Archives for the year of: 2013

State legislatures make decisions about funding formulas, so that is where lobbyists spend their time and energy.

In Florida, the legislature is very charter-friendly when it comes to money for operations, facilities, and capital sending.

When you read this article, you will see why.

Here’s a pithy quote:

“A growing number of lawmakers have personal ties to charter schools. Sen. John Legg, who chairs the Senate Education Committee, is co-founder and business administrator of Dayspring Academy in Port Richey. Anne Corcoran, wife of future House Speaker Richard Corcoran, plans to open a classics-themed charter school in Pasco County. House Budget Chairman Seth McKeel is on the board of the McKeel Academy Schools in Polk County.

“In addition, the brother-in-law of House Education Appropriations Chairman Erik Fresen runs the state’s largest charter management firm, Academica Corp. And Sen. Anitere Flores, also of Miami, is the president of an Academica-managed charter college in Doral.

Frank Biden, brother of Vice President Joe Biden, runs a for-profit charter chain in Florida called Mavericks.

Toni Preckwinkle, the president of the Cook County board, deplores the closing of 54 public schools in Chicago. She said it was a terrible idea.

She said:

 “You know, schools are community anchors. They’re social centers. They’re part of a community’s identity. And often kids go half a dozen blocks and they’re in different gang territory.

“The closings are going to take place almost entirely within the African-American community, and given the problems we already have with violence, I think it’s very problematic.”

Instead of closing schools, she said, “We ought to invest a lot more in our public schools. You know, feed the kids breakfast, lunch, and dinner; have after-school activities; keep the schools open until nine o’clock in the evenings and on weekends; invest in things like the Boys and Girls Club and the Park District—I mean, everything, basically, to dramatically ramp up the investments in our children.”

Preckwinkle realizes that our values are distorted: People “would rather pay to keep somebody incarcerated than to support music lessons or soccer team memberships or basketball team uniforms for kids in poor neighborhoods.”

Please, someone, introduce this woman to Arne Duncan and Barack Obama. Introduce her to Bill Gates and Eli Broad. Introduce her to Rahm Emanuel. Or how about the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune?

In this post, Anthony Cody takes issue with Randi Weingarten’s decision to write an essay with Vicki Phillips of the Gates Foundation about teacher evaluation. Here is the essay.

The fundamental problem with the Gates Foundation is that they have directed the entire national conversation to blaming teachers–instead of poverty and segregation– for low test scores. They have put hundreds of millions of dollars into evaluating teachers, finding good teachers (and rewarding them), finding “bad” teachers (and firing them).

For the past four years, since Gates dropped his small high school obsession, the foundation has been determined to prove that it is possible to find a metric to evaluate teachers. Test scores are a large part of that metric. In some states, thanks to Bill Gates and the Obama administration’s Race to the Top, the test scores count for as much as 50% of a teacher’s evaluation.

This emphasis on test scores has predictably led to narrowing the curriculum, teaching to the test, and cheating. It has also distracted policymakers from addressing the real causes of student failure, not teachers, but the conditions in which children and families live and the growing inequality in our society.

Gates has also funded phony teacher groups–made up of young teachers with little experience and no career commitment to teaching–who demand that teachers be evaluated by test scores, despite the evidence against it, and who testify in legislatures that they are teachers and they want no job protections. Gates, in short, is no friends to teachers, to the teaching profession, or to unions.

In 2010, he urged the nation’s governors not to pay teachers extra for experience or master’s degrees, but to increase class size for the most “effective” teachers. How will education improve if classes are larger, and teachers have less experience and less education?

I think I understand what Randi is thinking. She thinks she got Vicki Phillips to agree that teacher evaluation is moving too fast. And Randi did not endorse VAM or MET. She believes she won concessions from the nation’s most powerful foundation.

But here is my view: the teaching profession across America is under attack. The Gates Foundation has helped to fuel that attack by its claim that teacher quality is our biggest problem. Teacher-bashing has become sport for talk shows and pundits. Legislatures are vying to see what they can do to demoralize teachers, what benefit they can strip away, what right they can negate.

In the face of this onslaught, the issue of teacher evaluation is less important than the morale of teachers and the survival of the teaching profession. I have concluded that the effort to reduce teaching to a metric–the goal of the Gates Foundation–is failing and will continue to fail because the flaws are too deep for it to ever work. Teachers should be evaluated by their peers and experienced administrators. I have been impressed by the Peer Assistance and Review program in Montgomery County, Maryland. I note that no other nation in the world is trying to quantify teaching. There is a reason for that. What matters most cannot be measured, so we value only what can be measured. And that may be what matters least.

How great is the Providence Student Union? The students persuaded 50 accomplished professionals to take a test made up of released items from the math test.

60% of these brave and successful people would have failed to get a high school diploma if they were high school students.

The Providence Student Union made a video of the event. It is less than three minutes. See it here.

Next time you hear elected officials or advocates say they want more tests, ask them if they are willing to take the high school graduation test themselves. Ask Michelle. Ask Bill. Ask Arne. Ask Joel. Ask Bobby. Ask Andrew.

