Archives for the month of: September, 2012

In response to the transcript of President Obama’s interview with NBC, a teacher writes:

Class sizes here in Las Vegas are not going down. When they reshuffled on count day we lost teachers at our sites There are now 36 kids in all our 4th and 5th grade classes. Schools are only staffed at 93%. I think it is the districts way of punishing the Union for winning arbitration where it was clearly proved the money for salary was there. This district is so obscenely top heavy with administrators and coordinators. Every elementary has at least one instructional strategist or more. These strategists basically help coordinate testing and have almost no contact with students. I feel that money would be much better spent on another teacher to help lower class sizes. The position is a joke. Morale is so bad here.

TRANSCRIPT: PRESIDENT OBAMA SITS DOWN WITH SAVANNAH GUTHRIE

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW FOR NBC NEWS’ “EDUCATION NATION”

September 25, 2012 — As part of the NBC News 2012 “Education Nation” Summit this week, President Barack Obama sat down with NBC’s Savannah Guthrie to discuss his vision for the future of education in America.

The exclusive interview aired Tuesday on “TODAY” and this afternoon on MSNBC. A full transcript is below. If used, mandatory credit “NBC News / Education Nation.” Video will be available online at TODAY.com, NBCNews.com and EducationNation.com.

# # #

MANDATORY CREDIT: NBC News / Education Nation

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Mr. President, thank you for being with us for Education Nation. We really appreciate it.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
It’s great to be here.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Well, they say all politics is local. But sometimes local politics turn national. So I want to ask you about the strike in Chicago. There was a leading reform advocate who said, “This shows is it a new day for Democrats. They are no longer kowtowing to the unions.” Is that how you see it?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
You know, that’s not how I see it. What I see is that, all across the country, people want results. And I’m a strong believer that the way you get results is to get everybody involved. So it starts at home. Parents have to parent and turn off the T.V. and the video and make sure your kids are doing their homework and communicate with your teachers.

It means teachers striving for excellence in the classroom. It means school boards making sure that teachers have the resources and the creativity to do their best, principals who are leaders. And I think what you saw in Chicago, for example was the fact that they had the shortest school day in– in the country, just about. And– or the shortest school year.

And it was very important, I think, for Mayor Emanuel to say, “Let’s step up our game.” And it was important for the teachers unions also to say, “Let’s make sure we’re not just blaming teachers for a lot of big problems out there. Let’s make sure we’ve got the resources.”

So I’m glad it was resolved. Ultimately, the most important thing, obviously, is performance and– and making sure these kids are doing well. But I do think that from the perspective of Democrats we can’t just sit on the status quo or say that money’s the only issue. Reform is important, also. And that’s been sort of the– the benchmark we’ve used in my administration, is to say, “We’re going to give more money to those schools that are serious about reform but we’re not going to let people make excuses and suggest that it’s just a money problem.”

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Mitt Romney said that, “President Obama has chosen his side in this fight,” that you’ve sided with the unions. At another time last spring, he said, “He can’t talk up reform while indulging in groups that block it.”

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Well– you know– I think Governor Romney and– and– a number of folks try to politicize the issue– and do a lot of teacher-bashing. When I meet teachers all across the country, they are so devoted, so dedicated to their kids. And what we’ve tried to do is actually break through this left/right, conservative/liberal gridlock.

And that’s what my key reform’s been all about, “Race To the Top.” What we’ve said to school districts is, “You’ve gotta emphasize high accountability, high standards. Make sure that teachers know that we’re going to be paying attention to the actual outcomes for kids. But we’re also going to give more resources to schools who are doing the right thing: Training teachers providing them the professional development and support that they need.” some of the things that we’ve done haven’t been popular with teachers unions. You know, I’m a big proponent of charter schools, for example. I think that pay-for-performance makes sense in some situations.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
One of the things that Mayor Emanuel was fighting for was tying teacher evaluations to student performance. The teachers fought it. That’s something that’s at the bedrock of your education policy.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Well, the key is to work with teachers. When you look at what’s happening in Denver, for example, School District, teachers have embraced the idea of merit pay for teachers who are really doing a great job. But what is still a challenge, and I think teachers have a legitimate gripe here, is making sure that the assessments are done properly, that it’s not just based on standardized tests, which, oftentimes, forces schools to teach to the test.

