Archives for the month of: September, 2013

Yesterday, I received a notice from a group in Indianapolis called “The Mind Trust” about their bringing Condaleeza Rice to Indianapolis to talk about education.

Echoing a lame report issued by a task force for the Council on Foreign Relations, which she co-chaired with Joel Klein, Rice warned that America’s public schools were so terrible that they had become “our greatest national security crisis today.”

The task force solutions: charters, vouchers, Common Core, and new technology. The problem, as the task force saw it, was the fact of having public schools.

This fits the corporate agenda of the Mind Trust, which has a plan to dissolve public education in Indianapolis.

This is sheer humbug and poppycock. Others might say that Al Queda or the threat of domestic terrorism or our huge income inequality threatens our national security, not our public schools. But she has her talking points, and she is sticking to them.

I reviewed the report of the task force, which I found to be wildly exaggerated. The best part about the report was its dissents, which made hash of the report.

Actually, as I look back, I should thank Rice and her co-chair Joel Klein because their unfounded alarmism set me on a mission to pursue the facts about test scores, graduation rates, and international scores. And what I learned made me decide to tell the true facts in a new book.

Sadly, Rice has learned nothing new in the past year. Please give the lady a copy of my book if you see her.

Educators and school boards in Tennessee continue to express their opposition to State Commissioner Keven Huffman’s policies and autocratic style of leadership.

The Marshall County board of education sent a letter of protest against Huffman to the governor and general assembly.

The linked article says:

““We want Marshall to be number one in the state, but we have to have time to do that,” Marshall County Director of Schools Jackie Abernathy said. “Rigor is not always more.”

“The resolution comes on the heels of a letter signed by 40 percent of the leaders of the 138 school districts in the state that publicly criticizes Huffman and his reform policies. Among those to sign the letter, are Williamson County Schools leader Mike Looney, Franklin Special School District Director David Snowden and Metro Nashville Public Schools Director Jesse Register.

“Tullahoma City Schools Superintendent Dan Lawson penned the letter, and a copy was emailed to the governor and members of the Tennessee legislature.

“Marshall County is about 50 miles south of Nashville and serves about 5,300 students. Nearly 80 percent of students there are on federal free and reduced-price meal programs, and they are in need of pre-kindergarten and career and technical programs, she said.”

Huffman has managed to alienate many of those he is supposed to lead. Perhaps it is his inexperience. He taught for a few years in Teach for America but was never a principal or superintendent.

Jenny Shanker, the wonderful daughter of legendary labor leader Al Shanker, alerted me to a very important protest planned for Monday in Philadelphia.

The Gates Foundation and their showcase Mastery Charter, plan to meet at the Union League Club, the symbol of elitism in Philadelphia. How appropriate.

Read the link and do your part.

I wrote to Jennie and said, “We live in a mad time, where billionaires are treated as royalty, teachers are disdained, and unions are scapegoats.

This is a democracy. Do your part

Julian Vasquez Heilig is the most creative blogger I know in terms of his brilliant combination of flashy graphics, research, and informed commentary.

Here he describes the century-long battle between the managerial elites—who believe that schools can be improved by data, management, mandates and standardization, always controlled by them–and the pedagogical crowd–who have fought the managers that the starting point in education is the students, how they learn, what they need, not the management.

It is Taylor vs. Dewey.

The Taylorites run the show for now. They ARE the status quo.

The day of reckoning is coming.

They are losing because everything they have done has failed.

Educators know that their pensions are under attack. Some policymakers and pundits opine that the fabulous pensions paid to public employees are going to cause our economic system to collapse. You won’t hear them say much about the yawning income inequality gap, the growing share of the nation’s wealth now flowing up to the top 1%, or the disappearance of the middle class, as good jobs are outsourced to low-wage nations by corporations moaning that they can’t find qualified workers. What they really mean is that they can’t find engineers willing to work for sub-minimum wages.

So who is fueling the attack on your pension?

It may surprise you to learn that there is an “unholy alliance” between the far-rightArnold Foundation, created by former Enron trader John Arnold, and the respected Pew Charitable Trust.

When a new law was passed in Kentucky, critics were upset.

“Critics, who include pension-fund experts, lawmakers and AARP Kentucky, claim the new law will hurt workers, taxpayers and retirees. What’s more, they say the law was largely crafted behind the scenes by an unusual alliance between two out-of-state organizations: the Pew Center on the States and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Some detractors go further and assert that the Arnold Foundation is using Pew’s sterling reputation for academic integrity as a fig leaf to hide its own free-market agenda.”

