Did it ever occur to you that what rural communities really need is a privately managed charter school to compete with the community school? Apparently the idea sounds swell to Andy Smarick, who doesn’t think that communities should have any public schools.
Smarick worked as deputy commissioner of education in Chris Christie’s administration in New Jersey and before that worked in the George W. Bush administration and for various Republican legislators and conservative policy centers. He currently works for Andrew Rotherham at Bellwether Education Partners.
He is a proponent of charters everywhere, as the report under review shows.
The review by Craig Howley of Ohio University for the National Education Policy Center is critical of the premise that rural areas need charter schools. Howley says:
“While it is presented in a fashion similar to scholarly research, serious omissions and distortions make New Frontier little more than a political lobbying document targeting rural regions (even the most urbanized states have rural regions). Especially problematic are the inadequate support or explanation for New Frontier’s premises and its presentation of superficial and misleading use of research, particularly rural education research. In the end, it is little more than an advocacy document with premises that predetermine its recommendations: how to establish more charter schools in rural regions. Missing research and slanted representations render the document useless as a source of objective information. New Frontier is propaganda—neither a thoughtful inquiry nor an honest report.”

I’m sort of looking forward to when they come into rural communities.
I will love to see the reaction when they opine on disbanding the elected school board, or turning public property over to private title. “Who owns the charter school?” should be an interesting debate. Right now, if I check the county recorder’s site. we own the public school. It’s titled in the names of the elected public entity, the school board, and the city.
Public schools mean more to people than contracted service providers for their individual child.
LikeLike
Of course Andy Smarick supports a charter school in every corner of the United States. The strip-mining of public education won’t be completed until every last dime is in the pocket of the plutocrats.
LikeLike
The Milkens are already out in front of the corporate privatization of rural school systems. Their organization NIET received a $40 million grant in 2012 from Dept of Ed to ‘expand scope’ of teacher incentives & improvement. Here is their press release:
http://www.niet.org/niet-newsroom/niet-press-releases/niet-expands-scope-with-new-teacher-incentive-fund-grants/
“NIET will serve as fiscal agent in partnership with the primarily rural Central Decatur and Saydel Community School Districts in Iowa; the Emily O. Goodridge-Grey Accelerated Charter School, Sojourner Truth Academy, Hmong College Prep Academy and the Partnership Academy in Minnesota; and Athens City Schools and Morgan County Schools in Tennessee, both rural districts.”
Morgan County is one of the poorest places in the country. It is located in a beautiful, remote area on the TN Plateau among free flowing streams & rivers. These people understand survival in the cold, snowy, mountains; not survival in the jaws of Wall St. finance.The communities are steeped in Appalachian Mountain traditions and culture.
Median income per household is $27,210/yr. 16% of their population lives below the poverty line. Most of the jobs in Morgan Co. are in a prison, education,state park services, and law enforcement.
These kind & trusting people have little experience with the high powered finance specialized by the Milken brothers. Athens City is just slightly more populated and and has a couple of small Colleges in it’s town. They, too have little experience with the world of high finance. How will our rural heritage survive the corporate cannibalism of our rural communities? Shame on Dept of Education for sanctioning these schemes on rural TN.
LikeLike
Does the US Department of Ed ever fund anything that isn’t geared to privatizing local schools?
Why not just turn the whole place over to the Fordham Foundation? They’re running it anyway.
I resent paying them to promote this agenda.
Also, this:
“Median income per household is $27,210/yr. 16% of their population lives below the poverty line. Most of the jobs in Morgan Co. are in a prison, education,state park services, and law enforcement.”
The idea that they need ed reformers to come in and replace local people who have these jobs is just outrageous. Why are they trying to outsource the few middle class jobs that remain in rural areas? This is their economy. How does pulling money out of rural areas and sending it God knows where help the kids who live in these places?
LikeLike
It seems that they did fund the charter school in Walton Kansas ( not to be confused with the Walton foundation)
Walton is a town of about 300 that saved their school by turning it into a charter. See the discussion below about how the efforts to close this charter will likely destroy this small town.
LikeLike
Education in our own, very rural area has been attacked by a Democratic governor ruthlessly wielding a consolidation ax (that continues on today); now Republican Governor LePage has slashed resources available to rural schools, ostensibly to divert them to distant charters to which our children would have no access (even if we wanted it!).
We have three children, and none of them have gone to school for one day when someone wasn’t peering into their modest classroom window looking for money either for their own schools (consolidation) or for these charters…
Public education is not a “product” for which people “shop”, that is governed by “consumers”. It is rightly a public good, invested in and governed by “citizens”. Sometimes I wonder if anyone remembers the difference, or cares.
Then I read your blog.
“Thank you” is woefully inadequate, but I am grateful.
LikeLike
Dear “atimberedchoir”,
I would like to quote you – your third paragraph is just what I want to say to our legislature next week. May I have your permission to do that?
Thank you,
apublicschoolteacher
LikeLike
Wow!
Of course you have my permission.
Honored,
atimberedchoir
LikeLike
Thank you very much, atimberedchoir!!
LikeLike
Good Morning– This is very interesting information. I have been conducting research in terms of the amount of money Pearson Publishing has contributed to political campaigns. I know a contribution was made to Governor Cuomo’s campaign . Since I live in New York I was mainly interested in contributions made to potential Governors in New York— now I am curious and would like to know if a large sum of money has been contributed to other Gubernatorial campaigns ( by Pearson) across the United States. Don’t you wonder if and what amount of a contribution could have been donated to. Chris Christie ??
