Archives for category: Testing

Is it possible to measure creativity? Is it possible to measure artistic talent? Is it possible to assign a grade to students in the arts based on a measure or on multiple measures?

Those are the questions posed in this article, which describes the efforts by states to develop metrics for the arts. https://m.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-forget-the-sat-this-new-standardized-test-measures-artistic-ability

I am assuming that the title of the article is a mistake. It is not about a “standardized test” for the arts but rather a replacement for standardized tests.

I instinctively recoil at the idea of measuring creativity or artistic talent. There is something inherently subjective about any such judgments. These days, who can say what is art and what is not.

Please, teachers of the arts, help me here. I can see grading students for participation, persistence, and engagement. But how can you grade them for talent and creativity?

New Jersey Commissioner of Education David Hespe will step down and be replaced, at least temporarily, by his deputy.

New Jersey is only of only five states and D.C. that still administers Pearson’s PARCC exams.

FairTest posts a weekly review of news about resistance to high-stakes testing and efforts to improve testing.

“Less Testing, No High-Stakes, Better Assessments” — that’s the core message parents, educators and community leaders are effectively delivering to policymakers as a new school year begins across the nation. Look for a forthcoming FairTest report on “Testing Reform Victories 2015-2016” summarizing recent successes.

Alaska State Seeking Bids for New Test After Exam Administration Failure
http://www.adn.com/alaska-news/education/2016/08/23/alaska-education-department-again-seeks-information-for-new-standardized-exam/

California Designing a Fair, Forward-Looking Way to Assess Schools
http://www.dailynews.com/social-affairs/20160827/why-california-is-struggling-to-craft-a-fair-forward-looking-way-to-assess-public-schools
California Results of Teaching to the Test Are Not Good
http://www.sgvtribune.com/opinion/20160826/results-of-teaching-to-the-test-arent-good-letters

Colorado Districts Offer Menu of Options for Demonstrating High School Diploma Qualification
http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/co/2016/08/25/colorado-districts-giving-students-more-ways-to-prove-they-deserve-a-high-school-diploma/

Florida Judge Blasts State, Districts in Third Grade Test Retention Lawsuit
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/features/education/os-third-grade-retention-judge-ruling-20160826-story.html
Florida Test Opt-Out Movement Is Growing
http://www.local10.com/education/movement-to-opt-out-of-standardized-testing-is-growing
Florida Testing Contractor “Pleased” That State Fine Was Only $5 Million for Computer Screw-ups
http://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2016/08/state-testing-contractor-pleased-with-nearly-5m-settlement-after-2015-technical-difficulties-104970

Georgia State Officials Seek Input on Implementing “No Child Left Behind” Replacement
http://savannahnow.com/news/2016-08-25/georgia-state-officials-seeks-input-no-child-left-behind-education-replacement
Georgia Meeting Focuses on State’s Response to New Federal Education Law
http://www.gainesvilletimes.com/section/6/article/118790/

Idaho State Moving Toward “Dashboard” Accountability Without School Rankings
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/state_edwatch/2016/08/idaho_moves_toward_dashboard_model_with_no_summative_score.html

Kentucky Tests Only Tell Part of the Story
http://www.centralkynews.com/winchestersun/news/education/rosenthal-tests-tell-only-part-of-the-story/article_55f46ce4-6cba-11e6-b9ff-7fcbdeed1c0a.html

Maine Local School Board Adopts Resolution Against “Too Much Testing”
http://www.sunjournal.com/news/lewiston-auburn/2016/08/24/lewiston-school-board-theres-too-much-testing-schools/1981542

Massachusetts School Districts Collaborate to Develop Better Assessments
http://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/attleboro-to-join-other-school-systems-in-developing-new-tests/article_07ce5666-6b33-11e6-8ac7-6f4f6b1b21ee.html

New Mexico Test-Centric Schools Are Toxic to Students
http://www.currentargus.com/story/opinion/columnists/2016/08/30/testing-centric-schools-toxic-students/89538886/

New York Testing Language Learners in English Makes No Sense
http://www.uticaod.com/opinion/20160825/our-view-imtixaanka-macno-lahayn
New York Superintendent Speaks Out Against Testing Craze

New York: A Long Island Superintendent Speaks Out Against the Testing Craze and in Favor of Genuine Reform

Ohio Teachers Union Hits Airwaves to Promote Awareness of New Federal Education Law
http://www.dispatch.com/content/blogs/the-daily-briefing/2016/08/8292016teachers-union-hits-airwaves-on-student-testing.html

