Earlier today, I posted Wendy Lecker’s article, in which she said she was in search of one brave superintendent in Connecticut, who would stand up against the data-driven, test-obsessed climate of the times.
I have found him.
He is Thomas Starice, the superintendent of the Madison, Connecticut, public schools. Superintendent Scarice consulted with his school board, parents and the local community. He has shown leadership in responding to the state’s recently passed legislation about linking teacher evaluations to test scores.
I am happy to add Thomas Scarice to the honor roll as a champion of public education.
Like Superintendents Heath Morrison in Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina, and Joshua Starr in Montgomery, Maryland, Scarice has courageously stood up for the best interests of children as well as his educational ideals. His leadership has made it possible for parents and the local community to express their own concerns and values about what is best for their children.
The Madison community wants its students to be prepared to think and be creative, not just to be good test takers.
One parent in Madison, who teaches in another district, said, “We are lucky [in Madison] to have a superintendent who is pro-active, with a vision,” he said.
According to the article from the local press, Scarice’s vision “holds teachers accountable, while at the same time encouraging and supporting them to help nurture creative, adaptive thinking, was reinforced by a Madison Education Summit held Nov. 28 at the Madison Senior Center. Dozens of community members, including librarians, pre-school teachers, business leaders, moms and dads, coaches, town and state officials, and one nun, gathered to talk about the future of education in Madison.”
Here are the minutes of the December board meeting where the state evaluation system was discussed.

Wow! Courage.
Rumor has it a superintendent in NJ once told his wife the new evaluation law would cause problems.
If true, at least it is a start.
Kudos to Scarice. And the people of Madison Ct.
LikeLike
Congratulations to Mr Scarice along with the parents and students and teachers of Madison, CT. Perhaps other superintendents will get some courage now! I think the property values of Madison just went up.
LikeLike
What a breath of fresh air in those minutes.
LikeLike
I still see the hoops they have to jump through in order to embody the “spirit” of the state plan. The big hurdle will still be how to use student proficiency as a measure of teacher quality. With small numbers of students used to rate a teacher, any rating becomes less reliable and more susceptible to bias from all the variable for which there is no control. Of course, the issue of what is proficiency in fine arts classes, physical education, and any electives that form part of the curriculum. It is only in school that we are asking people to show proficiency in all subjects. What happened to having an appreciation for a particular discipline? Why are we letting ourselves be sucked into this insatiable desire to measure everything whether the data will tell us anything remotely useful or not?
LikeLike
When your first email came looking for one brave superintendent in Connecticut, I forwarded your blog post to my daughter, who teaches in Madison. From her first hand knowledge, which she has shared with me, I knew Supt. Scarice was a champion of public education. From his Welcome Back to School letter to staff to his heartfelt Holiday Message of Hope (after Sandy Hook) I knew he was a very special superintendent. He’s also a follower of your blog, Dianne. Kudos to Supt. Scarice!
LikeLike
Amazing, to use reason.
LikeLike
How can we find superintendents in Florida who have the same courage? I will help if I can.
LikeLike
When you find one, let me know.
LikeLike
How, as educators, can we convince the other industries how different ours is. It seems logical to hold educators accountable by test scores if you are an engineer, carpenter or salesperson. How can we educate these people if the NEA, AFT etc. is so misguided? Maybe we should start another organization that really holds the good of the students, education and nation as a priority.
LikeLike
Would Madison Public Schools be willing to share their white paper, “The Case for Customization: Local Teacher Evaluation and the Connecticut Guidelines for Educator Evaluation”? My guess is it could be helpful reading for those of us in other states who are dealing with similar, state-mandated, teacher and principal evaluation procedures.
LikeLike
Here is a link to Madison’s “white paper”. It is a public document. http://o2.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/patch/1a6b4e24f1bdadbbadade199150ccd43
LikeLike
Thank you, Don, much appreciated!
LikeLike
You’re Welcome, Ken. Share it far and wide!
LikeLike
Thank you for posting the document link. However, I cannot open the document. Is there a trick? 🙂
LikeLike
It’s a pdf document, so if you have Adobe Reader on your computer, use that. If you rename the file with the .pdf file extension on the name, that will make it easier in the future.
