Gary Rubinstein took a close look at the Success Academy charter school that kept a list of “scholars” who had to go, get pushed out because they were not the “right fit.” What kind of troublemakers were these children? Babies, actually.
The following appeared in the New York Times:
“Ms. Moskowitz said the school, which then went through second grade, had severe disciplinary problems. Mr. Brown [the principal] previously said in an email that he believed he could not turn the school around if the 16 students remained.”
Gary writes:
“When I think of a school in need of ‘turnaround therapy,’ I picture a school of veteran unionized teachers that has supposedly been ‘failing’ for decades. This school was in its second year when it was in need of being turned around. And the total number of students in the school was about 200, with about 70 kindergarteners, 80 first graders, and 50 second graders. All of these students have been at the school for their entire schooling and all had Success Academy teachers. I have trouble believing that this school needed a radical turnaround plan and if it really did, what does that say about the reform mantra that ‘great teachers’ overcome all if the great teachers at Success Academy were not able to maintain control of 200 5, 6, and 7 year olds?”
To get the real inside scoop, read the reviews of this school by parents, quoted by Gary on this post.

“Got to go list”
The Expel of Success
They’ve got to go
Before the test
The list, you know
Is for Success
LikeLike
Looks like Eva has to go. Her 15 minutes is up.
LikeLike
“Successful Turnarounds”
Eva’s found
Without a doubt
“Turn around”
Means “turn ’em out”
LikeLike
Old umpiring adage: When in doubt–throw em out!
LikeLike
This is brilliant.
LikeLike
It always amazes me how critical these people are of every thing about the public schools. The fact of the matter is that public school teachers and administrators cannot do what SA does in terms of discipline. We would be found incompetent, be fired and sued.
Rubinstien has a very valid point that public school would be on the road to being shut down. Maybe it is time for public schools to take over SA academies. Maybe even have campuses within SA campuses.
LikeLike
The internal contradictions in ed reform are just crazy. They can’t even agree on what this charter chain IS- half of them are arguing it serves all students and the other half are arguing it doesn’t, and shouldn’t have to, because the strength is it “isn’t for everyone”. Her own employees are sending children to the public schools as a back up. Obviously they know that’s the role they’re assigning public schools. The least she could do is admit it.
Moskowitz is out touting this model for ALL schools. She’s given an adoring reception in the US Congress, where they eagerly swallow everything she says. The notion that they take all comers is absolutely central to her argument. Without that, it’s just a different kind of magnet school- one that is completely deregulated and has no protections to ensure fairness. Why is that an “improvement”?
Why not just admit the obvious? Without the public school system acting as a back-up, she could not operate her schools. Then we could have a real debate instead or pretending these two sectors are “the same”.
LikeLike
At our Title 1, 1800 student body middle school, we accepted the responsibility to turnaround our most challenging students by creating SARP (student at-risk program) which was so successful that Harvard wrote about it in a study they did on suspensions. I have a chapter in my book which describes the program and I believe that Diane has a copy of “I’m in the Principals Seat, Now What?
LikeLike
Here’s Moskowitz testifying before an adoring audience in the US Congress.
Wow. That’s a lot of political clout for the CEO of one charter chain. When’s the last time the US Congress listened to an ordinary superintendent of a US public school lecture on the economy with such rapt attention and groveling deference?
Why do “movement” ed reformers have such ridiculously outsize influence in DC? Is that special status why nearly all our elected officials sound exactly like them, down to whole phrases and terms they use?
Click to access moskowitztestimony.pdf
LikeLike
Maybe Arne will ask Eva for our money back.
Click to access CSP.Grant-release.10.0115.pdf
LikeLike
Are you kidding me? Why isn’t this being reported everywhere?
LikeLike
I always thought falsification of grant applications lead to revocation. Am I wrong or was the grant written specifically with Eva in mind?
LikeLike