Pennsylvania State High School Grad Testing Requirement Moratorium
http://www.mainlinemedianews.com/articles/2016/08/26/main_line_suburban_life/news/doc57bba308328e9513734191.txt

Rhode Island What Parents Should Know About New High School Graduation Requirements
http://wpri.com/2016/08/29/everything-ri-parents-should-know-about-that-states-proposed-graduation-policy-changes/

Tennessee Confusion Over Whether Passing Score on Civics Test Is Required for Graduation
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2016/08/tennessee_civics_law_loophole.html

Texas Vendor Must Pay $20.7 Million After Multiple Testing Problems
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/education/article/TEA-slaps-N-J-test-vendor-with-20-7-million-9180639.php
Texas Legislator Calls for Suspending State Test
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/08/29/state-rep-calls-suspension-staar/

Virginia More Students Opting Out of State Tests
http://www.newsleader.com/story/news/local/2016/08/23/more-parents-opting-out-sol-tests/89196720/
Virginia Test-Based School Grades Do Not Show Educational Progress
http://pilotonline.com/news/local/education/public-schools/the-pass-rate-does-not-show-the-stories-changes-likely/article_97acb7db-a6a1-5c84-8bdf-a0811a94549b.html

West Virginia “A to F” School Grading System Makes No Sense

Grading Schools as We Grade Students? Hardly

International Scottish Education Secretary Tells Teachers to Ditch Unnecessary Tests
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/john-swinney-tell-teachers-ditch-8720363

ACT/SAT Opting Out of Admissions Tests May Ge a Good Idea
http://www.forbes.com/sites/willarddix/2016/08/29/opting-out-of-submitting-college-admission-tests-could-be-a-good-idea/#2e636419dbb6
FairTest’s Database of Test-Optional Colleges and Universities
http://fairtest.org/university/optional

Worth Reading Misguided Efforts to Close “Achievement Gap” Create “Play Gap” Inequality
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/08/23/our-misguided-effort-to-close-the-achievement-gap-is-creating-a-new-inequality-the-play-gap/
Worth Reading Making Whole-Child Education the Norm

Making whole-child education the norm: How research and policy initiatives can make social and emotional skills a focal point of children’s education

Bob Schaeffer, Public Education Director
FairTest: National Center for Fair & Open Testing
office- (239) 395-6773 fax- (239) 395-6779
mobile- (239) 699-0468
web- http://www.fairtest.org

Tom Ultican teaches in San Diego. He recently read Ciedie Aech’s new book about teaching in Hyper-Reformy Denver and highly recommends it.

Denver is a trifecta of reformers. Non-educator Michael Bennett was tapped to be superintendent. He has a law degree from Yale. He then was appointed to fill an empty Senate seat, so he is now Senator Bennett. He was replaced by Tom Boasberg, another non-educator. He too is a lawyer with no education background. And Colorado has wonder boy Michael Johnston, the TFA-Broadie in the state senate who wrote the nation’s most punitive teacher evaluation bill. It passed in 2010. Colorado was supposed to have great schools, great principals, and great teachers by now. Results don’t matter.

Tom loved the book and thinks you will too.

Alan Singer reports that ETS is adapting its teacher certification. It will replace students with avatars. Computer representations of real students.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/11692858

Why? Pearson is doing it. That’s competition for you. A race to the bottom. Like network television.

There are many reasons to object to th idea of teaching avatars. One is that the essence of teaching is interaction. The teacher and students connecting, responding, reacting. Teaching avatars is like acting without a audience. It can be done, but the actors are at their best when they feel the audience response.

Jonathan Pelto warns residents of Connecticut that their children will be forced to take the “new” SAT despite serious charges that the test is ill-designed and invalid.

The spark that set off this latest controversy about the SAT is a devastating critique by Manuel Alfaro, who until recently was Executive Director for Assessment at the College Board, which is responsible for the SAT. The SAT was redesigned at the direction of David Coleman, the architect of the Common Core standards. Alfaro became angered by what he saw and he became a whistle blower. Just last week, the FBI raided his home in search of evidence that he might have been the person who leaked 400 SAT questions.

Alfaro has been writing on Linked In, and he posted these statements on August 28.

The first is an Open Letter to David Coleman, letting him know that Alfaro is defiant and will see him in court. He accuses Coleman of perpetrating a “global fraud.”

