Maya Angelou, the Pulitzer-Prize winning author, was one of 120 writers and illustrators who called on President Obama to cut back on the deluge of standardized testing promoted by his administration.
The 120 authors and illustrators issued the following statement to the President:
We the undersigned children’s book authors and illustrators write to express our concern for our readers, their parents and teachers. We are alarmed at the negative impact of excessive school testing mandates, including your Administration’s own initiatives, on children’s love of reading and literature. Recent policy changes by your Administration have not lowered the stakes. On the contrary, requirements to evaluate teachers based on student test scores impose more standardized exams and crowd out exploration.
We call on you to support authentic performance assessments, not simply computerized versions of multiple-choice exams. We also urge you to reverse the narrowing of curriculum that has resulted from a fixation on high-stakes testing.
Our public school students spend far too much time preparing for reading tests and too little time curling up with books that fire their imaginations. As Michael Morpurgo, author of the Tony Award Winner War Horse, put it, “It’s not about testing and reading schemes, but about loving stories and passing on that passion to our children.”
Teachers, parents and students agree with British author Philip Pullman who said, “We are creating a generation that hates reading and feels nothing but hostility for literature.” Students spend time on test practice instead of perusing books. Too many schools devote their library budgets to test-prep materials, depriving students of access to real literature. Without this access, children also lack exposure to our country’s rich cultural range.
This year has seen a growing national wave of protest against testing overuse and abuse. As the authors and illustrators of books for children, we feel a special responsibility to advocate for change. We offer our full support for a national campaign to change the way we assess learning so that schools nurture creativity, exploration, and a love of literature from the first day of school through high school graduation.
In addition, Maya Angelou specifically condemned the Obama administration’s Race to the Top program. She said “it is ‘a contest’ that doesn’t help children learn to love to read and get a better understanding of the world.
“She states, “Race To The Top feels to be more like a contest… not what did you learn, but how much can you memorize.” “Writers are really interested in forming young men and women,” she said. “… ‘This is your world.’ ‘ This is your country.’ ‘ This is your time.’ And so I don’t think you can get that by racing to the top.”

Maya Angelou and her colleagues have my support. We are having our students research what each of those authors wrote and we are having the students read their works as appropriate for their individual reading level. What wonderful people they are for caring about their readers development and creativity.
Now my question is — did they receive a thoughtful answer to their letter or did they receive a form letter as typical from The White House?? Inquiring students want to know
If The President is listening.
Please let me know, so I can pass the information on to my students.
Thank you.
Marge
LikeLike
Thank you Maya Angelou! And bless all the authors etc. that signed this. It’s good to know a woman with her profile is willing to learn and respond to what this administration is doing to students!
LikeLike
The incompetence of Obama and Duncan administration fails our children and hurts the public education. It should be stopped.
LikeLike
Very impressive list. Would have thought that Henry Winkler of ‘Hank Zipzer’ fame, would have been on this list. Henry is dyslexic and his books related stories of a struggling student. Cannot imagine if he wrote about current experiences by students living through the CCSS Era. Shout-out to Dr. Maya Angelou, always a class-act.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lisa Williams ~ Lessons from the Classroom and Beyond and commented:
I have to share this on my own blog because it is too good not to. I’m not sure if President Obama and his administration will read, take to heart what is really being said here, and respond, but… The conversation about standardized testing is amped up. We have to continue to speak out about the insane testing policies that are holding our children (and teachers) hostage.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Lisa Williams ~ Lessons from the Classroom and Beyond and commented:
I have to share this on my own blog because it is too good not to. I’m not sure if President Obama and his administration will read, take to heart what is really being said here, and respond, but… The conversation about standardized testing is amped up. We have to continue to speak out about the insane testing policies that are holding our children (and teachers) hostage.
LikeLike
As always, Dr. Angelou is a voice for those who have no voice. It finally feels as though our message it getting out and people are paying attention. I hope they continue to speak. Our children need true champions, not faux reformers.
