Archives for the month of: December, 2012

The school district in Manchester, New Hampshire, is considering online classes–not blended learning–as Acosta-saving device. The idea is to put kids online and lay off teachers. Anyone who deals with children and adolescents knows that face-to-face contact, human-to-human relationships are very important. Something’s, like reading a book our practicing an instrument, may best be done alone. But it’s best to discuss what you have read with others and exhilarating to play your instrument as part of a group.

Here is Massachusetts high school history teacher’s letter to the editor of the Boston Globe, expressing his concern about the misuse of technology.

This teacher asks, how can we show that we really care about children?

A reader explains why armed guards will not end the violence:

As my own experience with troubled children, and as pointed out in the PBS ‘After Newtown’ program of 12/21/2012 pointed out:

(1) the shooters tend to be young males who largely fantasize about the shooting long before they act,

(2) they strongly tend to do active research of their act before doing so,

(3) they see this as a way to end their misery and gain a huge place in the theater of the public mind, and

(4) they know they die knowing the media will have to cover their shocking crimes.

So here are the consequences of putting armed guards in schools:

(1) the young assisins will only see the armed guard as the first thing to take out,

(2) this crime will only add to their search for infamous glory, and

(3) the school is no more safe from the shooter progressing into greater carnage.

The number of youth actively and progressively fantasizing about such things is relatively small, and can be identified. We would be remiss in just thinking that all we have to do is make sure all can get some mental health counseling. We actually have to treat our whole society’s basic mental disease of accepting high levels of alienation, mental narratives that exuse and allow alienation to grow, and not doing the work of community building that naturally curbs alienation. That would-be school guard with the equivalent firepower of our recent shooter would be better serving the memory of Newton by joining Big Brothers, Big Sisters, starting community centers, getting scout units that willing accept anyone, getting the lonely and alienated in on lots and lots of social activities, and other such ideas. Trying to end a gun culture will not happen, but it is possible to work with our gun culture to start selling the wisdom of the gun safe, and the need for a bigger vision of community than those that like shooting ranges.

In Louisiana, this mother reports, her 17-year-old autistic son will be required to take the ACT and EOC (end-of-course exams).

As she writes, “These children are also being forced to take the EOC. or “end of course” tests for high school courses that they have never taken. Allow me to reiterate. They are forced to take high-stakes, final exams for classes in which they have never been enrolled because they cannot meet the prerequisites.”

What will this prove, she wonders? Will it prove that her son’s school is a very bad school with very low test scores?

She says this is child abuse.

Her son is being subjected to tests that he cannot possibly pass to satisfy someone else’s political agenda.

That’s wrong.

I hope that journalists in Louisiana will investigate and report about whether this practice is general.

The Daily Howler is all over the media for its sour reporting about the latest international test (TIMSS). He finds that they reverted to their “doom and gloom” scenario without bothering to dig into the data.

He dug into the data and found lots to cheer about.

In this post, Bob Somerby parses the data and discovers that black students in Massachusetts did as well as students in Finland on the eighth grade math test.

Surely that is newsworthy, isn’t it? I mean, if the media wants to find headlines, this ought to be one. But it was not, because they can’t break free of their customary lens.

Hello, New York Times! Hello, newspaper of record!

The National Rifle Association wants an armed guard at every one of the nation’s 100,000 schools. Some legislators want teachers and principals to carry weapons.

Why should policy be reactive? Better to limit all weaponry to officers of the law, except for single-shot rifles for hunters.

Guns should be available only to those authorized to use lethal force.

In this link, with tweets on the subject, someone points out that Columbine High School had armed security at the time of the tragedy there.

Questions: how many assault weapons should be allocated to each school, who should be authorized to use them, where should they be stored, should they be at the front desk or locked up? if locked up can they be readily available when needed?

And: who will pay for the personnel, the weapons and the training?

