthy liars.
LikeLike
KARMA!!!
LikeLike
What you said.
Or as some would put it: what goes around, comes around.
Mr. Whitehurst fits the rheephorm profile perfectly: very short-term self-serving thinking without regard for long-term consequences.
For example, ignoring something as basic as: be nice to the people you meet on the way up; they’re the same people you meet on the way down.
And if I just happen to meet him on his way down…
Well, I’ll just have to quote two of his favorite Marxist philosophers—
Zeppo: The garbage man is here.
Groucho: Well, tell him we don’t want any.
😎
LikeLike
KrazyTA,
Thank you for your injection of Marxist (Groucho and Zeppo) humor! Always appreciated!
LikeLike
Always glad to help out someone that is “shrill” and “strident” for a good cause.
¿?
You know, like the following promoter of another lost cause:
“I am in earnest, I will not equivocate, I will not excuse, I will not retreat a single inch, and I will be heard.”
BTW, does anyone know if that William Lloyd Garrison fella ever succeeded in whatever he was doing? I didn’t see anything on that in the CCSS ‘closet’ reading…
😎
LikeLike
“\uD83D\uDE0E”
I can’t stand it any longer! What the heck does “this” mean?
LikeLike
Whitehurst has become a liar –and a very poor one at that. I used to respect his scholarly work but what he has written on high from the belief-tank demonstrates that he cherry picks whatever he thinks will support his contentions and ignores all else. That is losing “perspective” on “all objective criteria.” and propaganda, or lying through your teeth in order to advance your cause, not scholarship, so I think his fall from grace is very well deserved.
LikeLike
Revenge is a dish best enjoyed cold. You go girl!
LikeLike
Given Romney’s failure as a candidate for prez, your ideas were widely shared:)
LikeLike
Here’s a carefully written piece that (essentially!) says there’s no real debate in education reform, because the big funders so totally dominate 🙂
“The paper’s authors attribute part of the funders’ success to the framing of preferred policy positions as “evidence-based,” and therefore, politically neutral. Reckhow and Tompkins-Stange point out that this approach often has the effect of sidelining some stakeholders in the education debate. They conclude that rather than convergent funding strategies, in which money coalesces behind one viewpoint, funders should instead strive to facilitate a robust debate over education policy that takes a wide range of perspectives into consideration.”
I love the assumption that Gates and Broad WANT to fund a “robust” debate, they have just somehow mistakenly funded only the policy approaches they favor. I;m sure they’ll correct that omission and hire some people they disagree with. Yeah, right.
Maybe if we ask them really nicely they’ll allow a real debate.
http://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2015/3/24/school-masters-how-gates-and-broad-came-to-shape-the-educati.html#.VRHtVkNqM24.twitter
LikeLike
Politically neutral and evidence-based. Up is down and down is up. Gates and many of its peers are fully engaged in “policy-based evidence making” which is the exact opposite of what they claim they are actually doing.
LikeLike
Cry me a river.
LikeLike
As far as I can tell, today, so-called liberals, conservatives and neoconservatives are ALL neoliberals, with allegiances only to each other, free markets, billionaires and personal gain, while turning a blind eye to the millions of people who are struggling for a place in the middle class.
LikeLike
I BELIEVE in KARMA.
LikeLike
“It will be interesting to see who replaces Whitehurst, whether liberal, conservative, neoliberal, neoconservative.”
Is there any middle ground in these labels? Should there be? What is ideal in standing up for public education?
LikeLike
I’m an independent and I like the education platform of the Green Party, which calls for No Child Left Behind to be repealed and states,
“We also call attention to the results of a quarter century of corporate funding from the likes of the Bradley and Wal-Mart Family Foundations and a decade of No Child Left Behind — a vast, well-endowed and lucrative sector which seeks to dismantle, privatize, or militarize public education and destroy teachers unions. Regimes of high-stakes standardized testing and the wholesale diversion of resources away from public schools are provoking crises for which the bipartisan corporate consensus recommends school closings, dissolution of entire school districts and replacement by unaccountable, profit-based charter schools. The Green Party is unalterably opposed to the dissolution of public schools and the privatization of education.”
http://www.gp.org/what-we-believe/our-platform/17-platform/39-ii-social-justice#education
LikeLike
Looks like that man finally deserves what he’s got. No sympathy whatsoever. Flush it down in the toilet.
LikeLike
I think Diane Ravitch should replace Grover Whitehurst!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
I used to respect all that you had to say, Diane. Now I respect maybe half of what you have to say. But, your “firing” from Brookings was indicative of Russ Whitehurst’s passive aggressiveness, and not justified.
Essentially, he hires graduate students from Harvard–mostly Paul Peterson’s students–to write reports, that typically claim to be the first ever to study topics that hundreds of other–lesser, non-Harvard scholars–have already well studied. Ultimately, by dismissing the existence of most of the relevant research literatures, he has subtracted more useful information from the collective working memory than he has added.
Apparently he reflexively hired any Paul Peterson (Political Science Professor at Harvard) student that Paul Peterson suggested he hire and published whatever they wrote. Was he capable of original thought? Certainly he betrayed his own profession of psychology by dismissing ALL of its contributions to the relevant issues, and adopting any contributions, no matter how sophomoric or ill-informed, of a few universities’ economics and political science departments.
It is interesting that the cabal that controlled him like a puppet is now the most upset that he was canned. My hope is that he will be replaced by someone non-censorial about the full width and depth of education research and not beholden to the censorial Peterson-Finn-Hanushek-etc clique and any research that they do not personally prefer. There are very few independent voices left in the “education reform” crowd, but it would behoove Brookings to make the effort to find one of them.
Richard P. Phelps
LikeLike
Hooha!
Cabals at work in academia??
Down in lower ed,it is just scumbags!
Susan Lee Schwartz
http://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
LikeLike