Archives for the month of: September, 2013

This is an excellent article by historian and former high school teacher Jack Schneider.

He writes about the students who remember him fondly many years after graduation.

What do students remember?

Here is a sample:

My best teachers taught me how to read, write, and cipher.  But they also treated me with kindness and humanity.  They made me feel like I was welcome in their classrooms.  They instilled in me the sense that I mattered.  They inspired me to grow up and be like them.  Where, I wonder, are those kinds of characteristics in our current policy discussions about teacher recruitment?  Where is that in talk among so-called reformers about overhauling teacher training?  Where are those traits in our evaluations of the “value” added by teachers?

This principal works hard to support his staff and inspire them.

This principal protects the children in his school.

This principal learned that the State rated him as a 9.

Nine out of twenty.

That meant that no matter how many more points (out of 80) he might accumulate, he could never be rated “Highly Effective.”

So, in the spirit of evaluation madness, he decided to offer nine suggestions for State Commissioner John King (who by the way, has less experience as an administrator than the principal who wrote this post):

1) Our children, staff and communities are much more than a number. Instead of trying to reduce us all to a number (evaluative scores, test results, rankings, etc.) please take the time to get to know us and know what we are doing well because we are more than a number. 
 
2) Figure out what schools are doing well and try and emulate those practices instead of trying to make us all fit into the same box. I understand it’s difficult to know what’s going on in each school because there are thousands of schools in NYS, but a more robust understanding of the current landscape throughout the state would be greatly appreciated. Are there issues throughout the state? Yes! Are there schools and districts that need to improve significantly because the children deserve better? Yes! But, why must educational reform in NYS be rooted in what’s wrong in our schools instead of what’s right in our schools? Instead of feeling pressured to get our test scores up, I would much rather spend time sharing and collaborating with colleagues from around the state about best practices – these practices are what make a difference in the daily lives of children.
 
3) Give us time to shift, implement and take risks with our practices! We just adopted and implemented the Common Core State Standards all within the last year (many districts are still working on the implementation) and yet already, we are all being assessed against these standards. How is that fair? Just because a teenager passes his/her permit test and takes a few driving lessons, doesn’t mean he/she are ready to race at the Daytona 500! Instead, we need time to experiment, fail and problem solve without being judged. Give us time!
 
4) Take feedback from the people working in schools, with children, to help enhance, modify and improve various mandates and policies. We are living APPR each day – let us tell you what should change! We administered the Common Core NYS Tests to actual children – let us tell you what happened and what could be changed. We are struggling to “fit it all in” – let us tell you what could possibly change. Instead of implementing all these sweeping large scale changes across the entire state, things should have been piloted or tested in pockets so State Ed could have worked out the kinks before imposing it all on every child and educator in the state. 
 
5) Evaluating a teacher based on how students perform on high stakes testing is not a reliable measure (check out this article about the issues with value added models). The scores for individual educators will go up and down each year with little ability to predict where they will end up. So, what’s the point? For example, I know of an educator who received a 2 out of 20 last year but this year received a 13 out of 20. My guess is that next year the same educator will have a totally different score because of the student population. The number fluctuates dramatically each year and that is because there are too many variables to control for when evaluating an educator against how their students perform on high stakes testing. Eliminate this part of the APPR plan – let’s implement something more robust and thorough (maybe a digital portfolio) and less quick and dirty (ratings that are based on high stakes tests that rely heavily on multiple choice questions).
 
6) Change the NYS Tests! Instead of letting them be so one dimensional with an over abundance of multiple choice questions, give our children an opportunity to show you what THEY know and can do in the areas of literacy and mathematics. Instead of trying to trick them with multiple choice questions that many adults cannot answer and trying to exhaust them with days of testing, give them a chance to evaluate, synthesize, think critically and apply the skills they have to solve real life problems and situations. This way, we can have a true understanding of what our children know and can do. Instead, currently, all we can really figure out is if they bubbled in the right answer – not WHY they bubbled it in just if they did. The current testing situation, where the results are used to evaluate educators, does NOT work. Furthermore, it seems that NYS is saying that we can assess college and career readiness with how students perform on multiple choice tests – REALLY?!? We need to consider multiple data points – not just the results of one test! By considering multiple data points we do not have to rely on annual standardized state testing to evaluate our students or educators. For example, our students could be tested independently every three years, starting in third grade, using a standardized test. This way, we will have data points that span from elementary to high school graduation. Additionally, there should be group task oriented assessments during the years between standardized tests where the students must collaborate to solve a set of real life problems. Furthermore, our students should be expected to maintain a digital portfolio that will feature work from all content areas that will be scored against rubrics generated collaboratively between teachers and students. By integrating all these assessments we can use multiple data points to determine student growth over an extended period of time and across all content areas, not just in Mathematics and English Language Arts. Multiple data points mean that we do not have to rely on summative assessments for evaluation purposes and instead we will have access to formative assessment data that can help us meet the needs of our students in real time and give every student an entry point to learning. 
 