Here is a terrific cartoon on the subject, called, “Yesterday they called me a union thug, today…”

Helen Ladd and her husband Edward Fiske are distinguished observers of American Education. Ladd is a Professor of Economics at Duke University. Fiske was education editor of the anew York Times.

Together they describe a fork in the road for our nation’s public school system.

Will we continue towards free-market privatization or will we revitalize public education?

This is what they see ahead as the risks in the privatization agenda:

“First, it severs the connection between public schools and the civic purposes for which they were established and that justify the use of taxpayer dollars to fund them. Implicit in this vision is the notion that the benefits of education accrue first and foremost to individuals and that public benefits are simply the sum of private ones.

“Second, it rejects the notion of an education system. Those who view education primarily as a collection of independent schools serving private interests have few incentives to assure that multiple stakeholders — students, teachers, administrators, policy makers, the business community and others — work together through democratic institutions in pursuit of common goals.

“Third, the private education vision leaves little room for principles of social justice and the commitment to equal educational opportunity for all children. By emphasizing privatization and competition rather than community and cooperation, it trivializes the whole notion of “public” education. Nor does it take responsibility for addressing the special challenges that disadvantaged children bring with them when they walk through the schoolhouse door.

“Public schools in the U.S. have always operated at the intersection of two sets of legitimate rights: those of individuals, including parents, to pursue their own best interests and those of society as a whole to perpetuate democratic values and to promote collective prosperity.

“By and large Americans have found ways to strike a balance between these two objectives. Public schools have served as engines of upward mobility for millions of individuals, including waves of immigrants, while driving economic growth by providing an educated workforce. By emphasizing private interests almost entirely at the expense of public ones, the private vision, with millions of dollars behind it, threatens to undermine this historical balance.”

Bob Somerby, taught for many years in the Baltimore public schools. His blog The Daily Howler offers a fearless critique of media coverage of critical events.

His post on the latest international assessments (TIMSS) and the media’s decision tiresome putdown of American students is a classic.

He points out that on the math portions of the TIMSS tests, US students performed about the same as their peers in Finland. On the eighth grade TIMSS math tests, American students in several states outperformed Finland.

This should have been major news, in light of the constant ballyhoo about how poorly U.S. students have been doing for years on international tests. Decrying American student performance is the reformers’ trump card.

But instead of pointing to the real news, most papers told the same old story, which they might as well have written 20 years ago: “US Lags…”

At least a few thoughtful testing experts (Yong Zhao, Pasi Sahlberg, Keith Baker) recognize that the international horse race is nonsensical.

Once a nation reaches a certain level of development, the scores don’t tell you much about the national system or about the future of the economy.

Not everyone can be first. And it really doesn’t matter who is first.

Perhaps we should look at other metrics as more important, for example, what proportion of children are healthy? What proportion live in poverty? What proportion have access to high-quality preschool?

 

 

 

Privatization is in high gear in many cities–Chicago, DC, Memphis, Detroit, and elsewhere.

The corporate reformers say they want to save money but the closings don’t save money.

They say they want to improve education, but that hasn’t happened either.

Here is Helen Gym’s account of the Philadelphia story.

Here is someone you should follow.

In a recent post, this teacher writes:

In order to forestall state-takeover, our district is scrambling to find ways to make “substantial improvement.” By improvement, of course we mean in our MCAS scores. One way we are responding is to get a private company called “Achievement Net” or “A-Net” to help us administer standardized tests throughout the year, which are “tailored” for our curriculum. We put an entire grade into lockdown mode, administer the test, and send the bubble sheets off to be corrected. They come back with lots of statistics and forms to fill out. Every student will do this a total of 12 times this year. We spend hours poring over the results, breaking kids into daily half-hour pull-out groups, filling out A-Net forms handed to us that have questions like, “Today I will _ to make sure my students understand the material,” or “Today I will reteach _ to make sure my students understand the concept of_.”

Bottom line: more money intended for instruction diverted to the booming Edubusiness.