Earlier today, I posted EduShyster on this very same video. The point that the creator of the video makes with humor, I decided, is so important that it deserves a post of its own.
David Coffey, who created the video, is a teacher of teachers. He is a professor in the mathematics department at Grand Valley State University in Michigan. His wife is a first grade teacher.
He made the video linked above because he found it annoying that a celebrated movie director had written a widely publicized book about how to reform the nation’s schools. These days, it seems that everyone knows how to “reform” the schools, and the farther removed they are from the schools, the more they know.
I admit feeling a certain annoyance, frustration, even rage when I read that some star athlete has opened a charter school. Andre Agassiz, the great tennis star, has raised $750 million from investors to open a chain of charters. Why isn’t he opening tennis camps? That would make sense.
Not long ago, I read about a charter opened in Texas by a basketball star, or was it a football star? I don’t recall. Whoever it is, he is not an educator.
What madness has overtaken our nation? Why the push to hand innocent children and scarce public dollars to non-educators? How does “caring” about education translate into the experience and knowledge needed to run a school?
Everyone has “answers,” it seems. One of the top education books on amazon is by Tea Party hero, Ron Paul, who thinks we should simply get rid of public education altogether. Ron Paul is a physician and an elected official. Other than having gone to school, I see no education experience in his bio. His “answer” will take us backwards to about 1800 or so.
NBC’s Education Nation has a long list of speakers and panelists. The only educator that I spotted on the list was Randi Weingarten. The only education scholar was David Kirp of Berkeley. Otherwise the list of speakers is dominated by rightwing governors and ex-governors and business leaders. Why no working classroom teachers or principals from one of our nation’s many great public schools?
I do believe this era of collective Dumb will end. History does not move in a straight line. We must maintain our sense of right and wrong , we must maintain our professional ethics, we must uphold the standards of professionalism that other societies recognize as vital to the success of schools and children.
Stay strong and do what is in the best interest of children, families, communities, and our democracy. That is a winning formula, even if it is temporarily eclipsed by celebrity worship and a campaign of misinformation.

It has a lot to do with being a female dominated profession. You’ll find the same thing with social work.
LikeLike
Andre Agassi appeared on Huffpost LIVE this morning — small wonder, since HUFFPOST has supported charterization, and has made a decided move to the corporate right since the AOL merger… absolutely shameful that comments against charterization are SILENCED by ‘curation’ (censorship)…absolutely UNAMERICAN!
LikeLike
“Andre Agassiz, the great tennis star, has raised $750 million from investors to open a chain of charters. Why isn’t he opening tennis camps? That would make sense.”
Love it.
LikeLike
Ah, you should join us here in Columbus. The latest advertisement for the CharterLevy stars OSU football coach Urban Meyer . . . he doesn’t live in the district, and his kids never went to our schools.
LikeLike
Marcus Garvey, a great football player but not an educator, was on the Board of, and a major donor to, the Inglewood, Ca. KIPP Charter School.. ..do not know if that is still the case.
But currently, it is the misogynist and porn Hip Hop singer Pitbull who is even more offensive as a charter school owner/operator.
At least the Aggassi’s are worthy role models, but as you say, Diane, it would be more appropriate for them to open tennis camps (as famous tennis star, Jimmy Connors did in the Santa Ynez Valley, my home for many years), but the image of Pitbull as a role model entrepreneur opening sports and hip hop music charters is boggling.
Race to the Bottom is in the offing.
As to Education Nation, it is shaping up to be an ALEC presentation all the way, and all of us might let our own constituencies know, including letters to editors, that it will present only the side most tilted toward corporate earnings….specifying that yet again, it does not feature true public school (and university) educators.
LikeLike
I’m not a diehard football fan, but I think you’re probably thinking of someone else besides Marcus Garvey. Marcus Allen maybe?
LikeLike
OOOps…thank you dear pal, FLERP…both for reading my post carefully, and for gently showing me up as a non-football follower. I conjoined Marcus Allen with Steve Garvey. Of course it was the handsome Marcus Allen who supported KIPP.
Marcus Garvey was a Jamaican leader according to Wiki.
LikeLike
A strong high school math teacher in our district who was even recently our local association president, left to teach at a Chicago charter that’s funded by the Chicago Bulls. I’ve been afraid to check in with him to see how it’s going.
LikeLike
He needs to go back and learn how to make a good movie. His ego got in the way and he hasn’t directed a good movie in years. I guess he needed to write a book in hopes of making some money since his movies have tanked.
