This reader shares memories of a different time. I can vouch for what he or she writes. I remember those days too. The time after school was spent riding bikes or playing pick-up games of baseball or playing in someone’s backyard. Homework was for after dinner. There was always time for play with friends. The family ate dinner together. I went to a high school with about 1,200 students. None of the girls got pregnant. There were no drugs (but some alcohol and lots of fast driving). All teachers were Mr. or Mrs. or Miss. Were they the good old days? In some ways, yes, in some ways, no. But there was not the same degree of pressure on students to perform that there is today. No one committed suicide; the only deaths among youth were the result of reckless driving. We had childhoods.
What is sad is kids are no longer kids but little carbon copies of adults. When I grew up after dinner everyone went outdoors to play all kinds of games. It was all, clean good fun. We’d come home exhausted, sweaty and sleep like logs.
Drive down any residential street and no kids playing outdoors. Each having computers, texting, little islands unto themselves, and families not eating together. So sad.
I cannot remember anything I learned in first or second grade. Cursive writing in third only. Some Viking history in 4th. Frankly, what I would have liked to learn throughout school was about finances, saving money, investing, balancing a check book, raising kids, and more about communicating my needs to my mate.
I am 77 and I have a young friend who has been a second grade teacher for 23 years. I was absolutely APPALLED at the strict learning program for her second graders this year.
I am appalled also at these programs teaching babies to read at some ridiculous age, 13 months is it?
the whole world is upside down and so is the purpose of kids going to school. To learn social graces, share, abide by rules, respect self and others. All of life is about rules and that what we learn in school, but kids are meant to have fun, create, play,and not be stressed to the max and suffer anxiety.
When I was in high school, NO ONE became pregnant. NO drugs. Girls wore skirts, boys pants. If you were sick you were sent home. teachers were called Mr.or Mrs. etc. You wrote 5,000 essays if you talked back, or marred your desk. Later homework was neat
and thrown away to do over if messy.
No one freaked out. We loved our years at highschool.
Gee, Ben Franklin left school at second grade. Many great writers, people left early.
No one had died in my high school.
When my sons were in high school they were pall bearers 6x by the time they graduated.
And, even when younger, I told my sons, as you get older you will see more and more
suicides amongst your peers. This came to pass.
We must begin to see that something is radically wrong in education for so many deaths, suicides, pills, meds, etc. Something is TERRIBLY wrong.

Something IS indeed terribly wrong. When I watch who are our leaders and the way they act, well…younger people MODEL behavior of adults. When our government lies to us, the marketers put stupid ads on TV, and those reality shows…OY…burns brain cells and the behavior of those on TV and elsewhere is well…fill in your own words. I am not a fuddy-duddy, but I worry about our young. There are hooked up, hooked in, and in a straight-jacket.
I far too many parents who use electronics to babysit their kids.
When do kids sing, dance, play? When do kids get to hang upside down in trees? When do kids just get to sit in dirt and make mud pies? When do kids get to play “Red Rover, Red Rover, send _____ over? When do kids play marbles? When do kids play jump rope? When do kids play milk covers? When do kids play patty cake? My list goes on. From these unstructured games, kids learn all kinds of important things, like how to take turns and how to share, and that winning is no big deal. It’s the FUN that counts.
