Matthew Tully of the Indianapolis Star calls on Republicans to stop their war against state Superintendent Glenda Ritz. Ritz was elected in 2012, handiy beating incumbent Tony Bennett despite his 10-1 spending advantage. Since her election, the Republican Governor Mike Pence and Legislature and state board have done everything possible to undercut Ritz. Pence even created a rival education agency to bypass Ritz and the state education department.
Now the Governor and Legislature want to abolish her office, nullify the election, and turn the position into a gubernatorial appointment.
Matthew Tully says this is ill-advised. He favors an appointed office but thinks it would be wrong to do it in the current climate. She was elected fair and square. She got more votes than Governor Pence.
“Such a move would infuriate educators and others across the state and worsen what has been a toxic period in state education policy. It would be a slap in the face to voters who elected a Democratic superintendent in 2012, one who many GOP bosses, and the Indiana Chamber of Commerce’s leaders, do not like….
“If you think the debate has been ugly of late — with state Board of Education meetings topping anything you’d find in a room full of sugared-up preschoolers — imagine what would happen if already frustrated educators and their supporters statewide see their votes steamrolled by a Republican legislative supermajority.
“Any benefit would be greatly overwhelmed by the ill will the move would inspire, and by the message it would send. In a state where no leaders are calling for the appointment of currently elected (and Republican-held) offices like treasurer and auditor, this would be a straight-up bully move. And it would backfire in a bad way on Republicans by giving the same voters who worked so hard against Bennett in 2012 a reason to get motivated for 2016.
“Yes, the change would likely guarantee fewer of the fights we’ve seen between Gov. Pence’s education appointees and Ritz’s office. And, yes, it would allow the state to have greater alignment at the top when it comes to setting an education vision. But that’s all worthless if the people on the ground — Indiana’s teachers — feel abused, and if voters feel betrayed”
“Anyone who thinks Indiana’s schools can be improved in any real way without the buy-in of its educators is living in a policy bubble and not a classroom.”

“If you think the debate has been ugly of late — with state Board of Education meetings topping anything you’d find in a room full of sugared-up preschoolers.”
I don’t know exactly what his intentions were, but that was a pretty ugly insult. He’s comparing concerned educators and parents who want their voices heard at BoE meetings and who are angry that they’re not being heard with children on a sugar-high? I agree with him on the very narrow point in this article, but don’t mistake Mr. Tully (much less the Indy Star) for a friend of public education.
LikeLike
BTW, note that “fewer of the fights we’ve seen between Gov. Pence’s education appointees and Ritz’s office” and “fewer of the fights we’ve seen between Gov. Pence’s education appointees and Ritz’s office” are taken as good things in an of themselves.
LikeLike
Arg, the second quote should have been “allow the state to have greater alignment at the top when it comes to setting an education vision”.
LikeLike
Absolutely agree, Dienne. I’ve got Tully’s number, and it ain’t a line for Public Education.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lloyd Lofthouse and commented:
A perfect example of how the GOP achieves it’s goals and the goals of its private sector supporters by the subversion of democracy and cutting out the voters, who already said what they want when they voted.
LikeLike
Agree.
LikeLike
How can they simply abolish positions and make appointments? It boggles the mind. They move the line in the sand, the public legally crosses over it with their vote, and the politicians again move the line, or eliminate the line, and shove their agenda and their anointed ones down your throats. Maybe we should just forget about democracy at all, when it doesn’t seem to matter to those in power. I honestly thought Cristie didn’t get elected last time around but no matter the votes, he was the anointed one. Is it all a fix? Do the politicians think the public is so damned stupid that it would not realize a switch-a-roo to circumvent their vote occurred? They go behind closed doors, often at the eleventh hour, and bang out regulations favorable to vouchers and charters and harmful to public schools and teachers and students and parents, and we have to eat it. So Ritz beat the big money, and the powers that be want her out anyhow. Its amazing. Like Rheeject’s husband’s recent move to be the super mayor, and that didn’t fly either because, thank God, it was put to the public’s vote. If the powers in power could do whatever they wanted to, they certainly would. Give them an inch, and they think they are rulers of everyone and everything. Why is the war against Ritz not national news, an expose on how politicians behave badly and try to circumvent elections?
LikeLike
As a Hoosier, I am appalled by what is happening to “education” in our state. I retired 21 years ago, could not take it any longer and it has gone downhill from there. Politicians usurping the rights of educators.
Like the teacher whose letter “I quit” went viral, and hit a sore spot with so many teachers everywhere I am well aware of the “disgruntlement” – that word is FAR too weak, of teachers in our state.
I talked to our school board last night to try to fire them up to fight back but it takes more intestinal fortitude than they have and they have limited audience participation to 3 minutes. WOW. Talk about free speech and suppression of ideas!!!
Now Indiana has a Republican house, senate, and government.
I guess our school systems HAVE failed to educate. But the impetus for corporate schools is NOT the answer.
Do they not believe in the efficacy of democratic [small d] anymore?
LikeLike
is there a summary available anywhere regarding the pros and cons about elected state commissioners, versus appointed? I only know of Indiana and California having elected commissioners….We need a new one in Missouri….the state board is appointed by the governor, approved by legislators, but they are the ones who choose the commissioner…..public radio just gave a guest spot for a confluence charter person to lobby for….getting someone like the nicastro, who is leaving big messes…..are there other states which elect commissioners…….there is probably no real good answer as to what is the best way for states to name commissioners.
LikeLike
NASBE continues to update this information in a report on school governance. The pdf is posted on their site here: http://www.nasbe.org/education-issue/education-governance/
LikeLike
Here in Nevada the law was changed a few years ago. The state board and superintendent are appointed by the Governor. They now want to change the laws to appoint every district board. The Governor might just as well name himself the education dictator, the people have no voice, their wishes are ignored. More testing and bad policies from the Governor’s special adviser, she who will not be mentioned, are about to be implemented by our now tea party legislature. Joe, states should start by naming commissioners and superintendents that know something about education.
LikeLike
What is happening to the democratic philosophy on which are nation was founded! This article sadly speaks volumes. This is so outrageous but sadly typical in politics these days.
LikeLike
“The question isn’t who is going to let me; it’s who is going to stop me.”
This quote by Ayn Rand and was mentioned by Krazy TA:
LikeLike
This blog has done an excellent job of shining a light on the shenanigans in Indiana. Now finally the mass privatization of public resources in That archconservative state is getting news coverage beyond education blogs. That’s important. People who have ignored Indiana would be wise to start paying attention because the state is spawning some serious presidential hopefuls. http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/24552-the-ultra-right-wing-state-nobody-mentions
Sent from my iPhone
LikeLike
tully is no friend of teachers or public education. He is touting the plan put forward by a hubbard, one of those experts who helped GW bush ruin our economic system, and a person who has some real peculiar, mid-60’s attitudes towards special education students. tully and the indy star and are all about the ed reform movement. This appointment idea goes back to at least 98 when I put together the first real information for the legislature on the issue as they mulled the idea of doing this. It is all about little children not wanting to share and play well and they have the power to do this. At least in many states where the super is appointed the board is elected.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Dolphin and commented:
Here in Indiana, the Republicans, trying to usurp the Democratic process, are now trying to make Glenda Ritz’ position an appointed one. This after she won hands down. Matthew Tully is NOT for public education. And for some odd reason, the Indiana Chamber of Commerce has now supported the move to an appointed Superintendent. That should speak volumes as to what this is about. The Chamber of Commerce might as well be called the “screw you, I’ve got mine” Chamber.
LikeLike