LikeLike
Goldie Hawn??? Can’t wait to protest in NYC :Education Nation”” !!
LikeLike
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0gYhuUzx8Q
LikeLike
Does anyone know how it became all the rage for people to believe that anyone can “do” education? The DOE is run by folks who, for the most part, have little or know background in the profession for which they set policy. Would they have their family travel as passenger on an aircraft going 600 mph at 35,000 feet during an electrical storm? Would they have a tumor removed from their brain by a hotdog purveyor who took a crash course at a medical “leadership academy”? When and by whom and for what reason was “common sense” murdered?
LikeLike
Maybe this current fad of “doing” education is like the little dogs that celebs used to carry around in their gigantic purses? Just the latest accessory that they will soon tire of and leave it to the rest of us to fix up their frivolous mess. Too bad this time children are part of the fad and the stakes are so high.
LikeLike
RE: Ed Nation: perhaps a boycott of sponsors would be in order?
LikeLike
Indeed. Let’s find out who the sponsors are, and then announce our intent to boycott them. Money speaks to monied interests.
LikeLike
Celebrities weigh in on a vast array of things that they probably are not qualified to speak about – it’s being going on for a long time. Rob Reiner has been been very active in promoting early childhood education for example/
Another recent example that I think Diane mentioned is going to introduce her (and has shared his view of education) is Matt Damon. As I recall, his mother is an educator. But he is an entertainer.
Kami Cotler, who used to play Elizabeth in “The Waltons” became a teacher (according to the Today show) served as a co-director of a charter and now is on the board of directors of the school.
http://www.ivillage.com/forums/entertainment/celebs-fun/celebrity-chatter/movie-tv-talk/what-are-actors-waltons-these-days
LikeLike
Ok, but doesn’t there seem to be a difference between a celebrity opening a charter and claiming to know the answers and a celebrity introducing a speaker, or speaking up for teachers in general? I don’t think that Matt Damon is opening a school and claiming to know how to fix education.
Promoting early childhood education is also a lot different than claiming you know how to best practice early childhood education.
To even have to point out the apples and oranges aspect of your post has me feeling like sisyphus. I’m betting that you already knew that there was a difference.
LikeLike
Nifty rhetorical trick there, Joe.
But Matt Damon isn’t telling the world how to teach kids. He’s been active in telling the world to listen to teachers.
Huge difference.
LikeLike
Agreed!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
LikeLike
Boy Joe now you’re scraping the bottom of the barrel. Always have to have a lame zinger for Diane. You’re relentlessly looking for ways to put down and minimize her accomplishments while bolstering your own ad nauseum. This is a new low even for you.
LikeLike
Rob Reiner did great work with Prop. 10 in Calif…promoting a cigarette tax, about 12 years ago. It helped push the Childcare Planning Council (of which I am still a member, though in name only these days) and work on pre-school education.
Some celebs do much good community work.
LikeLike
So if a celebrity, like Reiner, works on a cause you agree with, that’s ok…but if she/he works on a cause you disagree with, they’re a cause for ridicule?
I’m in favor of celebrities using their $ and fame to help youngsters in a variety of ways.
LikeLike
There is a big difference between raising funds for a school you believe in and asserting that you, as a non-educator, should start a school.
LikeLike
Just to clarify, I acted from ages 6-16. Then, as a grown up, I got my California teaching credential, taught in both a traditional district and a charter school and then went into administration and board work for charters. It’s not really the same thing as a “celebrity” dabbling in education. Actually, I dabbled in acting…
LikeLike
Freeman Hrabowski is certainly an educator, although he is not in the public schools, most of his students come from them. Weingarten is a union leader who now has as many positions as her union members will allow!
LikeLike
Randi Weingarten’s classroom experience is quite limited too, isn’t it?
LikeLike
Randi Weingarten supports the Common Core State Standards in English language arts. That’s very disturbing, for no one who knows much about teaching English could be a supporter of these.
LikeLike
It isn’t surprising when non-educators express their delight with the new Common Core State Standards [sic] in ELA. One can chalk that up to purest ignorance. But when educators express support for standards [sic] this poorly drawn, this damaging to the teaching of English, that’s disturbing.
LikeLike
I’m all for everyone and anyone having his or her say about education. Good ideas come from surprising places.
JUST LEAVE THE AUTHORITY IN THE HANDS OF SITE-MANAGED LOCAL SCHOOLS, among professional teachers and principals who are free to attend, or not, to the blather.