LikeLike
Me too. It was like this for me, too. I remember more of my time in elementary school because I knew early, early on I wanted to be a teacher. I wanted to make school a happy place. Not boring. I wanted kids to enjoy learning about everything. I achieved this goal I am happy to say and retired recently after an extra long career. Too many wonderful teacher friends tell me how lucky I am “to be out”. How they feel so for the children and do the best then can to keep the stress away. We have come so far and yet don’t have the answers. I grew up in those simpler times. Did not have a lot of homework even in 6th grade. Had “split sessions” in gr. 7 and 8 which I LOVED. I learned a lot, succeeded and went on to strong academic success, in fact hold advanced degrees. I was allowed to develop in my own time. Lack of homework allowed for piano lessons, dance lessons, theater classes in elementary school and lots of outdoor play with neighborhood friends. Even with homework in high school I was able to be busy with Sunday School ass’t teacher, being a candy striper in our hospital, active in school clubs. But there was time for friends, family, and fun. Plus reading. Kids’ lives these days are so complicated and stressed. We will pay a price. It is very sad. What does the future hold? And will all of this new pressure on teachers and test scores and test prep really make our kids great citizens who are college and career ready? Will it make them good parents and friends and happy? I still go back to what it says in the Declaration of Independence: life, liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness. Our founders understood the value of happiness and the freedom we all deserve to at least be able to PURSUE it. It is not a gift and the circumstances will never be fair or equal for all and there is poverty, but if we put our energies in the right place ie helping fight poverty it would be so much better. I just noted that the state of California got 80 million dollars to champion the new affordable health care…..and it was outrageous to see the outcome. We need to target the money where the need is. And listen to experienced teachers and thoughtful leaders who have experience in schools that work. It is so worrisome. We need to reach kids where they are, not make them miserable in the hope this will get them used to rigor at an early age so they can do tremendous things later on. By the way I do not believe I had the greatest education or teachers in elementary school. But I learned a lot anyway.
LikeLike
Something is radically wrong, but not in education – something is radically wrong in society – children are seperated from their mothers too early, too many homes have no dads, parents are now the druggies, our culture promotes promiscuity, it is a rare family that brings its children to church every Sunday…. I could go on and on – yet we expect the same results in the clasroom that we got years ago when children had stability, good nutrition, a stable family life, …..come on folks, take off the blinders.
LikeLike
I’ll vouch for everything you’ve said except for having no dad. I guess in general having no dad is a bad thing, depends on the dad. I had a great dad growing up, but at the age of 38 when I conceived my daughter I made the decision not to marry her father. We had been together for three years although not living together, but it was clear to me that raising her alone and with the loving attention of my parents would be much better for he was controlling. The stress of his controlling nature would have been too difficult for me. I had suggested we raise her from two separate households, but that would not work for him.
I was told by my daughter’s Kindergarten teacher that she was one of the most contented children she had ever met, and had she to guess she would say she was raised in a two parent family.
My daughter is now 27 having graduated from UC Berkeley with honors in the field of Architecture and has been working for a well known and respected architectural firm in San Francisco.. She is clear headed, smart, kind and I’m proud of her.
LikeLike
Don’t be alarmed Diane, but there were many girls who got pregnant when you and I were younger, we just didn’t see them for they were whisked away to homes for unwed mothers, or wealthy enough sent to Mexico for an abortion. I know two.
LikeLike
Yes, there were pregnant girls in our day but we didn’t realize it. These girls often went away “for a while” to visit an aunt or grandmother.
When I was in the fifth grade, my friend and I went to visit a classmate who was home sick for weeks with “stomach trouble.” Her mother would not allow us to see her, which we thought was strange. It wasn’t until last year (at the age of 71) when I thought about that experience and suddenly understood what had happened! I know that a fifth grader CAN get pregnant because that happened to one of my students in the 1960s. However, in suburban New Jersey in the 1950s such a thing was unheard of.
LikeLike
If anyone is interested, here is a link to information about the birth rate for US teenagers.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db89.htm
The bottom line is that there were fewer teenage mothers in 2010 than in any since 1946.
Clearly some of the poster’s contemporaries in high schools were pregnant (though actually more likely the pregnant teenagers had dropped out of the high schools as about 26% of girls dropped out of high school in 1960.)
LikeLike
In 1960 you could drop out of high school and still find many areas for employment, in fact college wasn’t necessary for many careers. I went to college because my parents had gone to college, but at the time I graduated in 1966 I had no idea the direction I was going. I went for the adventure of it and because I loved learning. As my daughter says today, the high school diploma of 1966 is the college degree of today.
