Deregulation sounds like a swell idea. Get rid of all those government regulations and innovation will flourish. That’s the theory.
But many regulations serve important purposes, especially where taxpayer dollars are concerned; they screen out unqualified people; they monitor how the money is spent; they prevent frauds and scams. Take away regulation, take away government oversight, and the door will be open to the greedy and the opportunistic.
We saw that in the financial sector, where companies like Enron and Madoff used lax regulation to profit at the expense of investors.
When the same ideas of deregulation are imported from business to education, the conviction that an unfettered market will unleash innovation and success–the results are predictable. We should know by now that these principles don’t work in education (and some would argue that the spectacular collapse of the economy in 2008 proved they don’t work in business either.)
What the unfettered free market allows into education is unqualified leadership and lax oversight. How can anyone argue that this strategy will improve education? A few schools may prosper but many will flounder and fail.
Here is the story of FCI Academy charter school, which was founded by Bishop Edgar Allen Posey, his wife, and a third person. The campus is on the grounds of Bishop Posey’s church, the Living Faith Apostolic Church in Columbus. The school was in financial trouble, and it fired 17 staff members. It plans to open again this fall.
The fired teachers were skeptical:
“Some of the laid-off teachers doubted that kids will be getting a quality education next year at FCI.
“It’s just been mass chaos,” said Tina Geygan, who is one of the teachers let go. “We were having kids drop out like flies.”
“Annette McFarland, a middle-school science teacher at FCI who also was laid off, said she can’t see how the school could reopen in the fall.
“Just my own personal opinion, but I don’t know how they can,” having lost so many of the staff members, McFarland said.
“Blair Miller, who taught at the school under a one-year substitute-teaching license, said he can’t imagine the school hiring anyone for less than the former staff members were making. The father of three made $25,000 a year, putting him close to officially living in poverty.
“You can’t pay very much lower,” said Miller, 25, who took the FCI job right out of college with an education degree. “I’m going to be honest with you, I was hired to be paraprofessional, but I was teaching a full-time class.”
“Miller taught middle school language arts and math, he said.
“According to its 2012-13 state report card, FCI spent 44.8 percent of its revenue on classroom instruction, compared with a state average of 67.5 percent. The school met 6 out of 24 state performance standards, earning an F. It scored a D on its performance index, which gives credit for how many students scored well on proficiency tests despite the overall standards met.”
Bill Phillis of the Ohio Equity and Adequacy Coalition explains here what the failure of the FCI Academy charter school means for Ohio.
“FCI Academy charter school is another poster child to prompt state and federal agencies to expand investigations to all charter schools
The July 25 Dispatch article-Charter lays off 17 but plans to reopen-is about a charter school in financial trouble, but accompanying details in the article signal a need for a full-scale investigation.
FCI charter school is on the campus of Living Faith Apostolic Church in Columbus. It was founded by the Church’s leader, his wife and one other person. The Church leader’s wife is president of the school’s board. There may be something wrong with this picture. It doesn’t pass the smell test-Church leader’s wife is president of the board and the school is housed on Church property. 3314.03(A)(11)(c) of the Ohio Revised Code states: “The school will be nonsectarian in its programs, admission policies, employment practices, and all other operations, and will not be operated by a sectarian school or religious institution.”
In recent weeks the Horizon Science Academies, managed by Concept Schools, a Gulen Islamic-associated company, has been the target of state and federal investigations in Ohio and in many other states. Investigations should be extended to all charter schools beginning with the for-profits, such as White Hat, ECOT, Ohio Virtual Academy operated by K-12, Inc. and Imagine Schools.
Charter schools in Ohio spent over $900 million of funds belonging to public school districts. In most cases, there has been scant scrutiny of these publicly-funded, private, and in most cases, secretly-operated quasi-education organizations. It is time for ODE and the sponsors of these charter schools to give taxpayers the facts about these stealthy operations.
The governor’s office and the Ohio Department of Education, who have recently been concerned about four teachers and their role in exposing alleged illegal practices at a Dayton Gulen charter school, also need to explain how the FCI Academy is compliant with state laws that govern the formation, operation, and performance of schools that serve Ohio children. Hopefully the answer citizens receive about these questions is as swift as the attacks generated by the governor’s office and ODE on the four courageous charter school teachers and their role as whistleblowers.”
William Phillis
Ohio E & A
Join Our Mailing List!
Ohio E & A | 100 S. 3rd Street | Columbus | OH | 43215

“Take away regulation, take away government oversight, and the door will be open to the greedy and the opportunistic.”
Gee, you say that like it’s a bad thing….
LikeLike
I don’t know, i mean for the greedy it may not be a bad thing, but it depends on what kind of opportunist you are i suppose….
On a serious note though, it can be a bit much to think about. I heard a story not so long ago about a school that opened, but was trying their damnedest to stay away form regulation while still being a functional school. all that came of it was a student body bent on making money off of the school without reaping any form of educational benefit
LikeLike
“The father of three made $25,000 a year, putting him close to officially living in poverty.”
Well, look at the bright side, Diane.
He’s probably feeling very “empowered in the marketplace” and he’s not like those icky “assembly line” workers in Ohio’s public schools who belong to those low class and disreputable labor unions 🙂
It’s a race to the bottom on wages, basically.
He’d be making less than that if we didn’t have unionized teachers in public schools here. He’s essentially a free rider on a majority unionized work force.