LikeLike
I hasten to add that Professor Ravitch is spot on in her shock that this crowd of amateurs should be listened to, funded, put in charge of the teaching of our children.
LikeLike
Yes, Mr. Aggasi has a lot of nerve. Just because he has been an educator running a K-through-12 school for at-risk and challenged children for the past 12 years, he has no right running more schools. Read this below, it makes it abundantly clear he has no idea what he is doing.
“Tennis star Andre Agassi founded a school for children with special needs in his hometown of Las Vegas, Nevada in 2001. The Andre Agassi College Preparatory Academy began with grades three through five and is now a complete K-through-12 school for at-risk and challenged children.
Agassi Prep, as the special needs school is known, is a model charter school located in Las Vegas’ most at-risk area and was founded in part to create a sense of hope for the children of the community. The Andre Agassi Charitable Foundation set forth to raised $40 million to start and build the campus. Students are selected via a computer-based lottery system with preference given to children within a two mile radius of the school, which is in one of Las Vegas’ most economically-challenged areas. There are no admission fees or entrance exams to be accepted to the school.”
LikeLike
One site says the ratio of teacher to students is 1 to 8. Their reading scores in 6th grade are 33% proficiency, 7th grade is 24% mastery, 8th is 33% mastery and then for the state proficiency test in 11th grade, an amazing 98% of students mastered the test. Something’s fishy in Las vegas.
LikeLike
You cited no source for that flattering profile of Agassi, so I have no way of knowing which self-serving web site, obscure blog, or issue of “People” magazine it comes from. If you wish to understand Agassi’s aims in lending his name to this initiative put together by hedge-fund managers and venture capitalists, you might turn your attention to other sources of information, including the business section of the LA Times.
“The goal of the fund is to develop 75 schools serving 40,000 students over the next three or four years while earning a financial return for investors, which include Citigroup Inc. and Intel Corp.
“‘It’s a novel business model,’ said investment banker Bobby Turner, fund manager at Canyon Capital Realty Advisors. His Century City firm is Agassi’s partner in the Canyon-Agassi Charter School Facilities Fund. ‘We expect to attract investors who realize that making money and making societal change don’t have to be mutually exclusive,’ Turner said.”
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/02/business/la-fi-agassi-fund-20110602
More precisely, Turner and Agassi expect to attract investors who wish to cloak their greedy exploitation of children and their ham-handed attempts at privatization in the noble mantle of philanthropy. And I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts that they’re philanthropy would have a target other than charter schools if it weren’t for the New Markets Tax Credit Program.
*************************
Under the New Markets program, a bank or private equity firm that lends money to a nonprofit to build a charter school can receive a 39% federal tax credit over seven years. The credit can even be piggybacked on other tax breaks for historic preservation or job creation. By combining the various credits with the interest from the loan itself, a lender can almost double his investment over the seven-year period. No wonder JPMorgan Chase announced this week it was creating a new $325 million pool to invest in charter schools and take advantage of the New Markets Tax Credit.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/albany-charter-cash-big-banks-making-bundle-new-construction-schools-bear-cost-article-1.448008#ixzz2flc5Ey3b
*************************
LikeLike
Kevin, the source for my comment was my new book, where there ample documentation of the tennis star’s charter plan
LikeLike
Yes, Reign of Error…page 170.
LikeLike
Kudos to hm for this. Sounds outstanding in all parameters of critique to me.
LikeLike
Cynthia Weiss, you must have read the school’s press release.
Read this instead: http://archives.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2012/03/15/news/local_news/iq_51901516.txt
Or read my book, which tells a different story from the press release.
Andre Agassi is not “giving back” or doing philanthropy. He is opening charters “FOR PROFIT.”
LikeLike
How low can a celebrity go?
LikeLike
Prof. Ravitch:
My comment above, which begins “You cited no source for that flattering profile of Agassi,” was directed at Cynthia Weiss, not at you. That’s why my comment is indented under her comment, to indicate that it is a reply. Still, I could have made clear that I was talking to Ms. Weiss by referring to her directly, rather than as “you.”
LikeLike
I recall seeing interviews with Tony Danza discussing his experience actually BEING a teacher. Thought it was for only a short time…a year or so, I would think his input in such a summit could be interesting. But what is up with Goldie Hawn? Love her movies but when was she ever a teacher? Has she even acted in a role as a teacher? Also, noticed there are no Indy car drivers, chess players or football coaches included. Why not?