I mentioned to my daughter the other day that between the years of 1976 and 1979, for those three years I lived quite comfortably on $400.00 per month. Everything was cheaper then, even my house which I purchased in 1978, with a friend, for $5,000. down payment was valued at $41,000. I live in Oakland, CA
But, by 1989, when my friend sold me her share of the house the value had already climbed to $189,000. Something was already then going terribly wrong. Those who wanted to get rid of Roosevelt’s New Deal were already busy at work.
So that in 2005 when I refinanced my house to get some necessary repairs completed, it was valued at $800,000. I’d like to talk to an economist about this, to know how the Capitalists achieved this unraveling of the middle class.
LikeLike
Housing values differ greatly based on location. I bought my house for $90,000 in 1993.
LikeLike
“No one committed suicide?” Here’s a link to suicide rates – which were higher in 1990 than in 2010. http://www.afsp.org/understanding-suicide/facts-and-figures
While some folks played in their backyards in the 1950 and 1960’s years ago, some children worried whether they, their friends or family would be lynched. Some of us remember horrible anti-semitism. While some did not know girls were became pregnant, I did.
Yes, alcohol is a drug and there was plenty of abuse – and much less recognition of what we know call abuse of women or children. The opportunities for young women, people of color have expanded. So has marriage equality.
We’re a long way from perfect today, but we’re far better off in many ways than the 1950’s & 1960’s.
LikeLike
Isn’t this the saame playbook teacher economist used? Are you on the same team? Talking points seem to be aligned. You are being watched.
LikeLike
Nano – I give my name and “have been watched” for many decades – as an inner city public school teacher and administrator whose children attend urban public schools.
The reverence for the past that is displayed early in this post does not reflect the reality for millions of people of color, women, gays and lesbians.
Our “play book” is expansion of opportunity, a recognition that youngsters learn in different ways, and that there is no single best way to organize learning, teaching and schooling.
LikeLike
Nano- though I usually disagree with teacher economist and Joe Nathan, it depends on the issue- not the person. If you notice there are several of us here who typically agree with pro public school views who having disagreements with any post that glorifies the past. I was like Diane in that I wanted to improve public education and was supportive of reforms for years. But the destruction of public education was never my goal so I have changed direction. But I also do not advocate going backwards to some glory day that really was not so glorious for a lot of children who were discriminated against. But there were a few things done in the past I do wish we could return to. The part of the past described here that resonated with me was that childhood should be more innocent and fun! And I am very fortunate that I have been able to preserve that for my own children . . . but unfortunately not for all of the children I encounter.
LikeLike
“None of the girls got pregnant”
Maybe that you knew but I’m highly skeptical of that statement.
LikeLike
Agree, Duane.
My mother is in her mid 80’s and she knew of pregnancies during her HS days.
My mom grew up in NC.
Back alley abortions, some sent to ” live with an aunt”, the better off girls got to go out of the country for ” medical treatment”.
LikeLike
My mother talks about some girls who suddenly had to go live with “Aunt Mary” for a while or who just mysteriously disappeared. She didn’t put it together until much later.
LikeLike
Duane Swacker: I am basically with you and Ang and Dienne on this.
However, IMHO, there is no absolute “right” or “wrong” on this score. Diversity of honestly expressed and remembered human experience can be unnerving and unsettling.
However, what seems different—and dramatically so—to me now is the au courant manufactured contempt for the commonweal and in particular, public education, that is so prominent among the leading charterites/privatizers.
To make it personal. The junior high school [that’s what we called it then; not “middle school”] I went to in Detroit was in the midst of the black ghetto, with approx. 1500 students. All black, except for me and four other white students [for the benefit of the trolls who haunt this blog: please don’t embarrass yourselves by asking how I, and everyone else in the school, knew that there were only the five of us].