7) Give us data we can use to inform instruction and help our children learn and grow! Our children spend hours taking these tests, which we are never allowed to see again, and we receive the results just in time for the next school! What’s the point? We cannot do anything with this information because we don’t have all the pieces in a timely fashion. As educators, many of us dedicate our lives to using as many assessment points as possible to help us plan and guide future instructional decisions to best meet the needs of our children. The data from NYS seems to be used for one purpose, and one purpose only, to judge.       
 
8) Implement policies and mandates that foster and expect the use of 21st century skills and innovation in our schools! Challenge us to make technology a regular part of instruction- not an add on. Ask us to encourage our children to collaborate for the purposes of thinking critically and creating – that is the root of innovation. Innovative thinkers who are willing to keep failing until they perfect their vision are the ones changing the world and affecting the global economic landscape – not the people who can pick the correct answer on a multiple choice test.
 
9) Don’t use our children and educators as pawns in some massive money making scheme. Let Pearson figure out other ways to make money. Don’t try and privatize public education and turn it into a business. Our children should be the focus – each and every day we should be driven by doing what is best for our children; not what is going to put more money into the already fat pockets of different individuals and corporations. 

This teacher began her second career during the Bloomberg era.

She writes:

“I started working as a teacher for the NYCDOE during the Bloomberg regime (“second” career). It is, unfortunately, the ONLY regime that I worked as a teacher in. Previously, I had worked in the corporate world.

“From the beginning, it was obvious to me what Bloomberg was trying to do. I had seen it in the business world. “Starving” schools of programs, supplies, books, etc. It’s a tactic used by retail chains and corporations that want to close unproductive stores or offices ( in terms of sales). When I mentioned this to people I had worked with, many did not believe that what Bloomberg was doing could actually happen.

“And, it did- closure of many public schools, staff and students displaced, strong arm “business” tactics used, by skewing “data” to make it appear that schools were “improving” under this arrogant and distasteful Mayors’ policies, while trying to break the union and underserving the students.

“What surprises me most of all is how so many people acquiesced to all this, though there are a few groups that did not, and attempted to fight this Bloomberg juggernaut.

“Frankly, I’m tired of it all, and am looking forward to retiring in three years. If the next Mayor of NYC truly values education for the citizens of this city and the nation, the first step would be to undo ALL of the Bloomberg “reforms” and make the PUBLIC schools what they should be, places where the PUBLIC truly has input and say in how the schools are run, and let educators do their jobs unfettered without fear of reprisal and fear of losing their jobs.”

Bridgeport’s only newspaper, the “Connecticut Post,” endorsed the same three candidates as the Network for Public Education. The newspaper wants to see an end to the rancor and it wants the board members to be independent. Their goal, like that of NPE, is to elect a board that cares about the students, their community, and their public schools, and is not subject to dictation by politicians and outside interest groups.

The Network for Public Education has endosed candidates in several crucial local school board elections. NPE has a process that involves surveys of all candidates in each contest. We give our endorsement to those who support their community public schools and oppose privatization and the pernicious misuse of high-stakes testing.

We don’t have money, but we count on the help of all those who care about the future of public education to stand with those courageous enough to run for office. We count on the power if numbers, the power of democracy.

Here is the latest:

An Update on NPE’s Endorsed Candidates

Welcome to the twenty-third edition of our newsletter. This week we are pleased to announce FOUR new endorsements! We also have updates for you on our previously endorsed candidates.

New NPE Endorsements in Rochester, Bridgeport

We are pleased to announce the following endorsements:

Liz Hallmark, Rochester County School Board (NY)
Howard Gardner, Bridgeport School Board (CT)
Andre Baker, Bridgeport School Board (CT)
Dave Hennessey, Bridgeport School Board (CT)

The primaries in both Rochester and Bridgeport take place in two days, on September 10th, so please spread the word!