Alfaro wrote to Coleman and said (in part):

You have done an excellent job discrediting me so far. You have stopped news organizations from investigating my statements and allegations of the global fraud you have committed against millions of students and their families, College Board members, state governments, and the federal government. You have convinced the heads of the Department of Education using the SAT for accountability that—to use the words of your Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel—I’m “a disgruntled former employee who has expressed anger at the college Board in a very public way. Though his employment ended over a year ago, he has not “moved on.”” However, even with all your resources, I feel that you are still at a disadvantage. So, I’m going to show you one of my cards: in order to properly defend myself against any charges you level against me, criminal or otherwise, a court will have to grant my legal team access to College Board records.

I’ve tried to get help from parents, Senators, House Representatives, the White House, and the heads of the Department of Education of the states using the SAT for accountability without success. Thanks to you and the FBI, I will soon have a path to the College Board records I so desperately need to prove the global fraud you have committed.

The second denounces heads of state education departments for using the new SAT without telling the public that it is invalid.

It begins like this:


Residents of CO, CT, DE, IL, ME, MI, and NH, the heads of the Department of Education of your states have failed to protect the best interests of your students and your families, opting instead to protect their own interests and the interests of the College Board.

As these officials are elected (or appointed by an elected official), you can demand their immediate resignation or you can vote to replace them immediately to ensure that the department of Education in your state is headed by an individual willing to put the interests of your students and your family first.

In the paragraphs that follow, I will describe how the current heads of the Department of Education have failed you and why they lack the judgment (and common sense) to protect the best interests of your children.

On May 7, 2016, I wrote a letter to the heads of the Department of Education in CO, CT, DE, IL, ME, MI, and NH to let them know that the College Board has committed global fraud against their states and the federal government. In that letter, I offered to meet with their legal teams to expose the fraud. Instead of meeting with me (or asking me for additional information), they approached the College Board about my statements and allegations. According to a Reuter’s story, published on Friday August 26, 2016, here is what some of the states had to say about my statements and allegations:

A spokesman for the Michigan Department of Education, Bill DiSessa, said the state “checked with the College Board” and decided not to look into Alfaro’s claims. Jeremy Meyer of the Colorado Department of Education said the state discussed Alfaro’s email with the College Board and was “satisfied with the response we received.”

Kelly Donnelly, spokesperson for the Connecticut State Department of Education, said the state considered Alfaro’s email to be “replete with hyperbole, but scant on actual facts. We did not take further action.” Donnelly said the state hadn’t reviewed Alfaro’s detailed posts on LinkedIn.

Although I have not seen any of the explanations the College Board may have provided, I can assure you that none included the following critical fact: The College Board, ETS, and the Content Advisory Committee did not have time to review all the items prior to pretesting, as the College Board has repeatedly claimed they do.

It is very hard to be a whistle blower. It is difficult to walk away from a lucrative job. Manuel Alfaro did it. I name him to the blog’s honor roll for his courage and integrity.

Mercedes Schneider writes here about the strange events surrounding Manuel Alfaro, an ex-College Board employee who has been complaining loudly about the defects of the redesigned SAT.

His home was raided by the FBI, very likely searching to find out if he was the one who released 400 test items to the media.

The day after the raid, he wrote a long commentary about the flaws of the new SAT.

A Florida judge supported parents who fought for alternatives to the mandatory state reading test. Some districts permitted alternatives, others insisted that children would be retained in third grade if they didn’t take and pass the third grade test.

http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/gradebook/judge-issues-mixed-ruling-on-floridas-third-grade-retention-law/2291108

“A Leon County circuit court judge has come down in favor of families challenging Florida’s third-grade retention practices, ruling that school districts ignored the children’s right to alternative forms of promotion and the state Department of Education allowed that to happen.

“In her order, Judge Karen Gievers highly criticized the Hernando County school district for its “illegal refusal” to allow students to have a portfolio option to demonstrate their reading abilities, as permitted in statute. Notably, she also included report cards “based on classroom work throughout the course of the school year” as an acceptable option.

“Gievers took a further step in undercutting Florida’s long-time reliance on testing by validating the Opt Out Network’s use of “minimal participation.”

“The statute does not define participation,” Gievers wrote in her order. “The children were present on time, broke the seal on the materials and wrote their names, thus meeting their obligation to participate.”

The article calls this a “mixed” ruling, but I think it looks like a home run for parents who didn’t want their child’s future to be tied to one standardized test.

Thanks to reader Sheila Resseger, who sent this article about the low PARCC scores in Rhode Island.