And one of the reasons that we have sought reforms to No Child Left Behind. I think it had great intentions. I give President Bush credit for saying, “Let’s raise standards and make sure that everybody’s trying to meet them.” But because so much of it was tied just to standardized testing, what you saw across the country was teaching to the test.

And I– I can’t tell you how many teachers I meet who say, “You know what? This makes school less interesting for kids. And as a consequence, I’m ending up really shrinking my curriculum, what I can do in– in terms of creativity inside of the classroom.” And that’s not how you or I, for example, when we think about our best teachers, we don’t think about studying a bunch of tests to see how we’re going to score on a standardized test.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Some people think President Obama gets so much support from the teachers unions, he can’t possibly have an honest conversation about what they’re doing right or wrong. Can you really say that teachers unions aren’t slowing the pace of reform?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
You know, I– I– I just really get frustrated when I hear teacher-bashing as evidence of reform. My sister is a former teacher. She now works at the university, working with teachers. And I can tell you that they work so hard. They’re– they’re putting money out of their own pockets in the classroom every single day. They’re not doing it for the pay.

And in some of the toughest school districts, they’re not just teachers, they’re counselors, they’re disciplinarians, they’re parents. Because these kids are coming into these schools with so many different problems. And you know, what is absolutely true is, if we’ve got a bad teacher, we should be able to train them to get better. And if they can’t get better they should be able to get fired. I do think that– you know, reform has to be a part of every agenda in the country– school district in the country, because there’s some schools that are just under-performing.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
And I want to ask you about that. And I’m sure you could recite these statistics by heart. American students: 25th in math.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Yeah.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
17th in science, 14th in reading. And yet, the U.S. spends just about as much as any other country per pupil.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Uh-huh (AFFIRM).

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Why aren’t we getting our money’s worth? People are probably wondering, “What are we spending our money on, then?”

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Well you know, part of the problem we’ve got is we’ve got a very diverse country. Compared to some– these smaller countries, where all the kids are coming to school pretty well prepared, they’re not hungry, they’re not poor– in our country, we– you know, we’ve got poor kids and we’ve– some kids who have deep troubles at home. And– and that affects performance.

But there’s no doubt that we can step up our game. So what I’ve proposed, moving forward, building off of Race To the Top, is let’s hire 100,000 new math and science teachers who are actually trained and math and science, as opposed to just being thrown into the classroom without the kind of preparation they need.

Let’s continue to focus on early childhood education, makes a big difference– particularly for kids who are low income. Part of our Race To the Top is let’s figure out what are the drop out factories out there, the– the– couple of thousand schools where we know they’re really under-performing. And let’s transform those schools.

And– and in all these situations, what we have to do is combine creativity and evidence-based approaches. So let’s not use ideology, let’s figure out what works, and figure out how we scale it up. And let’s combine that with resources. And– and this is big argument, and big difference, that I’ve got with Governor Romney in this election.

Because they talk a good game about reform. But when you actually look at their budgets– they’re talking about slashing our investment in education by 20-25%. We’ve already seen 300,000 teachers that have been fired across the country. And as a consequence, class sizes have gone up by 5%.

And, you know, when you talk to a teacher– I was meeting with a couple of teachers in Las Vegas– where they said, in the first week of school, they’ve got 42 kids in a class, some of ’em sitting on the floor, it takes a couple of weeks before they try to redistribute to maybe get it down to 35 or 36 or 38. That has an impact on kids learning. So reform is important. And resources are important. And you can’t be for one but not be for the other.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Let me ask you about No Child Left Behind. This– the amendment has granted waivers to states because Congress hasn’t amended the law. Allows them to not have as rigorous of standards. Something caught my eye, absolutely, and I bet it caught yours, too. Because of those waivers, in some states, states are permitted to have different proficiency standards by race. So in other words, in the state of Maryland, African-American students are only expected to reach a certain level of proficiency, but white students are expect to– to reach a higher level of proficiency.

They’re expected to improve at a faster rate. But the bottom line is we have a situation in America, in 2012, where you have African-Americans expected not to reach the same level of proficiency as white in certain subjects. And I just wonder, on a gut level, does that bother you?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Of course it bothers me. And– and one of the good things about No Child Left Behind was to say all kids can learn. Black, white, Hispanic, doesn’t matter. That everybody should be able to achieve at a certain level. But the problem that you had was, because it was under-resourced, and because some kids were coming in to school, a lot of minority kids were coming into school, already behind, the schools were not going to be meeting these standards, weren’t even coming close to meeting these standards.