We are delighted to announce our endorsement of Liz Hallmark! Liz earned a Doctorate in Education at the University of Rochester and has worked as a teaching artist at schools throughout the Rochester City School District. Currently, Liz is an Adjunct Professor who teaches Masters-level teaching candidates at Nazareth College and the Warner Graduate School of Education.

As both an educator and a parent of two children who graduated from city schools, Liz firmly believes that it is time for there to be an educator on the Rochester City School Board, and NPE agrees! The Democratic Primary is on September 10th (only two days away) so spread the word. We invite you to read our full endorsement here and visit Liz’s website.

We are excited to announce our endorsement of three candidates for the Bridgeport Board of Education: Howard Gardner, Andre Baker, and
Dave Hennessey.

The September 10th primary in Bridgeport — Connecticut’s most populous city — looks to be a key contest in the battle for control of the school board. In recent years, politicians and school officials have enacted damaging reforms in Bridgeport and a change in the make-up of the board is necessary to correct the course of the school district.

Andre Baker, a four-term Bridgeport City Councilman, brings a political experience and history of working cooperatively with the diverse electorate of Bridgeport. Dave Hennessey served 38 years as a teacher and coach in Bridgeport and has also been a member of the Bridgeport City Council. Information Technology Professional, Howard Gardner, brings extensive business and community service experience to the race.

To continue reading about our endorsement of these candidates, click here. There are only two days left until the primary, so please spread the word!

An Update on NPE’s Endorsed Candidates
The summer is ending, but our candidates are still up and running!

This summer, NPE has endorsed several candidates. We thank all of our followers for helping to support these great candidates. As the summer comes to an end, we would like to give you a brief update on where our candidates stand:

Sue Peters is running for Seattle School Board, District 4. Sue has nearly a decade of experience in Seattle public schools.

This summer, Sue won 41% of the primary vote, despite being outspent by her opponent by 8:1. The general election will be held on November 5th. You can visit Sue’s website to read more.

Marie Corfield is running for New Jersey Assembly. As a mother and public school teacher, Marie is truly dedicated to protecting public schools and helping their students thrive.

This summer, Marie held the #CorfieldMoneyBomb, and we thank you for helping to make this fundraiser so successful! The general election will be held on November 5th. You can visit Marie’s website to read more.

Ronda Scholting is running for Douglas County School Board in Colorado. Ronda is a proud mom of two sons who graduated from Douglas County schools. She also works with Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals. Last week, we wrote to you about the Koch brother’s plans to contribute thousands of dollars on her opponent’s campaign. Please help support Ronda by visiting her website. You can also RSVP here to see NPE’s Anthony Cody speak in Douglas County on September 12th.

Kimberly Blanton sent this to me. She wrote:

“I am a former Boston Globe/ Economist reporter who now writes a blog at a Boston College think tank. I recently met and fell in love with a teacher. I am so amazed at how hard he works for his students, and I am even more puzzled by why teachers have become so vilified.”

Now, if only all the editorial writers and pundits had a real teacher in their lives–a parent, a sister or brother, a child, a beloved–the world’s view of teachers and education would change!

 

 

Love Letter to a School Teacher

The man who entered my life like a whirlwind, wooing me on Valentine’s Day with a sculpture of lovebirds swinging on a heart that he’d made from balloons, is now applying his handiwork to preparindg his Boston high school classroom for the new school year.

It’s the Saturday before Labor Day, when America is enjoying its last vacation of the summer, and he’s operating a power drill as he installs whiteboard, paid for out of his own pocket, on top of the antiquated chalk board in the room where he’ll soon begin teaching sophomore biology. Having decided he cannot tolerate another year of chalky, gritty hands, he’s fashioned a less-than-satisfactory solution in a public school system that has no resources for modern educational equipment. He’d already gotten a start earlier in the week on cleaning the room but has more to do before classes begin this week.

Since when, I wondered, did our teachers have to stand in as maintenance staff? The first thought to strike me as I walked into this grand old limestone building with its dingy walls and dysfunctional windows is that all the talk about public education being our top national priority is not genuine.

