A teacher writes:
“Diane, I am a special education teacher in Eastern NC. I have taught in some wonderful schools in Buffalo, NY and Richmond VA before coming down here to open my doors to foster children who are involved with the juvenile justice and mental health departments. My teaching role is to work with self contained students with behavior issues.I feel I am a humble person who doesn’t toot their horn much but I will say I have been proud of being involved in more miraculous reclaiming of youth than setbacks. I pay close attention to the politics involved in my former states. Both North Carolina and New York, politically are on opposite ends of the spectrum. However both states, and I’m sure many others, are clearly trying to destroy public education as we know it for the sake of publicly sponsored charter schools, many of whom are owned by huge conglomerates, many invested in by Middle Eastern oil barrens among others. They are doing this by driving out public school teachers to replace with unlicensed, inexperienced teachers in the Charter system and Teach for America. They are doing this by taking the caps off class sizes, and not investing in the buildings and school supplies. They are doing this by forcing a terrible curriculum down our throats on purpose in hopes the parents complain to their local administrators instead of the politicians and policy makers. I am sure I am not saying anything Diane Ravitch has not said before but it is frustrating because I am witnessing all of this happening before my eyes. I push into regular ed classes that have over 40 students in them, we haven’t had new teaching materials or textbooks since the 1990’s and we’re supposed to teach to this new curriculum. There is a feeling classes like social studies will be a thing of the past since it doesn’t translate to national test scores or the Common Core. Our teachers are no longer rewarded for having Masters degrees, we’ve had only a 1% raise in 6 years, and kids in class have no basic writing materials like pencils and notebooks because their parents won’t supply them, the school won’t supply them and teacher won’t pay out if their pocket for them. States up north are fortunate to have unions to slow this stuff down. Our state does not. It seems to me this plan of ultra reform will probably happen first in North Carolina. Parents need to get outraged and voice their displeasure. We all need to march on our state capitals and use our first amendment rights as best we can. We need to become political activists for the first time in some of our lives. We need to express that this is not a Democrat thing or a Republican thing, its the Constitutional right to a free and public education. We also need to expose the ultra rich individuals who are putting their funding and resources into these policies of evil reform.”

Re: “right to a free and public education” —
It is interesting — and maybe important — to ask: on what grounds can one have a “right to” receive something which isn’t actually in existence (e.g., because nobody continues to produce it any more)? Suppose nobody wanted to become/remain a doctor any more, for example, given the appalling bureaucratic (and other) conditions under which they’re increasingly expected to practice _their_ profession — would it make sense, in such a world, to claim that one had a moral or other right to receive healthcare? (even if one was living in a place whose government stated that one had a right to receive that).
LikeLike
He is quoting Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The main part guarantees a free appropriate public education for all students.
LikeLike
I know what he’s quoting … But of what force are guarantees, when the good or service that’s being guaranteed is no longer being produced? (In order for any good or any service to be distributed — fairly, or otherwise, or at all — that good or service must first _exist_. If you or I started a new country, we might write into its constitution and its other laws as much free stuff as we cared to imagine — free education, free healthcare and free prescription-filling, free public transport, free food, free psychotherapy, free Internet, you name it — but if nobody happened to be _producing_ those goods or services (or if the only people willing to keep on producing them were cutting corners and providing dangerously defective items, perhaps with government support to keep them “free”)’ it wouldn’t matter how many laws and judges were telling us we had a right to receive those things for free.
LikeLike
I believe people with disabilities should have the same access to services that are provided to the majority. Since NC state constitution states it will provide public education- I think it should be to all students. The national IDEA law says any state that receives federal funds needs to comply with this law. It is not a necessarily a moral right- we do not govern by morals necessarily. It is what the US and NC voted on and promised. We are a country governed by laws. We should follow them or change them.
LikeLike
Ms. Glastone,
I’m not sure where you are coming from. You talk about the right to receive something which isn’t actually in existence. Are you talking about public education? Are you seriously suggesting that public education is not delivering a quality education? That’s true in some areas of this country (very poor, mostly urban areas), but not for most. The majority of professionals in this country have gone through and graduated from public schools and universities and despite the bad press, the majority whom seem to be doing all right.
Most of us believe that public education is worth the expense. And that we get what we pay for. It’s not fair to raise standards, stiff public education of the money it needs, and then cry wolf when the goals aren’t met.
Have I misread your claims?
LikeLike
I think I did and thought of it as propaganda, but the writer needs to be more clear in what she is trying to say.
LikeLike
Take your neoliberal propaganda elsewhere.
LikeLike
“I pay close attention to the politics involved in my former states. Both North Carolina and New York, politically are on opposite ends of the spectrum.”
This teacher should realize that the two states are not as different politically as she thinks. New York city and LongIsland are relatively blue and upstate is very very red.
And there are a lot of very very luke warm democrats, neo-democrats, neo-liberals, and moderate democrats here in NY state. There are the DFERs . . . . .
NY may be socially liberal compared to other states, but I have found the average upper class progressive in Manhattan, for example, to be socially liberal and fiscally convservative and stingy . . . . Everyone is out for a great cause until it comes to their pocketbooks.
There are many exceptions to this, and of course, these are my perceptions about NY.
Still, this teacher wrote a beautiful, truthful, and powerful letter, and the part about us being activists perhaps for the first time in our lives hit a nerve that I am sure is fated to transform millions of people across this vast and diverse nation . . . .
LikeLike
I agree it is well written. But I am pretty sure I know who wrote this. He has lived in these states so I know he is aware of the diversity of ideas across both states. I am proud of this teacher and all of my colleagues across NC who are trying to fight these dangerous reforms for the sake of the children. We have not yet mobilized as well as NY or Chicago since a lot of these new reforms have not yet been fully implemented. Many do not see what the future holds, but special education is often the hardest hit when it hits the fan. But the grass roots efforts are growing. There are many sites working on this like Organize 2020, NC BATS and Opt out of Tests NC.
LikeLike
To the special education teacher who wrote this: very well said. Someone (Diane?) has to tell us what to do. They are slowly taking over our schools because of “failing and poor test results.”
LikeLike
There are many things we can do.
1. Read this blog and associated links to stay informed.
2. Call and petition your representatives in local, state, and federal government regarding any and all legislation related to education issues.
3. Talk to colleagues, relatives, and friends to educate them.
4. Attend any meetings you can that are hosted by educators, Boards of Education, legislators and make your voice heard.
5. Go to the National Opt Out website and read about how teachers and parents are opting out of testing.
6. Be vigilant.
7. Read Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” when you feel like giving up. (I believe this is the civil rights issue of our time.)
LikeLike
Concerned mom, you are right. I managed to get a number of people, including Republicans, to vote against Dr. Bennett (who was a “rising star” in the reformers’ firmament) in Indiana back in November 2012. I even made home-made signs on my computer for people to post in the windows of their cars.