And the article adds:

“Pew may be mostly known for its financial support of PBS programs, which has given the foundation the kind of publicity that reflects the self-described “non-partisan and non-ideological” nature of Pew’s work.

“Yet Pew has become a key player in one of America’s most partisan issues as cities and states tackle the complex problems involving public worker pensions. Pension reformers present their cause as a bipartisan good-government crusade, but a visitor landing on the website of nearly any one of this movement’s myriad organizations quickly falls down a rabbit hole of interlocking conservative organizations — whose unifying theme seems to be reflexive hostility toward workplace protections and the union contracts that guarantee them.”

Paul Horton is a history teacher at the University of Chicago Lab School and a passionate supporter of public education. Here he reviews Reign of Error.

He calls his review “The One Percent’s Solution and the Betrayal of Public Education.”

That is a good summary of the book right there.

Horton traces the nation’s commitment to public education to its earliest days:

After the Revolution, but before the ratification of the Constitution, the Northwest Ordinance set aside a portion of land sales in the Northwest territories, now the Midwest, to build and fund public schools, beginning a 325 year commitment to public education from the national government.

After briefly outlining the federal role in education, Horton writes:

This historic commitment to public Education has been now been abandoned by the George W. Bush and the Obama Administrations. Moreover this abandonment represents a tectonic shift that most of the public does not understand.

The earthquakes and trimmers occur in public opinion only when parents begin to understand the devastating effects of standardized testing that is being used as a political bludgeon on the children of America to justify the destruction of public education in the United States.

This abandonment of public education is the subject of Diane Ravitch’s brilliant new book: Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools.

Ms. Ravitch’s book should be read by every American parent, teacher, and school administrator because together these groups must join together to form a movement to resist the anti-democratic “reforms” that have been imposed on the American public education system with virtually no public hearings or due process.

A combination of private foundations, liberal and conservative think tanks, consultants from McKinsey, and Federal officials, according to Ravitch, have supported the private takeover of the public schools. If left unchallenged, says Ravitch, the public school system will soon reach a tipping point where quality public schools will no longer be able to compete with private schools. Public school funding is being gutted by privatization schemes.

He notes that the Obama administration doubled down on the George W. Bush administration’s failed policies of testing, accountability, and choice. Decisions were made by consulting officials on loan from the Gates Foundation, the Broad Foundation, and others who had little experience in the trenches of public education. It is a sad and sorry tale.

He concludes:

Ms. Ravitch’s new book, Reign of Error is the best way to educate yourself about the takeover of our educational system by billionaires who, even if they are well-intentioned, do not understand what they are doing. She encourages us not to wait until our children’s scores fall thirty to forty percent on standardized tests to read this book. Rather, we must educate ourselves and others so that we can understand why a test company that produces shoddy products is going to destroy the confidence of our children to advance the misguided policies of the Obama administration that have already failed. Ms. Ravitch’s book is a moral laser beam aimed at the conscience of the American public: there is nothing as morally perverse as educational leaders who applaud that fact that seventy present of the students in one state can fail a test so that they can call for the “death penalty” for more public schools so that Wall Street bundlers and other billionaires can make more money and pay fewer taxes.

 

This was written by Raniel Guzman, who is a teacher in the School District of Philadelphia and an adjunct professor at Esperanza College of Eastern University:

May 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014.            

An attributed Chinese proverb is often wished upon one’s enemies by asserting, may you live in interesting times… This understated “curse” levied upon one’s enemies has a restrained Buddhist sensibility even as one wishes ill toward others. Educators today are indeed living in interesting times. Students and parents are certainly living in interesting times as well. However, the curse placed upon us all is not restrained but rather overt.

The curse is well known to educators and asserts the following, may 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014. So then, who has placed this “curse” upon us all? I am certain we can think of obvious enemies. Nonetheless, I am not certain many of us are thinking about the less obvious and thus more lethal enemies. They give politically correct speeches, and radiate a fatherly presence. Their threat resides precisely in the proximity to their victims, namely us. We often develop a blind spot for such figures and hope that they will protect us from sorcerers and things that go bump in the night. Unfortunately, simple examination of deeds, rather than speech, proves otherwise.