I cannot remember a single black administrator or teacher; unless my memory is faulty, they were all white. There were adults [not all] in the area around the school who were convinced that the white school staff was bitterly prejudiced against their children—although I never personally witnessed any truly vile racist behavior on the part of school staff, and if I had, it would have been very hurtful and I would remember it. Yet a large part of the criticism I heard then—and in later years—about the public schools in Detroit, was based on an attitude that [alleged or real] racist white administrators and teachers were capable of doing better. That is, that many [not all!] of their critics felt strongly that they were obeying the lower and uglier sides of their natures, and that they should and could have done better. *So much more to say about this but I leave it here for now.*
Nowadays, notice how the propaganda machine of the leading charterites/privatizers seizes on anything, no matter how vile and unfair and unfounded, in order to distinguish their eduproducts from “traditional public schools” [aka in edufraud lingo as “factories of failure” and “dropout factories” and “schools of abuse” and the like]. Just one example among many that was the subject of a posting yesterday on this blog — “Who Funded Campbell Brown’s Campaign Against Pervy Teachers?”
Link: https://dianeravitch.net/2014/01/17/who-funded-campbell-browns-campaign-against-pervy-teachers/
That is, there is a strong note in the charterite/privatizer chorus that when it comes to public education we must “end it, not amend it.” That there is no hope, however slight, that improvement is possible, that public education and educators are incapable of doing better. Then they torture numbers, massage facts, and mangle logic in order to “prove” this point and then on to selling the latest eduproducts like VAM and charters, vouchers and padded cells, merit pay for low-paid education delivery specialists and CC.
Forgetting [?] among other things that, as Chiara Duggan has mentioned, the “choice” they push comes without “voice.”
Just my dos centavitos worth…
😎
LikeLike
Krazy TA, it would be accurate to say that just as there are people who want to eliminate charter schools, there are people who want to eliminate the traditional district public education structure.
However, what I think I’ve learned in working around the country is that the vast majority of folks see a role for both the traditional district structure, and for charters, and for other publicly funded programs such as statewide schools, or programs allowing high school student taking courses on college campuses with public $ following them, paying tuition and book fees.
LikeLike
If the girls got pregnant…and they did….They would send them away for awhile and hide it….Know of many.
LikeLike
The vast majority of students with disabilities were not given any schooling. Many were given away at birth and institutionalized. But gifted children were often accelerated with no problems. My mother skipped two grades in the 50’s and went to college (Cornell) at 16. She was one of 3 girls in mechanical engineering.
LikeLike
I agree. We’ve come along way when it comes to caring for children with disabilities.
LikeLike
Strongly agree with Janna.
LikeLike
Here’s something else that was missing in 1960: lockdowns! According to a NYTimes article earlier this week the lockdown is the new fire drill… Schools budget are looking more and more like the federal budget: more money for “defense” and less for social well being. http://waynegersen.com/2014/01/18/the-lockdown-is-the-new-fire-drill/
LikeLike
I agree here too…more for testing, “defense” and much much less for social well being.
LikeLike
There was also a golden age of teaching —60 – 90’s. While our salaries were not high, it was a great era to experiment, great conversations with colleagues, and a great learning experiences working with diverse populations. Most importantly, always felt I was part of something larger than myself—today, the reform agenda is to be part of something smaller than ourselves.
LikeLike
What was different in society is that it offered relatively stable jobs. My father was a manager so he would have done well in any society but my wife’s father was a maintenance man for a bank. He had vacations and a pension. That is something that lower level workers no longer get. He didn’t make much but his job was stable and he could depend on it.
LikeLike
Even most white collar workers today (managers, engineers, accountants, etc.) have no job security. They are often asked to work on short-term contracts with no benefits. Anyone at any level can be laid off at the whim of upper management, who have their eye on short-term earnings and the stock price, nothing else.
LikeLike
Crisis of Imagination Crisis of Power is a new article posted on the online ROAR Magazine site. I think it is getting at something being grappled with here. Memories of Better Times In Education is not about nostalgia but it is about economic arrangements that are deliberately extinguishing the childhood (and educational) conditions necessary for the development of imagination. Once that is accomplished, all forms of plutocratic power imposition will be possible and no cooperatively-created alternatives to the current catastrophe will be permitted. Progressive Educator, Harold Rugg comes to mind as he dedicated his life to the study of Imagination and its role in a democracy.