Here were the results for the kids with the greatest need for support:

Less than 22 percent of black and Latino students scored proficient in English compared to a statewide average of almost 38 percent on the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, a challenging test rolled out last year amid dismal results.

Less than 9 percent of English language learners reached the state standard, and that number fell to less than 6 percent for special-needs students.

The achievement gaps widened.

The State Commissioner of Education, Ken Wagner (formerly deputy commissioner in New York state), is quoted.

Less than 22 percent of black and Latino students scored proficient in English compared to a statewide average of almost 38 percent on the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, a challenging test rolled out last year amid dismal results.

Less than 9 percent of English language learners reached the state standard, and that number fell to less than 6 percent for special-needs students.

Related content R.I. educators urge stay the course on standardized testsIn an interview yesterday, State Education Commissioner Ken Wagner said poverty was not to blame for the chronically low scores among urban school districts.

“If you go back 40 years, we’ve always been at a 30- or 40-percent plateau,” he said, referring to the percentage of students reaching proficiency in English and math. “Part of the story is we need to stop changing our minds. We need take a common-sense approach and stick with it for the long haul.”

Rhode Island, unlike Massachusetts, has switched state tests. It has reversed course on whether passing a test should be a high-school graduation requirement. Legislative leadership has undermined the work of education commissioners.

Math scores increased by 5 points this year, with nearly 30 percent of all students meeting the standards. Students improved in every grade level. In English, scores improved by two percentage points, with almost 38-percent reaching proficiency. Students improved in five out of eight grade levels.

Tim Duffy, the executive director of the Rhode Island Association of School Committees, said Rhode Island is moving forward but “not fast enough.”

“The anxiety about the PARCC seems to have dissipated,” he said. “But the scores are stagnant at the upper grade levels, which reinforces that the test has to be part of the graduation requirements.”

Wagner moved this year to drop the PARCC as a graduation requirement after widespread criticism that urban students were not adequately prepared to take it, among other concerns.

The PARCC, which was originally adopted by 24 states, is down to seven. Rhode Island is the only state in New England to stick with the test, which has been confounded by technical problems and a huge opt-out movement in states like New York. Massachusetts switched to a hybrid of the PARCC and its own test, the MCAS, this past year.

Wagner denied that the test is too hard, a common criticism. Instead, he said Rhode Island has much work to do to put a rigorous curriculum in every school, ramp up teacher training and redesign the way schools, especially high schools, are structured.

High-school students across Rhode Island performed poorly on the tests. In Providence, every high school but Classical scored in the single digits on the math and English PARCC tests.

But it wasn’t just the urban schools that underperformed. At Burrillville High School, only 17 percent of the students scored proficient on the English test. In North Kingstown and South Kingstown, approximately a third scored proficient and in Westerly, 21 percent did.

Wagner says the tests are not too hard. Surely that can’t be an excuse for the vast majority that “failed.” Can’t blame poverty.

The real problem, he says, is that we need to stick with the PARCC no matter how many kids fail.

Tim Duffy of the state’s school committees wants PARCC to be a graduation requirement (Wagner disagrees). What will Rhode Island do with all those kids who never pass? At this point, it would be a very large majority. Will they drop out? Will they get jobs without a high school diploma? Will they stay in third grade or fourth grade until they pass? Will third grade become a huge parking lot where few students make it to fourth grade?

Please, someone, explain how this would work. And Commissioner Wagner, how many years will it take until most students in Rhode Island “pass” the PARCC test, a feat not accomplished by any other state except Massachusetts? Will students with disabilities stay in school for the rest of their lives?

No surprise: Most students in Rhode Island “failed” the Common Core PARCC tests. As I have explained many times, the tests were designed to fail most students. They are aligned with NAEP Proficient, which most students have never reached, with the sole exception of those in Massachusetts, where slightly more than half have reached that standard.

What is the point of giving a test that is too hard for most students?

Mike Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute wrote to say that the tests were designed to show college readiness, and only 40% (or less) are college ready. But 70% enroll in college. Thus, he writes, a remediation crisis in college.

But really, why should schools test third graders for college readiness?

Colleges set their own admission standards, they can accept or reject whoever they want.

I wonder if Michael Phelps or Simone Boles would have tested “proficient” on PARCC?

I posed these questions to him:

Making the passing mark so high that most kids fail is insane. Does that make them smarter? Will they be denied a high school diploma? Will they be retained in grade? Will the schools become giant holding pens where most kids never get past third grade?

Mike is never at a loss for words so I expect he will answer.