Archives for category: Teachers and Teaching

A retired teacher is happy that parents are opting their children out of state testing

She writes:

“I am a former elementary art teacher and I am thrilled parents are taking matters into their own hands. The testing culture is madness. I had to sit in too many staff meetings, and watch as the administrators devote all professional development time to students passing the standardized tests. It did not matter that students did not take tests in art, the specialists still had to sit there and listen for hours about how to teach to the test. All resources were put toward classroom teachers teaching to the test. All professional development days were used for classroom teachers teaching to the test. The specialists were told to find something to do on those days. I thought to myself, we as educators need to just say no. I am glad someone finally is saying no!”

A regular reader has posted several comments that seem to
imply that not enough teachers are being fired. Or that a system
with a small number of teachers fired was not up to par, assuming
that there are many “bad” teachers who have not been found out yet.
This seems to be the assumption behind Race to the Top and the
Gates’ approach to evaluation: stack ranking, from top to bottom.
Fire the bottom. I responded that about 40% of teachers leave
within the first five years of starting their job. He asked for
evidence. Good question. Here are two good sources. Ken Futernick
of Wested in Sn Francisco wrote an excellent article called “Incompetent
Teachers or Dysfunctional Systems?”
Matt Di Carlo wrote
a good overview of
the research here.
In no other profession do so many
people exit so rapidly. This suggests to me that states and
districts should have high standards for hiring teachers and then
should mentor new teachers, build a collegial culture, and make
sure that retention is a goal. We make a huge mistake with the new
evaluation systems, which seem intended to find and fire weak
teachers. The goal should be to make teachers better, if they are
willing to be helped. Churn is bad.

This question comes up again and again, and different studies reach different conclusions. Typically, TFA teachers get better than usual results in math, but not in reading, which is less susceptible to test prep and more influenced by home life.

Mathematica Policy Research released a new study today, saying that TFA and TNTP teachers get better results in math than traditionally prepared teachers. But Dana Goldstein analyzes the findings and learns that the headline oversimplifies.

For one thing, the gains were modest: “For the average child in this study, who scored in just the 27th percentile in math compared to her peers across the country, having a TFA teacher will help her move up to the 30th percentile–still a long way off from grade-level math proficiency.”

For another, the study shows that experience matters: “The bias against first-year teachers is borne out in the data. The students of second-year teachers outperformed the students of first-year teachers by .08 standard deviations–a larger gap than the one between the students of TFA and non-TFA teachers. And even though TFA recruits did well in this study, that doesn’t mean teachers reach their pinnacle after two years on the job. To the contrary, the researchers found that for teachers with at least five years of experience, each additional year of work was associated with an increase of .005 standard deviations in student achievement. ”

And Goldstein notes that 89% of the TFA teachers in the study were white, which causes concern because there are many reports of urban districts losing teachers of color, especially African Americans. That may be as big or bigger a problem in the long run that a few percentage points up or down.

This is an excellent article by historian and former high school teacher Jack Schneider.

He writes about the students who remember him fondly many years after graduation.

What do students remember?

Here is a sample:

My best teachers taught me how to read, write, and cipher.  But they also treated me with kindness and humanity.  They made me feel like I was welcome in their classrooms.  They instilled in me the sense that I mattered.  They inspired me to grow up and be like them.  Where, I wonder, are those kinds of characteristics in our current policy discussions about teacher recruitment?  Where is that in talk among so-called reformers about overhauling teacher training?  Where are those traits in our evaluations of the “value” added by teachers?

Kimberly Blanton sent this to me. She wrote:

“I am a former Boston Globe/ Economist reporter who now writes a blog at a Boston College think tank. I recently met and fell in love with a teacher. I am so amazed at how hard he works for his students, and I am even more puzzled by why teachers have become so vilified.”

Now, if only all the editorial writers and pundits had a real teacher in their lives–a parent, a sister or brother, a child, a beloved–the world’s view of teachers and education would change!

 

 

Love Letter to a School Teacher

The man who entered my life like a whirlwind, wooing me on Valentine’s Day with a sculpture of lovebirds swinging on a heart that he’d made from balloons, is now applying his handiwork to preparindg his Boston high school classroom for the new school year.