Send e-mails to legislators. I had never done this before, but I bit the bullet and did it. I got some thoughtful replies (and a couple of no-brain replies which were like cut/paste talking points). But I stayed polite, and answered back again.
This is important. Point out that VOTERS (you and me) should be listened to, not so-called experts (reformers, charter, for-profit operators, etc.) who don’t vote in the state.
If we teachers come across as reasonable, well-informed, and passionate about education, then we can make a difference. Good luck to all public teachers and resisters of deform/reform in North Carolina. We’re hoping for your success, and we’re behind you.
LikeLike
“Teacher in Bridgeport Ct”… I liken Diane to a top notch diplomat or Secretary of State. We do have generals out there like Karen Lewis and Carol Burris. The author of this article stated that many teachers are becoming activists for the first time and it is all new. Everyone is in this together wondering what is the best thing to do bring justice to public education. How do we “Davids” fight “the goliath”? I often wonder about the students’ role and in learning about civic responsibility “on the ground”. When I watch impassioned pleas of students before school committees, I do feel students old enough to understand, should protest that their very right to freedom is being challenged by these “corporate ed reforms”. It brings me to tears seeing “social studies” come alive and realizing how much our youth really DO UNDERSTAND. So many students feel powerless just as we teachers do. So what do WE ALL DO? Should we be asking our students this these questions… “If Rosa Parks had been a student in a title one public school during this time period, what would she have done and why? Would she continue to take these tests? Refuse to? Why?” There are some very real and important “history in the making” lessons for both students and teachers ahead of us.
LikeLike
A modest proposal … parents and other community members who see that the school system is deeply unsatisfactory should sue the school system, the charter school management, etc. — on the grounds that the school system, the management, etc., is _violating_ _the_ _laws_ _against_ _truancy_ by requiring children to spend their days in places that are not “schools” in any meaningful sense of the word. CONSIDER: what would be done if a private person (a parent or other identifiable individual) were to prevent children in his/her family or community from attending an actual school, confining them instead for six hours a day in a place that was not a school: a place where they had no pencils, no books, no instruction (or deeply inaccurate instruction) while instead of lessons they were being given tests which they were required to pass on the basis of the non-instruction? A place where the most accurate thing they were told was that their confinement was specifically in order to coach them in passing these tests, so that they would appear to be receiving an education instead? Someone who did this to his/her own children, or who kidnapped the children of neighbors in order to do this to them, would be up on charges as soon as anyone else noticed: particularly if his/her actions included efforts to convince the neighbors (and the children) that this was, indeed, an education and was required by law and was protected by law, When a school _doesn’t_ school — yet is supported, financially and otherwise, by government “partnering” together with business interests that advertise the place as a school — can’t it be sued on the grounds that its management is in conspiracy to violate or evade the truancy laws?
LikeLike
The major concern that I have with these types of lawsuits is that the money to pay them comes out of the school’s or district’s funds, which further cut money that is sorely needed in a lot of other places.
LikeLike
What other options do they have?
LikeLike
Don’t be concerned about that most school districts have insurance to cover this let’s get parents on the right page they are thinking charters are the magic bullet to revive education wrong. Teachers, pArents and students the. Community in concert together will. People who run charters only wAnt the money, if they cared about education they wod hAve been in it before the money got good.
LikeLike
The same argument, or a similar argument, could be made against suing (or otherwise bringing to justice) a _private_ _individual_ who was committing the same evils WITHOUT “governmental partnership” helping him/her out. If someone in your neighborhood was preventing your kids and the neighbors’ kids out of school, wouldn’t stopping thT be worthwhile and necessary.
Re “government/community partnerships” between government and corporations: there is a word for a socio-economic system in which governmental agencies “partner” with one or more privately owned corporations to “encourage” that organization to produce and/or distribute the goods and services that the government wants produced and distributed. The precise technical term for such an arrangement, in civics and economics, is the word “fascism.”
LikeLike
They usually don’t if they are federal lawsuits–they come from insurance companies.
LikeLike
@kategladstone.. I like your out of the box thinking… where are the lawyers willing to FIND THAT ISSUE that will bring about justice! Wondering where laborlawyer is these days!
LikeLike
Try using asterisks instead of underscores, please. Thanks for weighing in and joining the conversation, kategladstone.
LikeLike
Not to be rude, but you REALLY, desperately need to rewrite your posts. They are full of run-ons, and what is with using the underscore key? I find the posts extremely frustrating to read.
LikeLike
I don’t know this teacher who believe ANY state is out to “destroy public education”. Anyone in the profession who thinks like this is not very “educated”.
Those in the teaching profession which such a viewpoint need to step back and not stand so close for it distorts their vision.
Consider the argument against the low salaries teachers in NC get. Critics of the Republican leadership are quick to say the state in 46th as though this alone mean the teachers are underpaid.
But, when you step back you see a broader picture, which displays more then the “46th in the nation” proof NC teachers are underpaid.
Let’s look at the “46th in the nation” worst taxed state, Did you know it is Ohio, or the 47 through 50 are NJ, CA, NY and IL?
‘Incidentally, OH ranks 10th in teacher salaries, NY 3rd and CA 1st.
So, as we see there is more than meets the eye when analyzing what people in the public sector earn and the cost to pay them.
Each state is unique and depending on which party governs leans in a different direction.
Yes, NC teacher salaries should be higher, and teachers would
have no problem seeing taxes raised to do this.
But, equally yes, OH, NJ, CA, NY and IL taxes should be lowered. Would any teacher in these states propose lowering teach salaries so these states can cut taxes?
Would all the teachers who think their salaries should be loered to reduce the tax burden, please raise your hands!
LikeLike
Actually, a lot of states are dismantling public education. Whether that was these states’ stated goal at the beginning or not, that is what is happening. And WHY should those taxes be reduced? Perhaps instead of reducing the taxes, they need to be redistributed. For example, corporations often pay nothing or next to nothing, even when these large conglomerates can afford to do so. This is in the name of providing jobs or “stimulating the economy,” even if the jobs are low-paying or the economy doesn’t improve.
LikeLike
AJbruno please read Reign of Error before returning to comment. The movement to destroy public education is an international and national effort so of course it is also impacting the states. It costs money to have highly trained educators teach our children. Just like I pay anyone who provides services to me and my family I have no problems with my taxes paying for police, firepersons, librarians, public works maintenance people, a myriad of other service workers and of course teachers. And they all should be paid a living wage that is comparable or even a little higher than the private sector since I want the best for our state.
LikeLike
Nope and this is an stupid proposal. This movement to demonize teachers is nAtional and why should teachers in most states who haven’t had A raise since these deform era have to cut their salaries for lower taxes.
LikeLike
If you don’t see and see clearly and without doubt that many, many states are in the process of destroying public education with the help of the Obama administration then you haven’t been paying attention to anything.
As for the “tax burden” I not only receive a salary from those taxes but I pay into the tax pool myself and have for over 38 years. I don’t agree with you at all and I never will.