In this high school, it appears that the walls haven’t been painted in many years, even though a fresh coat of paint is a relatively inexpensive way to inject excitement into a tired old building. To me, the walls speak to the lack of care for the children in urban schools. The vast majority of students in my partner’s high school are recent immigrants, are economically disadvantaged, or have special needs.

Constructed in 1929, this beautiful old building speaks to our once-high aspirations for public education. Now, its tall windows must be propped open with two-by-fours and food crates. There is no air conditioning, and my partner loathes those sweltering September days when the slits in the windows bring no relief to his third-floor classroom. As the temperature rises above 85 degrees, he sweats out his lessons on evolution and methods of scientific inquiry in front of sleep-deprived teenagers also struggling in the heat.

Like many teachers, he entered the profession to make a difference in individual lives, in the Boston community, maybe the world. It is his 26-year commitment to teaching and to improving the lives of children of the working class that I fell in love with first. As the new school year kicks into gear, I’m remembering the care he took the previous spring – our first together – to find new ways to reach his students. There seems to be little appreciation in our culture for the challenges of conveying the wonders of bacteria, nutrition, genetics, and the workings of the digestive system to inner-city teenagers who may have more pressing concerns – these and other subjects are so abstract and removed from the worlds they live in.

The television that almost seems to dangle from his classroom ceiling tells another story of the history of U.S. public education. Installed in the late 1980s, it was a gift from a television station, given on the condition that students watch a 10-minute news program every morning, three minutes of which were candy and fast-food commercials. The television hasn’t worked for years. That’s probably a good thing. Today, corporate America has moved on. Via grants through their foundations, major corporations now funnel their efforts and money into charter schools, which typically employ non-union teachers.

Now that my partner has solved the chalk board problem, his next maintenance project will be to devise storage in his classroom. The two small bookshelves holding battered biology textbooks were probably part of the original construction. He needs a better place for his students to store the notebooks they’ll use throughout the year to save and organize their assignments.

If only the rest of the country were as committed as he is to teaching our children well.

We will win for many reasons:

First, because everything the “reformers” have tried is failing, and they keep doing it again and again, and failing again and again.

Second, because the public really likes their local public schools and hates all that excessive standardized testing (see the latest PDK/Gallup Poll).

And third, we have the best humorists.

We already have Edushyster and StudentsLast.

Now comes a hilarious new website that explains the financial side of the current version of “reform.”

It is called “StockholdersFirst.”

Please watch and listen to the catchy lyrics of the song.

Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, wrote the following essay for this blog:

“Democracy and Education: Waiting for Gatopia?

“John Dewey arrived at the University of Chicago in the middle of the Pullman strike. He wrote his wife, still in Ann Arbor, that he had met a young man on the train who supported the strike very passionately: “I only talked with him for 10 or 15 minutes but when I got through my nerves were more thrilled than they had been for years; I felt as if I had better resign my job teaching and follow him around until I got a life. One lost all sense of the right or wrong of things in admiration of the absolute, almost fanatic, sincerity and earnestness, and in admiration of the magnificent combination that was going on. Simply as an aesthetic matter, I don’t believe the world has seen but a few times such a spectacle of magnificent, widespread union of men about a common interest as this strike business.” (quoted in Westbrook, 87). This sense of “magnificent, widespread union” represented the definition of Democracy to Dewey; it was the very core of his writing, work, and public advocacy.

“Later, after he had moved to Columbia University in New York, he had a major disagreement with a very articulate student, Randolph Bourne, about the media pressure to get involved in WWI. Bourne argued then and later in an unfinished essay entitled, “War is the Health of the State” that states thrived on war because war consolidated the state’s power and allowed it to repress any kind of dissent. Dewey was an outspoken advocate of American entry into World War I, but began to question his support after seeing several of his colleagues at Columbia fired for their outspoken opposition to the War. These serious doubts turned into deep regret when he saw that the Espionage Act was used to repress freedoms of speech and press. Respectable citizens, including many thoughtful journalists and political leaders like Eugene V. Debs were routinely thrown into jail. His serious doubts began to trouble him more deeply as he witnessed the Federal response to the postwar Red Scare of 1919, when many American citizens were deported without constitutional due process. He was so disturbed by all of this that he helped found the American Civil Liberties Union that sought to protect due process and other constitutional rights. (Ryan, 154-99)

“From the early 1920’s forward, Dewey became a vocal and articulate public spokes person for Democracy in all American institutions. He founded and led an AFT local at Columbia and often spoke at labor and AFT functions. He believed with every cell of his body that American Schools had to be the incubator of American Democracy. As the shadow of fascism descended over Europe, he became a fellow traveller with the United Front to defend the world from an ideology that had nothing but for contempt for Democracy or any notion of an open society. For Dewey, education that allowed the organic evolution of free speech and the discussion and respect for all points of view in the classroom inoculated American students from the threat of fascism.