LikeLike
Good point. Democracy is fading away from all of our society. I am reading more and more critical pedagogy and realizing I never really did know what democracy was.
LikeLike
Ahh, the good old days, before schools forced parents to drive their kids straight to swimming and violin. Here’s what Andy Hargreaves and Dennis Shirley say about that era in their book, The Fourth Way:
“Teachers who entered education during this First Way and who were still teaching decades later expressed immense nostalgia for the schools of the 1960s and early 1970s. But there were two diametrically opposed nostalgias, not one. Teachers in schools that had been more innovative were nostalgic for the freedom to develop curricula to meet the varying needs of their students as part of a mission to change the world. This group believed that today’s reform environment of high-stakes testing and curriculum prescription had stolen this mission from them. They grieved for the passion and creativity that had been taken from their teaching.
“Teachers in schools that had been more traditional were also nostalgic for their lost professional autonomy, but not for the same reason. For them, autonomy meant liberty to teach academic subjects just as they chose-including long lectures in which they could display their subject mastery. They remembered schools that were smaller, where unmotivated students left early for employment, and where the students who stayed wanted to learn.
“The First Way therefore suffered from huge variations in focus and quality. Whether a school was traditional or innovative, excellent or awful, creative or bland, depended on the lottery of leadership among individual school leaders within an unregulated profession. The theories of change in action during this First Way could start innovation and spread it among a few enthusiasts. However, the skill base of teacher education rested on intuition and ideology, and not on evidence. There was no leadership development to create consistency of impact or effort. Parents had no way of knowing how their children were doing in school beyond the information conveyed on report cards. Fads were adopted uncritically, and many young radicals turned schools upside down during their brief tenures before leaving for greener pastures.”
. The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change (Kindle Locations 196-206). Kindle Edition.
LikeLike
“There was no leadership development to create consistency of impact or effort. Parents had no way of knowing how their children were doing in school beyond the information conveyed on report cards. Fads were adopted uncritically, and many young radicals turned schools upside down during their brief tenures before leaving for greener pastures.”
Well, I don’t see how this is any better today. The recent deforms only seem to be accelerating these faults, especially the bit about the “young radicals”.
LikeLike
This is definitely not a sales pitch for today punitive education reform. But CCSS….that’s another matter.
LikeLike
The poster’s age group represents an anomaly. By the time they were 3 the Depression was over; When they were draft age, both WWII & Korean wars were over. They were in the smallest segment of the smallest generation: lots of jobs to go around, lots of ’empty lots’ to play in while the ‘big kids’ were off fighting WWII. This was the most Silent slice of the Silent Generation: unless you read it in your small-town daily or heard it on the party line, it didn’t happen. Pregnancy, incest, wife-beating, cancer, suicide (let alone murder), other races, poor people and how they lived– not discussed in polite company.
LikeLike
How is it that they sell drugs outside elementary schools and no police are there to stop it? That tv is FILLED with violence, blatant sex, filthy language, talk show about eveything on earth and very few inspirational shows? How is it that movies are the same? Why is that kids are becoming mean vile bullies? And how is it that kids are connected to machines more than people? Society displays values in our media, books, tv and life that lead kids to suicide and misery at the thought of having to compete and be a part of it. Look at the Oscar nominations if you don’t believe me. American Hustle, Wolf of Wallstreet, Blue Jasmine, Osage County, Dallas Buyers Club, anything here remotely inspiring you to lead a good life or depressing to the max? And we wonder why kids are so depressed and sad? Of course if you have stellar parents they’ll protect you from all that, hopefully, but how many people have stellar parents how many are divorced, depressed and struggling selfishly letting their kids grow up but not raising them? It’s sad but it’s not the schools responsibility to make up for the horrors our society thrusts on our kids. Unless and until we change our values, from material to spiritual, from competitive to cooperative, from divisive to harmonious, from indifference to caring none of this will change for the better,. It is only a reflection of what people seem to live..
