Back in 2011, the Florida legislature decreed that every student must pass an online course as a graduation requirement. Was this decision based on research about the value of online learning? No. It was justified as a means of readying all students for an online workplace but there is as yet no solid evidence that students learn better online. Perhaps it was sheer coincidence that the legislature’s mandate coincided with former Governor Jeb Bush’s determination that digital learning was the wave of the future; Jeb launched a national campaign, well funded by the technology industry, to promote digital learning, including a high school graduation requirement to take at least one or two courses online or no diploma. Six states have since adopted Jeb’s propsal and require students to take at least one course online as a graduation requirement. That sold a lot of new hardware and software but there is still no evidence of its necessity or value.
The Orlando Sentinel found that many seniors are familiar with digital technology but they have not met their graduation requirement:
“More than 11,000 Central Florida 11th-graders — about 43 percent of the region’s juniors — have not yet passed an online course, even though they must do that to earn a diploma next year. The class of 2015 is the first to fall under the online-learning requirements the state adopted four years ago.
“Spencer Thompson, 16, met the requirement at his parents’ insistence, but he isn’t surprised many classmates have not.
“I think it’s forcing a lot of kids to do something they don’t want to do,” said the junior at Hagerty High School in Seminole County.
“Some teenagers think they learn better with an in-person teacher, Spencer said, and some have found it a hassle to fit an online course into their schedule. Online courses, he added, are a useful option — he’s taking a virtual math class next year — but shouldn’t be required.”
Now districts are scrambling to find ways to help students meet the requirement for virtual coursework. “Orange, Seminole and Volusia schools next school year will enroll any 12th-grader who hasn’t taken an online class in new “blended learning” economics or government courses.
“These courses will be taught during the school day, with a teacher at the helm, but at least 50 percent of their lessons — enough to meet the state’s requirement — will be delivered via computer. Because economics and government both are required for graduation and typically taken senior year, administrators have a captive audience and a way to make sure students meet the online rule.”
Some students don’t have a computer or Internet access at home. Some prefer face-to-face interaction with a teacher. For a time, students took their drivers education courses online, but “the Legislature later decided that would not count for the graduation rule.
“This year, lawmakers reversed themselves, so if Gov. Rick Scott signs the latest bill, starting in July students can again use an online driver’s education class to help earn their diploma.”
Really, it shouldn’t matter what course the student takes as long as the purpose of the mandate is filled: to divert more public money to private vendors.
In Maine, Jeb Bush’s “Digital Learning Now” campaign stalled when a local reporter wrote an award-winning story about the money trail connecting Bush’s Foundation for Educational Excellence, the tech vendors, and Maine politicians.

Jeb.
Pass the beer nuts.
LikeLike
“including a high school graduation requirement to take at least one or two courses online or no diploma.”
I have complete faith in the ability of people who make money off these products to sell them. Is there some reason politicians and lawmakers have to sell them too?
Good for the kids for being wary of Jeb Bush’s hard sell on the products he promotes. Next they can ask him why he went from selling these based on “efficiency” (read: cheaper) to selling them based on “personalized learning”. Why did he have to rebrand? Are these being pushed harder in lower income and middle class schools? Is that where the “efficiency” part comes in? That’s what we found out in Michigan, where the plan was to fund schools at the low, low price of 5k per student relying on the economies of online classes.
Hopefully they’ll retain these valuable consumer critical thinking skills they’re learning into adulthood. They’ll need them.
LikeLike
Our United States cannot take one more Bush. Sorry to tell you, Jeb, your daddy and brother have muddied the waters for you. “No Child Left Behind” has already done horrible damage to our educational system, which probably can never be reversed.
I am a Republican, and I will never vote for Jeb Bush. He makes me sick.
LikeLike
“Polling data indicates very little support among Michigan residents for the technology-based teaching concepts that were being discussed by a secretive “skunk works” group whose discussions became public about a month ago.
The group, comprised of state officials and private businessmen, had been working in secret since December on a low-cost, technology-based charter school concept that would use a funding system similar to vouchers.
While Gov. Rick Snyder denied any involvement with the group, several members of his administration, including the state’s chief information officer, participated in the group’s discussions. Snyder endorsed the group’s ideas on technology use in education during a virtual town hall meeting last month, saying he thought the increased use of technology to reduce the cost of education was “pretty cool.”
The poll indicated support for the group’s proposals was lacking, with 64 percent of those surveyed saying they opposed the plan to create technology-based charter schools designed to operate for less than the roughly $7,000 per pupil funding the state allocates to schools.
Snyder endorsed the group’s ideas on technology use in education during a virtual town hall meeting last month, saying he thought the increased use of technology to reduce the cost of education was “pretty cool.”