It’s the Saturday before Labor Day, when America is enjoying its last vacation of the summer, and he’s operating a power drill as he installs whiteboard, paid for out of his own pocket, on top of the antiquated chalk board in the room where he’ll soon begin teaching sophomore biology. Having decided he cannot tolerate another year of chalky, gritty hands, he’s fashioned a less-than-satisfactory solution in a public school system that has no resources for modern educational equipment. He’d already gotten a start earlier in the week on cleaning the room but has more to do before classes begin this week.

Since when, I wondered, did our teachers have to stand in as maintenance staff? The first thought to strike me as I walked into this grand old limestone building with its dingy walls and dysfunctional windows is that all the talk about public education being our top national priority is not genuine.

In this high school, it appears that the walls haven’t been painted in many years, even though a fresh coat of paint is a relatively inexpensive way to inject excitement into a tired old building. To me, the walls speak to the lack of care for the children in urban schools. The vast majority of students in my partner’s high school are recent immigrants, are economically disadvantaged, or have special needs.

Constructed in 1929, this beautiful old building speaks to our once-high aspirations for public education. Now, its tall windows must be propped open with two-by-fours and food crates. There is no air conditioning, and my partner loathes those sweltering September days when the slits in the windows bring no relief to his third-floor classroom. As the temperature rises above 85 degrees, he sweats out his lessons on evolution and methods of scientific inquiry in front of sleep-deprived teenagers also struggling in the heat.

Like many teachers, he entered the profession to make a difference in individual lives, in the Boston community, maybe the world. It is his 26-year commitment to teaching and to improving the lives of children of the working class that I fell in love with first. As the new school year kicks into gear, I’m remembering the care he took the previous spring – our first together – to find new ways to reach his students. There seems to be little appreciation in our culture for the challenges of conveying the wonders of bacteria, nutrition, genetics, and the workings of the digestive system to inner-city teenagers who may have more pressing concerns – these and other subjects are so abstract and removed from the worlds they live in.

The television that almost seems to dangle from his classroom ceiling tells another story of the history of U.S. public education. Installed in the late 1980s, it was a gift from a television station, given on the condition that students watch a 10-minute news program every morning, three minutes of which were candy and fast-food commercials. The television hasn’t worked for years. That’s probably a good thing. Today, corporate America has moved on. Via grants through their foundations, major corporations now funnel their efforts and money into charter schools, which typically employ non-union teachers.

Now that my partner has solved the chalk board problem, his next maintenance project will be to devise storage in his classroom. The two small bookshelves holding battered biology textbooks were probably part of the original construction. He needs a better place for his students to store the notebooks they’ll use throughout the year to save and organize their assignments.

If only the rest of the country were as committed as he is to teaching our children well.

Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, wrote the following essay for this blog:

“Democracy and Education: Waiting for Gatopia?

“John Dewey arrived at the University of Chicago in the middle of the Pullman strike. He wrote his wife, still in Ann Arbor, that he had met a young man on the train who supported the strike very passionately: “I only talked with him for 10 or 15 minutes but when I got through my nerves were more thrilled than they had been for years; I felt as if I had better resign my job teaching and follow him around until I got a life. One lost all sense of the right or wrong of things in admiration of the absolute, almost fanatic, sincerity and earnestness, and in admiration of the magnificent combination that was going on. Simply as an aesthetic matter, I don’t believe the world has seen but a few times such a spectacle of magnificent, widespread union of men about a common interest as this strike business.” (quoted in Westbrook, 87). This sense of “magnificent, widespread union” represented the definition of Democracy to Dewey; it was the very core of his writing, work, and public advocacy.