And so what we’ve said to schools is “You’ve gotta continue to keep those high standards. But we are going to measure growth. By age– we’re– we’re still going to keep track of what you’re doing with each group. And you’re not going to have an excuse to do really well with white kids, let’s say, and the black and Hispanic kids aren’t doing as well, but you average it out and you meet something. We’re still going to disaggregate the information about black, white and Hispanic kids, to make sure that everybody’s moving.” But moving towards this growth model of how you measure the job that a school’s doing gives every school an opportunity to continually improve without labeling them as failures, and then not giving them the resources that they need to actually step up.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Let’s talk about college tuition. I know you’ve done a lot, you talk a lot, about what to do on the aid side. On the cost side, tuition is going up by leaps and bounds. It will make your jaw drop when you (CHUCKLE) find out–

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Right.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
–you know, what a little kid today is going to have to pay for college–

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Right.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
–in 20 years. In your State of the Union you said, “I’m putting you on notice, colleges. If you don’t reduce this tuition, you’re going to see your funding drop.” Is there any evidence that they’ve done anything to change, that they’ve listened to that threat?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
There are some schools that have. And you’re right– our first step was to make sure that we were providing the aid and grants that were needed so that the burden wasn’t all falling on kids. And we expanded Pell Grants. We took $60 million out of the student loan program that was going to banks and middle men. We said, “Let’s cut out the middle men. Let’s use that to expand the assistance we’re providing the kids.”

So as a consequence– the average actual out-of-pocket cost for kids has not gone up as fast as tuition has gone up. But that’s not a sustainable model. So we’re going to have to actually keep tuition down. Now, the biggest problem we’ve got with tuition– especially at public universities, is state legislatures have been shifting priorities.

You know, they’re spending money on– you know, prisons, or other requirements, as opposed to the traditional support they’ve given to public education. And what we’ve said to state legislatures is, “You’ve gotta do your part and prioritize this. ‘Cause how well your state does is going to depend on how good your– how well your– your workforce is educated.”

But what we’ve also seen is school starting to do something about costs. You know, in some cases, it may involve thinking about tele-education, and are there ways that kids can get credit in some cases without actually being in a classroom. In some cases, it may involve, frankly, changing the facilities at these colleges and universities.

I mean when you’ve got country club– you know– level– workout facilities and dining halls and all that stuff, that costs money. And– and, you know– I always tell kids when they’re shopping for schools, I said, “You know, when I went to school, we didn’t expect to have good food at the– at the cafeteria. And we didn’t expect to have a five-star health club at– at a university.”

So the– we’re working with schools that can find ways to– to cut costs. But ultimately, states are going to have to step up when we’re talking about public schools. This is also why community colleges are so important, because that’s a good option for a lot of kids. And not everybody’s going to need a four-year college degree. Everybody’s going to need some form of higher education. And community colleges are an under-utilized resource, as we want to provide two million more slots for people who are attending community college to get trained for the jobs that are out there right now.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
What would you advise a high school senior today who had a dream school that would leave him or her $100,000 in debt, or they could go to another school that would not? Should they lower their academic sights for financial reasons?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Well, a couple things I would say. Obviously, each school is different. And some schools have a big ticket retail price, but when you factor in the aid that the schools give, it may not cost the kid as much. But if– if they’ve got a chance of getting a great education without loading up debt– you know, then– you know, sometimes that’s– that might be the better option.

One of the things that, you know, we want to do is make sure the kids know what it is that it’s going to cost them to go to college. So my– as part of our Wall Street reform package, we set up something called The Consumer Finance Protection Bureau, which is designed to help consumers on a whole range of things, financial transactions, mortgages, et cetera, credit cards. And one of the things they’ve done is to create a mechanism to work with schools so that kids know before they owe.

They get a clear sheet before they sign up for that school, explaining, even if the college tells you, “Look, don’t worry about cost we’ll– you’ll be able to get the money for your college,”– a lot of times kids don’t know how much they’re actually going to owe at the end of four years. And so we’re saying, “You’ve gotta make that information above so the kids can be better consumers and as a consequence get the best bargain possible.”