LikeLike
How about the children attending schools where they are not allowed to check out library books authored by Maya Angelou, Morpurgo or Pullman? These learners are trapped in districts that have committed their reading dollars to federally-approved programs which reduce all literacy to multi-colored dots taped to the spines of children’s literature.
If her computer-determined literacy level does not match the colored dot, our young friend is forbidden to select a book other than her assigned color. No exceptions. Forget that a relative might be willing and able to snuggle up for a family read that is “above level” but advances little sister’s wonder, wisdom and comprehension. The librarians have marching orders from above and beyond all that is holy and acceptable and that’s the way it is. No Equity here, No Excellence but also No Excuse for this Evil.
LikeLike
Really interested in knowing the President’s response. (Sadly, bet I know it already.)
LikeLike
As long as big business is making money on testing, it will exist……unless you have a school system that will start saying ‘NO!”
LikeLike
“She states, “Race To The Top feels to be more like a contest… not what did you learn, but how much can you memorize.” “Writers are really interested in forming young men and women,” she said. “… ‘This is your world.’ ‘ This is your country.’ ‘ This is your time.’ And so I don’t think you can get that by racing to the top.”
Yes and more…Race To The Top is segregating schools. It is designed to fail and it is destroying public schools, the teaching profession and the hearts and souls of our public school teachers. NCLB set benchmarks that ensure that every school will eventually fail systematically underfunded the most needy schools. RttT is throwing wrenches into working school systems with high stakes testing, SGOs and teacher evaluation systems that are designed to find failure.
In NJ the State requires that teachers receive 3-4 observations/year. That may not sound bad – but this is what it looks like in our school district – each administrator has to perform 65 observations, which include a pre and post conference. There are 180 days in our school year. Do the math. This does not include APR reports that range from 10-20 pages per employee. Administrators are shut behind closed doors, taking days off of work to write reports – they are not running schools. Teachers are not being trained in the new requirements and then being held accountable for the results of them. It is feels like a perpetual train wreck in action. And for what? New Jersey Public Schools rank #2-3 in the nation. We are not failure factories…but may soon be.
LikeLike
Perhaps school administrators have a thing or two to learn from Champion Charterite Dr. Steve Perry (“America’s Most Trusted Educator”—it’s right on his website in big letters) about managing time.
According to him, at one and the same time he can get wonderful results running his school AND tweet constantly and repeatedly take time off to go to lucrative speaking engagements.
Rheeally!
Although apparently on Planet Reality things aren’t quite as perfect as he portrays. For only one of many contraindications—
Link: http://jonathanpelto.com/2013/11/09/big-home-football-game-capital-prep-principal-steve-perry-gulfport-mississippi/
Or maybe his only big accomplishment is amassing a lot of $tudent $ucce$$. And all that triumphal commotion?
“Noise proves nothing. Often a hen who has merely laid an egg cackles as if she laid an asteroid.” [Mark Twain]
😎
LikeLike
This is fabulous news!
LikeLike
It’s about time. I especially like their call for a “national campaign to change the way we assess learning so that schools can nurture creativity, exploration, and a love of literature…”
LikeLike
I am grateful to all of these authors.
LikeLike
This is not surprising, but welcomed! Ms. Angelou’s opinion should be enough for the President to realize that testing is harmful and the money spent on tests is wasteful.
LikeLike
How are you feeling Diane? Sadly, I teach in a high school that HAS a library, but no librarian, the children have no access to the books.
LikeLike
Thank you writers …. for saying what so many teachers have been thinking for a long time …. but have been trapped into this testing mania….
Read books … my what a concept .. Lets bring it back …chapter books, not just a chapter but the entire book!! … yes yes yes ….
LikeLike
Maya Angelou was a recipient of the “Presidential Medal of Freedom” a couple years ago and Obama awarded the medal to her. You know that Obama has to know her personally, too, at the very least, through his good friend Oprah, who considers Angelou to be her “mentor-mother-sister-friend”. If Angelou cannot get through to Obama, sadly, that just shows what an incredibly tight hold the neo-liberal agenda of our country’s ruling oligarchy has on this president.