LikeLike
These folks aren’t “doing education”. They’re doing investment. Privatizing education while continuing even marginally the public funding through our tax dollars is a guaranteed market. This is why hedge fund managers are backing so many of the charter operations. There is a lot of money to be made. By the time the public figures out that celebrities and business people don’t know what they are doing, investors will have made their money and moved on to the next bubble.
I swear a bunch of MBAs sat around brainstorming on how to develop new markets for the private sector. Idea: take what’s public and privatize it for profit. Sell the idea that public education is a failure. Ignore the fact that most educational failure is largely influenced by soc-economic forces such as POVERTY and the guilt by association is made.
It’s called market capture.
LikeLike
Maybe it’s kind of the Live Aid mentality for this decade. Open a school blah blah blah
Save the children
We are the World
LikeLike
One of my least favorite “education reformers” is the singer John Legend, who is a legend in his own mind. He hosted the “TED” talks several months ago and touts education as the next big civil rights issue. I haven’t heard about about him actually going to inner city schools to spout his expertise. This is a portion of his bio:
“Outside of music, Legend is involved in numerous social and charitable causes. He is a supporter of the Harlem Village Academies, a New York City organization that runs several charter schools. Legend serves as a vice chairman on the HVA board. He explained to Black Enterprise magazine why education is such an important issue to him. “I come from a city where 40 percent to 50 percent of our kids drop out of high school. I did well in high school and then went to an Ivy League school, but I was the exception. We need to do more to make sure every kid has a quality education.””
Legend has worked with Teach for America as well. He is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, which of course qualifies him as an education expert, in spite of the fact that he never taught, according to what I’ve read about him. He just riles me with his smarmy attitude.
LikeLike
He is an African American man who came from a school where 50% graduate to go to an Ivy League school. He is now working to give back to other students of color. But, he does not agree w/ your views so you are dismissing his beliefs and his view as “smarmy.” Not cool in my book.
LikeLike
Let’s not forget legendary quarterback Fran
Tarkenton weighing in with an “apples ‘n oranges”
comparison of teachers and pro football players:
You can watch it here on YouTube in video form:
or you can read it here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204226204576601232986845102.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Fran Tarkenton:
What if the NFL Played by Teachers’ Rules?
Imagine a league where players who make it through three seasons could never be cut from the roster.
Imagine the National Football League in an alternate reality. Each player’s salary is based on how long he’s been in the league. It’s about tenure, not talent. The same scale is used for every player, no matter whether he’s an All-Pro quarterback or the last man on the roster. For every year a player’s been in this NFL, he gets a bump in pay. The only difference between Tom Brady and the worst player in the league is a few years of step increases. And if a player makes it through his third season, he can never be cut from the roster until he chooses to retire, except in the most extreme cases of misconduct.
Let’s face the truth about this alternate reality: The on-field product would steadily decline.
Why bother playing harder or better and risk getting hurt?
No matter how much money was poured into the league, it wouldn’t get better. In fact, in many ways the disincentive to play harder or to try to stand out would be even stronger with more money.
Of course, a few wild-eyed reformers might suggest the whole system was broken and needed revamping to reward better results, but the players union would refuse to budge and then demonize the reform advocates: “They hate football. They hate the players. They hate the fans.” The only thing that might get done would be building bigger, more expensive stadiums and installing more state-of-the-art technology. But that just wouldn’t help.
If you haven’t figured it out yet, the NFL in this alternate reality is the real -life American public education system.
Teachers’ salaries have no relation to whether teachers are actually good at their job—excellence isn’t rewarded, and neither is extra effort. Pay is almost solely determined by how many years they’ve been teaching. That’s it. After a teacher earns tenure, which is often essentially automatic, firing him or her becomes almost impossible, no matter how bad the performance might be. And if you criticize the system, you’re demonized for hating teachers and not believing in our nation’s children.
Inflation-adjusted spending per student in the United States has nearly tripled since 1970. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, we spend more per student than any nation except Switzerland, with only middling results to show for it.
Enlarge Image
tarkenton
Over the past 20 years, we’ve been told that a big part of the problem is crumbling schools—that with new buildings and computers in every classroom, everything would improve. But even though spending on facilities and equipment has more than doubled since 1989 (again adjusted for inflation), we’re still not seeing results, and officials assume the answer is that we haven’t spent enough.
These same misguided beliefs are front and center in President Obama’s jobs plan, which includes billions for “public school modernization.” The popular definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results. We’ve been spending billions of dollars on school modernization for decades, and I suspect we could keep on doing it until the end of the world, without much in the way of academic results.