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Back to education reform for a moment. Your supporters, even your detractors, say what you did with Race To the Top had a huge impact. It really broke decades of stagnation–

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Yeah.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
–in terms of what educators were willing to do.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Right.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
You did that with, I think, what, less than 1%–

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Right.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
–of the federal budget on education. So it raises the question, “Why not do more? Why not put more federal dollars toward these competitive grants and try to get more impact?”

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Well we’re working with Congress to try to continue to fund this Race To the Top model. There’ve been members of Congress who’ve been resistant. Traditionally, education aid has been spread around by a formula. And, you know, if you’re a Congressman or you’re a Senator from a particular place– you want to make sure you’re getting your fair share, regardless of whether your school districts are reforming or not.

So sometimes there’s resistance to taking money out of the formula side and putting it into these competitive grant programs. But we’re going to keep on pushing, because what– as– as you point out, we ended up seeing 46 states, even the ones that didn’t win the competition, initiate reforms because they were chasing those extra dollars.

And– what we want– to– to say to school districts and states across the country is each state is different. That– that, you know, we’re– we’re not suggesting that all wisdom comes from Washington. But there are some basic baselines that everybody should be able to meet. There– there are some basic standards.

And there’s certain practices that we know work. We know that if you have well-trained teachers, who are given– you know, treated like professionals and given room to be creative in a classroom and a good principal who’s a leader, and you’re keeping track of the progress the kids are making, that kids do better. And– you know– when we have good data that shows how you improve schools it shouldn’t be just sitting in a drawer.

And– and the– idea between Race To the Top is we’ll work with you. We’re not going to tell you exactly what you want to do. But we’re going to tell ‘ya what we think works. And if you want extra dollars to implement that we’re going to be there for you.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Before I let you go, you got in some hot water at home, I heard, a while back, when you let the world know that Malia had gotten a C on a science test. That got me thinking. Have you ever failed a test?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Oh yes.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Really?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
Absolutely. You know, I– I– I was– I would say I was a mediocre student until I got to college. I– I goofed off way too much. Malia and Sasha are so far ahead of me basically, in all respects. They’re– they’re just better people than I was at their age. And– and– and they’re doing wonderfully. You know, I– I couldn’t be prouder of them.

I will say that at least at the school they’re at– they’re getting a lot more homework than I– I did when I was that age. I mean they– they– they seem to be working deep into the night. You know– I– I didn’t study that ardent till– the night before an exam. (CHUCKLE)

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
I wondered if Malia, who’s in high school now, you have a high schooler, if she’s studying current events.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
She–

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
And studying this presidential election.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
You know, she is studying current events. And– you know, she’s pretty dispassionate about it. She’s able to kinda separate out Dad, who’s at home, from the debates that are going on out there.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Are you? (CHUCKLE) Are you in there grading those essays?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
No. You know, I tell her, you know, I want her to think for herself. The– the– the best education is one where kids learn how to learn, and they– they– they learn how to think for themselves. And my entire goal as a parent is the same goal I’ve got as parent– president, which is to– to make sure that every child out here is equipped to– to compete– and to be good citizens in an environment that is changing so fast that you know, what you need– to– to– be able to do is to constantly take in new information, adapt it, analyze it, use it.

And– and I think that we have all the– all the ingredients we need to– to succeed in– in this competitive environment. But it does mean that we’ve got more work to do at the local level. And hopefully the federal government can be helpful. We can’t do it all. We only count for 10% of education funding. But I think that we can leverage the resources we have to make sure that schools are making a difference.

SAVANNAH GUTHRIE:
Mr. President, thank you for your time. I really appreciate it.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA:
I appreciate it. Thank you, I enjoyed it.

* * *END OF TRANSCRIPT* * *

I noted in an earlier post that Karen Lewis is a National Board Certified Teacher.

I said that she was one of the few–if not the only–union leader who is NBCT.

Happily, I was wrong. I published another post that mentioned other union leaders who are NBCT.

Here are more:

Kitty Boltnott was head of the Virginia Education Association from 2008 until July 2012. She is NBCT.

John Braglia (department chair and social studies teacher at James B. Conant High School) is a National Board Certified Teacher who is President of Local 1211 (Illinois Federation of Teachers), which serves teachers in Township High School District 211 in Palatine, Illinois (northwest suburbs of Chicago). District 211 is the largest high school district in Illinois with approximately 12,500 students in five high schools.

Ellen Bernstein, president of the Albuquerque Teachers Federation, is NBCT.