Dear God, how sick is that? What a gut-wrenching realization to people who had high hopes for Obama and those just waking up to what this reality is all about. When the most powerful leader of the free world cares less about other people’s children than he does about other people’s money, the chances are that we are not nearly as free as many had thought. No doubt, this “Presidential Medal of Freedom” recipient truly understands the irony of this terrible tragedy.
LikeLike
I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings
by Maya Angelou
The free bird leaps
on the back of the wind
and floats downstream
till the current ends
and dips his wings
in the orange sun rays
and dares to claim the sky.
But a bird that stalks
down his narrow cage
can seldom see through
his bars of rage
his wings are clipped and
his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.
The caged bird sings
with fearful trill
of the things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom
The free bird thinks of another breeze
an the trade winds soft through the sighing trees
and the fat worms waiting on a dawn-bright lawn
and he names the sky his own.
But a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams
his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream
his wings are clipped and his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing
The caged bird sings
with a fearful trill
of things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom.
LikeLike
Maybe Maya Angelou can get through to Oprah. If she can’t get through to Oprah, maybe Deepak Chopra can get through to Oprah. I’m sure he doesn’t believe in the Common Core or Race to the Top any more than Maya Angelou does.
For the tragic news about “school reform” to reach the general public, it will have to be picked up by the mainstream media at some point. That’s why the personal “school reform” stories of children, parents and teachers need to be heard. And that’s where Oprah comes in. At some point the most moving of these stories will reach Oprah’s staff, and they’ll be passed along to her, if only because they involve killing the spirit of childhood and stifling the hopes and dreams of children. Whatever you want to say about Oprah, she publicly stands for the exact opposite.
For someone like Oprah Winfrey to amplify the real narrative of public education would be a huge step in the right direction. If she were to publicly agree with Diane and turn against the corporate reformers, it would be a little like the televised moment when Walter Cronkite turned against our involvement in Viet Nam. It could mark a watershed. The TV audience is more fragmented today, but Oprah remains one of the most influential people in the world.
She knows full well that standardized tests have nothing to do with true education. She knows that inspiration doesn’t emerge from test prep. Would she ever speak out against Bill Gates and the Common Core? It could happen, if her high-profile confidants were to stage an intervention of some kind. Once that happened, maybe she could enlist some of her fellow moguls, the more enlightened ones, to stage an intervention with the President. Somebody ought to let her know that we’re on the wrong path. Deepak? Maya? How about it? Please read Reign of Error and pass it along to Oprah, ASAP.
LikeLike
DIANE RAVITCH WITH OPRAH! Fabulous! Now… who do we know who can make this happen???? Maybe Jon Stewart???? Matt Damon???
LikeLike
I agree that Diane should be featured by Oprah, but Oprah is far too into her OWN way of thinking, with her OWN branding, her OWN deference to the corporate America that advertises on her OWN media.
She is her OWN worst enemy . . . . . and what’s a billionaire to do when you can’t buy any handbags? I guess you buy a farm in Honolulu near the future Obama manse half paid for by Penny Pritzker.
Oprah and Diane are like a frozen Hungry Man dinner and a fine meal at Chez Dumonet-Josephine; they don’t mix. But their juxtposition has a high utility to the public.
Too bad Ms. OWN-er of everything commercial, crass, and O-ridden magazine covers featuring a new portrait of – guess who – every week is not so O-pen minded.
Truth be known, Oprah knows plenty about Diane and chooses not to even feature her on anything on the OWN . . . .
Oprah is an ersatz feel good journalist. . . . . it was a blast and hysterical to see on one of her covers recently a headline that read “Stop worrying about everything and start living and enjoying” . . . .
Right! Tell that to mainstream working America.
But then again, to those whose social safety nets and public schools are being destroyed by Oprah’s corporate pals, she can always put her arms around you, embrace you, and say, “Let them buy handbags . . . . . “
LikeLike
Robert Rendo:
Say what you will about Oprah Winfrey’s materialism and successful marketing efforts. One thing she’s selling that’s worth a look is personal empowerment.