The only beneficiaries are the teachers unions.
Some reformers, including Bill Gates, are finally catching on that our federally centralized, union-created system provides no incentive for better performance. If anything, it penalizes those who work hard because they spend time, energy and their own money to help students, only to get the same check each month as the worst teacher in the district (or an even smaller one, if that teacher has been there longer). Is it any surprise, then, that so many good teachers burn out or become disenchanted?
Perhaps no other sector of American society so demonstrates the failure of government spending and interference. We’ve destroyed individual initiative, individual innovation and personal achievement, and marginalized anyone willing to point it out. As one of my coaches used to say, “You don’t get vast results with half-vast efforts!”
The results we’re looking for are students learning, so we need to reward great teachers who show they can make that happen—and get rid of bad teachers who don’t get the job done. It’s what we do in every other profession: If you’re good, you get rewarded, and if you’re not, then you look for other work. It’s fine to look for ways to improve the measuring tools, but don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Our rigid, top-down, union-dictated system isn’t working. If results are the objective, then we need to loosen the reins, giving teachers the ability to fulfill their responsibilities to students to the best of their abilities, not to the letter of the union contract and federal standards.
– – – – – – – –
Mr. Tarkenton, an NFL Hall of Fame quarterback with the Minnesota Vikings and the New York Giants from 1961 to 1978, is an entrepreneur who runs two websites devoted to small business education.
—————————————————————-
—————————————————————-
If you’re still reading this, here’s a reply from the blog
“South Bronx Teacher”:
———————————————–
———————————————–
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Sacking Fran Tarkenton
Who knew that former Minnesota Vikings and New York Giants quarterback Fran Tarkenton has an opinion about education deform. Yes, it is true. I am still trying to figure out why he needed to chime in to the debate yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, but those thoughts are left to bigger people than myself.
Aside from the typical union bashing and the groveling to the shrine of Bill Gates, the gist the The Mad Scrambler is attempting to convey is what would happen if the NFL lived in an alternate reality that had the same rules and pay scales as education.
Tarkenton writes, amongst other things;
“Imagine the National Football League in an alternate reality. Each player’s salary is based on how long he’s been in the league. It’s about tenure, not talent.”
Of course, a few wild-eyed reformers might suggest the whole system was broken and needed revamping to reward better results, but the players union would refuse to budge and then demonize the reform advocates: “They hate football. They hate the players. They hate the fans.”
I guess what Fran fails to mention is that the 32 teams in the league divide the TV money, licensing, all evenly. Heck, even ticket sales are a 60/40 arrangement. Seems like socialism to me. In fact what incentive to the owners of the teams have to win when before a down is played they have already made a profit.
What about the salary cap? Does this not only assure the owners that the few teams that are sufficiently under the cap can bid on free agent players, but limits the players true worth? And what is with this deal that veteran players, no matter how good or ineffective they are are paid a minimum of $810,000?
Even this years rookies are subject for the first time ever of an NFL draft scale that affects all first round draft picks. No more given $80 million with $35 million guaranteed to the likes of Sam Bradford. Now 1st round picks will be only allowed a 4 year contract with an option for a 5th. Cam Newton, the #1 draft pick this year received a contract worth only $22 million for 4 years.
Should he not be paid according to his abilities and talent?
Does this not irk Fran Tarkenton?
Does the socialism of the NFL irk him as well?
But come to think about it, I think it is darn time that teachers enjoy the same benefits as NFL players do.
Think about it, if we are treated like NFL players — we can commit felonies, spend several years in state or federal prison, and then still be able to teach.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we can be arrested multiple times for DWI and then still keep our jobs.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we can physically abuse our wives and/or girlfriends, or husbands and/or boyfriends and then still keep our jobs.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we can take performance enhancing drugs and watch our apples shrink, or in the case of women, watch their hoo hoos grow.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we can be insubordinate whenever we want to our supervisors and be able to get away with it.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we could lie, cheat, steal or whatever to get to the top and then still keep our jobs.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — our character would not matter.
If we were to be treated as NFL players — we couldn’t read the first page of “Dick and Jane,” but we will still be able to teach
If we were to be treated as NFL players — everything we want will be taken care of for us by someone else. We would have no responsibilities.
Tarkenton is right. Us teachers live in a fantasy world, an alternate universe. We have no idea how good we have it and how poorly an NFL player struggles in the real world.
LikeLike
OMG, what a windbag. I am very familiar with this type. The armchair quarterback.
LikeLike
YUP. Another know-nothing gets a national forum. The WSJ no less.