Tammy Wawro, the new president of the Iowa State Education Association, is an NBCT teacher.

Sharon Gallagher Fishbaugh, the president of the Utah Education Association, is NBCT.

Christy Levings, NEA Executive Committee, is the Vice Chair of the NBCT Board of Directors.

Penni Cyr, President of the Idaho Education Association, is NBCT.

No Child Left Behind is widely considered a disaster.

The law mandated that 100% of all students would be proficient, as measured by the standards in each state, by 2014. We now know that no state will meet that requirement. Schools have been closed all over the nation because of this idiotic law. Principals and teachers who were doing their best to meet unrealistic expectations, were fired.

NCLB is the Death Star of American education.

When Secretary Arne Duncan offered waivers from the 2014 deadline, most states asked for them, knowing that they would never meet the law’s deadline.

But NCLB still has one stalwart supporter, one diehard fan who will never say die. She will defend NCLB no matter how many schools die. That is Margaret Spellings, who was one of the law’s architects; she served as Secretary of Education in the George W. Bush administration, following Rod Paige.

She believes. She will never waver. There is no evidence that will ever persuade her that she was wrong.

A new study says that for every charter that opens, a Catholic school closes.

The author, Abraham Lackman, who worked for the New York state senate when it passed the first charter law in 1998, said that no one anticipated that charters–which are publicly-funded and tuition-free–would drain students from Catholic schools, which are not tuition-free.

He says the charters are not as good as Catholic schools and cost the state additional millions of dollars.

The head of the foundation that supports charters in Albany said that parents make the choice. “We’re more concerned with where they’re going, not with where they’re coming from,” he said.

Texas brought No Child Left Behind to the nation.

Remember that candidate George W. Bush said that Texas had figured out how to fix the schools. He said test every child every year, post the results, reward the schools where scores go up, humiliate those where scores go down. And, wow, a miracle: the scores go up, up, up; the achievement gap closes; graduation rates go up. Win-win-win-win.

Except it didn’t happen. And now the whole country is stuck with a testing regime that is sucking the life out of education.

This report from Texas describes a growing revolution against testing. The schools are up in arms: 77% of the school boards enrolling 86% of all Texas students have passed a resolution opposing high-stakes testing. The Houston superintendent said that 65 days (out of 180) are consumed by testing.

Now a group known as “Moms Against Drunk Testing” has joined the fray. They are mad as hell and they are not going to take it anymore. Last year, the state cut the school budget by $5.4 billion, while handing a fat contract to Pearson for $468 million. Meanwhile the state wants more and more and more testing.

(A few hours after this post appeared, I received the following message: So glad we have support around the country! Our real name is TAMSA (Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment) and we have a facebook page and a website. Please “like us” and “join in” on our website! The more members and “likers” we have, the stronger we will be in the upcoming legislative session.

website: http://tamsatx.org/
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tamsatx
)

Go, Texas, go! If the testing vampire is slain, the whole facade of faux reform collapses. No test scores, no merit pay, no evaluation by test scores, no closing schools by scores.

Don’t mess with Texas!

I am speaking on Sunday morning to a joint convention of the Texas School Boards Association and the Texas Association of School Administrators at the Austin Convention Center.

On Sunday from 2-4, I am meeting with parents and teachers to talk about the kind of stuff we discuss on this blog. Eastside Memorial High School. Y’all come!

Our bad ideas about testing, bad teachers, and failing schools have infected Australia and New Zealand. NZ plans to open “independent public schools,” aka charter schools.

Never mind that Australia and New Zealand have higher scores on the international tests than most other nations, including the US.

Only one nation can be number one, and in the case of PISA, it’s Shanghai, which is not even a nation. Shanghai is not representative of China, but an unusual city whose schools have mastered test prep.

Now every nation in the world is supposed to engage in outrage and flogging a of teachers, because only one can be first.

That’s what it means to Race to the Top.

One wins, everyone else fails.

GERM–the global education reform movement–is spreading.