LikeLike
As soon as moms started working and dumping their kids in daycare, so went the neighborhood. In the 1970s most moms were still at home with their kids. Streets were teeming with kids playing, etc. This started to end in the 1980s when women started going to work and warehousing their kids. No, daycare is not the same as having a mother, sorry. There were researchers who said this but they were outcast for stating the obvious. There is much more community and neighborhood life in 3rd world countries. Now, if a mother decides to stay home and actually raise her own children, she is isolated and alone. That is the truth. How safe is a neighborhood when there are no mothers to look out for the kids?
LikeLike
Isolated and alone? Where do you live? I belong to many mommies groups and the majority are stay at home moms (SAHM). In my neighborhood most of the moms stay at home. A few work from home. Only a third go to work and often part-time. I do believe that children for lower socio economics do not get these benefits but the current middle class still has a lot of SAHM at least here in the south.
In 2011, 23 percent of married-couple family groups with children under 15 had a stay-at-home mother, up from 21 percent in 2000. In 2007, before the recession, stay-at-home mothers were found in 24 percent of married-couple family groups with children under 15.
So it is not like the 1970’s but not like you describe either.
LikeLike
John,
There have been countless massive cultural, political, economic, and technological changes since the 1970’s. Please don’t oversimplify a complex issue by laying all blame for today’s social problems on working moms.
LikeLike
I find it hard to relate to either John’s or Janna’s posts. I felt extremely privileged to be a stay-at-home mom in the early ’90’s: this was strictly due to having worked thro my 20’s & some infertility, resulting in coming late to motherhood.
All those middle-class families I knew who were 5 or more yrs younger were forced, after the Wall St crash of ’89 (thanx R Reagan) into a 2-career ‘lifestyle’ if they wanted to buy a home, & times have not improved since. The only stay-at-home moms I know now are beneficiaries of a 1%-job husband… As we so often note on this blog, schools, parents, students get blamed for what has ben a colossal failure of our govt to come to grips with globalism in a manner which sustains our way of life with… JOBS.
LikeLike
SFF I was not sure if my experiences or yours were accurate so this is what I found. It looks like neither of us sees what is really happening across the country:
“Stay-at-home mothers are younger, less educated and more likely to be Hispanic than they were in previous generations, and perhaps have a more traditional view of family and more limited job skills than other women these days, according to a Census Bureau report that analyzed changes in stay-at-home motherhood from 1969 to 2009. Eighteen percent of stay-at-home mothers lack a high school degree, compared with 7 percent of women in the work force. And black women were about half as likely as white women to be stay-at-home mothers.
Across the country, 70 percent of married women over the age of 25 with children work outside the home. The median income of those households is about $87,700, compared with $64,000 for households where the mother stays at home, according to an analysis by Andrew A. Beveridge, a sociologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. “The biggest difference is education,” he said.
According to the Census Bureau’s 40-year review, “Those with the least education are now the most likely to stay out of the labor force as stay-at-home mothers.”
LikeLike
I do not believe that things are any more corrupt or hopeless than they were in the civil war, Watergate, WW2, Salem Mass circa 1692. People are what we are and it is not always pretty. Our plight as human beings is to transcend the temptation, the turmoil and trends. We must be grounded in here and now because war is taking new forms, the enemy is not some dictator in the Middle East . The enemy is a by product of the very culture we want to wax nostalgic over. The American Dream was stolen by those who got the most from it, Rob Kall the editor of OPed considers the billionaires who form the emerging plutocracy “mutants” who pose a direct and diabolical threat to the rest of us. Fir them, more is never enough. It is as if they prey on human weakness. Nostalgia is one of those things. Sadly .,we will never return to that world. I miss riding my bike and kick ball too. Though where I live, on the lost coast, kids still do that too.
