I asked earlier if there were districts that still manage to offer a full curriculum despite the federal mandates. Where are the good things happening. There were many good responses. These are some of the most provocative:
Response #1:
In California, there are over 1,000 separate school districts. Each reflects a different community. Districts that have access to wealthy constituents have been successful at raising new money to hire staff and maintain programs. Small districts have exercised substantial creativity and leveraged the occasional windfall into other wonderful things.
You’ve never heard of most of these schools.
In Humboldt County on California’s north coast, several elementary schools have maintained a program where every child can learn to play the violin.
Anderson Valley High School in Boonville, CA, has its own space program.
Public school kids from all over Northern California go to a week-long Outdoor Science School at Mendocino Woodlands State Park. http://www.mendocinowoodlands.org/ross.html
Others attend an overnight Living History at Fort Ross State Park, living the life of a native Kashaya, an Aleut, or a Russian officer. http://www.fortrossstatepark.org/elp.htm
There is Living History on the tall ship Balclutha in San Francisco Bay. http://www.nps.gov/safr/forteachers/index.htm
If you go through the Donors Choose site, you’ll see teachers putting together all kinds of interesting and innovative projects on their own time.
There are wonderful things happening in American schools – even Title 1 schools. It’s just that the staff and parents are too busy doing them to tell the world about them.
Response #2:
Absolutely there is a vast difference between affluent schools and schools in poverty when it comes to test emphasis. My own kids attended an “exemplary” campus where tests happened, but were not freaked out about, because the kids were all going to do fine. They had the background knowledge and schema to perform well. They were read to as toddlers. The test was considered a starting line, not a finish line.
I teach in a vastly different environment, where 96 percent of our campus is economically disadvantaged. These students are in survival mode. It will take an act of God for some of them to even approach passing because kids don’t learn well when their basic human needs are not met. So we are stressed about the tests all the time.
Response #3:
I live in California near many affluent districts such as Los Alamitos, Beverly Hills, Palos Verdes and San Marino. Visit any of these schools and you will see a rich and balanced curriculum that will compete nicely with those in private schools. Parents at these schools often have “Foundations” that raise thousands of dollars each year to support art, music and P.E. Highly educated parents often volunteer in classrooms, essentially bringing down the student/teacher ratio to 10:1, at least in the primary grades. And of course there are no Teach for America people in these schools because they only hire fully qualified, mostly experienced teachers.
As for test scores, although they are certainly taken seriously, there is no test-prep from September to May because teachers know that almost everyone will score high.
The inequity that exists in our educational system is a national disgrace. Let’s hope we get some authentic reform soon.

The frightening thing about these responses is that the schools where these great things are happening are the schools where the more affluent children attend. I was a principal of a Title 1 school and I understand the stresses mentioned in response #2. The divide between rich and poor is being accentuated by the divide in curriculum which has the socially disadvantaged schools focused on test prep and pressure while the kids in the other schools receive enriched learning experiences that will ensure they continue to be successful. The problem of the achievement gap can only get worse.
LikeLike
Is there any way we can see the socio-economic demographic of the California schools where the good things are happening? It might ease my distress!
LikeLike
All of the programs I listed in my post (which is response #1) are attended by Title 1 schools. Anderson Valley High School is a Title 1 school and I believe ~80% latino. It does have the unusual advantage of educating relatively low income children in a community with significant affluence (it is a wine growing region) that also happens to care about educating other people’s children.
This is another school you might want to read about, Rosa Parks Elementary in San Francisco. It has a Japanese language program, and even a garden with chickens. They have attended the Mendocino Woodlands weeklong outdoor science program I mentioned as well.
LikeLike
from my Rosa Parks link:
—————–
“When I mentioned touring this school to other white and Asian-American parents we knew who’d actually heard of it, there were, on occasion, curled lips, and comments I would be embarrassed to repeat. Last year I overheard one of my co-workers complaining to all and sundry that the district had assigned her to a horrific Title I school, Rosa Parks, and she wouldn’t be caught dead sending her son there. When I asked her what she didn’t like about it, she admitted, somewhat sheepishly, that she’d never visited. I told her we were very happy there.”
LikeLike
Ah, thanks. Hope!!!!!
LikeLike
As long as public schools have geographically based admission systems there will be socioeconomic segregation in the school system.
LikeLike
Well, I can’t send my children to some of the great-sounding schools in California. It’s over 1,000 miles away. Geographic admissions have to happen at some point. Logistics dictate it. Furthermore, part of schooling is to connect to one’s community and the people who live there. Geographic based admission isn’t as much the problem as de facto segregation in communities.
LikeLike
Geographic admission reinforces segregation in communities.
LikeLike
Charter schools do not have geographic admission.
According to the Civil Rights Project at UCLA, charters are more segregated than public schools.
LikeLike
ccording to the UCLA study “E Pluribus…Separation: Deepening Double Segregation for More Students” we are seeing increased economic and racial segregation thought K12 education. They suggest relaxing the geographic admission requirement by changing the boundary policy as being done in Ohio or using non-geographic admission systems like regional magnet schools. I did not see a suggestion that charter schools be banned.
The report can be found here: http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus…separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students
LikeLike
Sorry for the typos and bad link. Here is a good one.
http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/mlk-national/e-pluribus…separation-deepening-double-segregation-for-more-students
LikeLike
It will not take the full link, but you can get to it from the half link.