“Later, after he had moved to Columbia University in New York, he had a major disagreement with a very articulate student, Randolph Bourne, about the media pressure to get involved in WWI. Bourne argued then and later in an unfinished essay entitled, “War is the Health of the State” that states thrived on war because war consolidated the state’s power and allowed it to repress any kind of dissent. Dewey was an outspoken advocate of American entry into World War I, but began to question his support after seeing several of his colleagues at Columbia fired for their outspoken opposition to the War. These serious doubts turned into deep regret when he saw that the Espionage Act was used to repress freedoms of speech and press. Respectable citizens, including many thoughtful journalists and political leaders like Eugene V. Debs were routinely thrown into jail. His serious doubts began to trouble him more deeply as he witnessed the Federal response to the postwar Red Scare of 1919, when many American citizens were deported without constitutional due process. He was so disturbed by all of this that he helped found the American Civil Liberties Union that sought to protect due process and other constitutional rights. (Ryan, 154-99)

“From the early 1920’s forward, Dewey became a vocal and articulate public spokes person for Democracy in all American institutions. He founded and led an AFT local at Columbia and often spoke at labor and AFT functions. He believed with every cell of his body that American Schools had to be the incubator of American Democracy. As the shadow of fascism descended over Europe, he became a fellow traveller with the United Front to defend the world from an ideology that had nothing but for contempt for Democracy or any notion of an open society. For Dewey, education that allowed the organic evolution of free speech and the discussion and respect for all points of view in the classroom inoculated American students from the threat of fascism.

“If he were alive today, Professor Dewey would be shocked by what he would see. In part, Dewey’s whole philosophy of Education was developed to countervail the corrosive influence of capitalism on communities and the gross economic power of giant corporations. He sought to defend individual growth and creativity and nurture the sense of public responsibility that was under assault from the pulverizing individualism of the dominant ideology of big business backed Social Darwinism.

“Dewey’s vision is now a major target of major foundations that are funding the push to privatize American Education. Major Wall Street investors and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli Broad Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, among others, are working together with the Obama Administration to destroy what is left of public education in this great country. Combined, these corporations control approximately 50 billion dollars in assests.

“I will not take the time here to unpack the strategic plan coordinated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and three people within the Department of Education who have turn their strategic plan into a public policy called “The Race to the Top.” You should read Diane Ravitch’s new book to get a clear picture of how this has all been done very legally with the help of the best lawyers that money can buy, millions of dollars thrown at the Harvard Education Department, and with tens of millions of dollars to hire the best Madison Ave. Advertising and PR firms and the best web designers (go to “PARCC” or “Common Core” online). What you need to know is that none of the people behind this plan have any respect for public schools or public school teachers.

“Like Anthony Cody, I have been insulted several times by Secretary Duncan’s Press Secretary and friends of our president who are not open to any imput from experienced teachers. Indeed, I was the subject of a veiled threat from Mr. Duncan’s Press Secretary that I describe here: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html.

“In another case, a good friend of the President told me when I protested the Chicago School closings: “who do you think you are kidding, only 7 or 8 percent of those kids have a chance anyway.” Several weeks later when I raised the same subject again, he gave me the Democrats for Education Reform standard line that inner city schools failed because teachers have failed. He was not interested in hearing about poverty and resource starving of schools. I called him on this. The first quote sounded eerily like what Mr. Emanuel communicated to Chicago Teacher’s Union President, Karen Lewis, in a famously closed door, expletive filled meeting.

“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government. Governments must read and respond to petitions: our Education Department does not seek to communicate with any citizens except by tweeting inane idiocies about gadgets and enterprise. What we have is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsoring the overthrow of the public school system to bulldoze a path to sell billions of dollars of product. Other companies like Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and Company, and Achieve, Inc. are just coming in behind the bulldozers.

“We must teach the rest of our society that democracy still matters in schools and everywhere else. The time for talking is over! We need to get into the streets and get arrested if necessary. Most importantly every one of us needs to call the same senator or congressman every day until NCLB and RTTT are dead, Arne Duncan does not have control over a penny, and all stimulus money that has yet to be distributed, is given by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the districts around the country that are the most underserved to rehire teachers and support staff. Not a penny should go to charter school construction, IT, administration, or hiring consultants from the Eli Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, or McKinsey. Not a penny should go to Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill or any form of standardized testing. All state superintendents who took trips from any Education vendor should resign, and no state should hire an administrator or superintendent at any level who does not have proper accredited certification and ten years of exemplary classroom teaching.

“Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education or wait like sheep for Gatopia to numb us all!”