I gained new respect for her when she featured Steven Pressfield–novelist and author of nonfiction books such as The War of Art and Turning Pro–on her network: http://www.stevenpressfield.com/2013/09/3-things-i-learned-from-oprah/
Pressfield has a message for the world: You must do the work you are called to do. (Which is exactly what Diane has been doing, and of course she is a pro many times over.) It never occurred to me that Oprah would be interested in Pressfield’s books. But of course I was wrong. It could be that you’re wrong about what she might find useful and inspiring.
Do you really know what Ellen Degeneres, or for that matter, J. K. Rowling or any other influential celebrity, thinks about “education reform,” and whether or not they’d be willing to speak out against it? These people got rich because of their broad appeal to the average person. There’s at least a chance that they would respond to the voices of the average parent or teacher if we could just get their attention.
LikeLike
Oprah now lives in a completely different sphere. She meets with the key players in the corporate reform movement and, regardless of her personal influence, I think she is part of the billionaire boys’ club primarily because of her money and her support of their privatization efforts: http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?428396-Bill-Gates-Jeb-Bush-Oprah-and-Warren-Buffett-meeting-at-SC-island
Years ago, when Oprah was telling black parents that she thought the reason why they tend to use an authoritarian parenting style was because of their heritage as slaves, I very felt encouraged and really hoped she’d be a catalyst for change. Instead, what I saw was HER change. Now she supports people doing the same kinds of things to children of color in military style charter schools with drill sergeant (mostly white) teachers.
Forget about Oprah. She’s enamored by the racist Chris Christie. I think she lost her heart sometime way back when, after she bought that private jet.
LikeLike
Randal Hendee:
“I gained new respect for her when she featured Steven Pressfield–novelist and author of nonfiction books such as The War of Art and Turning Pro–on her network . . . ”
Well, Randal, I lost all respect for her when she featured a small cadre of reformers on her show: Corey Booker, Chris Christie, and Mark Zuckererg, when the latter was donating $100 million dollars to Newark Public schools, dollars that arose from a largesse of tax system injustices that allowed Facebook a $460 million dollar tax refund in the very recent past . . . . tax dollars avoided by a huge corporation that should have been paying its fair share rather than be able to cherry pick the charity de jour, Randal.
Wth regard to Oprah, you know what they say in tennis: you’re as good as the partners you play with. Take a look from NJ.com:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.nj.com/njv_bob_braun/photo/8926444-large.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/mark_zuckerberg_discusses_newa.html&usg=__bnhGicdr0O38qx8vINyihxakOog=&h=253&w=380&sz=25&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&tbnid=-tXdrbyU-95hMM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=123&ei=epWAUtSPBarj4APrhIGwBg&prev=/search%3Fq%3Doprah%2Bcory%2Bbooker%2Bmark%2Bzuckerberg,%2Bbill%2Bgates%2Bchris%2Bchristie%2Bcelebrate%2Bdonation%2Bto%2Bnewark%2Bschools%26um%3D1%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26hl%3Den%26gbv%3D2%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1&sa=X&ved=0CCwQrQMwAA
And a much deserved excerpt from the article above:
” . . . . . . Booker described the meeting as an “informal lunch” and would not discuss further details of the conversation.
The conference also drew the likes of Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates and Oprah Winfrey, on whose show Booker, Christie and Zuckerberg officially announced last year his donation of $100 million, challenging Newark to raise another $100 million. . . . . ”
Ms. Winfrey is no dummy (although her social and emotional IQ are questionable), so she has plenty of intelligence and staff members to inform her of many sides of a story. One of Oprah’s biggest mantras is that the “truth shall set you free” . . . . but she does not have the social competence to air anyone’s views but the reformers or certainly feature Diane and the likes of her.
As for her “success in marketing”, Randal, it’s ironic since the vast majority of her viewers are middle to upper middle class women, ages 32 to 55, and these women are the mothers of children who attend public school, whose public schools they are proud of, and whose gender alone comprises a statistically significant portion of teachers.
