Joel Shatzky is Professor Emeritus at SUNY-Cortland, where he taught from 1968-2005. He presently teaches at Kingsborough Community College. He sent this post:
On a recent trip to visit family and friends in Turkey and Israel I asked, a propos of the Olympics, what importance is given to sports in their respective national universities. After all, many Olympic athletes train at universities in the United States where the excellent coaching and focus is to develop world-class athletes. For instance, Ashton Eaton, the gold medal winner in the decathlon, represented the University of Oregon in collegiate sports and was a world-class athlete when he became a member of the Oregon Athletic Club Elite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashton_Eaton Many other American athletes begin their careers in college varsity sports. To my question concerning university sports in their respective countries, however, my Turkish friends and Israeli relatives affirmed what I had long thought: varsity sports is not a significant part of the campus culture in these countries. In fact, the United States is almost unique in the world in the emphasis and attention placed upon our collegiate teams, especially in football and basketball.
The recent scandal at Penn State and its aftermath brought out some much-needed soul-searching concerning the significance of collegiate sports in identifying a university in the public realm. In an article I wrote in the Examiner several years ago, based on a critical report by the Knight Foundation, it was pointed out that:, “75% of these [Division 1] college athletic programs, instead of making money for their schools, are losing an average of $10,000,000 a year, forcing cut backs on faculty positions and other expenses for what is supposed to be the primary mission of higher education: learning, not entertainment for alumni boosters.” http://www.examiner.com/article/inside-our-schools-collegiate-sports-wag-the-dog There is no reason to suppose that the situation has improved markedly since then.
If the significance of colleges and universities in our cultural values is to provide entertainment for mass audience on Saturday afternoons or during “March Madness” then we are going to end up, to alter the title of a Neil Postman book, “Entertaining Ourselves into Insignificance.” I wonder when, given all of the problems this country is facing, we behave like mature adults rather than the perpetual adolescents in which big time collegiate sports would like to keep us indefinitely?
Of course, athletics can be an important part of many students’ educational experience but they need to be balanced by the more daunting objective of properly educating the next generation that will require high-level thinking, establishing clear priorities that require hard work and persistence which govern the behavior of students from other countries. Of course, our educational system has been successful for our top students, but we need to encourage a culture that nurtures those many students who are not at the top.
We must face the fact that unless we alter the emphasis of our priorities from forms of escapism to solid learning, we will become in the future the thing we should fear: a country that longs for a return to its past.

Diane,
I could not agree more. Exacerbating the issue is the reality that a number of these individuals are in college strictly because of their athletic prowess, with very limited, or no academic potential whatsoever. Even worse, many of these athletes are attending school on full scholarship. Institutions of higher education? For some, maybe; for these “students,” not a chance.
LikeLike
I suggest people read the following two books:
Sperber, Murray. Beer and Circus: How Big-Time College Sports is Crippling Undergraduate Education. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000.
Yost, Mark. Varsity Green: A Behind the Scenes Look at Culture and Corruption in College Athletics. Stanford University Press, 2010.
I used to think that big time university sports affected only academics. With the Penn State scandal, I was wrong. It is time to reign this monster in.
LikeLike
College is not the only place investments in athletics get a top seat. Some high schools have the it too. Look at this Allen, Texas, investment. http://www.midwestsportsfans.com/2012/08/the-new-high-school-football-stadium-in-allen-texas-will-blow-your-mind/
LikeLike
I went to the University of Michigan. I had some awesome professors, a great education, and terrific classmates and a first class athletic program. Given the choice between an excellent education and a first class athletic program, I choose both
LikeLike
I agree Mark. I went to the University of Florida where I also had both. Athletics at UF are funded separately and apart from the academic side of UF, and the athletic side actually donates millions to the academic side. Furthermore, because of the athletics program many alumni donate to the University, thus providing support the school can’t get from the State. Athletics allows UF to attract top students and to nurture a school spirit which is most widely known today as The Gator Nation. My Dad is a retired professor from UF, so I see both this from all sides — staff, student, parent of student, alumnus.
LikeLike
A School District just outside of Dallas just spent $60,000,000.00 building a state of the art football stadium. The parents argued that tremendous benefit their student would get from this investment.
LikeLike
Texas makes Texas size mistakes. One has to get the priorities right
LikeLike
My father, who was a Princeton grad, always donated to Princeton, but in later years he said he tagged his gift for undergraduate instruction by professors. He was disgusted with the trend toward using graduate students as instructors while the professors were engaged in research. He was also concerned that schools were accepting large gifts to build facilities without considering the costs to run programs and maintain the facilities. Certainly the use of adjunct faculty brings up questions about the way schools use their funding. Since I am talking off the top of my head, I will not try to draw any conclusions other than to say perhaps there are many areas in which higher education might need to examine priorities.
LikeLike
The hyper-focus on research at the expense of education is wrong. The great professors need to both teach and conduct research. I could not agree more that priorities need to be examined — and I believe having the best teachers teach is worth its weight in gold
LikeLike
I was fortunate at the University of Montana, the researchers taught about the research they were conducting.
LikeLike