I will paraphrase Bernie Sanders and ask why the USA can allow 1 out of 4 corporations to pay NO corporate income tax yet we can’t support our veterans, our soldiers, our teachers, our children, our elderly, our disabled, our people?
LikeLike
This might be slightly off post, but one of my colleagues made a frightening assertion:
PUBLIC ED is becoming too expensive for states to handle anymore. That’s why they’re outsourcing it to these other entities who would (presumably) bear the full burden of the cost. What he overlooked, I think, is that taxpayers are still stuck with the burden of funding vouchers (at least that’s the case in Indiana).
LikeLike
Perhaps the thinking is that vouchers would require the schools where they are used to employ the money more efficiently that the big district school systems.
LikeLike
Have you checked out the housing costs in California, the gas prices, the overall cost of living? I read an article last week about teachers who live in Los Angeles. It stated that fewer than 9% of teachers can afford to buy a house at the median price in Los Angeles. And its even worse in SF and the Bay area. Or shouldn’t well-educated professionals be able to own a house? I doubt that teachers are overpaid anywhere in the country.
LikeLike
NC teacher, I feel sorry for all of the teachers in NC. What has happened to you is the same garbage that is going on in other states. The same thing has happened in Michigan. No raises, no supplies, large class sizes, fewer teacher protections, and the expansion of for-profit charters. Too many people have sat back in fear. They will keep destroying schools because most people will do very little to stop it. I hope you can organize teachers and parents to fight against the insanity. Good luck. It is hard to believe that all of this has happened and politicians from both parties have allowed it all.
LikeLike
I feel for all teacher’s nationwide. As a North Carolina resident and parent of two children in elementary school I am devasted at such reforms. Teachers are admitting they are rushing through objectives, not having all resources or the time to create lesson plans. Testing has created such anxiety until students are not interested in learning, the curriculum is destroying their drive and excitement. My daughter said to me the other day if I do not score a level 3 or 4 on Discovery Ed I will not make it to the 3rd grade. She is 7 years old and constantly reminded about scores and where her score triangle falls. Teachers in some districts are afraid to go against the stron alliances put forth by principals and other administration.
I will not sit back and watch my Constitutional Right be deceitfully taking away by greedy, inconsiderate and narrow-minded private interest groups. If you looked at the wealthy individuals funding this reform they went to private schools that encouraged creativity, individuality and the ability to embrace your uniqueness( check out where Bill Gates went to school). Your socie-economic background should not determine the type of education you receive. Every child has a God given right to be afforded the educational opportunities through public education. If common core is so great, why aren’t the Prep schools using Common Core? Why are they not testing the daylights out of their students?
I am a vocal parent at my daughters school and I will continue to advocate on their behalf and for every student. If there are local parents in NC wanting to make a difference please feel free to contact me.
We have the power, there are more moms, dad, grandparents, family and friends then their are billionare’s/millionare’s. Money should not determine our students future, even the Bill Gate’s, Koch Brother’s of world got help from those less fortunate before raising to the top.
Concerned Parent.
NC WAKE UP AND STOP DRINKING THE KOOL-AID!
LikeLike
Tera: Look at what you say again: “Your socie-economic background should not determine the type of education you receive. Every child has a God given right to be afforded the educational opportunities through public education.”
Perhaps one’s “socie[sic]-economic background should not” determine the quality of the education one receives, but it always has. A kid can have what his daddy can pay for. Who pays for kids whose daddies can’t or won’t pay for a high quality education? Who SHOULD pay for the education of kids whose daddies don’t or can’t? And why?
In saying “Every child has a God given right” to a good public education, you surely aren’t saying that God will pay for it.
The question then is, Who will Pay for students whose daddies don’t or can’t?
LikeLike
The problem is the charter school system is not the answer. Charter schools do not have to accept kids who have disabilities or anti-social behaviors that often accompany a child who has a poor upbringing. Charter schools do not have to implement the expensive, unnecessary standardized tests that are driving kids and parents from their public schools. Charter schools can force parents to make their kids submit to religious teachings and beliefs that conform with those schools even while they accept public tax money. In fact 70% of the charter schools in NC are religious schools.. That includes Muslim, Jewish, and Christian schools. In some states, charter school executives are bringing in salaries close to half a million dollars a year while the school pays no rent for buildings, transportation or lunches. The introduction of corporations into public schools invites too much opportunity for corruption- something I don’t want my own kids exposed to. If parents have the money to send their kids to private schools- awesome. If private schools want to offer discounts or scholarships that come from their revenues to diversify their student population- fantastic. But for public schools- put the tax money there, recruit amazing teachers to teach in bad neighborhoods and give them the tools to successfully make the kids productive members of society.
LikeLike
That the public schools should be reformed and not in the way they are currently being Rheeformed is perhaps obvious. But until that utopian day, do you feel comfortable holding the ready to learn kids as hostages by prohibiting charter schools?
What’s wrong with a school’s having a religious orientation if the parents choose it in an effort to bring their kid out of the public schools into a safe and academic environment?
There are massive dilemmas here, where neither choice is desirable, but for a parent, since time is limited because their kid won’t go on hold, I don’t see how you can blame them for not wanting to wait until the public school utopia comes into being.
It’s like saying that the good apples have to stay in the barrel with the bad apples until we learn how to keep all apples from rotting.
LikeLike
First, it’s a matter of separation of church and state that says legally tax money should not support any religious affiliation. If a parent wants a religious education, there is free Sunday school for that. As for those rotting apples, I work with those rotten apples every day and every day I thank God for the chance to work with them. If we discarded all the rotten apples, we would be no different from the ancient Spartans who threw their imperfect children over a cliff to die. Throughout some of these “rotten apples” who have publicly announced to have or have been suspected to have been diagnosed with Autism include Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Emily Dickinson, George Washington, Marilyn Monroe, Henry Ford, Michelangelo,Mark Twain, Beethoven, Thomas Edison, Andy Kaufman, Andy Warhol, Dan Akroyd, actress Daryll Hannah, Andy Warhol, In fact, here’s the whole list of bad apples you would have thrown away: http://www.disabled-world.com/artman/publish/article_2086.shtml
LikeLike
I knew it was a weak metaphor. People are not apples. But difficult people are a distraction in school to the ‘normal.’ But the question was why compel parents to keep their children in such classrooms. Actually, not the real question. How to pay for the saving work of you and people like you. YOU are doing wonderful work. But people have a natural antipathy to coercion. You seem to want to deprive them of choice, though out of the noblest of motives.
LikeLike
Moral high dudgeon doesn’t pay the bills. Your interpretation of the language of the first amendment is fundamentally in error. It says that the government may not establish a religion, that is require a state approved religion. The 1st amendment does NOT say public money cannot go to this or that religiously sponsored school. It’s done in higher education all the time. The 1st amendment guarantees freedom of conscience, but doesn’t speak about money funneled to a parent to use at a school of a choice.