Uh-O (rpah).
I guess she missed that target audience.
Oprah’s views on morality will inevitably overlap with all of ours at one point or another.
So what.
The small overlap is noteworthy and yet does not materially alter the outcome of the evil these deformers and Rheeformers are perpertrating against humanity.
If you are so enamored of Oprah, why don’t you send a Hallmark to her (only send the very best) and appeal to her “truth” side and see what happens . . . . .
LikeLike
Reteach 4 America,
You hit the nails on their heads!
Oprah is feel-good fraud.
There is a huge difference between a society that focuses on personal empowerment, which is critical, and personal empowerment that dovetails with social and collective empowerment, which is equally critical and which ultimately determines how a society evolves and exists.
Perhaps Randal Hendee’s thinking does not appear to be complete . . . .
LikeLike
Perspectives are highly altered when you can afford to drop $65M just for your private jet. Not to mention the costs of maintenance and upkeep. http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-buy-a-65-million-gulfstream-g650-2013-6
The same goes for all the homes billionaires own across the globe. The focus in life for them now is staying that wealthy.
There’s no concern for those of us who are just trying to be thousandaires. We’re losers in their book. We’re not even seen as the people who helped them to amass their billions, such as by watching Oprah’s shows regularly and often purchasing Microsoft products. Billionaires tend to take all the credit for their success and common people are seen as threats to them losing it now.
Personally, I hope that THIS is their heaven and that they pay for their over-indulgences by facing an eternity of our reality in the after-life. (Sorry, lovers of capitalistism, but no one deserves to be so greedy and selfish that they are never satiated and can’t ever say, “I have enough now” –especially when they can see that poverty has been increasing all around them.)
LikeLike
Well, Hello, Dolly . . . . .
Agreed! The old paradign of earning vast wealth, centering around and depending upon fossil fuels, is over. There are other BRICS countries who want the fuel as well.
Oh well.
Now the American style capitalists have to turn inward and attack public trusts by partnering (bribing) our elected officials to denigrate public schools, teachers, pensions, single payer systems, Medicare, and Social Security.
And if we 98% object, their advice to us, while sitting in their $65 million dollar jets, is a simple “Let them buy Lamborghinis!”
LikeLike
Robert Rendo:
I’m not enamored of Oprah at all. I’m enamored of Arundhati Roy and Margaret Atwood. Noam Chomsky and Chris Hedges, Dan Hicks and the Hot Licks, and a bunch of other personalities that go against the mainstream.
I don’t have any illusions about Oprah’s hypocrisy or her association with celebrity “reformers.” What struck me is that she featured a writer I actually am enamored of–Steven Pressfield. Pressfield’s message flies in the face of the actual practice of “school reform,” and as such is a potential lever to pry open Oprah’s thinking about education. No, I’m not particularly an Oprah fan, but I am a personal empowerment fan. (Frank Sinatra might have been a first class jerk, but that doesn’t prevent me from listening to his music all the time, without guilt.)
Oprah has one of the world’s most influential interview platforms. If she were to host Diane Ravitch, it would be a great thing. It’s even possible that Oprah’s thinking might begin to change as a result, if ever so slightly.
There’s no guarantee, of course. Even very thoughtful interviewers like Terry Gross and Diane Rehm have sounded unconvinced by Diane Ravitch’s arguments. In fact, Diane Rehm was recently heard fawning over Amanda Ripley when she was on tour with The Smartest Kids in the World. I’m still hoping Reign of Error will be featured on Fresh Air and The Diane Rehm show. But if I were running Diane’s Ravitch’s publicity, I’d trade them both for a shot at Oprah.
I wasn’t being 100% serious about my appeal to Maya Angelou and Deepak Chopra to get Oprah to change her mind about education and to try to get the President’s ear on the topic. But strange things do happen, don’t they? People can change their minds.