Once our public employee unions are gone (due the diligent and tireless efforts of both Republicans and Democrats and a LOT of lobbyists) wages at schools will fall thru the floor. 25k may look princely by the time they’re done “reforming” this state.
LikeLike
I was wondering if “Democrats for Public Education” was legitimate or just an election season tactic by Democrats to pander to the public school supporters among their voters.
I was wary, because I noticed it had two former midwest governors, OH and MI, and those are states where support of labor and public schools would still be important to Democrats and where elections are hotly contested (unlike, say, NY, which is a lock for them). Also, I can’t help but notice we get zero support for public education until late July of an election year.
Ahem 🙂
Anyhow, I think it is just a tactic. I can’t find any evidence that they’re doing anything at all on “advocacy for public education” (although I hope they’re paying the intern who very occasionally Tweets on their behalf and he or she isn’t working free).
I wish I was wrong, but I don’t think I am. Here’s the twitter account. See what you think:
LikeLike
I agree. I am afraid they will say all the right things and then disappear after elections.
LikeLike
I’m reminded of Ledru-Rollin’s quote, “There go the people. I must follow them, for I am their leader.”
The leaders of Dems for Public Ed. will peel off from the rear flank, in mid-November. I’d love to be proved wrong.
LikeLike
MA:
“In a press release from the union, two teachers explained why they chose to join the Teamsters. Like most charter schools, AMSA hires teachers to one-year contracts and does not offer seniority. The school did not, until now, have to wrestle with the union to fire employees.
“A lot of key people, award-winning teachers, were let go. That decision cannot be made in five minutes in a back room so someone else can get the job. We need a process so that everyone can feel more protected,” said Lino Alvarez, a computer science and Web design teacher at AMSA.
“We looked at other unions, but decided the Teamsters was the best union for us.”
Jessica Bowen, who has worked at the school for six years, said in the press release: “I see how vulnerable workers can be without unions. I’m a history teacher, so I studied the labor movement, but in an academic sense. To see how it works firsthand is eye-opening. The Teamsters were so positive and every time we asked questions, we got answers. It felt right, like, we now have the support we needed.”
Where is Arne Duncan on this? Has he weighed in yet? Any contract provisions he objects to?
This might be a real dilemma for them in DC. I believe they’re still pretending they support private sector unions in DC, although I’m not even clear on that, honestly. What do you think? Private sector unions go under the ‘ol bus, too?
http://www.telegram.com/article/20140803/COLUMN73/308039953
LikeLike
Looks like politicians and lobbyists and 1%ers and the privateers won’t be happy until schools are totally deregulated and run like daycare centers, with uncertified “teachers.”
When curriculum is delivered online with clerks walking the floors, at minimum wage, with no health or pension benefits, they’ll cheer.
When every educational outlet is privately run, funded by corporate backers to start with, and listed on the stock exchange, then funded by pubic taxes, they’ll all cheer. Only since they will continue to go after the middle class and impoverish us all, we won’t even be able to pay taxes; there’ll be no jobs.
When that happens, according to their desires and plans, there will be no need for union busting as they’ll be gone; there will be no need to test the teachers or the kids, because the unions will be gone and no need to tie “results” to efforts to bust unions.
Teachers will not need degrees anymore, because lets face it, we already have enough kids who got out of college and are working now at minimum wage jobs (my kid was one of those for 3 years b/c cause…she is a TEACHER). She’ll lose that job soon enough, to be replaced by a clerk. Perhaps high schools can teach the kids how to push McDonald’s menu buttons and ring up Walmart registers.
Our future general of kids will all be as dumb as rocks, except for the lucky “rich” kids who attend “academy.” The only role the Broads, Kochs, Gates, etc., will have is to figure out how to further disenfranchise “the peasants” until we’re all living under a bridge in a cardboard box, lining up at some government store for a meal and an orange suit so we can be recognized as peasants. Whatta world. Rant over.
LikeLike
“Take away regulation, take away government oversight, and the door will be open to the greedy and the opportunistic.”
Don’t forget the criminals.
Or do am I being surepetitious?
LikeLike
“Unfettered greed will answer every need.”
So goes the [unspoken] mantra of the leaders of the charter/privatization movement.
No fetters at all. Excepting, of course, all the constraints and restraints that are put on those opposing such unbounded “disruptive innovation” by so many politicians that enable and protect those in mad dog pursuit of $tudent $ucce$$.
Fetters for thine but not for mine.
Just like what might be called the “education entitlement” mentality of edupreneurs and their edubully enforcers and educrat enablers and accountabully underling spin doctors: for the vast majority of students aka OTHER PEOPLE’S CHILDREN, mandated training in low-level skills and docility; for THEIR OWN CHILDREN, genuine teaching and learning and confidence in being the leaders of tomorrow.
So none of this nonsense for Harpeth Hall [Michelle Rhee] or Lakeside School [Bill Gates] or Delbarton School [Chris Christie] or U of Chicago Lab Schools [Rahm Emanuel].
No, as Dr. Candace McQueen of CCSS and Lipscomb Academy fame might say if she were channeling Leona Helmsley, “That’s only for the little people.”
Link: https://dianeravitch.net/2014/03/23/common-core-for-commoners-not-my-school/
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.”
The inmates are running the asylum.
😎
LikeLike
A few thoughts:
1. He would have financially been better off teaching is a Catholic school, where the pay starts out at $29,000 (dependent upon the diocese);
2. It’s a messed up world. The ethics of within all schools – public, private or charter is disgraceful at best.
LikeLike