It’s a common progressive misunderstanding.
Nevertheless, it would probably be best if for schools, religiously sponsored schools were private. Maybe that’s why people want their taxes low, so they can pay private school tuition.
LikeLike
And once again we hear the fear that somewhere, somehow, a few dollars might be spent on other people’s children. The difference between the “I’ve got mine, screw all of you!” Tea Party and the Great Society’s “We are all in this together” and “Love your neighbor as yourself.”
LikeLike
Your mistake is assuming that children of low income automatically have a low quality education. I disagree. There are plenty of places in the US where low income children have a great education.
LikeLike
My school for one.
LikeLike
the line, “parents need to get outraged”, says it all. As a teacher I never got attention until I got a parent or parents ear and then,”BOOM”, the administration jumps. This would happen on local to state levels, but parents need to work with teachers and en mass say, “NO”.
LikeLike
“We need to express that this is not a Democrat thing or a Republican thing,”
Exactly right. The sooner everyone sees this, the better. It’s not as simple as voting for the name with the “D” next to it.
LikeLike
That’ll be the day when any public school teacher votes R. It actually IS a Democrat/Republican thing for me because of the awful record nationally of the Democrats. Perhaps the R’s in NC are extreme in the opposite direction of cutting funding.
The pernicious effects of RTTT were made possible by the “stimulus’ money. The costs in lost opportunity arising from the ACA are such than no sensible person can support any Democrat because of their attitude toward borrowing money and taxes. To the extent that public school defenders align themselves with the ‘tax and spend’ Democrats, they loose support of the rate payers.
LikeLike
I regretfully voted for Obama mainly because he ran on the promise of repealing No Child Left Behind. Instead of doing that he basically kept NCLB,added more testing to it and changed the name. Arne Duncan, our Secretary of Education has sold out to Pearson like everyone else. I would gladly vote for a Republican if what they stood for wasn’t just to the benefit of the rich, the white, and the few. .
LikeLike
There’s your problem, right there. Liberal bigotry against Republicans. You voted for him. You could have known what he really was if you had looked and listened. But you were taken in by his lies. I just can’t understand people who haven’t had enough. You can’t believe that Republicans want prosperity for all. If you can’t, you can’t. But don’t whine when YOU made the choice you did. Man up. Accept responsibility. No excuses. Here is a template, “I was wrong, woefully wrong to . . . “
LikeLike
Here in Florida, for as long as I’ve been here – around 13 years, more teachers vote Republican than Democrat. Now that the R’s are dismantling public education without opposition many teachers are dismayed and feel betrayed but so do I for voting D. There are no differences between the parties anymore. Just one bit corporate-enablign party of the 1%.
LikeLike
Poor Harlan doesn’t realize that the republican presidents of the last three decades drove up our national debt, strangled public services, and cut taxes for the rich. Obama has implemented the same economic plan as Ronald Reagan – it’s called neoliberalism.
Although Obama has different social aims, his economic plan should be right up Harlan’s alley, but Harlan doesn’t understand that because he watches FOX and falls for the carrots to divert his attention away from the income inequality and lack of social mobility, and downright poverty, plaguing this nation. But Wall Street and the stock market is doing just fine (thanks to corporate Obama), so all is well with the world, for Harlan, except he doesn’t like Obama.
LikeLike
Don’t be offensive, JIM, and lie about economic history. Attack my ideas, but not me.
LikeLike
Harlan, when I attended the NEA Representative Assembly a few years ago, it was reported that 40% of the membership identified themselves as Republicans. Your assumption is false.
LikeLike
Terrible, terrible things are happening in Dallas due to Enron Exec Bush: please post and help us.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/education/headlines/20140301-group-pushes-for-election-to-remake-dallas-isd-as-freer-home-rule-district.ece
LikeLike
I am the author of this article. I sent it to Diane a few months back, not long after I began to think “enough is enough” and that it’s time to start learning about what’s causing the problem and an ambition to figure out what to do about it. To the person who mentioned I need to step back from the situation for a non-biased viewpoint, to me is like telling Martin Luther King Jr. that being black distorted his viewpoint on civil rights. I wish I could invite every resident of North Carolina into my classroom to see what I see every day. Because of the explosion of kids who need IEP’s, and no funding to add teachers to our building, I now teach four classes of Social Studies (grades 6,7,8, and an extend- one level respectively), a class of Language Arts, and a class of Adapted Phys. Ed. without a planning period and about 20 minutes for lunch as my only break. This is probably against some labor code or something but it’s the only way to do what I do successfully while keeping my class rosters of kids with special needs at less than 9 kids per class. So yeah, being close to the situation every day does give me a special perspective on things.
I realize, sharing stories like mine to fellow teachers and colleagues can be seen as preaching to the choir. Preaching to the masses is a whole lot more challenging, especially since those in bed with the corporate stakeholders who benefit from this push for “school reform” are also in league with the mass media outlets who share in their greed. Sharing these stories who aren’t aware, or familiar with our plight is tough to do without sounding like a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists. It’s also tough for some people to sympathize with “whining liberal communist teachers” who want to raise everyone’s taxes as many of these news outlets portrays us as.
Here’s one last thing to consider. The elected officials in North Carolina defend their massive cuts to education as a way to cut costs and preserve the state’s low cost of living. Sounds almost plausible. But then if you go two states further South to Georgia for example, their cost of living is comparable. Cost of a home the same size goes for about the same price and same tax rate. Yet their teachers remain on a fair pay scale, not a frozen one, and they have officially rejected Common Core as well as the influence of charter schools. They have also voted republican in more presidential elections than North Carolina. The politics just don’t add up.
LikeLike
I saw a tweet from our lady headmaster the other day as she was replying to ladyliberty on the StoptheCommonCoreNC Blog…She replied with #teaparty.
Anyone who opposed the Common Core and speaks out about it is….from what I have observed .. a member of the teaparty.?????
LikeLike
In my opinion political affiliation matters little. I for one have registered “unaffiliated” when I moved to NC and registered to vote. To me, the biggest political enemies to public education are Arne Duncan, and the president who appointed him as Secretary of Education, and the Republican run governor and State Assembly of North Carolina. The best thing we can do as voters is vote in people who’s care for the people they represent outweigh their allegiance to corporate entities that stand t make a buck from their policies. The pool to select people from to support and vote may be small, but it’s one of the ways we’ll ever have a chance to stand up for the kids we represent.
LikeLike
StoptheCommonCoreNC is sponsored by the Civitas organization which is tea party. But I agree with Eric and NC Teacher78. I am an independent since I think both sides have been bought out by corporate interests. I will be voting individuals not party. I do get uncomfortable though when the reason some groups oppose Common Core is they think it is movement to make everyone a progressive liberal (Obamacore) or the strangest I saw was that it was an agenda to make everyone homosexual. ( Not sure how it accomplishes that). I am against Common Core but neither of those are my reasons. Lack of evidence and developmentally inappropriateness of some standards and the tying to high stakes tests are my major problems. The corporate takeover of education and data collection are other issues I have.
