Who deserves credit for creating the anti-testing movement in New York State?
Governor Andrew Cuomo.
He is so devoted to standardized testing that students in third grade in New York will have “six straight days of tests, 90 minutes a day.”
Cuomo loves standardized testing and high stakes, though not for his own children, of course.
Mark Naison also credits State Commissioner John King, who shares Cuomo’s devotion to tests and punishments and regularly displays a “contemptuous attitude…towards parents, teachers, and principals who question the usefulness of so much testing.”
Friends, we do not have to tolerate what we know is wrong for children.
Opt out.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
Thanks for sharing this important perspective. Cuomo’s coffers have been filled by corporations profiting from the labors of teachers and students. This has to end.
LikeLike
Got this in my e-mail this AM. From Dick Ianuzzi, President of NYSUT.
Dear Local Leader:
NYSUT is aware that “opt-out” conversations are sweeping the state in anticipation of next week’s ELA testing and the coming administration of other state tests. We know that you and your members are being asked questions by concerned parents. Teachers are trying to reconcile their own roles as public school educators, private citizens and as parents too. We all share frustration with the state’s over-emphasis on standardized testing, which is narrowing the curriculum and placing great stress on many students.
As an organization, however, NYSUT should neither encourage nor discourage decisions by parents to opt out of state testing. It truly is parents’ choice, based on what they believe is best for their child.
With that said, as local leaders you should know and share with your members as needed the following:
Locals and individual union members who advise parents or students to “opt out” of state tests may face risks.
A teacher who, in conversations with students or parents, takes a position on testing contrary to the school district’s educational program may potentially be charged with misconduct or insubordination and could be subject to disciplinary action.
A local speaking as a union or an individual member speaking as a parent or citizen about educational concerns over standardized testing for instance, in a letter to the editor or in a statement to the Board of Education is protected as long as they are not encouraging parents or students to opt out from a scheduled test.
This is a complex and emotional issue for all of us teachers and parents. NYSUT is committed to protecting its members and doing what’s best for their students. We will continue to provide advice and answers to questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to reach out to your regional office or to me directly if you have further questions.
In solidarity,
DIck
LikeLike
Wow…the nerve to end the letter with “in solidarity”? Lukewarm. With ‘leaders’ like that who needs enemies?
LikeLike
You have the right to remain silent …
LikeLike
Very disappointing but predictable and timid self-serving ltr from NYSUT. No one will accuse NYSUT or Ianuzzi of courage and leadership when teachers, parents, kids, schools and unions are under relentless assault. We need a Karen Turner in every union local.
LikeLike
I agree, as a 27 year member of NYSUT, I’d like to see Mr. Ianuzzi grow a set and challenge State Ed. and Gov. Cuomo to do the right thing. Unfortunately Albany does some strange things to people…….
LikeLike
Ira, her name is Karen Lewis.
LikeLike
Same thing happening quietly in CT. Parents in moderate to very successful town are so unaware that school resources are being restructured to meet teacher evaluations and student success plans and CCSS infiltration. Parents stomp their feet to ensure no budget cuts, and they don’t realize that “mandates” are becoming the drivers of school budgets.
LikeLike
Let us not forget NYSUT agreed to have these tests as part of APPR. I did not check my First Amendment Rights at the school house door.
LikeLike