Yesterday I mistakenly reported that the US Department of Education had closed down the “What Works Clearinghouse,” which reviews research and reports on the results. I corrected my error as soon as I learned about it. In fact, it was a different website that was closed down, the “Doing What Works” site, where educators might find practical advice.
The What Works Clearinghouse is still open, and that is a very good thing, because it just released three reviews of New York City’s “merit pay” plan. All three agreed that it failed. It failed to improve student achievement. It failed to increase teacher retention.
This latest evidence of the failure of paying teachers to raise test scores continues an unbroken stream of failures that have been documented for nearly 100 years.
Will the U.S. Department of Education immediately suspend the Teacher Incentive Fund? Will it use those hundreds of millions for a “Reducing Class Size in High Needs Fund.” Will Michelle Rhee stop saying that the way to save deficit-ridden districts like Philadelphia is to offer performance pay?
Let’s cross our fingers and hope for the best.

If we have tried this countless times for 100 years, and it has failed, it’s no wonder that Finland wants to have nothing to do with us. Maybe our educational leaders are the worst in the world, not our teachers.
LikeLike
Hmmm… I’m not sure what you mean. The $100 merit pay bonus that I got for being “highly effective” last year has truly motivated me to pursue excellence again this year. The focus of my daily instruction is finally where it should be: money. Of course, the government gave me $62 – and kept $38 of my motivation for itself. (Indiana)
LikeLike
Anyone want to bet that Arne pays Mathematica for a study on merit pay and that the results tout a .001 effect size as groundbreaking? Alert the media- we have effects that prove every other study done on merit pay is wrong!
LikeLike