Archives for the year of: 2013

Maureen Reedy, a veteran teacher and a teacher of the year in Ohio, has been fighting valiantly against the privatization movement in Ohio.

In this article that she wrote in the Columbus Despatch, she demonstrates how charters of low quality have diverted billions of dollars from the state’s public schools.

Consider:

“While 77 percent of Ohio’s public schools were successful last year (rated Excellent with Distinction, Achieving or Effective), only 23 percent of Ohio’s charters were successful (rated Effective or Achieving). So 77 percent of Ohio’s public schools are receiving A’s, B’s and C’s while 77 percent of Ohio’s charter schools are receiving D’s and F’s. And the bottom 111 performing schools last year? All were charter schools.”

And consider this:

““Following the money” also leads us to family-run charter-school operations with hefty salaries and few education credentials, including multimillion-dollar salaries for the CEOs of Ohio’s two largest charter-school chains, David Brennan of White Hat Management Co. and William Lager of Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow. Our tax dollars also are going to pay for advertising campaigns to recruit students to attend their underperforming charter schools.”

And here is a fact that is very odd: When public money goes to charters in Ohio, there is no transparency or accountability. It mysteriously transformed into private money belonging to the charter operator.

The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which sponsors charters in Ohio, disagrees with Reedy. It says that most charter schools are not for-profit (although the two that Reedy mentions are reaping huge profits), and that the number of failing charter schools and failing district schools are about the same.

Willa Powell, a member of the school board in Rochester, New York, will keep her child home on testing day.

Buried in this story is a very strange comment by State Commissioner John King.

“As we looked at flat test scores in New York and across the country, it was impossible to ignore a few sobering facts,” said state Education Commissioner John King in a video message to parents. “We’re not faring as well as we should be in the new global marketplace. Too many of our graduates aren’t prepared to succeed in college or their careers. The Common Core state standards are the answer to this problem.”

Help me understand.

He says the scores are flat, so we will adopt tests that we believe will cause the scores to go down.

He says too many of our graduates are not ready for college or careers. We think the new standards–though no one has any evidence– will solve this problem.

What am I missing here? Logic?

Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone has a hilarious article about a hedge fund manager who manages pension funds, but is also a board member and co-founder of StudentsFirst in New York, which advocates against defined benefit pension plans.

You will enjoy reading the exchange between Dan Loeb, the hedge fund manager, and Randi Weingarten, who tries to set up a meeting to discuss the inconsistencies in his views.

As this article in the New York Times explains, elementary schoolchildren are frightened by the tests that start this week, based on the Common Core.

The article points out that neither the students nor the teachers are prepared. Some of the material was never taught. “But the standards are so new that many New York schools have yet to fully adopt new curriculums — including reading material, lesson plans and exercises — to match. And the textbook industry has not completely caught up either. State and city officials have urged teachers over the last year to begin working in some elements of new curriculums, and have offered lesson plans and tutorials on official Web sites. But they acknowledge that scores will most likely fall from last year’s levels.”

Merryl Tisch, who head the state Board of Regents, toured a school and heard about how upset the students.

“Believe me, I relate to test anxiety,” she said during a visit last week to the Academy of Arts and Letters in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, one of several schools that city and state education officials visited to express support for the new tests. “We can’t wait,” she said. “We have to just jump into the deep end.”

“We” have to jump into the deep end? No, your child must.

Think about it. As a parent, would you throw your child into the deep end, even if he or she can’t swim?

Opt out.

The American Indian Model Schools has turned into a long-running drama. This week it took a sharp turn for the worse, as the board fired top administrators, some board members denounced other board members, and everyone was angry.

All this followed the revocation of the charters due to fiscal improprieties.