LikeLike
Janna, one of the ways at least the right wing agenda uses to touch on people’s nerves is to use labels such as “communists” ,”homosexuals”, “hippies”, “tree-huggers” and racist ones as well, especially when the NAACP gets involved or they tie things to the president. They hope that if they can successfully bully people into seeing things their way, they’ll eventually get what they want.
LikeLike
It sounds like there is some sort of irrational backlash against teachers and the schools in NC, whereas there is not in Georgia. Why would that be? Do teachers in NC hold some sort of perverse views that make them abhorrent to the voters?
You must admit that teachers are by and large are “liberal communist” in orientation. Could it be that?
Perhaps teachers need to rethink their politics.
LikeLike
It’s because the state lawmakers and media actually portray their teachers and schools as a valuable asset to the people of their state. Some old-school folks like yourself may feel threatened by progress. I get that. But believe me if you want what’s best for the people of your state you’d stop believing the brainwashing contraband that Fox News likes to feed you.
LikeLike
This kind of response Eric is why we old school folk can’t align with you. You betray a progressive’s blindness to the realities in the country now.
LikeLike
Harlan,
I think you are right that there has been a Democrat hold on NC for a long time. . .and it might have been abused a bit and now it’s payback or something. That’s the only thing I can figure (I was too young to know or understand anything before this shift). There is obvious disdain for teachers by our current leadership, but I think it’s more “the best defense is a good offense” type thinking. They know they are not looking after the teaching force, so instead of letting that get to them they just attack.
LikeLike
@ Harlan – Perhaps you need to rethink your politics. You wouldn’t know “liberal communists” if they slapped you in the face.
If you think a strong support for the public sector, in particular schools, is “liberal communism”, then sign me up.
The U.S. has always prided itself on its mixed economy…until the austerity, demonization, and privatization of Reagan…all while he drove our debt up to give the rich their tax breaks. This has been the same economic approach since, and people like you fall for this scheme…calling it “liberal communism”.
Turn of FOX and wake up Harlan.
LikeLike
Here’s something which should be required in NYC, ALL children of public school children MUST attend public schools. Will any public school teacher not agree with this suggestion?
LikeLike
Re proposing that “all children of public school children must attend public schools” — I presume that “public school children” means “children who attend public schools.” Why is it being proposed that, as soon as any child attends a public school, his/her children must be forbidden to attend any other school?
LikeLike
He means that any child of a parent working for the public school system must be required to be sent only to a public school by that parent. I suppose the analogy is that any policeman must live in the city he works for. But analogy doesn’t hold. Police services are not the same as education services.
LikeLike
How does “public school children” mean “children of public school employees”? I _thought_ I was a native speaker of English …
LikeLike
He either can’t write clearly or his spell checker betrayed him and he didn’t proof read. I don’t think he meant what he said but only he can confirm my hypothesis.
LikeLike
You’re being offensive and conducting personal attacks again, JIM. You’re still lying about Reagan.
LikeLike
Harlan, if his meaning is as you say, then an equally close analogy is to the law in Sweden which requires every factory to have its water intake downstream from the location where the factory discharges its waste water. Once that law was enacted — sometime in the 1970s, as I recall — the factory owners very quickly figured out ways to make their waste water clean and non-toxic to the point of drinkability.
LikeLike
I adore your Sweden Law comment Kate. I also find your posts hard to read but you do make some interesting points. I think Harlan’s interpretation is correct. I do have problems with people who want things for other people’s children different from their own. The hypocrisy of sending your children to a school without Common Core when you want it for everyone’s else’s children seems suspicious to me (Arne Duncan and John King and Bill Gates). I would love my children to go to my public university and even through my program if they decide to become teachers. Though we always need improvement I believe we do a good job and our graduates do well. My children are in public schools and still thriving. But not if we ransack them financially for vouchers.
LikeLike
Harlan, since when are communists liberal, unless you are talking about theoretical communists such as the Oneida community? If you’re talking about historical communists such as Castro, Mao, and Stalin, their world view is/was the opposite of liberal. They repressed the freedom of others on a massive scale, whereas true liberals want to increase freedom (“liber” =” free” [Latin] as you probably know), but also believe they need to support the commonweal by advocating for such institutions such as free public schools, libraries, public health, fire and police departments, public roads, etc.
LikeLike
Like the “liberals” who put Obama in power? Where has he tried to increase freedom?
LikeLike
For those who feel preserving public education for the sake of special education is another hot button for me. Once again, working directly with the students I work with I do have a special perspective. The one thing I love most about my job is taking the one or two kids who display extreme behavior, the ones most teachers write off as “unteachable”. I always see those kids as a challenge I am willing to accept. With that being said I have worked with a boy with significant autism, in addition to having a parent who is a convicted child molester. A year ago he did nothing but scream, attack and all out tantrum on a daily basis. With the help of a more stable home life, the fact that myself as well as the other teachers he has have not given up on him, and we show love and compassion to him regardless his behavior, we can fast forward to last week where he scored a 100% on a 7th grade test of colonization, that was modified in terms of presentation- not on content, in a class where I push in with 37 other general education students. This student who a year ago was deemed “unteachable”, is now flourishing and is one of the most creative people I have ever met. Some day your children or grandchildren may all be religiously watching a cartoon on Nickelodeon or something from a kid like I mentioned- an unteachable, disabled public school educated kid who has no business being the beneficiary of our hard earned tax dollars. If you want more stories like this I have 7 plus years experience to back me up.
LikeLike
Yes, the public of every state, should have a state constitional duty to fund the type of services you have described.
LikeLike
From an economic standpoint, raising children and educating them is an economic burden. If the cost of living in a medium size city is high, maybe there are less children, and it is economically advantageous to the city as an entity to shift the burden of children to the suburbs. If the cost of living in the city is high, and the public education is lousy, people will migrate elsewhere. This would seem to be what is happening in medium size cities or somewhere like Chicago, where the demographic of school age children may shrink. What happens on a statewide scale may be different. There is no way enough people can leave to change the demographic or shift the burden of education somewhere else. So, starving education of money will probably just cause harm to the state’s that do it, by making them harsh and undesirable places to live or do business.
LikeLike
Class size should have a required cap which has to be implemented through activism. If you don’t have a union then you should be writing to your political representatives. You complaint about pencils is easily solved, buy some, ask for a donation, or else you’ll have students in class without writing utensils. Your choice. I feel that you are not informed about the CCLS because you stated that it was not related to Social Studies. So, I have to wonder whether you have ever read it. Your complaint about books and supplies is a local issue; your principal should have some input on that problem. What does she say?