I’m glad that a celebrity like Maya Angelou is speaking out against bad education policies. There’s nothing wrong with trying to get the attention of other celebrities. Like I said earlier, though, that’s more likely to happen if children, parents, and teachers keep telling their own stories of nightmare reform. Maybe Parents Across America or United Opt Out could become the next Another Mother for Peace: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Another_Mother_for_Peace Check out the list of celebrities who supported that group.
There’s a new poster waiting to be designed. After all, high stakes standardized testing “is not healthy for children and other living things.”
LikeLike
Randal Hendee:
Your latest post offered, for me, more comprehensible input.
Points well received. We are in an age where media is in many ways more fluid, elastic, flexible, accessible, and subject to waves and changes before it ever reaches prime time. And that’s all due to IT, nothing more.
It also behooves all of us to try and tap every faucet. Why not? It cannot hurt.
In the realm of possibilities, we can debate all day about the sub-realm of probabilities.
But one, as you may be implying, is guaranteed never to make any change with an absence of effort and persistence.
You have a positive and productive outlook, all without being a pollyanna. Keep us posted if you make any moves with appealing to people on camera.
LikeLike
Good Evening — I was wondering where Ellen DeGeneres stands in regards to the devastation that is going on with public education in Louisiana. She has been very supportive of struggling teachers, and has donated large sums of money in those in need.
What about Musicians coming forward to take a stand about the high cost mandates that are destroying music programs in public schools. Where did Lady GaGa go to school? What about artists stepping up to help support the art programs in public education? The children who find solice in the arts need those with influential voices to stand up and be heard. Perhaps musicians & artists could unite to send a letter to President Obama as well. Wouldn’t that be something?!!!!
Marge
LikeLike
Good Evening, Marge.
Are we being a little dreamy eyed? Ellen Degeneres and other high wattage, pop culture people on major network televsion will never come forth and defend public education, teachers, and unions because they work for corporate media, and it is corporate America, the owner of corporate media, that is out to destroy public education.
Just ask the Waltons and Eli Broad.
Of course, Ellen can be found on the frontlines for a good old fashioned LGBT defense and that’s fine, but when it comes to sticking up for the working and middle classes, for the protection of consumers, for defending public education as a public trust and social responsibility to be paid for by everyone’s fair share of tax payment, you will find Ms. Degeneres to be un-Generous, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Don’t rely too much on celebrities because they know where their next contract’s bread gets buttered.
What next? Miley Cyrus as the poster girl fpor public education? Glee doing an episode on the cutting of the arts in order to pay for standardized testing? . . . .
LikeLike
Hi Rendo,
I find your analysis rather too simplistic–that celebrities will for “education Rheeform” because they are paid by corporations. That is too simplistic–life and politics are not all black and white like that. And almost everyone is paid by corporations, except those of us in the public sector, or small business. (And those of us in the public sector are paid by politicians, many of whom are corrupt.) And we all are dependent on products and services produced by corporations.
That said, rather naive to think that celebrities are so important, or that they can change the world, (Although some do some good, like Angelina Jolie.) Most are very self-centered people, although perhaps out of a sense of guilt they may try to do some good too. (And some, likely thinking it is “doing good”, have contributed to the terrible “education rheeform” organizations, without realizing they are actually harming education.)
Much more important to convince the general public, and the politicians they vote for, than to convince celebrities.
However, it is true that celebrities, unfortunately actually, way too much, get a lot of attention in the media. So it would be good if more would speak out about the truth here. One who has is Matt Damon. One would wish he could do more to bring out the truth to the public, and get other actors on board with that. The other side has had more than one movie to present their dishonest agenda–such as “Waiting for Superman”. Wouldn’t it be great if a moovie could come out showing just how dangerous that trend (“education deform”) is to the children of this country? Nothing can affect the public consciousness like a movie. Could Matt Damon perhaps start a project to make such a movie?
I think it would be great, as someone else wrote, if Oprah put Diane’s book in her book club, and invited Diane on for an interview. That show is watched more than any other. You might conclude that Oprah is an evil shill for the corporations–no chance of that. I would say that I don’t think she is evil, but misinformed. Perhaps folks like Matt Damon and Maya Angelou could help bring her around?