Read here:

The Treehorn Express
Treehorn’s story : Open attachment.
http://treehornexpress.wordpress.com
[Maintained by NZ educator Allan Alach]

NAPLANISM JUST GETS STUPIDER & STUPIDER

WHAT IS NAPLANISM? NAPLANISM is a belief that learning is best in school classrooms when the following conditions prevail :-

* Testing is the essential element.
* Fear is the best motivator for achievements in learning.
* Manipulation of a school’s daily time table for more time to be spent on NAPLAN preparation is essential and is officially encouraged.
* Cheating through extensive daily repetition of test-taking is ignored. This kind of cheating has high-level approval.
* Children must be denied access to other essential elements of child development during preparation for NAPLAN testing.
* Established professional ethics of the teaching profession and of school leadership have to be suspended during the NAPLAN period.
* Normal teacher compliance and willingness to work with authorities has to be exploited. Teachers are nice people. Use them.
* Teachers, principals, all school personnel and P&C members are forbidden to discuss the crippling effects of NAPLAN.
* Testimony from outstanding educators, statisticians, academics and practitioners must be hidden, silenced or ignored.
* No choices are offered to parents for their children to participate in the tests or test preparation. No mention allowed on enrolment forms or on websites or newsletters.
* If scores aren’t high, teacher ability has to be denigrated. They can’t spell, numerate, teach, always want to strike. Useless lot.

It is a cruel, nasty, shady system.

There are so many other essentials to be in place for the test publishers and their political fans to have their way:-
+ Semantic manipulation, especially with the word “OUTCOMES”. For politicians and education journalists, this means ‘test results’. e.g. C.Pyne : “Certainly student outcomes have gone backwards during the past ten years .” For teachers, “outcomes” means ‘identifiable improvement across the curriculum’. Quite different. See. It has a real meaning. ‘Outcomes” has become a colloquialism that is used when you don’t know what you are talking about.

+ Other uses of semantic subterfuge include the hood-winking use of words like…
“REFORM” to mean ‘forcing better test results on a testing program’ on measureable maths and grammar items with nothing to do with other school learnings;
“PERFORMANCE” to mean ‘test results’ and not ‘challenges to a beneficial activity’ ;
“IMPROVEMENT” to mean ‘better temporary results on the tests’ and not ‘gains in general ability’;
“FUNDING” to mean ‘we don’t what we are doing, so we’ll bribe everybody to get on our side.”

+ TEACHER QUALITY refers to those who get better results on the tests than others. The higher the scores, the better the teacher.

+ The list of the best and worst schools and school authorities must be printed and noted for derision and applause.

These conditions are relatively easy to establish and maintain once the compliance of principals, teachers’ unions and educational societies has been obtained by fair or foul means; and corporate Australia has been frightened by a manipulated and false scenario. This teacher compliance and corporate encouragement was a first step for the establishment of NAPLANISM in 2008-9 and was embodied in Klein’s advice to Gillard. It was too easy. She went about her duties for Klein and his testing firms with zeal and found the victims to be quite pliable. They remain so.
STOP PRESS Her Immenseness is in New York this week. ‘London to a brick’ she will contact her mentor Joel Klein for further advice and encouragement. Hang in there, kids.
0o0o0o0o0o0o0

Part of the silliness is evident in the quoted extract at the heading to this Treehorn Express in this childish response from Peter Garrett, composed no doubt by one of his expert testucators, to an inquiry from a respected, former High School principal, who had quoted Treehorn. Of course the Treehorn newsletter is proudly based on opinion and anecdotal evidence, with far more substance than does any NAPLANistic score. The opinions and evidence are based on over 40 years of
chalk-dust and primary schooling face-ups gathered by a once testing-fixated primary school principal who did a complete 180 when he realised, during one school testing period, that he was destroying children‘s love for learning by his thoughtlessness; and later came to realise that achievements in all school subjects are higher and more permanent than anything that any national testing can do, if evaluation of effort is carried on hand-in-hand with learning and by sharing the ‘outcomes’ [see above]. There is ample ‘anecdotal evidence’ for this stance.