Sigh
LikeLike
Fran’s showing off his scrambling skills there.
Not a fan of the South Bronx Teacher response, though. It matches Fran the Man’s ignorance step-by-step.
LikeLike
Parody, FLERP!, Parody!
LikeLike
Hey know it all Fran, imagine that you are a coach and you can only recruit single star players and your rival recruits 5 star players. Which coach will be more successful and win the most championships? Let’s guess? Your analogy is absolutely arrogant and stupid-get a clue. I guess you are desperate for money these days because you just kissed Gates’ rear end.
LikeLike
diane:
miami opened a new charter this school year called slam.
its a collaboration between the singer pit bull and the nearby miami marlins baseball team (the stadium is down the street) and its in miami’s well known cuban immigrant hub of little havana.
the area is very poor and supposedly will train middle school age kids for careers in sports management
jeffrey luria owner of the marlins is widely considered to be a major league scumbag for taking 675 million in public dollars to build a new gleaming baseball stadium for his last place marlins. he originally claimed the marlins were close to broke and threatened to move the team. turns out financial info leaked months later showed the marlins making a nice profit. meanwhile he unloaded all the top players to cut payroll costs and the marlins are the worst team in baseball this year.
so here we have a millionaire celebrity and billionaire team owner getting public tax dollars to provide the marlins with future low cost ushers ticket takers valet parkers hot dog vendors etc. can you believe it?
we teachers really appreciate all you do and we are with you!
LikeLike
Yep, the people of Miami got fleeced. And they have responded with their non-attendance for both the ugly stadium and product on the field.
Man, am I glad I’m a Cards fan and have been for over a half century!
LikeLike
And now Goldie Hawn is getting in on the game by putting her image among the reform monsters. Imagine how Blond Beauty may not know the Beasts she is courting.
Hawn’s asset base after a long career in cinema is more than $60 million dollars.
Goldie: stick to scripts and acting. Do some directing and producing. Coach your untalented and not-as-good-looking daughter on her thespianship.
But please don’t stick youir nose in public education unless you’re really willing to be talmudic and learn about the situation from a classroom teacher’s perspective.
Remember Goldie: your grandson goes to a private French bilingual school with small class sizes. This is not the same as mainstream America. If you want to be using your celebrity, stop teaching kids about yoga and breathing to relieve stress and start speaking out against the scandalous child poverty rate in the United States.
You used to dance occasionally with your father on Laugh-In. You’d bring hom onto the set as an extra. Would he be proud knowing that you are in the company of reformers who are stratifying children in America?
Think about the whole context here, Goldie, not just the neo-liberal glamorous A list party version of it. . . . . .
Until then, I am not motivated to see your latest work or recommend it . . . .
LikeLike
What is “being talmudic”?
LikeLike
In Judaism, it is a mindset and value system in which things are studied in depth and one questions everything, debates back and forth, makes cases for issues. . . . critically thinks, and NEVER takes anything at face value. . . this is the condensed answer to your question.
LikeLike
And to Tony Bennett (the singer):
Do you really think it’s a good PR move to put your sterling name and voice out there next to your separated-at-birth-evil-twin Tony Bennett, former educational near-criminal of Indiana?
Mr. Bennett, you started your career taking requests from patrons in a restaurant. You’d listen to their needs and try and come up with the song they wanted.
Would you consdier doing the same for teachers? Would you listen to their requests and come up with a different tune that would present the truths to the reformers, the very truths they refuse to absorb?
Don’t throw your artistry away, at 83, to a bunch of plutocrats who want to rob children of their education.
LikeLike
Mr. Rendo…you’re on a roll….keep going! I will keep reading.
LikeLike
Linda,
Can’t get too much more in touch with my inner Frank Rich and Roger Ebert.
I suppose if there were some way to poke fun at a currently far less coiffed Nancy Reagan (who, by the way, kept a few hundred thousands dollars worth of gowns without paying a dime of tax on them), I would write more, but I think I’ll put in another hour’s worth of re-writes on my sight word lesson plans for this week.
It was Mrs. Reagan’s husband Ronnie who came out with “A Nation at Risk” and catalyzed this horrendous movement. It was also her “I don’t recall” hubbie who busted open unions faster than Paula Deen breaks open a bag of refined sugar.
Goldie Hawn is fine with her notion that private schooling is fine for the progeny of Private Benjamin, but she has no clue about public trusts. . . .
