Archives for the year of: 2013

Linda Whittington writes from Mississippi to explain what happened because of her opposition to chartre schools:

As a member of the Mississppi House of Representatives, I agree and am doing what I can to stop the charters from coming into our state. So much so that the Speaker of the House removed me from the House Education Committee where I had served since 2007. No sitting member had ever been removed without consenting to the move. The Speaker acknowledged that I was removed because of my votes against charter schools.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, and the American Civil Liberties Union have filed a lawsuit challenging a state law that allows tuition tax credits, saying it subsidizes religious schools.

Where are the lawsuits in Indiana, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Louisiana to challenge voucher programs that directly fund religious schools with public money?

Gary Rubinstein, the brilliant math teacher at Stuyvesant High School in New York City, has done it again.

He has dissected the Gates MET study–the one that says test scores are better at determining teacher quality than observations–and he says that the data in the study don’t make the point that has been widely reported.

Gene Glass, Research Professor at the University of Colorado, takes apart the MET study, and like Gary, says that the $50 million was a waste.

I wonder when Gates will abandon his mission to find the perfect metric to measure teacher quality. It isn’t working anywhere; it has perverse incentives; it is inaccurate and unreliable.  How long will he stick with this failed idea?

Just think how many musical instruments that $50 million would have bought, how many librarians could have been rehired, how many after-school programs might have been funded.

 

 

EduShyster continues to set the gold standard for reformy humor.

In this post, she describes the annual campaign by charter operators in Massachusetts to pressure the state legislature to lift the cap so they can open more charter schools.

She notes that the students most involved in demanding more charter schools are already enrolled in one. She notes that they are bused to hearings and miss school to demand more charters.

This happens often in New York City. When there are hearings about school closings, there are usually bus loads of charter students and parents in identical tee-shirts, demanding more closings of public schools and more charters.

When I first saw this, I was puzzled. Why would they want more charters if they already attend one? How many schools can one student attend? Would a public school principal be allowed to hire buses to take students to a public hearing? Or to do it during school hours? Of course not. He or she would be fired.

Mercedes Schneider has a Ph.D. In statistics. She teaches in St. Tammany Parish in Louisiana. Recently, she has discovered that the Louisiana Department of Education has engaged in fancy statistical manipulation of test scores and school grades. The bottom line is that the public is getting spin and hype from that agency, not trustworthy data about student achievement.

In this post, Mercedes explains her efforts to get honest data from the Department. She was thwarted repeatedly.

Louisiana is a beautiful state with wonderful culture and warm people.

For generations, Louisiana has had a reputation as one of the most corrupt state governments in the nation. Plus Ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.

Bob Somerby at the Daily Howler is a watchdog of American journalism.

He regularly criticizes the media, and is especially good when he looks at education. He recently dissected the misleading and overly negative coverage of international tests.

In the past few days, he has been on a roll. He was incensed by the Washington Post‘s fawning coverage of our greatest “education celebrity.” Over the past weekend, trying to immunize Rhee from the renewed uproar about cheating, The Washington Post ran a long article about Rhee’s celebrity, an editorial defending her, and an opinion piece by her admiring biographer.

Here are a few choice comments by Somerby: “A true journalistic disgrace: Over the weekend, the Washington Post was at it again. It was doing the thing the Post does best. The Washington Post was peddling Rhee. This newspaper simply won’t stop.”

And this: “…she’s the dream girl of the world’s billionaires—and the Washington Post won’t stop peddling.”

Read The Daily Howler pieces here, here and here.

A word about the Washington Post. It continues to run Valerie Strauss’s invaluable blog, which has provided a voice and a platform for critics of corporate reform, including critics of Rhee. And an editor there invited me to review Richard Whitmire’s biography of Rhee. That said, the newspaper’s editorial board has been Rhee’s most unflinching defender and whatever she does and says.

 

Kris Neilsen wrote an amazing post (“NC Teacher: I Quit“) a few months back, which was opened by 150,000 people, at a minimum.

He continues to teach and to write. He has recently written a series called “This Is How Democracy Ends.” In this post, he expresses his profound opposition to the Common Core State Standards.

He believes that the corporate reform movement has foisted the Common Core standards on the schools, with the expectation that scores will fall, reinforcing their claim that American public education is a failure:

He writes: “This fits nicely with the ongoing onslaught that StudentsFirst, TFA, Bill Gates, The Broad Foundation, the Walton family, and Democrats for Education Reform have sustained. As Kentucky schools showed recently, the mix of new standardized tests and the Common Core leads to dismal school failure. How many more schools, districts, and states will see the same problems? How long will it take for teachers and schools to be the ultimate scapegoat of those failures? How long will it take for bad policy to remove good teachers and replace them with mass-produced teachers with 6 weeks of training in test administration and little else?”

The Hamburg (NY) teachers union has refused to agree to a deal on teacher evaluations that would give all power to the superintendent; they want an independent person to make the final judgment when a teacher appeals a bad evaluation.

Negotiations broke down when an administrator threatened that teachers would be fired if no agreement was reached.

Remember that the deal is about getting $450,000 for the district to comply with Race to the Top, which requires that teachers be evaluated by the scores of their students. New York has an evaluation plan whose own designers (AIR) have said is not ready for prime time.

By agreeing, the teachers agree to be judged by a methodology that is JUNK SCIENCE.

Be strong, Hamburg Teachers. Minimize the damage to teachers, and you protect your students and your schools against churn and demoralization.

Karen Francisco, the fearless education writer at the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette, describes here how Republican legislators are planning to hack away at the powers of the state superintendent.

They are trying to reverse the defeat of Tony Bennett and negate the will of the voters, who overwhelmingly voted to Glenda Ritz as state superintendent.

With Republican supermajorities in both houses of the legislature, they have the votes to silence Ritz and the people who elected her.

This is shameful. The legislature of the great state of Indiana is openly flouting the will of the electorate.

The people who elected Glenda Ritz should vote these scoundrels out of office next time.

Maine Governor Paul LePage had a tantrum (or hissy fit) when the state’s Charter School Commission rejected four out of five applicants. He was especially annoyed because two of the four rejected were for-profit online corporations. As we learned from an exposé last fall in the Maine press, the state commissioner of education got help from Jeb Bush’s friends in writing a “digital learning” law for Maine. Governor LePage must have longed to win more praise from Jeb and the technology industry, which really really really wants to break into the Maine market.

The Maine Charter School Commission did due diligence, followed the law, and rejected unqualified applicants, despite political pressure from the governor.

To learn why the commission rejected four of the five applicants, read this great column.

Here is a sample:

“LePage caught many in the State House off guard Wednesday when he called a rare news conference to complain that Maine schools are “failing” and that our educators “abuse our children in the classroom by lying to them.”

His primary target: the all-volunteer Charter School Commission, which earlier this week denied four of five pending applications for new charter schools — including two “virtual” online schools pitched by out-of-state, for-profit companies that have spent much of the past year or two cozying up to the LePage administration.

“I’m asking (members of the commission) for the good of the kids of the state of Maine, please go away,” snarled LePage. “We don’t need you. We need some people with backbones.”

Two things worth noting here:

First, as he hits the halfway point of his seemingly endless four-year term, Maine’s chief executive has been reduced to telling those who tick him off (an ever-growing segment of Maine’s population, mind you) to simply “go away.”

Second, if their actions this week are any indication, the seven members of the Charter School Commission have backbones of pure titanium.”