More important to get to politicians though. They are heavily lobbied by the “rheeformers” now, and it has turned out to be politically popular to jump on that agenda. These folks use buzz words that appeal to politicians. (Once again though, I would not classify all politicians who follow that line, such as Obama, as being “bad”, but misinformed.) Chris Christie, a Republican, just won re-election by a landslide in a heavily Democratic state, making edrheeform a major part of his platform. Cory Booker is considered an up and coming star in the Democratic party, and has also been heavily tied to that agenda.
I think it important that we get to Hillary Clinton, soon. I think she has a very good chance of becoming the next President of the United States. I think there is a chance of her being a major improvement from Obama in the area of education. But there is also the danger of her jumping on the rheeform bandwagon. The rheeformers are already likely trying to win her over. (Including through Bill, who now very involved in philanthropy, works with folks like Gates). I think it would be great if a meeting could be arranged with her soon, with education leaders like Diane Ravitch, Linda Darling-Hammond, and others, to really educate her about education. (Perhaps Maya Angelou, who has been close to the Clintons, could help with that as well.)
LikeLike
Marge,
Sardonic tones aside, you are right.
If we don’t fight back effectively against the reform movement, the arts in schooling will only be something for very rich kids, and it will shrink the pool of wondrous talent out there. . . . who will comprise our future symphonic orchestras? Who will be our next 20 or so Zubin Mehtas? Our next Spielberg or Otto Preminger?
Who will be our Meryl Streeps and Philip Seymour Hoffmans? Our next Placido Domingo or Gelsey Kirkland?
Our next Elizabeth Peyton or John Currin?
Who and how?
I would call for all the veteran artists who have been enormously successful and don’t ever have to be concerned about working again. Those are the people, like Paul McCartney, Streisand, Springsteen, etc. who should be stepping out and speaking out, no?
Not that we can rely on celebrity culture mainly, but big publicity for this cause will not hurt . . . .
LikeLike
I have a long list of people I contacted, which I could share. Maybe we could compile some kind of group letter or petition? I think one of the primary problems is that those people are supporters of Obama and don’t want to go against him.
LikeLike
Victorino — Thank you for your response. I may be dreamy- eyed, but I am willing to give it a try on behalf of my students. I have many students who do not score well on high stakes standardized tests (2″s) but they are gifted musicians and artists. I know of a little girl who could not sit still in class. She was dyslexic, and grew up to be a ballerina. If 120+ authors stepped forward and were not afraid of CORPORATE PUBLISHERS others will step forward as well. Others who have written in to the Diane Ravitch blog are boycotting Amazon, Walmart, etc. . This may seem insignificant to some, but I jumped on board with the boycotting and feel DAVID will be successful against GOLIATH (big corporations ) because we have RIGHT on our side. I will continue to fight on behalf of children. This testing is ABYSIVE. I would love to start a petition for musicians; artists, and dancers. Perhaps you & I can work together . Thank you Victorina.
Marge
LikeLike
Okay, Marge, you are not dreamy eyed.
Form the petition online and start circulating with Victorino.
I am a published illustrator (NY Times among others), and I value the visual and performing arts, and sports are equally imporatant for a number of reasons.
Just stick to your vision and belief, and for this one, put on blinders to prevent carmudgeons like me from stopping you. Yours could be a seed that, once pushed through “celebrity” sunshine, could sprout and become a forest of giant redwood oaks. One never knows what could become of your petition and the movement it could start.
After all, the mindset is something studios would want to tap into if it reflects populist sentiment. . . . there is something in it for them as well.
In fact, if you want, you can send a draft to my e-mail, and I will review it and offer suggestions and edits . . . . amicus curiae only. Your discretion purely.
I am at artwork88@aol.com.
-Robert Rendo
LikeLike
Marge and Robert,
Sorry, a sudden family crisis came up and I can’t get into this right now. If you google “liberal and conservative celebrities” or something similar, you’ll find lists of both, including on a right-wing website promoting the boycotting of liberalism, which include the names of entertainers, sports stars, newscasters, etc.