We are responsible for them, and as adults we cannot thwart their world . Technology and plutocrats are a reality they need to be ready for.
LikeLike
I would add only that this is in fact a democracy, & voters– particularly conservative voters– have chosen to turn a blind eye to the fact that every administration since Carter has been busily undoing the legislative measures which built up the middle class and protected it from the vicissitudes of the no-holds-barred capitalism that brought us speculation and depression in the 1st 1/3 of the 20thc. We now have precisely what we voted for: a corrupt system where corporate interests dictate legislation which fills their coffers while impoverishing the ordinary US household.
LikeLike
Photographer Dorthea Lange photographed children of a different age in America. I recall a poignant photo of children working in a textile factory near dangerous machinery. Are we heading back to a time where the majority of our nation’s children (thanks to adults) live in misery? Children may not be barefoot working 12 hour days in factories.. instead they live in rat infested apartments with parents who increasingly are out of the home as they have to work 3 jobs to pay the rent. They are not home much (or parents who are unemployed with mental health issues etc…). The children are forced to go to school where they spend an inordinate amount of time on tasks for which they or their teachers see no purpose (succeeding on an endless array of tests where the questions make absolutely no sense and yet they cannot review anything with their teachers). Play is nearly a forbidden word. They cannot interact naturally with their peers yet are supposed to miraculously understand the unspoken rules of getting along with others. They are referred to as human capital by the board of ed departments that oversee their curriculum. They in effect are being denied the ability to learn by the very institution that is supposed to encourage learning! School has been made into a dog eat dog pressure cooker “business environment” where the results of student test scores determine the fate of their teachers’ lives and the students lives as they learn to feel like failures when they get the “results”. Life should be joyful for children but alas life is not at all joyful (especially if you are as unlucky as to be a child from a lower income family). As our president sends his children to a joyful day at a private school, poor parents send their children to a torturous day of test prep and top down curriculum that makes their classroom teachers ill to administer and yet their hands are tied. Thanks Arne Duncan. Thanks Obama. This is not what the America I grew up in looked like. Sure, our nation has always had its share of problems and my public education was not perfect but I still had a childhood. There were poorer housing developments (projects) near the school where I went (even though the school included a large middle and upper class population). My friends who lived in the projects still played after school, attended school plays, partook in sport events and teams. Their parents were able to work jobs which enabled them to put a roof over their heads and a meal on the table and even have time to spend with family. In middle school and high school we had homework. Some days homework could be completed after dinner or before (I had a choice). Other days, I needed to spend more time and so I would. But there were always breaks to be a kid. I did not spend holidays being given mandatory work packets! I spent them with my family and was lucky enough to have parents who were able to take their vacation time when I had mine. It is sick what the likes of ignorant “leaders” like Duncan are doing to our nation’s children. Sick. I read Peter Gray’s recent piece on childhood and WE TEACHERS, PARENTS, LEADERS must take a stand and it is a stand for human rights. This is not the world that MLK would have envisioned for any child black, what or other! DUMP DUNCAN…… Mr. Obama…. DUMP DUNCAN. Hard to imagine that our president is promoting RTTT.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/give-childhood-back-to-children-if-we-want-our-offspring-to-have-happy-productive-and-moral-lives-we-must-allow-more-time-for-play-not-less-are-you-listening-gove-9054433.html
LikeLike
Thanks for this, artseagal. What an excellent link. I encourage all to read it. It is right on the money.
I too benefited from extensive play in a ’50’s US rural area. I was saddened to learn from a playmate from those days that her daughter (in the ’80’s) did not have the same freedoms, tho she lived in a similar rural area– there had been pedophile incidents which caused parents to circumscribe their kids’ activities.
I wonder whether things had actually changed– or whether it was just the increased knowledge, perhaps thro media, which caused the change. No question there were shady characters in my ’50’s nbhd as well, but people weren’t as attuned. I sometimes think the cultural changes we observe reflect simply a foolish rejection of the human condition, perhaps encouraged by technology– an attempt to control all variables.