For years, it was the toast of conservative pundits because of its high test scores, its no-excuses discipline, and the epithets hurled by its director Ben Chavis at unions, school boards, liberals, “multiculturalists,” and anyone else he didn’t like. It won praise from Governor Schwarzenegger, President George W, Bush, Jonathan Alter, John Stossel, George Will, and was the lead exemplar in David Whitman’s book praising “the new paternalism,” which was titled “Sweating the Small Stuff.” Whitman became Arne Duncan’s chief speechwriter soon after his book came out.

Back to AIMS. Chavis was indeed a harsh disciplinarian, but he was also strategic. At last count, there were almost no American Indians enrolled in the school. The student body was predominantly Asian-American.

The troubles began with a state audit which reported that $3.8 million of the schools’ funds ended up in businesses run by Chavis and his wife. The charges are still under investigation by the local district attorney.

Rachel Levy is a well-informed blogger who keeps a close watch on DC and Virginia education politics.

Here she wonders why anyone is surprised by the latest revelation about Rhee.

Who will investigate now that the two official bodies that previously investigated cleared Rhee without managing to dispel doubts about what happened?

And what about the hundreds of teachers who were fired because they taught kids with scores inflated by schools that cheated?

When Glenda Ritz took over outgoing Superintendent Tony Bennett’s office, she was surprised to find some very expensive teleconferencing equipment. But it didn’t work, because it was only partially installed.

Turns out that Bennett was so sure of his re-election that he installed a system costing $1.7 million from Cisco. Unfortunately it is incompatible with the current technology.

So all Ritz has is three very elegant blinds.

For $1.7 million.

Wonder how many teachers that might have paid.

School officials across the nation keep warning that the new tests are “harder,” and passing rates will drop by 30% or more.

Why?

The passing mark–or cut score–on tests is not determined by science. It is a judgment call.

Those who are in charge decide where to place the passing mark.

If the scores go down on a test that is new, it is because the officials set the passing mark with foreknowledge that scores and passing rates would fall.

In addition, the state education department piloted the questions, and they know with a high level of precision which are hard and which are easy.

If the scores fall, they were designed to fall.

This is what they want.

Why? I don’t know. Ask them.

Huffington Post reporter Joy Resmovits notes renewed calls for investigation of cheating under Rhee but then points out that the issue has been thoroughly investigated, at least to the satisfaction of Rhee, Henderson, Duncan, and the Huffington Post.

She notes the latest cheating “audit” by Alvarez & Marsal and even refers to the fiirm as auditors. But A&M is not an auditing firm. It has no experience investigating test security.

A&M is a high priced management consulting agency. It restructures bankrupt companies. It was hired to turnaround the St. Louis public schools. Its CEO took charge; he had previously run the clothing store Brooks Brothers. A&M collected $5 million and left after a year with the schools in worse shape.

The NYC Department of Education gave A&M a no-bid contract for $15.8 million to reorganize NYC school bus routes. Executives were paid $500 an hour plus per Diem. When their new schedule was implemented, it was a disaster, with thousands of kids stranded on the coldest day of the year.

And now DC hires them for “test security.”

Why not bring in the investigators who got to the bottom of the Atlanta mess? Real investigators, not a business restructuring team.

The movement to opt out of state testing is spreading in Néw York. State leaders are threatening parents and schools with loss of funding; teachers are threatened with disciplinary action if they encourage parents.

PARENTS, DO NOT BE INTIMIDATED.

It is your choice.

If everyone stands together, the petty tyrants in Albany can’t do anything.

Here is an email from a parent in Long Island:

*****

I want to make you aware of a movement happening on Long Island, NY.

The NYS ELA standardized tests are are set to begin this Tuesday, and there are many parents who are choosing to opt their children out of the tests.

NYSED is trying to bully the schools into bullying the parents by saying that schools will lose funding if more than 5% op out. Some districts are playing along with the state, but many are cooperating with parents and making accommodations for children who will not take the test. One district even issued a resolution condemning the tests. Isn’t that great?

It would be great if you and your readers would support us. We are on Facebook at “Long Island Opt-out Info.”

https://www.facebook.com/groups/141680156005331/