To reduce the cost of education. This was a coupla years ago, so he’s probably rebranded that to “personalized learning” because obviously this polling doesn’t look good!
Someone should ask Governor Snyder if he had real live teachers when he was in school, or whether adults decided that was too expensive and they didn’t really feel like paying for it. He’s wealthy and the governor of Michigan. How did he manage without a mandated online course?
http://www.mlive.com/education/index.ssf/2013/05/post_13.html
LikeLike
“In Maine, Jeb Bush’s “Digital Learning Now” campaign stalled when a local reporter wrote an award-winning story about the money trail connecting Bush’s Foundation for Educational Excellence, the tech vendors, and Maine politicians.” <– this is a mouthful.
There was another story about Jeb's foundation getting "ins" for computer based learning mills, and it said something like there is pushback, but Jeb makes them get a foot in the door. Seriously, Jeb needs to disappear.
LikeLike
My son wanted to take several electives last year and didn’t have room in his schedule, so he took an online geography class. I am a geography teacher, but even with that extra back-up, he HATED the class. He said the only thing he learned was to never take an online class again.
LikeLike
This is enough by itself for a call to arms. Who wants to be Paul Revere and spread the word about the corruption being spread by fake education reformers in the United States? Remember, Pearson is a UK company, so the new Paul Revere could also shout: “The British are Coming!”
LikeLike
Glad to hear legislators in Maine were a lot smarter (or at least had a little more integrity) than the idiots down here in Florida. Does anyone have a link to the article Diane is referring to from Maine??
LikeLike
The profit motive behind digital learning: a prize winning article about Jeb Bush and Maine: http://www.pressherald.com/news/virtual-schools-in-maine_2012-09-02.html?pagenum=full
LikeLike
In my professional opinion, this is the stupidest thing I have heard of (within the last 10 minutes re: education). I can barely self-monitor myself when taking online courses, etc. I can think of many of my juniors and seniors w/ learning differences that would really struggle with online courses. A few years ago, I had a few taking them because of scheduling conflicts. Disaster: accommodations ignored, inability to self-monitor, cover-ups by admin. to appease parents or to avoid being dinged for failure rates, etc.
LikeLike
From the Obama White House, 6.6.13–
Preparing America’s students with the skills they need to get good jobs and compete with countries around the world will rely increasingly on interactive, individualized learning experiences driven by new technology.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/06/06/president-obama-unveils-connected-initiative-bring-america-s-students-di
LikeLike
“Preparing America’s students with the skills they need to get good jobs and compete with countries around the world will rely increasingly on interactive, individualized learning experiences driven by new technology.”
It’s getting hot. Have some Kool-Aid….
LikeLike
I was forced by an administrator, against my will and against my better judgment, to “teach” an online Spanish class this year. It was a disaster. The kids got quite good at clicking buttons and answering questions on multiple choice quizzes, but at the end of the course, they could not carry on even the most rudimentary conversation in Spanish. There is a mindset that seems to be getting more and more prevalent in our culture that everything is better if you do it on a computer. That is absolutely NOT the case with learning a second language. The overwhelming body of research and best practices says that the best way to teach a second language is to have students use the target language in situations that are analogous to their every day lives, and that mimic the processes by which they acquired their first language. As wonderful as computers are as tools for communication and creativity, they cannot come close to doing those things. When it comes to learning a second language, there is no substitute for face-to-face communication in real-world situations.
But hey, the good news is that somewhere a corporate executive got ever so slightly richer off of the frustration and misery of my students.
LikeLike
I’m part of the first class that had to take these mandatory online classes, and I’ll be glad when it’s finally discarded (Jeb shouldn’t be surprised if he loses the youth vote for this election). I think they’re a great tool if a student really wants to take an online class, but they are useless for mandatory learning. There isn’t much these classes offer that can’t be found somewhere else; especially for the art and foreign languages that most kids seem to take.
LikeLike
FLVS is hilarious. My step daughter retook Three math courses, an English course, a science course, and a history course she flunked in high school through FLVS. She googled all of the answers. She even had a DBA cheat sheet to pass her DBAs. When she didn’t pass the DBAs, she just scheduled another one and cheated at that. Eventually she’d pass. She had As and Bs on every makeup course. The only reason she had Bs was that she asked the teachers to just give zeros on some assignments at the end so she didn’t have to turn the assignments in. Yes she is lazy. I really didn’t care if she cheated, because that is on her. We rarely use any of that stuff in real life, and she just won’t be able to have a career in those subjects she hates… plus she’s my step daughter, and we’re not that close… I did email FLVS and rat her out, but no one did anything, and no one responded. I expected they would proctor the exams, but NOPE.
LikeLike