Randi, Dennis, I have a B.S. in Biology from UCLA and have
a M.S. from Texas A&M University. I decided to go into
public school teaching to share my love of science with children .
However, ever since I entered the public schhols in NYS, I have
been placed in the most economically challenged school districts
(South Bronx and now Newburgh NY). My evaluations based upon
observations have been, so far, glowing over the fifteen years I
have been teaching Chemistry and Living Environment, but my
students performance is dismal (especially in Chemistry) because
they either simply don’t care or they were placed in a course that
was above their academic ability. I also feel that my
administrators are giving me the most behaviorally difficult and
academically challenged students and with the new evaluation taking
effect, my tenure will be threatened. At the same time, my district
is giving the honors students to novice teachers straight out of
college or those with the inside connections despite seniority. As
a result, I am very frightened that in two years, I will be deemed
ineffective and my employment threatened. I am 55 years old with
virtually no further prospects for future employment. I strongly
feel that this is all by design to defame high salary teachers and
dismiss them. I told my colleagues when this all was mandated that
we have lost the protection that tenure was supposed to protect,
namely, the firing of teachers that aren’t part of the “good old
boys club” which is patently obvious in my district-those teachers
who went through the district or are married into it (or are lower
in the salary scale) are given the best students and those that are
not of the former are given the worst students. Is there any
recourse I have? I am convinced that the local, state and national
unions will only afford one a token gesture of support to teachers
in my plight for the sake of politics. Can you help a teacher put
out to pasture too soon?

This is a terrific new book with essays showing what a farce the current test-based evaluation of teachers is.

It includes the work of several distinguished scholars who understand that it is farcical to judge teacher “quality” by using the scores on standardized tests.

I was happy to write the introduction.

Read the description and you will want to read the book.

One major finding: No state is using the teacher evaluations to improve instruction, only to punish and reward teachers.

This is a hugely valuable book that will help push back against dumb ideas.

This comment came from an elementary teacher in Florida–who is a National Board Certified Teacher– whose school got an F on the state’s useless and invalid grading system:

I have no doubt that the whole point of what the conservative Republican NC legislature has done and what the “reformers” nationwide are doing is make sure that as many of us as possible leave the profession so that the NEA and AFT are ruined and, so their thinking goes, the Democratic party by extension.

The sad irony is that the neo-liberals in the Democratic party are happy to help this happen; they are more than willing to trade union support for corporate and Wall Street support and let teachers and public schools die in the process and the two political parties become one party that represents the plutocracy.

My Florida school received an “F” last year on Florida’s insane School Report Card scam. We have been in session for exactly 10 days. I have been “observed” daily since the 6th day of school, as have all of my colleagues. The district and the state are sending in these “observers” to collect “data” so they can create a “reform plan” for our school (and the 9 other Title I schools in our district that received “F” grades this past year).

I can’t begin to explain how annoying, humiliating, and nerve-wracking these anonymous and silent observations become, day after day. I feel that my first graders and me are fish in an aquarium or animals in the wild while these cold, nameless “observers” appear and disappear, marking down everything we say and do on their clipboards without ever acknowledging that we are human beings and not scientific oddities.

There is no allowance for humanity at all in this system. No bad days for teacher or kids and no lousy lessons that fall flat are allowed. With the Danielson rubric it is easy to make sure that every lesson is lousy in some way. Although they delude themselves into thinking that they are there to “help” us in reality all they do is raise tensions and create animosity and fear. I guess that’s in keeping under our newly revealed surveillance society and the NSA.

I loathe these people and wonder how a teacher can abandon their original mission of educating children to become a member of the reform inquisition where they spend their days working to end the careers of their former colleagues and providing the evidence to deliver the “death penalty” as NY governor Cuomo calls it, to long-term neighborhood schools.

Although I have dearly loved my profession for nearly 2 decades now I honestly don’t know how much longer I can continue to work under these circumstances. The pressure to speak up and tell these people to get out of my room and leave me alone builds every day. My blood pressure problems and stomach ulcers are returning after a summer free from stress. I want to teach my children to pick up a clipboard and sit in a circle around these hated people to make little marks on papers while staring coldly and unfeelingly at them for 40 minutes to see how it makes them feel.