Their “curse” is characterized by dilution and diminution. Teachers, students, administrators and parents are diluted in endless paper chases disguised as tests, assessments and reports. Conversely, the edification of concepts and individual free will are systematically diminished. The combined effects may elicit the maddening image of a hamster running endlessly in a caged wheel. However, a more accurate image of these effects is more akin to desperate victims racing to the top of an inextinguishable inferno.

May 100 % of your students score proficient or above on standardized tests by 2014 is particularly stressful when father figures emphasize the deadline, by 2014. This has been the curse that has dominated the bulk of my teaching career. A curse so powerful it has decimated all attempts to render it inoperative. This “super curse” has brought forward other conjurers, who with wands in hand have temporarily waved away some provisions yet, have not been able or willing to undo this “super curse”. What would motivate someone to place such a curse?  Let’s entertain some thoughts.

Many profess that a goal as noble as ensuring that all students score proficient at the same time and place is beyond reproach. Well, it is simply reprehensible. This cynical goal suffers from a pernicious pathology, which advocates forgive as a delusion for perfection. Shamefully, these apologists hide the correct diagnosis. It is not a delusion of perfection that motivates the jinxers, but rather a pathology of exclusion. We all know the consequences of not scoring proficient and obtaining AYP, -they close your (our) school. However, 2014 can’t seem to arrive soon enough for some hexers. Hence, the rush by officials –this year-, to close as many public schools throughout our country under the convenient excuses of “austerity” and “scores” is well afoot. The unprecedented shuttering of dozens of public schools particularly in largely African American communities, as in Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C. etc. are justified under the rationale of budgetary challenges.

This rationale anchors itself on the operational premise of right sizing. Irrespective of the fact that we are talking about children and their development -this thinking may have legitimate administrative basis in the private sector. However, the current juxtaposition of private sector practices and public sector commitments, such as providing an adequate and free education as stipulated in the constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, have dissimilar agendas and unequal strengths. Why then the rush if the “super curse” will effectively close thousands of public schools all across our country within a year? We will surely have the right size and number of schools soon enough. Could it be that the proponents’ zeal for the “super curse” is waning? Hardly.

In fact the “super curse” is going very well. The political party, pardon, -the political parties, both of them, have put away their “profound pedagogical partitions” to unite in this effort. Likewise, the industrial testing complex continues to redact tests, assessments, practice workbooks, study programs, while hiring consultants, garnering ever greater budget allocations, and accumulating data all aimed to ensure that scores comply with targets of soon to be imposed common core standards. But above all of these machinations, one supersedes them all, the president’s silence on these matters is the best indicator that all is truly going well among the jinxers and hexers. Conversely, hope for a change is sequestered. So again I ask, why the rush? Could it be that the “super curse” itself is waning? Hardly.

In fact, the jinxers are emboldened by their powers and lack of meaningful restraints, -why wait? “Let’s exclude NOW!” they demand. What we have in front of us now is a turn to Kronos, but an inverted Kronos. We have all seen the depictions of Kronos devouring his children. His filicides are motivated out of fear, a fear of competition from his children. Thus, he eats them. In our case, our Kronos is not committing filicide, but rather devouring the children of others. One can imagine a repented titan with a renewed paternal instinct and displaced fear of competition in the presence of other children asking another titan, “How do we devour the potential competitors of our children?” The other titan may respond, “Well, one way is to be proactive. For example, you offer your children greater pedagogical and assertive experiences and opportunities. In addition, you enroll your children in a school that is free of stigma, for example, one that does not administer standardized tests, say a private school or a divinity school. In other words, enroll your child in a school that does not partake in omens or curses.”

Nonetheless, there is still another way, a more reactive way, to devour your children’s potential competitors, -you close their schools and in doing so -eliminate the competition. Once shuttered, you place stigma upon the displaced children and adults. Moreover, you place a scarlet tattoo on both and you never lift the curse. The calculation is the following; the failure of some children will ensure that mine will thrive. This charter is an open collusion devoid of formalities.

I am well aware that we live in highly secular times, which are dominated by facts and figures. But for some of us who recognize the evil that lurk in men’s hearts, we cannot ignore the immutable. Those who conspire against children are devoid of judgment. Consequently, their motivations are drawn from an irredeemable well. They practice technical numerology, model apparitions, and consult conjurers. Some of them believe in curses. Others still are weary of omens. Some even fear children, often their own. I believe in God. Evil may cause great pain and destruction, but evil never prevails. Evil’s harvest never mature and eventually in its rage devours its own seed.