LikeLike
If we all have the same problem we all need to fight together as one all over the world and Pray to our father to lead us in the right path
LikeLike
Class size used to have a cap size, until our political representatives did away with it last summer along with the elimination of Masters degree supplements for teachers, the introduction of the new pay system where the top 25% teachers get 4 year contracts with a small pay increase in exchange for their due process rights, and the 50% overall cuts to statewide school funding. All this while millions of dollars of tax money is going to religious based, charter schools, and the world’s largest publishing company Pearson to use Common Core. Speaking of Common Core- Mr. Welfare, I am not sure where you’re getting YOUR information from but North Carolina is only implementing Common Core assessments for Math and Reading. Social Studies and Science assessments are still provide by the state or county district.
LikeLike
At least where I am, “Science, social studies and technical subjects” has an appendix in the CCSS ELA standards that teachers in those subjects are supposed to follow. They’re a fairly broad list of reading and writing “skills” that, by themselves, are not too awful. That is at least the case in social studies, which I teach. It’s the awfulness of the rest of the CCSS that I have issue with.
And I think it’s only a matter of time until new, “wonderful” standards show up for social studies, science, and other things as well.
LikeLike
Eric Allgrim, I just can’t see that much difference between those selling the common core and those buying the common core: both statist in orientation rather than individualistic. I believe that you personally are putting the individual kid’s soul at the center of your practice. Why must you twist the arm of the rest of society because they want that for their kids too and can get it in charters.
You do the work of a saint, but vitiate it by wanting to be a well-paid saint. If you weren’t in teaching, think, you’d have to be out working in that nasty private business world economy.
Granted you don’t get enough for what you do, but everything you do get comes from private economic activity. It’s unseemly to bite the hand that feeds you.
Faculty room grousing may bring one a sense of solidarity but one can forgive parents for not wanting their children indoctrinated with non-traditional values by people that they actually pay. Thus they flee to the charters.
LikeLike
No teacher is asking to make a fortune, or make everyone’s taxes suffer to help us buy a new fishing boat or a trip to the Bahamas. In fact I would be fine with the salary I make right now, if it meant the public schools in the county I work for and my own two kids attend had the means to patch leaky roofs, update textbooks that align with current standards, made sure students had access to classroom computers that worked, and added enough teachers to keep the class sizes less than 30 students. This minimally gives kids a fighting chance. You want school choice? Stop having the state pay millions of dollars to endorse Common Core which forces all kids to be little mathematician robots instead of letting the kids take advantage of their creativity and resourcefulness to succeed. As for non-traditional values, I am not sure what you mean. Science based public education has been a traditional institution to advanced societies all throughout history. I applaud and thank you though Mr. Underhill for having the courage to read Ms. Ravitch’s blogs and adding your perspective to the debate. I assure you though, the sense of solidarity is well beyond faculty grousing. It has made us more politically aware, and a sense of duty to stand up for our kids. Not for the sake of our jobs. In fact many of us fear reprisals from our employers. We do it because we are well-educated ourselves, most of us parents ourselves. We have amassed almost 40,000 members on social media to champion our cause with the BAT (bad ass teachers organization) and almost 1,000 members of the newly created Badass Moms group.
LikeLike
I join you in condemning the CCSS, but many public school systems, “democratically” controlled by elected boards, are embracing them. Some teachers are embracing them too. A number of administrators as well. I support opposition to them.
If the BAT weren’t organized on the model of communist protest, I could be more sympathetic. Their web site censors in the interests of “solidarity.” I have come to identify their protest with the seeds of socialist tyranny even thought I agree on the specific issue of the CCSS. In spite of their somewhat kooky statements, I almost prefer the tea party reasons for opposing them. I don’t trust the BAT.
My belief is that the core political/philosophical problem is that a large majority of the cadre of public school teachers do not understand capitalism and use words that say they oppose it when the prosperity and freedom of this country is based on capitalism. As long as this majority of public school teachers utter anti-capitalist rhetoric I personally find it difficult to take them seriously. And they repay me with personal attacks rather than seriously attempting to re-understand public education as a defacto service “business” which has fallen into the public sector by virtue of progressive efforts starting with Woodrow Wilson to deprivatize the economy, in the interests of a socialist route to social justice.
And few of us are equipped to undertake a real analysis of what social justice is. Rawls was the last to do so effectively. My daughter read him at University, but it rolled off her back like rainwater off a duck(judging by her acquisitive behavior), and I have not yet undertaken to read him and try to understand him myself.
Much comes down to one’s conception of a “right” and what the class of “rights” encompasses under the constitution.
Recent events in Ukraine give added point to these discussions about education. What does a “right” to an education mean, when one’s political freedom is compromised by invasion of one country by another. Sometimes I don’t think public school teachers really believe in freedom enough to give it precedence over keeping their own bureaucratic jobs.
I do appreciate your willingness to respond clearly and candidly.
LikeLike
It is true that the true servants of the poor take a vow of poverty themselves, in terms of historical saints and so forth.
But this is where an intentional structure of a middle class comes in. We agree our country needs a strong middle class and that we have to be intentional about maintaining that. In the midst of it, however, comes the perpetuation of “middle” ideas, which could also be considered “mediocre.”
Everything has cost. What costs do we want to bear and for what end? And how does public education fit into that equation?
I also think public schools used to be more like charters. So we’re sort of just going back to the drawing board. We’re remodeling, with some restoration and some gutting. Eventually, if we go all charter, we’ll end up right back where we are now in terms of top heavy structuring and so forth.
Fighting entropy never ends. Again, it’s just a question of what big picture do we want, how do we want to get there and at what cost?
LikeLike
Joanna, can you develop your argument a bit on what “characterization” of education would result in the administration top heavy structure we have now. It seems to me the opposite would be true.
LikeLike
I have started a petition on the Whitehouse.gov site to ask the president to choose public school educators to fill important cabinet and advisory positions. Right now, his nominee for Undersecretary of Education (second in command) is the CEO of a rather aggressive charter school organization. PLEASE SIGN! It must have 100,000 signatures by March 29th to stay up and be considered for a response. After you sign, please share!
Thank you,
Eilene
NC School Teacher
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/support-public-schools-and-give-education-posts-those-who-have-worked-and-support-public-schools/5sQJpJcm
LikeLike
ay ay ay cantar y no llores
LikeLike
A mentor (fellow NC parent) offers these comments (mostly in regards to Common Core):
“I also see his vision for a national standard as a necessity. In fact, that is a global need, not just a US need. We need a baseline and a common measure. I get that. The problem isn’t the vision for this, it’s the implementation through excessive testing, and worse testing that is tied to funding rather than testing as a diagnostic. Even worse than that, is the fact that school systems under pressure to gain funding via the system: 1) Game the system with their “gifted” students, and 2) push all the pressure to perform on the children. The latter is super-bad because it elicits the same physiological and emotional responses one expects from a child that is bullied at school. Scary indeed that we would condone this, but everyone above the student has a pat answer that absolves them from guilt. Teacher: I have to follow policy, or I will be fired. Principal: I am just trying to get my teachers the funding support they need. Superintendent: I have to keep the schools in compliance with state mandates. State Board Of Ed: This is what the legislature handed us. Sate Legislature: This is what we have to do to get Federal funds (aka our own tax dollars) back from the feds. No one, at any level, is willing to stand up for the kids on the bottom of the rung. Kids that bear all the weight of the excuses made above them. Kids that aren’t allowed, or string enough yet, to fight back.