In Chicago, the corporate reformers who claim to be leading “the civil rights movement of our time” are closing down schools in black communities. How this enhances the civil rights of the children is a mystery known only to the elites.

This is a news bulletin from the Chicago Teachers Union about tomorrow’s protest demonstration:

NEWS RELEASE

March 26, 2013

StephanieGadlin@ctulocal1.com

Secret Memo: CPS warns principals about possible civil disobedience in response to massive school closings

School officials asked to spy on demonstrators, take note of media

CHICAGO – The day before educators from the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) intend to join with parents, students, clergy, community leaders, civil rights activists and the rank-and-file members of SEIU Local 1 and Unite HERE Local 1; the union released a confidential memo sent to the city’s public school principals warning them of potential civil disobedience actions in protest of school closings. Mayor Rahm Emanuel will seek to shutter more than 50 neighborhood schools in the African American community by the end of this school year.

Thousands of parents, students, teachers, paraprofessionals and school clinicians attended various hearings across the city where they presented evidence that their schools were not being “underutilized” and begged for them not to be closed. Despite the outcry, the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) chief executive listened instead to a politically-connected, ad-hoc commission she created and has since recommended 61 school actions, including the closings. Should the Board approve, this will be the largest closing of schools in a single school district in the nation’s history.

CPS’s announcement was met with shock, outrage, disbelief and defiance. While many of those impacted have vowed to fight until the end to save their neighborhood school from closure, others plan to rally downtown on Wednesday, March 27th, to illustrate their demand for education justice. People will gather at 4 p.m. at Daley Plaza where they will proceed to City Hall and to Board of Education headquarters.

Preparing for what could be the spark of 21st century Civil Rights Movement in Chicago, the school district recently instructed principals to prepare for the worst. “Be approachable and supportive to feelings of unrest, anxiety or dissatisfaction” the secret memo read. “Observe and report all information regarding possible protestors, locations, dates and times… Is the media present? Which news outlet(s)?”

The CTU obtained the memorandum from a source who has requested anonymity for fear of repercussions. “They’ve asked us to do a lot of things that I’m not happy with, but some of this is going too far,” the person said.

CTU President Karen Lewis, “Why are they asking principals to work as agents of this administration when they are the ones who have created a climate of chaos? Civil disobedience is a direct response to unjust policies and practices. We intend to use whatever nonviolence protest actions we have in this fight for education justice.

“The bottom line is the schools targeted for closure are based on the racial makeup of those schools and their zip codes,” Lewis said. “We will continue to plead our cause, fight in the courts and in the streets for what is right for our students and our communities. They can start with a moratorium on all school actions now.”

###
The Chicago Teachers Union represents 30,000 teachers and educational support personnel working in the Chicago Public Schools, and by extension, the more than 400,000 students and families they serve. The CTU is an affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers and the Illinois Federation of Teachers and is the third largest teachers local in the United States and the largest local union in Illinois. For more information please visit CTU’s website at http://www.ctunet.com .
SG:oteg-743-tr

Several weeks ago, a Chicago website reported that the Chicago Tribune, the Joyce Foundation, and the University of Chicago were engaging in “push polling.” This is a telephone poll that literally “pushes” the listener in a certain direction, with questions designed to have pre-determined conclusions.

Read the transcript. Do you think this was a push poll?

This just in, and don’t forget tomorrow’s big rally at Daley Plaza to protest the closing of more than 50 public schools:

 

 

 

 

CReATE has a petition that we are asking university researchers and education professors to sign on to.  After reading our brief on School Closings (url below), they can go to

createchicago@gmail.com and put SIGN SCHOOL CLOSING PETITION in subject line.  In your message, include your name, university affiliation, and an email address where you can be contacted (this will not be included on the petition).

DEADLINE –  MONDAY, APRIL 1ST at NOON. The signatures will be brought to a Chicago school closings press conference on April 2nd.

Thank you,
Stephanie Farmer and the school closures working group

JOIN CHICAGO AREA EDUCATION RESEARCHERS TO DEMAND THE CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION REJECT CLOSING 54 SCHOOLS

We, the undersigned, call upon the Chicago Board of Education to reject the closing of 54 schools at their May meeting, and instead, to implement reforms that are guided by solid research and by a vision of public education that offers every child the very best that our city has to offer.  We also urge consulting with the professors in CReATE, who bring both scholarly and practical expertise on these issues.

Chicagoland Researchers and Advocates for Transformative Education (CReATE), a network of over 100 professors from numerous Chicago-area universities who specialize in educational research, has reviewed the literature on school closures and conducted an analysis of newly released data to critically assess Chicago Public Schools arguments to justify school closures and to gain a better understanding of what Chicago residents can expect from massive school closures.  The history of previous school closures and school actions reveal that closures negatively impact academic performance and create more hardship for communities already suffering from social abandonment.  Our findings do not support CPS’ arguments for closing schools and we conclude that school closures will contribute to a separate and unequal educational system in Chicago.  To access the research brief, go to:tinyurl.com/cm9l7jd