LikeLike
Here’s some news to show how privatization is penetrating rural America: the VT legislature was so concerned over a nascent movement for privatization they are enacting a law to make it illegal to do so… through 2016… it’s a little more nuanced than having contractors come in, but boards are desperate to save $$$ and some of the citizenry has heard (and believed) reports about the wonders of privatization… Here’s the link to an article from the Burlington Free Press: http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2014303110032
LikeLike
Vermont has one of the nation’s longest running school choice programs but it is very unequal. Only families living in towns without a school are allowed to choose a different public school…unless of course they are wealthy and can afford to pay tuition elsewhere.
LikeLike
Not exactly… There are 90 towns that have no HS and are not in SUs or SDs. In those towns parents choose the HS that makes the most sense for their child based on geography and/or curriculum… Some of those 90 towns have no schools at all, in which case the parents have K-12 choice… the 90 towns have varied practices in terms of paying tuitions… some towns will pay whatever the “receiving school’s” tuition is; others will pay only what the state average is, providing the parent with a de facto voucher… how much tuition the district charges is determined at town meeting… Long story short: it is a very idiosyncratic system that calls out for a fix of some kind…
LikeLike
Thanks for supplying addiitional details. I agree with you that the Vermont system is inequitable – some rural families have options, some don’t.
LikeLike
Also, someone should tell the DC people that “teacher” isn’t a low status job in rural areas.
Teaching jobs are sought-after positions. We don’t really need them to “elevate” teachers. They were never demeaned and devalued here.
LikeLike
Now, Disne, you’re going to hurt Andy’s feelings. I know that my writing does.
LikeLike
Sorry about the typo, Diane.
LikeLike
Here is a rural charter:https://w-usd373-ks.schoolloop.com/cms/page_view?d=x&piid=&vpid=1317989000065
LikeLike
Rural charters are a terrible idea. In rural communities and small towns, the public school is the hub of the community. Why would you want the community support divided? International studies have shown that one of the elements of successful school systems is strong community support. When the community–especially a small community–battles over space, facilities, and resources, it does not help the schools or the children.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch,
You might want to look into this one a bit more. This rural charter SAVED the local elementary school, which was going to be closed by the school district. No divided community support here, unified community support behind the charter.
Here is a video on Walton:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQT2uwDXcF0
LikeLike
TE, I do not consider the Walton Foundation to be a credible source on anything regarding education, privatization, public education, what’s best for kids.
LikeLike
The name of the town is Walton. From what I’ve seen, the Walton Foundation appears to have nothing to do with this charter, which was funded with money from the Charter Schools Program operated by the U.S. Department of Education.
LikeLike
I still see no value in rural charters. I believe in the bedrock democratic tradition of public education, paid for (as John Adams said) by the people and controlled by the people, not by benefactors or hedge fund managers.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch,
Walton is a town of 300 people that was going to close it’s elementary school because enrollment had fallen to 84 students. The community wanted it’s school saved, and becoming a charter was the way to save it. I have no idea why you think this school is not controlled by the people in the town and why you think it has anything at all to do with hedge fund managers.
It looks like another school in Oswego has started another agricultural based charter school (in a K-8 school where enrollment fell to 42 students and managed to keep the school open by maintaining enrollment of 50 to 70. Here is a link: http://www.usd504.org/vnews/display.v/ART/503ada7be83e7
LikeLike
Fortunately rural families all over the US have charter options. They sometimes have been used to counter consolidation, which deprived some rural communities of the school that was “their hub.” They sometimes have been used to create distinctive options to the traditional school.
Some of the most exciting progressive rural charters are part of the progressive, project based EdVisions collaborative.
http://www.edvisions.com/custom/SplashPage.asp
LikeLike
The full byline of “A New Frontier: Utilizing Charter Schooling to Strengthen Rural Education” lists Bellwether Education Partners, J.A. and Kathryn Albertson Foundation, and the Rural Opportunities Consortium of Idaho.
The consortium is funded by the Albertson Foundation and counts among its members Andy Smarick, Mary Wells, and Andrew J. Rotherham of Bellwether Education Partners, along with Terry Ryan, the newly appointed president of the Idaho Charter School Network and formerly VP for Ohio Programs at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. The Albertson Foundation’s chairman of the board is Joseph B. Scott, an early investor in K12, Inc. who made millions when the company went public. The Albertson Foundation is the primary proponent of school reform in Idaho, spending millions in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent the so-called “Luna Laws” from being repealed through ballot initiatives in 2012 and continuing to spend millions on a massive ad campaign called “Don’t Fail Idaho,” which promotes the usual reform initiatives (charters, vouchers, standardized testing, value-added measurement, and union busting).
Apparently, Smarick and his hedge-fund cronies at Bellwether are eager to see if the returns on investment made possible by the New Markets Tax Credit Program are as lucrative for charter-school investors and operators in poor rural towns as they have been for investors and operators of charters in poor urban neighborhoods. Terry Ryan’s legacy as an architect of Ohio education policy includes scores of examples of fraud, corruption, and misappropriation of public funds by charter-school operators; he no doubt has similar plans for Idaho.
LikeLike
All people in rural America, NEVER let a charter come in and destroy your school system. Why do you need a CEO from Chicago, NYC, etc. to run your school? It is nothing but a rip-off.
LikeLike
I think the town of Walton, Kansas views their charter school as the savior of the town.
LikeLike