I am concerned that, in NC, we are looking for a scapegoat. Someone we can point to, and blame for all our educational woes. Some say it’s the Republicans. Some say it’s the Feds. Some say it’s Gates and corporate greed. The real issue is that we haven’t even come up with a common, truthful definition for what our kids are doing from 8am – 3pm every weekday. Rather than get in there and fight for our children, we let them suffer more bully-like testing and believe that the problem is simply that teacher’s aren’t paid enough. Teacher pay is just another symptom of the problem. One that needs to be addressed for sure, but hardly the central issue.”
LikeLike
A strong statement that I like. I question two premises: 1)that we need explicit national or global standards. 2)that government needs to be responsible for them.
Knowledge is democratic. It is open to all, if a student wants it. Each family should be responsible for the education their children.
I wonder whether every kid has a right to be born to responsible parents.
Why do I have a duty to be responsible for educating other people’s children?
Don’t just say, “you aren’t compassionate.” Maybe so, maybe not, but still try to answer the question, why I am (or should be) responsible for children I did not father. I may choose to be voluntarily, but I don’t see that the government should compel me to.
LikeLike
It’s called being a contributing member of society. The old adage is true- if you don’t spend the money on educating the people- you’ll be paying to keep them incarcerated- either way you have to pay. What if we didn’t all want to be protected by our firemen, police officers, and military? It’s our civic duty to pay taxes in our country. Otherwise there are places like Haiti that would be perfect for you.
LikeLike
Now, don’t get testy and personal. That’s always the sign of a person who can’t or won’t argue. Police, firemen, and military are essential civic functions. Try to convince me that education by the government is in the same category as public safety services.
We seem to be incarcerating quite a few in Michigan already. Is that prima facie evidence we didn’t educate them well in the public schools available to them? If the schools can save them and didn’t the schools failed. If the schools can’t succeed because of environmental factors, then the schools will never succeed. You can’t have the argument both ways.
Some people argue that charters are the best way to save more of those potentially at risk in the inner cities. DeBlasio shut some co-located charters in NYC recently. Is that good policy? The scuttlebutt is that he did so to pay off the teachers’ unions who helped get him elected. What’s your reaction to that?
You make your public school classrooms work. How many others do?
I say voucherize completely and make special provision county wide for children with disabilities. That preserves special education, but permits freedom for the rest.
LikeLike
I am a product a public school education. I attended a middle class school outside Buffalo, NY. My friends and I did not come from wealth. The culture of the students of my classes were very diverse. We had students who came from Asian parents who worked and attended a nearby university. We had students from lower income families trying to get out of poverty in the city. My friends and family members turned out to become doctors, Harvard educated lawyers, professors, small business owners, corporate executives, professional athletes, professional athletes, engineers, police officers, firefighters, local politicians, criminals, dead beats, and so forth. Our school districts in suburban Erie County NY are still some of the best funded buildings, and highest paid teachers in the country. Did we have some bad teachers? Sure. Just like we all experience our fair share of employers , bosses, and co-workers. That’s a part of life. My point is, public school has not failed as a system as a whole. I realize in some areas, especially in urban centers, and places like Detroit where political corruption rendered the state bankrupt, not all public schools are bad.
As far as rights go, our unalienable rights- life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness- applies to all Americans, not just the wealthy. The pursuit of happiness is not specifically defined as the pursuit of money or wealth. I pity those who think all we have to offer to the world as Americans are money grubbing agents of greed. We have so much more to offer which is why even though we may test lower in math, reading, and science overall compared to other nations, we are still admired by the international community as being creative, artistic, innovative, and have an abundance of skilled labor even if we don’t have cheap labor. It’s why more high tech industries are reinvesting in the United States, especially NY where taxes are high. (http://www.superpower-inc.com/content/new-york%E2%80%99s-superconductivity-industry-highlights-technology-and-economic-benefits).
If you voucherize everybody, that seems to me it defeats the purpose of charters which is to subtract the less desireables for the cream of the crop and pay them accordingly.
LikeLike
I’m not sure I follow your argument in the last two paragraphs of your post. As for your own experience, yes, some public schools function quite well. Some charters do too.
The question I posed was whether teachers as public servants are the same sort of public servants as policemen and firemen, and I’d add the court system as well. The government has a responsibility to protect “life,” and “liberty” and “the pursuit of happiness.” Police and fire responders protect those rights by providing public order so people won’t be killed (right to “life”), and won’t be kidnapped or enslaved (right to “liberty”), and enforcement of contracts as people go about pursuing wealth and happiness through the potential for action that wealth confers.
In essence the police, fire, and courts keep people from interfering with other people. The function is restraint of people’s actions. The framework of law allows people the freedom to pursue whatever they want in life.
My question is whether government sponsored education is of the same sort of public service as police, fire, and courts, and if so why (or why not). Does compulsory education prevent one group of people from attacking others (life), imprisoning others (liberty), or impeding one’s pursuit of happiness.
It may be so, but I just haven’t been able to see it yet. Explain it to me if you wish.
LikeLike
YES- teaches are public servants like police and fire responders- did you read this? https://dianeravitch.net/2014/03/04/david-berliner-why-we-must-support-public-schools-and-their-teachers/
“The Pulitzer prize winning historian, Lawrence Cremin, explained it this way: When the history of the United States is written from the vantage of the middle of the 21st century, and the question asked is what was it that made the United States the preeminent nation in the world during the 20th century, the answer will be found in the 19th century. Cremin argued that it wasn’t the Gatling gun, or the telegraph, or the telephone, or Fulton’s steamboat that made America great. Rather, it was the invention of the common school. That is the gift that keeps on giving.
It was the public schools that gave America some mobility across social classes, providing a modicum of truth to the myth that we were a classless society.
It was the public schools that changed our immigrants into patriotic Americans.
It was the public schools, along with public libraries, that gave Americans the skills and opportunities to develop the kinds of knowledge that Thomas Jefferson had rightly noted is first among the necessary conditions for a democracy to function.
It is the public schools that serve most of our nations’ special education students, hoping to give them productive lives, and hoping to give their parents a modicum of relief from a tougher parenting role than most of us have had to face.
It is the public schools that primarily serve the English Language Learners who, in another generation, will constitute a large part of the work force that we depend upon.
It is the public schools that serve America’s neediest children and their families.
And it is the public schools, in the wealthier neighborhoods, that provide a large proportion of American students with a world-class education.