Not only that, but the Treehorn opinions and anecdotes are shared by hundreds of Australia and New Zealands’ greatest educators, academics and statisticians who are familiar with NAPLAN and NZ’s National Standards. There’s Margaret Wu, Brian Cambourne, David Hornsby, Kelvin Smythe and those 100+ academics who signed that petition to “Say NO to NAPLAN”. All of these and Treehorn are on the same page as the world’s greatest known educators overseas : Diane Ravitch, Marion Brady, John Goodland, Neil Postmann, Sir Ted Robinson and so on, who challenge their own politically-based GERM viruses….and Pasi Sahlberg who doesn’t have to. Then there’s those thousands of anti-GERM articles, a few of which are provided by Allan Alach each week. Treehorn, typical of so many school children whose intellectual property is being invaded and fracked, would welcome a challenge to any one of the Treehorn Express statements or opinions, from any one of the ACARA testors, NAPLAN supporters or St. Custard ‘experts’. Try it.
saynotonaplansaynotonaplansaynotonaplansaynotonaplanaynotonaplanaynotonaplansaynotonaplansaynotonaplan
ALSO
1. Mr. Pyne, alternative Minister for Education has yet to answer my letter of 9 September concerning ‘outcomes’, ‘robust curriculum’, ‘principal autonomy’ and ‘teacher’ quality. I have faith in him. He seems to be a thinker.

2. Can anyone from anywhere provide a comment or opinion on the embargo of news from the APPA-NZPF conference held last week? Please read the Treehorn Express article “What Happened? Why?” on http://treehornexpress.wordpress.com and use the comment section. I am quite bewildered as any normal parent or grandparent would be; and I sincerely hope that our New Zealand guests and O.S. speakers are not offended by the snub. I, for one, just don’t understand. If it was deliberate, it is totally non-ANZAC I’m a little bit suspicious, of course, that the Murdoch lobbyists have been busy. Your comment?
____________________________________________________
MUST READ

Bridging the Ditch


This is a letter to co-editor Allan Alach of New Zealand, summarising the week on this side of the ditch : 1. Naplan Results Released. 2. McCharter Schools for Queensland. 3.APPA-NZPF Conference. 4.Teacher Strike. 5. Peter Garrett Responds. 6. No Pyne Reply.
It’s been quite a week.
____________________________________________________________________

“If they’re [Queensland] endemic as cellar-dwellers, it’s pretty serious systemic problem.”
[Christopher Bantick, Education Expert, Trinity Grammar, Melbourne. Courier Mail 4 18-09-12]
_____________________________________________________________________
LINKS http://www.dianeravitch.net http://www.literacyeducators.com.au http://leading-learning.blogspot.co.nz http://www.networkonnet.co.nz http://saveourschools.com.au
http://primaryschooling.net http://www.marionbrady.com http://susanohanian.org http://alfiekohn.org http://www.essential.org http://optoutofstandardizedtests.wikispaces
http://www.essential.schools.org http://www.joebower.org http://treehornexpress.wordpress.com/bridging-the-ditch/ http://allthingslearning.wordpress.com

Phil Cullen AM, FACEL,FACE,FQIEL
41 Cominan Avenue
Banora Point 2486
Australia
07 5524 6443
cphilcullen@bigpond.com

FOREWORD

John White, the TFA Commissioner of Education in Louisiana, put out a press release celebrating the state’s increased numbers taking AP exams.

Gary Rubinstein looked at the press release and thought it was a joke. The number taking the exam went up, but the scores did not. As Gary writes:

“In this latest press release they call their AP results a ‘surge’ because the number of students ‘taking’ the AP went up by 17% while the NUMBER of students (NOT the percentage) getting a 3 or better went up by 18%. Do they realize that this is meaningless? Those percentages are basically the same number, which is what you’d expect.”

In fact, the SAT scores of black students dropped in all three sections of the test.

How embarrassing! Don’t the folks in Baton Rouge know that people can read and might read more than the press release?

This is one of the most puzzling questions of our day.

Rachel Levy asks it in all sincerity.

How can the Democratic Party embrace individuals and groups that are working to elect Republicans? Why does it embrace individuals and groups that are actively working against unions, immigrant rights, gays, and public education?

Can anyone explain it? Is the tent so big that Democrats support those who support Republicans?

I don’t get it.

It sounds so easy.

Take a vote. Get control of your school. Hire a new staff. Next year, your school is a great success.

The Heartland Institute recommends it for everyone.

This think tank in Chicago helped to write the ALEC model legislation to encourage state legislatures to pass a “parent trigger.”

This is meant to privatize public schools across the nation.

The only thing that the Heartland website doesn’t admit is that there is not a single school in the United States or anywhere in the world where a parent trigger has actually happened.

There is no example of a successful (or unsuccessful) parent trigger.

Please note there is no parent trigger for charter school parents.

Once the trigger is fired, there is no going back.

This has got to be one of the most idiotic of all “reforms” on the table.

No evidence, no experience, just privatization ideology as their guide.