LikeLike
I have been a principal over a wealthy public middle school, and a superintendent over a poverty public school district. The differences are stark regarding the additional benefits found on the wealthy side of public education, and it is only partly the government’s funding fault. For instance, my middle school PTA would annually raise around $150,000 a year, about $100,000 of it on one night during an annual formal gala held at a local country club. That was pocket money for the school to fund everything from an extra orchestra assistant, to paid speakers at assemblies, to campus beautification projects, to massive educational field trips for the student body. In my current district, my PTA’s have less than 50 members each, and annually they raise less than $5,000 (if that).
Further, in my wealthy middle school, teachers still had to worry about the exams – I disagree that rich kids easily pass the new, rigorous tests in an easy manner. As principal, I personally would have struggled with some of them if I would have been suddenly handed a pencil, and so would many of you. They do have to still work at it. Yet, I will agree the intensity of the prep for the exams is very different. What this results in has little to do with the school’s money. It is more that if the wealthy campus wants to have a 2 hour assembly about anything from college prep to character education to anti-bullying, it’s fairly easy to tell the teachers to take a break. Same is true with field trips, and the opportunities for teachers to leave their classrooms for teacher training – a sub for a day or two won’t hurt that much in those campuses. But in poverty campuses, every hour is precious regarding those exams (and core learning in general). This creates pressure to NOT have assemblies, field trips, and heaven forbid a teacher misses too many days. ….And that’s not a money issue. If my poverty middle schools got a check for $150,000 tomorrow, we would still worry about these things due to the learning gap that exists.
Where I do think the money makes a stark difference is in music education. Running band and orchestra programs is extremely costly, as it has to systemically begin in at least 5th grade and move through 12th grade. That’s teachers, assistants, instruments, uniforms and performance costs across all campuses for at least 8 grades. I was just involved in purchasing new band uniforms for our high school, which are CRAZY expensive. $120,000 was the tally for the entire band. It was the talk of the community for months! My former middle school could have put that together with a combo fall and spring pairing of golf outings…. The wealthy campuses and districts will always have a leg up in that specific area so long as funding formulas stay the same. Technology is another similar situation, and I fear it is becoming even more so.
One concrete change that could benefit this scenario that would be on the cheap – take a look at school district attendance boundaries and individual campus attendance boundaries. I am not advocating for LBJ-like changes, nor am I advocating for vouchers. But good superintendents and school boards should be able to figure out how to mix their kids better in their current schools, especially in mid-to-large districts. {I personally wish voucher advocates would “slow their roll” and take a look at this option much more than they do…} I appreciated my wealthy middle school’s situation that still found about a 25% poverty rate due to one corner of my attendance zone that had a bunch of apartments in it. I literally had multi-millionaire children of nationally-known families sitting next to poverty students due to this 25% mix. I am sure those kids benefited from that arrangement, on both sides. ….And you can bet as principal I maximized those interactive benefits as much as possible, sometimes to my detriment as far as community perception was involved. If you are a community member interested in maximizing poverty student experiences, this might be a great conversation to have with your superintendent and/or Board Trustees. Even though it would still be difficult for the district to implement, it certainly is easier than changing the entire funding system. Thanks.
LikeLike
Thanks for your comment; I appreciated reading it.
LikeLike
Two things: Stop punishing schools for not making AYP and fund schools more equitably. Punishment is a very poor motivator, never mind that the playing field was never level. Wealthy communities will always find ways to provide extra resources, but no teacher should be providing toilet paper and soap. It’s bad enough when actual classroom materials are heavily supplemented by teachers.
LikeLike
My wife and I are both elementary teachers in the same district but at completely different schools. She teaches at a school with over 80% free and reduced lunch whereas my school has 7%. When I ask her about the policies in her school versus the policies we have in my school IN THE SAME SCHOOL DISTRICT, it led me to this conclusion: rich kids get taught, poor kids get tested.
LikeLike
My children attend an elementary school and a middle school in Palo Alto, CA, and I teach in a high school in the district. So, in my house, we’ve got all three levels covered, and I can tell you that we have high quality offerings, we’re not worrying about the tests, and it’s totally unfair to students in less affluent communities. I tried to address that inequity last year in my remarks to a federal education commission:
LikeLike
I agree with Response #2: Though the more affluent neighborhood schools will need to work to maintain their high test scores, the test isn’t as big of a deal there as they are in the lower socioeconomic schools. Many times, the arts or electives in general are sacrificed to provide remedial instruction based on standardized test results. In Florida, if you fail the reading or math exam, you must take a remedial course the following school year. That takes away an elective course. If you are in a low performing school according to test results, you are not going to have many students in elective courses.
LikeLike
The practice of assigning kids to two math classes really distresses me. It sounds sensible, and if people see success with it I withdraw my objection, but I am concerned that doubling down on something that isn’t working will just make the student even more distressed. I’d like to see those kids enrolled in a class that uses math in a different way to see if the math that is impossible for them on a worksheet makes more sense when building a birdhouse.
LikeLike
My son has a non-verbal learning disability. The school has suggested that he should have a period of “math lab,” which would basically be another math class every day. He hates math because he struggles so much. It would be like a punishment to make him take two math classes every day. Not to mention that he would have to drop his band or foreign language class, which are the classes that he loves and succeeds in.
LikeLike
Wish I could say the same about my former (retired) district, where the superintendent referred to testing as a “game” that we will play and a former district official told teachers ” . . . we can’t do the fun things with our students any longer.” They won’t admit it, but it ‘s become all about test prep.
LikeLike
Here’s another example of good stuff happening in schools:
http://www.momsrising.org/blog/riverside-school-cafeterias-are-changing-for-the-best/
In Riverside, there’s a school cafeteria that has a daily barbeque for lunch, serving fresh food right from the grill.
LikeLike