LikeLike
I haven’t read Shyamalan’s book or seen the interview on TV and watched only one of his movies… but I DID read an interview he did in the New York Magazine and found he was on the same wavelength as most readers of this blog in many respects. He thinks class sizes should be smaller, he thinks “part of the answer to fixing schools” is to have teachers seeking advanced degrees and being paid the same as doctors… he questions the underfunding and reforming of urban public schools while other schools are getting everything they need and believes that urban kids are getting a message that our society doesn’t care about them. See this post to get a link to the NY magazine article that gave me a different different perspective on Shyamalan: http://waynegersen.com/2013/09/06/a-hollywood-directors-take-on-reform/.
LikeLike
Any comments about the Success emails on the other thread? It’s true Andrew! Aren’t you shocked?
You’re not fit to shine Diane’s shoes and who are you other than Eva’s lackey?
LikeLike
What’s that all about?
LikeLike
Check email sending now and check the success charter parade thread…look for Andrew Ratner.
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLike
A bit off-topic, but does anyone know anything about the American Institutes for Research? Since Utah opted out of the CCSS consortia, this is who they’ve contracted with to provide our charming testing. I’ve read through the website and it’s pretty obtuse. Is it owned by Pearson or some other group? What kind of group is it? Thanks in advance.
LikeLike
I smiled at your comment because in the field of education research asking about AIR is sort of like saying “What’s this Google thing? A website?”. They’re a huge research organization that produces a lot of program evaluations and things like that. As far as I can tell they’re completely independent and not owned by anybody. I don’t think they have an agenda particularly; they get paid to offer services. Gates has paid them, the NEA too. If you even casually read education research chances are you’ve read something they’ve produced. Hope that helps!
LikeLike
Diane described Randi Weingarten as an “Educator” this is a dubious distinction to say the least.
Weingarten’s tenure as a “Teacher” at Clara Barton High school was virtually non-existant. It was akin to the fraud perpertrated against the students of Michelle Rhee when Broad was building her up as his proxy.
Take a trip to Brooklyn and see how many in that area remember Weingarten as an “Educator”
LikeLike
Take a trip to anywhere in the 5 boroughs, and see if anyone recalls Weingarten as a true educator . . . . or union leader for that matter . . .
LikeLike
You are absolutely right!
The tragic irony is that much of the perverse actions taken against public schools in America have their foundation in NYC. Weingarten is complicit in mayoral control, charter expansion, the psuedo evaluation system and the selling out of teachers as a whole.
Dr. Ravitch, has a lot on her plate but I would challenge her to make ANY assertion of Weingarten as a friend or advocate of public education in America.
LikeLike
We’ve been through this Rex, and Diane feels strongly that she does not want to create internecine quarreling because it’s better to be unified than fragmented in our fight and pushback. Politically, she may have a point.
Right, Diane? And I mean that with respect. Ain’t going to be no one out there who is going to criticize or belittle our beloved Diane Ravitch. No sarcasm there. Hope I’m not embarassing you, Diane. The vast majority of us on this blog love you.
But I would posit and argue that intra-union conflicts, confrontation, and opposition produces new factions and caucuses that end up reinventing unions to better serve their members and society at large. In fact, it was the in-fighting in CTU that produced Karen Lewis and better, fairer, and more just representation in the CPS. It also lead to a much needed, long overdue, and effective strike that sent reverberations and powerful messages throughout the country.
Randi Weingarten is a traitor and trickster, but her constituency is catching on and are not as dumb as she has counted on in the past. Yet, it will be very difficult but not absolutely impossible to unseat her.
It’s okay for us to differ with Diane on this one. It does not pierce at all our unification with her or her with us. We can agree to disagree. Maybe Weingarten will have a change of heart, but I am not holding my breath.
Google movement of rank and file educators. .. . .they are an amazing example of reinvention and virtue. There is a huge fight ahead of us, but there is always real hope.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.
LikeLike
One of those listed for Education Nation is Deborah Quazzo, who was appointed as a member of the seven-member Chicago Board of Education by Rahm Emanuel five or six months ago. Quazzo is one of those right wing business people who had never been active in the work of Chicago’s real public schools. She was appointed to the seat vacated by Penny Pritzker, who is now U.S. Commerce Secretary. Since her appointment to the Chicago school board, she has spoken and voted the Rahm Emanuel party line religiously.
And as mindlessly as the rest of her colleagues on that dismal public body.
LikeLike
George Schmidt, thanks for helping explain why I could not be part of that charade. I could not legitimate a farce, in which a Rahm appointee with zero experience is treated as a voice of authority.