LikeLike
Never mind. I’ve got it!
LikeLike
Can this document be reproduced?
LikeLike
Yes, it can
LikeLike
Madison is an extremely wealthy and hyper-segregated community. 1.4% of the district’s students qualify for reduced-price or free lunch; fewer than 2% are black or Hispanic.
Perhaps I’m just a cynical urban district public school parent, but I view this community’s strong desires for “local control and local autonomy” as something other than a full-throated protest against using test scores to evaluate teachers. They are simply worried that the new rules might somehow compromise the considerable advantage (salaries, working conditions) the district currently enjoys in being able to attract and retain the best teaching talent.
I agree that teachers who teach in districts besieged by poverty, pollution, and disintegrated family and social structures should not shoulder most of the blame for what are clearly society’s failings. The flip side is that I’m not sure it makes a lot of sense to hold up enormously advantaged, carefully walled-off districts like this one as an exemplar of public education.
LikeLike
Tim,
I agree.
I wonder though, it seems like the voices of parents in urban areas are not heard or valued.
Kids of wealth have parents who are accustomed to respect: their voices will not be silenced so easily.
In my opinion, it is in the segregated wealthy towns where the reform pushback will have the most impact and success.
LikeLike
Is it only superintendents of high-poverty urban districts that are worthy of honor if they protest invalid measures? Let’s welcome good sense from superintendents in every kind of district. The revolt in Madison shows that affluent parents won’t tolerate misguided policy. Why should high-needs districts? I will be overjoyed when we see backbone in urban districts too.
LikeLike
While I admire these superintendents greatly, I sincerely doubt that they are speaking out without the backing of their communities. Their communities are home to people who are used to having their opinions valued. They are also communities that have little to lose from state sanctions since they are probably almost completely locally funded. Urban areas are generally much more dependent on state and federal funding. I suspect that superintendents would do well not to bite the hand that feeds them. You either need to have your retirement planned or be very sure of who has your back.
LikeLike
Good superintendents educate their community and build community support. Unfortunately, many urban districts have non-educators as superintendents, or superintendents who went through a quickie program and have very little understanding of how to help schools they are responsible for.
LikeLike
I agree with you, Diane. I have no administrative background, but I imagine that a superintendent, particularly in a large urban area, must cultivate and rely on talented administrators serving under him/her. Certainly developing skilled principals would be extremely important to building that sense of community as well. After a long hiatus to raise my family, I returned to the classroom just in time to get run over by “mail order degree” administrators steeped in punitive rigidity. Strong leadership is a gift to us all.
LikeLike
The pushback in CT had to start somewhere. The “reforms”
passed last year are misguided, and influenced by corporate
interests. From what I understand, ALL stakeholders in Madison are
on board and aligned to do what they are supposed to do: protect
the best interests of the children attending public schools in
their community. How often has anyone seen in one district: Llocal
Politicians, Board of Education, Superintendant, Administration at
all levels, PTA, and Teacher’s Association unified on any issue? In
this case, all the stakeholders are actually doing what they are
supposed to do, by using common sense and expertise. They deserve
our respect, and should serve a model for all districts regardless
of geography or economics.
LikeLike
I am proud to say I was able to work with Tom Scarice for his time in Weston, CT. Having just retired after 35 years teaching the last 32 in the CT public schools I count Tom as one of the two exceptional leaders I’ve known the other being Ernie Fleishman when I started in Greenwich back in 1981. It is even more important to value leaders like Tom today when the atmosphere in many districts, wealthy suburban as well as urban, is one of fear and dictation. What stood out about Tom immediately was his willingness to listen to opinions and allow for discussion without repercussion and that, folks is sadly NOT the norm or even easy to find in education today. To the folks who are commenting that his stance is “easier” because he’s in a relatively well to do district, I’d say it’s exactly the opposite. Frequently, the more advantages the district has, the more the grunts in the classroom are given mandates instead of being included (really included, not just paid lip service by having committees where decisions have already been made). In my time working with Tom Scarice, I always felt that we could simply talk without any hidden agendas. This continues to give me hope for the profession and for our kids!!
LikeLike