Every morning I tell myself that I’m doing it for the children but that mantra is becoming tattered and worn out and doesn’t make it any easier when I know that my classroom will be a daily exercise in humiliation, degradation, disrespect, a source of mistrust in my own professionalism and abilities and that I am forced to actively participate in my own destruction.

The people who are “observing” and controlling me all chose to leave the classroom and quite teaching for one reason or another. None of them have achieved any of the things that they claim I must now do — overcome lack of English speaking ability, physical, mental, and emotional handicaps, and extreme poverty and oftentimes neglect and abuse to produce the ever-rising test scores the state demands.

The district eliminated our school librarian’s position this year. We have little to no money to purchase materials to help these kids catch up due to an austerity budget. Seven of our colleagues were laid off last June and only three of those positions will be restored. Everything being done to us is designed to prevent us from succeeding. None of it is helpful or supportive — it is all punitive, shaming, and soul-destroying.

And still I go in every morning and smile at my six year olds and read them stories all while I am dying inside and living in fear, anxiety, and under tremendous stress. I want out and I know that’s what the reformers want most of all — for me to leave just a few years shy of a good pension that they won’t have to pay. The question has become “Is this job worth sacrificing my good health and mental stability for?” and my answer has become “No.”

I don’t want to give up and let them “win” but I don’t want to destroy myself either. This twice former “teacher of the year” and National Board Certified teacher with 2 masters degrees has just about thrown in the towel and that makes me feel even worse but I can’t maintain my best work under these circumstances and I can’t give my children 100% when the “observers” are sucking out my soul, hour by hour, either.

Kay McSpadden is a high school teacher in York, South Carolina, and also a columnist for the Charlotte Observer.

In this post, she writes about the students she has taught, the difficult lives they lead, the courage they display.

Even as the kids are grappling with hard lives, the legislators in North and South Carolina are wreaking destruction on one of the few stable institutions in the children’s lives: Their school.

She writes about her students:

“In this rural school district where the majority of students qualify for free or reduced lunch, my students often write about how hard their lives are, about their parents who are absent because of work or divorce or restraining orders or death, about how poor health and homelessness and bad choices keep them from a more hopeful future.

They are not self-pitying but matter-of-fact – which is, in itself, heartbreaking.

One girl wrote that for years she worried she was also doomed to divorce because all the adults she knows – from grandparents to aunts and uncles to her parents – have separated.

“Then one day I had an epiphany,” she wrote, putting to use a word she said she had learned in an English class. “I don’t have to be like them. It was liberating, realizing that I can make my own destiny.”

Her pluck and resilience might seem remarkable except that so many of my students echo it – from the girl who was sexually assaulted as a toddler to the teenager who lost a brother to drug use. Despite catching the school bus before 6 a.m. and not getting home until 12 hours later – and despite not always knowing where they will sleep when they do – the students I know show up most days glad to be at school.”

Why do they come back day after day?

“They know that the adults there care about them – from the cooks to the principals, the custodians and the attendance monitor, the teachers and aides and librarians and secretaries and resource officers. All of us keep coming back because we make a difference in the lives of children. No one works long in education who doesn’t believe that.”

Meanwhile, back in the state capitols, the adults are making life worse for the young people:

“The governors and the legislatures of both states have decided that corporations rather than children should be their priority, and their actions prove that – cutting resources for public schools, diverting money to vouchers and charters, forcing schools to eliminate essential staff and programs, devaluing the work teachers do to improve their skills and earn advanced degrees, keeping their wages low, encouraging inexperienced and temporary teachers to rotate in and out of their school districts, evaluating teachers with invalid metrics, emphasizing standardized testing.

I don’t blame anyone for bowing out of the classroom. At some point in the future I may have to do the same.

But for now my students keep me there. Too many of them have already been let down by the adults in their lives, the ones who know them personally as well as the ones in Raleigh and Columbia who make decisions that add to their suffering. I want to be like the other committed adults who work in my school, people who make it a place where every child belongs, where every child matters.

 

 

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/08/30/4276767/difficult-times-for-teachers.html#.UiJRAhYgtWh#storylink=cpy

 

 

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/08/30/4276767/difficult-times-for-teachers.html#.UiJRAhYgtWh#storylink=cpy