This is exciting!

Folks, the tide is turning!

An experienced superintendent announced that he will run for state superintendent against Janet Barresi, the current superintendent who is a member of Jeb Bush’s shrinking Chiefs for Change.

Barresi worked as a speech pathologist, then became a dentist. She opened charter schools. She is part of the Jeb (“test ’em until they cry, then give everyone a grade”) Bush school of thought.

Her challenger rejects the corporate reform rule book:

Dr. John Cox has been a superintendent for 20 years in Oklahoma.

Read this from Dr. Cox:

“I chose to run for state schools superintendent because I do not agree with the current reforms that are being forced on our public schools,” Cox said. “It is time that we return to trusting our teachers and believing and knowing that they are professionals.

“It is also time that we trust principals and superintendents to do their job, and return local control back to our school boards and communities.”

He said he believes his candidacy was a way to being part of a process to save public education in Oklahoma.

“The only recourse that we as educators have, is to work towards improving our schools by fighting for local control, taking care of our teachers, and making a system that allows all children to be successful,” Cox said. “It is time that we take a common sense approach to accountability.”

Cox said the major challenges facing the school superintendent and school districts, in general, is adequate school funding.

“We lead the nation in school funding cuts since 2009, and we need to advocate for increased funding,” Cox said. “Some people will say that throwing money at public schools does not increase student learning, but I will tell you that extra funds help provide … personnel that have direct contact with students and will provide more one on one learning for our students, which will improve student learning.”

Alice Mercer’s review
of “Reign of Error
” addresses the question raised by some
EdTech reviewers about where I stand on the use of technology in
the classroom. She quotes from the book to demonstrate that I
strongly believe in the value of technology as a tool to transform
and enliven teaching.

Why read a few sentences in a dull textbook
about John F. Kennedy’s electrifying Inaugural Address when you can
watch it in the same amount of time, get a visceral sense of the
man, hear his voice, watch the crowd react, and get a vivid
real-time overview of the world he was describing?

Why read about an event when technology can take you to the scene?

Mercer also understands and explains the lure of technology to those who see
the schools as an emerging market, a chance to tap into scarce
public dollars. She knows that entrepreneurs hawking
“personalization” and “individualization” are often
thinking about adaptive testing and test prep, not creative ways to
engage young minds in exploring new ways of learning. And when a
financially strapped district spends $1 billion on tablets and
iPads instead of repairing crumbling buildings, we must ask about
priorities.

As it happened, Michelle Rhee and I nearly crossed paths in
Philadelphia. This
article describes our contrasting visions
for the public
schools of Philadelphia. She spoke on September 16, in a panel that
included George Parker, the former head of the Washington Teachers
Union, who now works for Rhee, and Steve Perry, ex-CNN commentator.

Governor Tom Corbett cut $1 billion from the schools in 2011, while cutting corporate taxes. He later added back a small part of the cut, but he left many districts in terrible fiscal trouble.

Philadelphia public schools have a deficit of $300 million, and
thousands of staff have been laid off, including teachers, guidance
counselors, social workers, librarians, and many others. Bear in mind that the Philadelphia public schools have been under state control for more than a decade. During that time, Superintendent Paul Vallas launched the nation’s most sweeping privatization experiment, which failed, according to independent evaluations.

According to this article (and in an op-ed published in the Philadelphia
Inquirer), Rhee saw the fiscal crisis as an opportunity to
introduce performance pay. How that would close the budget deficit
was unclear.

In my presentation at the Philadelphia Free Library, I read the language of the state
constitution, which unequivocally assigns responsibility to the
state of Pennsylvania to support a thorough and efficient education
for every child. That is not the case today. Governor Tom Corbett
expects the state-controlled School Reform Commission to squeeze
savings out of the teachers’ contracts, cutting salaries, benefits,
and laying off more teachers. That is not the way to go.

Someday the children of Philadelphia will be the voters of Pennsylvania or
some other state. They must be educated to choose their leaders
wisely. Someday these children may sit on a jury where YOU will be
judged. Just hope that they have the wisdom, knowledge, and
compassion to judge you fairly. My view: The children of
Philadelphia are as worthy of a good education as the children in
the nearby suburbs. They need small classes, experienced teachers,
arts programs, well-maintained facilities, guidance counselors,
libraries staffed by librarians, up-to-date technology. They need
what the parents in the suburbans want for their children. And they
deserve nothing less.