LikeLike
George, what do you think of Marian Wright Edelman, head of Childrens Defense Fund, who also is on the panel? (Of course, anyone else can respond too)
LikeLike
Here is my response to why stars should not tell teachers how to fix schools or worst yet implement their “ideas”… Here is an analogy. I love independent film and enjoy movie going. So, by the same token, perhaps I should direct a film. I have the same amount of “film experience” that a film director opening a school based on his/her “education experience has. The main difference is that my making a film no matter how bad it turns out, will do no harm to the long-term lives of our nation’s children. There might be some angry investors and film-goers who walk out of the film though. But, why would I be so arrogant to think that simply going to movies makes me an expert director? So let all the Oprah’s, Goldie Hawn’s, etc do what they do best – and let education professionals do their job WITH SUPPORT not attack from our very own government. Interesting how no stars stepped up to the plate to help with the crisis in Philly recently if they have all the answers and “know what is best”!
LikeLike
How right you are, Diane! It would be absurd to the general public if a celebrity told a doctor, lawyer, or business person how to do their job. Yet for some reason many feel it “ok” to let those same celebrities tell us how to do our job! I don’t tell Goldie Hawn which movies to undertake. Why does she need to be on a panel discuss reforms that effect my children and me and not herself or her children? It’s insanity!
Thank you for this. You truly say what is on my mind.
LikeLike
After a lifetime teaching and writing books on education, I have decided to open a world-class tennis camp. In polling prospective donors, the preference is that I name it in honor of Diane Ravitch. I am soliciting further donations to make this dream come true, to offer all-paid tennis scholarships to inner-city children who will be chosen by lottery, because the lack of tennis courts in urban areas is the civil rights issue of our time. The good news is that I have already secured superb tennis courts for this school’s use. Prospective donors will be glad to learn that Mayor Bloomberg, Bill Gates, Eli Broad, Mark Zuckerberg, Jared Polis, and both Koch brothers has offered the tennis courts on all their private estates for use by the newly-christened Diane Ravitch Global School of High-Stakes Tennis. Mr. Geoffrey Canada and Ms. Michelle Rhee have agreed to serve on the Board. Please join this outstanding initiative.
LikeLike
ira shor: your comment is ‘double-quote’ worthy.
“No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking.” [Voltaire]
“The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter.” [Mark Twain]
Thank you for this most effective one-two combination.
🙂
LikeLike
ROFLMAO
LikeLike
At least two aspects spring to mind:
o Teachers, theoretical education specialists, school politicians, et co. have not made a very good job of giving us quality schools. Moreover, every few decades the (at least somewhat) consensus opinion on how schooling should be made changes.
o After having spent a decade-and-a-half in school, many have a legitimate knowledge of what does not work or has not worked in their own specific case (one-size-fits-all attempts at schooling are far too common). For people with children in school, the experience can be multiplied, if less intensely.This does not necessarily give them a good basis for constructive suggestions, but it does give them a good basis for pointing out flaws.
As an aside, why would it make less sense for a star athlete to open a school than to sell underwear? In both cases, he has a legitimate (if arguably unfortunate) opportunity to make money on his name; in both cases, the actual work is likely to be done by people (designers/teachers, and so on) than do have the appropriate qualifications.
LikeLike
Dr. Ravitch, what is your opinion of Randi Weingarten’s role in the corporate attack on teachers?
LikeLike
Joe Nathan:
Here’s the quote from the Guardian article, August 2, 2013:
“Choosing a school has already presented a major moral dilemma. ‘Sending our kids in my family to private school was a big, big, big deal. And it was a giant family discussion. But it was a circular conversation, really, because ultimately we don’t have a choice. I mean, I pay for a private education and I’m trying to get the one that most matches the public education that I had, but that kind of progressive education no longer exists in the public system. It’s unfair.’ Damon has campaigned against teachers’ pay being pegged to children’s test results: ‘So we agitate about those things, and try to change them, and try to change the policy, but you know, it’s a tough one.'”
Matt Damon is critiquing the current system and comparing it unfavorably with his own education. Your characterization of what he was quoted as saying is inaccurate, misleading, and just plain wrong. I heard him speak at the Save Our Schools rally in 2011 in DC, where he made a powerful defense of public school teachers. In other words, he’s been doing exactly the opposite of what you accuse him of.
I could be wrong. Maybe you were with him in a room somewhere and you thought he said something bad about teachers. I kind of doubt it, though.
LikeLike