But mostly what I glean from your post: one needs a comfortable economy in order to afford one’s children the opportunity of a play-filled, creativity-inducing childhood. Such was always available to the “1%” of the 19thc., & briefly to the middle-class of the 1950’s.
LikeLike
Just had to share…
I have been spending the day cooking and doing laundry. My eldest child was outside playing with a friend. As I washed dishes and puttered around in the kitchen I could hear them laughing and having a grand old time. After a while things got quiet, which always sets off alarm bells for mamas. I couldn’t see them either. So, I turned off the faucet and walked toward the window where I saw the two of them perched up in a tree!
So, yeah, it still happens.
LikeLike
As I reply to you, I can hear neighborhood kids playing in the dark. Sure, it still happens, at least in my expensive NJ neighborhood.
But, being 10 or 15 yrs your senior, I am looking down the barrel of a retirement income of 1/3 (pensions having been dispensed with in the mid-’90’s in my husband’s highly-pd engrg career– & 401k’s decimated in 2008), & the knowledge that my boys’ BA’s (neither got my husband’s ‘STEM’ genes), bought in cash & debt by us so as to give them a leg up w/no student debt– are resulting so far in nothing but free- or slave-wage internships & barely-above-minimum-wage employment. This despite yrs of highly-pd work by me as well, which went into once-valuable housing, which is declining rapidly.
Time to hunker down. My obsession is figuring out how to pay off the mortgage, so several generations can live together, a la depression-era.
LikeLike
The speed at which we plow forward with so many facets of education reform, makes it impossible for any of these reforms to be successful and function well. It is difficult to believe that the leaders of these movements believe they will be effective. These leaders are educated people and therefore think openly and logically. The resistance to these reforms have been countered with closed minded, illogical responses. One can conclude that there is another intent to this reform and it is not in the best interest of the future of public education. I hope this is not the case, however, when you speak to the people in the classrooms, we are careening out of control and students are not receiving the education they once did just two or three years ago.
LikeLike
John, you are so right. We are plowing ahead without looking where we are going. Shouldn’t we move the rocks first? If these current trends are truly the right track, then let’s tweak them and make sure they are doable. (They need a lot of tweaking, but this is all hypothetical.) Then pilot the program in various parts of the country to see if the results match the intent.
Saying we just can’t wait to see if the program is valid is like sending a bull into a china shop.
Which leads us to believe in ulterior motives.
LikeLike
It’s wonderful to look back on the past with fond memories. Somehow we seem to forget all the angst of our childhood years. I’m glad so many of you had happy times – my experiences, I guess, were tainted.
My mother, a young widow, couldn’t get a line of credit or buy a house. Women didn’t do those things. My uncle co-signed for the house, even though he didn’t pay a cent. We had money when my father was alive, we were poor when he died. And it was hard for a woman to find work, even with a college degree. Life for the average woman has improved (and not everybody is happy being a stay at home mom – I certainly wasn’t).
Yes, there were happy moments. There were sad ones too.
I lived through the Civil Rights Movement and the ERA. I lived through the assassinations. I remember the student demonstrations, which often resulted in violence. It was a scary time.
Bad things happened in the 50s and 60s and 70s. To adults and to children. Those were the days – but not for everyone.
And we didn’t learn about the treatment of the Native Americans or the Asians or the African Americans. No Trail of Tears, no internment, no talk of the horrors of slavery in the curriculum. We were taught the American Dream. Our fault or not, we ignored the ugliness. No wonder we are now so shocked at what we see. We were wearing blinders throughout our youth and into adulthood.
Enjoy your day dreams. But when you awake it is 2014, and it’s turning into a living nightmare. Forget the past (for better or worse, those days are gone), roll up your sleeves, and get ready for reality. There’s important work to do.
And, if we’re lucky, we can get a taste of that dreamy childhood for our great grand children.
LikeLike