LikeLike
I have appealed to every celebrity in the entertainment industry I could think of who seems open-minded and caring, including Ellen (and sports stars turned broadcasters), for their support of public education, and not a single one of them has stepped forward (Matt Damon was already onboard, due to his mom).
Something is going on in Hollywood. I’m not sure why traditionally liberal artists won’t fight for public education, but I think they are far from being liberal minded these days –unless it’s about LGBT issues. Maybe things changed when they saw their friends opening their own charter schools and figure they could fall back on that, too, if things turn sour for them. Today’s rich people are concerned about staying rich, at virtually any cost..
LikeLike
I tried Streisand, Spielberg, etc. No takers.
LikeLike
Victorino
Isn’t this a sad world when we have to rely on celebrities to say what we already know..but…thanks again to the most brilliant poet in the world..Maya…
LikeLike
Make your own Music……………..
Testin’ in the Morning
Testin’ in the Evening.
Testin’ at Supper-Time
You are my little TESTER…
You are Tested all the Time..
OK……..NOW CHILD……
Go to School and take your Tester a present..
It is Tester appreciation Week
LikeLike
Maya
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
I was told since a young child to always “Stop and smell the Roses”
Why in the hell does anyone need to Race???
What is at the end of the track?.
..devastation and a mangled up bunch of student minds who know nothing except how to speed up and spin tires
Life is already just ONE…
Take it easy..Calm Down..Let EACH CHILD find their interests and become a productive citizen….
EACH CHILD…INDIVIDUAL….
“Hitch your wagon to the stars and become the very best that you can be..”
Do NOT LET YOUR CHILDREN BECOME THESE ROBOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
Ms. Angelou,
If you are reading this, please know that the vast majority of people on this blog are the free birds you so beautifully and powerfully write about, and we continue to fight hard to free those who are caged, and that would be our students, their families, our families, and society and democracy at large.
Thank you for your courage and integrity.
If the mood strikes you, don’t hesitate to write a poem about Mr. Obama’s education policies.
Your audiences, that would be several million, await . . . . . .
LikeLike
I meant to post this earlier…. It’s an article from last week’s NY Times, “Robots or Aliens as Parents? Colleges Gauge Applicants’ Creativity.” It discusses the fact that a growing number of select colleges “have turned to off-kilter questions” as part of the essay process. The stated reason? “[A]t a time when some elite colleges worry that high school students are more likely to be high achievers than independent thinkers, oddball essay questions offer a way to determine which of the A-student, high-test-score, multi-extracurricular applicants can also show a spark of originality.” Interesting commentary on the times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/03/education/robots-or-aliens-as-parents-colleges-gauge-applicants-creativity.html
LikeLike
Good Evening– The students in my school express their individuality better than I am able. I would like the 120+ authors who were courageous enough to stand up against high stakes testing to know that they are the inspiration for creativity for all types of minds. Please click on the URL below to view a video of my students put to the words written by Amy Ludwig Van DerWater and music written by Barry Lane
http://youtu.be/RY3F4Q0zz8U
LikeLike
I agree with Maya Angelou. Concerned parents, citizens who care, and Organizations like United Opt Out National have to continue speaking out against the torture machine a.k.a. State Required Tests. Stop expecting children to be perfect especially when adults are clearly not. Even our present and past U.S. Presidents have made mistakes and have admitted to being wrong a time or two. Congress/State Legislators are most certainly not perfect although they are demanding children to be. Take away the funding for the tests and see how many are willing to pay for them out of their own pockets since they are so necessary. Then take notice to how much of a necessity the tests are when the money stops flowing in for them. Raise teacher’s salaries instead of forcing them to support a self-serving effortless agenda that is being used to abuse their students, our children. A 20% penalty for not performing well on an already anxiety filled test day is absurd. Tests that no one is allowed to see again and question in case errors exists after it was scored is even more absurd. After-all machines like people also make mistakes. So Please Stop Penalizing Our Children For Not Being Perfect!!!
LikeLike