Whatever your feelings about charter schools and private schools, for the foreseeable future the vast numbers of our students and the vast number of the jobs open to educators will be in our public schools. So for both personal and patriotic reasons, educators and their closest family members and friends need to support our nations’ greatest invention, our public school.”
LikeLike
The false assumption here is that the public schools of the 20th century are of the same quality or even nature as the public schools of the 19th century. The common school is 1 through 6. They are not Jr. High School or High School. Jefferson did not believe you could educate everyone to higher levels. Another false assumption in your argument.
LikeLike
In the 19th century the U.S. was largely an agrarian society. Students didn’t need to go past third grade or so because they were going to spend their lives on farms or doing unskilled or low-skilled labor that supported farming communities. The high schools were mostly located in the cities, and poor parents needed child labor to supplement the family income or to care for younger children while the parents worked. Most students attending the emerging secondary schools came from the middle class. Children (mostly boys) from the upper classes attended private schools. Young ladies attended finishing schools which emphasized art, music, and deportment. Is this this system you propose to take us back to?
LikeLike
Some rambling thoughts on public education……
For those of us not in the teaching profession it is often hard to appreciate the view of those who teach in the public school system, for we see education of our children differently.
What I have observed has been the defensive posture of teachers when the public education is discussed.
First, most teachers believe the value of teaching is paramount, deserving of special treatment, which include the protection of “tenure” which I do not believe is afforded others in any workplace. And, any effort to end tenure is aggressively fought.
Also, over the years the teaching profession has benefited from changes that lightened their workload. Reduction in class size has been a major benefit, as the average number of students per class is closer to twenty than it is to thirty or more. But, this has not brought improvements in student performance. Nor, has the addition of teachers aides in many schools.
Many schools even added a high level of security, including on site police officers, as discipline is beyond the ability of teachers to maintain.
Generally, teachers, their union and the public school system want the status quo to remain. They are resistant to any change which they believe threaten the traditional public school system.
They are quick to say charter schools degrade education, refusing to appreciate why more parents want to enroll their children in this alternative to traditional public schools.
Teachers and unions are also against vouchers as they believe the money “belongs” to the school, and moving it with the child hurts public education. But, without vouchers the poorest children would never have the opportunity to choose alternatives to failing pubic schools as well to do families have.
Teachers and the entire public school “industry” also attack the private school alternative, which are demeaned for making a profit, as though this translates into inferior education.
It is rare when teachers and their unions join the REAL opponent when it comes to improving education. One such occasion has been the battle against Common Core. After being mum when it was first adopted by forty-five states, teachers are finally lending their voices to the millions of parents dismayed how such an untested inferior product was forced on the public education system.
That is a positive first step, but it needs to be followed with others to ever right the course of education in our country.
Teachers and their unions need to challenge the authority of the US Dept. of Education which added burdensome requirements on school administrators and teachers alike. Reducing the power of the US DOE would bring education back to the states where it belongs and return autonomy to teachers, lost since the US DOE came into existence more than thirty years ago.
Also, rather than criticizing charter schools, traditional schools should address the reasons many parents want their children to attend them. Fighting ‘competition’ with negative rhetoric will not win back customers who were lost to inferior service, failing education.
Public schools can once again be the pride of our country, but this can only be done if teachers stop falling prey to the hucksters who continue to peddle new programs to address whatever problem arises, wasting money and adding layers of requirements.
This may be an oversimplification by someone who is not an educator, but I’ve yet to see any suggestions offered that focused on improving education rather than protecting teachers and the status quo first, and children after both have been satisfied.
—
Regards,
Anthony Bruno
ajbruno14 gmail
LikeLike
Well put.
LikeLike
Awesome post Janna. Government funded school has an obligation to provide a safe environment (life), inform the people with their rights and duties truly are as Americans (liberty), and the pursuit of happiness, well that alone defines education.
LikeLike
To “ajbruno” — my parents were public school teachers in NYC for 40 years, and they put all of their children in private schools.
LikeLike
I’d be interested in learning what they think of the teaching profession today compared to what it was when they taught.
The ones I know feel it is more difficult then it was 20-30 yrs ago
LikeLike
Ajbruno, in North Carolina, teachers never had 100% security as the word tenure makes it seem. We have had the right to a hearing before being dismissed or disciplined because in the past, teachers in the South would be forced for teaching evolution instead of creationism. We don’t have the right to collective bargaining so we essentially don’t have a union.
If a school is failing, especially in a low income, urban environment, why not hold the administrator or school board responsible for not recruiting adequate teachers.
The vast majority of the students I work with that struggle the most, the reason is because the parents at home either don’t care about their child’s education, or have the time to lend a hand. It doesn’t matter what school they go to- they’re going to be behind. The ones, who do get a push from their parents tend to succeed no matter what school they’re in. Why aren’t we holding parents responsible or giving them tax breaks for their child’s success instead of basing pay on teacher’s performance who sees the child for only 45 minutes a day.
The attack against charters isn’t primarily to protect our livelihoods. I’m sure most of us will simply have to adapt eventually and teach in those schools, and probably end up getting paid more than we are now. It’s frustrating to teachers knowing that there are some extremely intelligent, knowledgeable, and experienced educators out there and none of them are being used for their input on how to reform our schools.
LikeLike
If you live in Michigan, you no longer have the right to strike or picket!!! Where is the outrage over the loss of freedom? The USSR is long gone and now government’s/the 1%’s biggest enemy(any group by whom targeting makes them $$ ) is it’s own citizens, so they are out to silence and crush them.
LikeLike
PS: The USSR is BACK….only the name has been changed. One of the downsides of being in public service is that you are required to SERVE. Anyone who prefers not to comply can simply go into the private sector where the freedom may be
greater but so are the risks.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Middletown Voice.
LikeLike
To “ericallgrim” — so, on your premise, a school that teaches ONLY one subjects (civics), is the kind of school you want the government to fund? That has a certain rough logic: a government-funded school teaching absolutely nothing except fir what the government wants its citizens to regard as their “rights and duties” … Is that the kind of world you want to live in, or want your (and others’) income to fund?
LikeLike
Absolutely not. It was a simple analogy. The pursuit of happiness should be addressed by the exposure to as many subjects as possible.
LikeLike
NC Teacher Survey (Evaluation and Merit Pay)
PARTICIPANTS NEEDED!
UNCW Professor, Janna Siegel Robertson and I are seeking your participation and assistance in distributing a statewide survey that will serve to evaluate how teacher evaluation and merit pay reforms are impacting teachers across the state of North Carolina.
Our goal is to collect enough data to fairly represent the opinions of NC teachers that will later be combined with other statewide data and relevant literature to make appropriate recommendations to the state legislature. So please feel free to forward this message to any other NC teachers or teacher organizations that you feel would be interested in participating!
To participate in the survey go here:
http://20.selectsurvey.net/uncwmpammo/TakeSurvey.aspx?SurveyID=96KH4l7
Thank you for your assistance in this endeavor!
Regards,
Megan Oakes
LikeLike