“If he were alive today, Professor Dewey would be shocked by what he would see. In part, Dewey’s whole philosophy of Education was developed to countervail the corrosive influence of capitalism on communities and the gross economic power of giant corporations. He sought to defend individual growth and creativity and nurture the sense of public responsibility that was under assault from the pulverizing individualism of the dominant ideology of big business backed Social Darwinism.

“Dewey’s vision is now a major target of major foundations that are funding the push to privatize American Education. Major Wall Street investors and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli Broad Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, among others, are working together with the Obama Administration to destroy what is left of public education in this great country. Combined, these corporations control approximately 50 billion dollars in assests.

“I will not take the time here to unpack the strategic plan coordinated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and three people within the Department of Education who have turn their strategic plan into a public policy called “The Race to the Top.” You should read Diane Ravitch’s new book to get a clear picture of how this has all been done very legally with the help of the best lawyers that money can buy, millions of dollars thrown at the Harvard Education Department, and with tens of millions of dollars to hire the best Madison Ave. Advertising and PR firms and the best web designers (go to “PARCC” or “Common Core” online). What you need to know is that none of the people behind this plan have any respect for public schools or public school teachers.

“Like Anthony Cody, I have been insulted several times by Secretary Duncan’s Press Secretary and friends of our president who are not open to any imput from experienced teachers. Indeed, I was the subject of a veiled threat from Mr. Duncan’s Press Secretary that I describe here: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html.

“In another case, a good friend of the President told me when I protested the Chicago School closings: “who do you think you are kidding, only 7 or 8 percent of those kids have a chance anyway.” Several weeks later when I raised the same subject again, he gave me the Democrats for Education Reform standard line that inner city schools failed because teachers have failed. He was not interested in hearing about poverty and resource starving of schools. I called him on this. The first quote sounded eerily like what Mr. Emanuel communicated to Chicago Teacher’s Union President, Karen Lewis, in a famously closed door, expletive filled meeting.

“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government. Governments must read and respond to petitions: our Education Department does not seek to communicate with any citizens except by tweeting inane idiocies about gadgets and enterprise. What we have is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsoring the overthrow of the public school system to bulldoze a path to sell billions of dollars of product. Other companies like Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and Company, and Achieve, Inc. are just coming in behind the bulldozers.

“We must teach the rest of our society that democracy still matters in schools and everywhere else. The time for talking is over! We need to get into the streets and get arrested if necessary. Most importantly every one of us needs to call the same senator or congressman every day until NCLB and RTTT are dead, Arne Duncan does not have control over a penny, and all stimulus money that has yet to be distributed, is given by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the districts around the country that are the most underserved to rehire teachers and support staff. Not a penny should go to charter school construction, IT, administration, or hiring consultants from the Eli Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, or McKinsey. Not a penny should go to Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill or any form of standardized testing. All state superintendents who took trips from any Education vendor should resign, and no state should hire an administrator or superintendent at any level who does not have proper accredited certification and ten years of exemplary classroom teaching.

“Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education or wait like sheep for Gatopia to numb us all!”

Hannah Nguyen reports what happened at the “teacher town hall” in Los Angeles that featured Michelle Rhee, George Parker, and Steve Perry.

The event was tightly controlled and scripted, and most of the discussion among the panel consisted of complaints about unions.

Yet this student managed to be heard. There is a link to the video embedded in her story.

What a brave and articulate young woman!

Gary Babad is a New York City parent who enjoys fame for his parodies, which he posts from time to time on the NYC Parent blog.

He has created his own news service (GBN), which gets scoops from improbable and often non-existent sources.

This is one of his best.

According to informed sources, President Obama will turn the Syrian situation over to the Department of Education if he doesn’t get clearance to deploy the Department of Defense.

Why? Because Secretary Duncan can use his waiver authority which does not need Congressional approval.

Read the post and prepare to laugh out loud!