1. Stephanie Farmer, Roosevelt University
2. Isaura Pulido, Northeastern Illinois University
3. Pamela Konkol, Concordia University Chicago
4. Kate Phillippo, Loyola University
5. David Stovall, University of Illinois at Chicago
6. Michael Klonsky, DePaul University
7. William Ayers, University of Illinois at Chicago
8. Erica Meiners, Northeastern Illinois University
9. Leslie Bloom, Roosevelt University
10. Therese Quinn, University of Illinois at Chicago
11. Sumi Cho, DePaul University
12. Federico Waitoller, University of Illinois at Chicago
13. Crystal Laura, Chicago State University
14. Diane Horwitz, DePaul University
15. Kevin Kumashiro, University of Illinois at Chicago
16. Isabel Nuñez, Concordia University Chicago
17. Horace Hall, DePaul University
18. Amira Proweller, DePaul University
19. Noah W. Sobe, Loyola U

This is funny. Bobby Jindal and John White have ruled the state education system with an iron hand since Jindal won control of the state board of education. They have pushed vouchers and charters on the theory that parents need “choice” and the public schools should have no priority.

Now a Republican legislator has proposed that the voters should choose their state superintendent.

Let’s see how Jindal and White feel about that choice.

Matt Di Carlo examines the latest data about the availability of school nurses, and it is disturbing.

For many children, the school nurse is the only medical care they will get.

Only 41% of schools have a RN on staff.

The data are none too new. They are from 2006, before the economic collapse. Very likely, the number with full-time nurses is even less now.

Now here is a job for the Gates Foundation. Place a Gates nurse in every school in every low-income district. That will raise test scores even more than MET or VAM.

The first organization out of the box to salute today’s Indiana court decision endorsing vouchers is the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, which exists to support vouchers.

As you learned in an earlier post today, vouchers in Sweden have been concurrent with growing social stratification (in the U.S., we would call it growing segregation by race and class), lower test scores on international assessments since 1995, and growing profits for vendors of educational services.

So if vouchers spread, we can expect resegregation of U.S. schools, even worse than what already exists; we can expect public funds to flow to church schools that teach creationism; we can expect growing inequality; and we can expect no improvement whatever in education.

Milwaukee has had vouchers since 1990 and is today one of the nation’s lowest performing school districts.

This is an ominous trend, which will hurt our democracy, our schools, and our children:

From the Friedman Foundation:

For release March 26, 2013

The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice

Indiana Supreme Court Rules School Vouchers Constitutional

INDIANAPOLIS — The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice hailed today’s ruling from the Indiana Supreme Court, which declared the state’s school voucher program constitutional. The announcement ends a nearly two-year-long review of the nation’s largest voucher initiative, for which more than half of the state’s student population qualifies.
The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the program by a vote of 5-0, ruling “the voucher program expenditures do not directly benefit religious schools but rather directly benefit lower-income families with school-children by providing an opportunity for such children to attend non-public schools if desired.”
Following the enactment of the Choice Scholarship Program in May 2011, a group of Indiana taxpayers represented by the National Education Association filed suit, claiming vouchers improperly benefited private religious schools. Parents who intervened in the case, represented by the Institute for Justice, argued the true beneficiaries of the program were the families.
“Kids and parents won today,” said Robert Enlow, president and CEO of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. “With this announcement, Indiana should move immediately to make this opportunity available to more families, and other states should look at this victory and see that the education establishment’s ability to obstruct families’ freedom to choose is waning.”
The Meredith v. Daniels lawsuit moved to the state Supreme Court after a Marion County Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the program in January 2012. Judge Michael Keele rejected the plaintiffs’ argument the Choice Scholarship Program violated the Indiana Constitution’s Blaine Amendment, which prohibits state treasury money from being used explicitly for the benefit of religious or theological institutions.
Judge Keele noted that scholarship recipients can “choose to use the funding for education at a public, secular private, or religious private school.” Such was the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002, when it upheld the constitutionality of Cleveland’s school voucher program.
“School choice continues to prove its successes nationwide,” Enlow added, “whether that’s in schools, homes, legislatures, or courtrooms. The issue is about giving families the right to find the best educational setting for their kids, pure and simple. Protectors of the status quo should stop standing in the way of kids and rather work to increase the availability of high-quality educational options.”
Indiana’s legislature currently is reviewing a proposal to expand the Choice Scholarship Program. In the program’s second year, 9,324 low- and middle-income families are participating. The expansion would allow siblings of voucher recipients, children with special needs, kids in foster care, and K-12 dependents of military members to qualify for vouchers. It also would increase the cap on the individual voucher amount to $6,500 from its current $4,500.
Currently, 22 states and Washington, D.C., have some type of private school choice measure. In voucher programs specifically, there are 104,000 participants in 12 states and Washington, D.C.
About the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, solely dedicated to advancing Milton and Rose Friedman’s vision of school choice for all children. First established as the Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation in 1996, the Foundation continues to promote school choice as the most effective and equitable way to improve the quality of K-12 education in America. The Foundation is dedicated to research, education, and outreach on the vital issues and implications related to choice and competition in K-12 education.
Contact
Jeff Reed
Communications Director
Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice
E-Mail: jeff@edchoice.org
Phone: 317-681-0745