Archives for category: Teacher Evaluations

North Carolina is one of the red states with a super-majority of Republicans in control of he legislature.

So Republicans can do anything they want, as they control state government.

The editorial today in the Raleigh News Observer defends teachers. The editorialist sharply rebukes Phil Berger’s punitive, mean-spirited education “reforms.” That’s welcome news.

The editorialist points out that the predictable consequence of letter grades will be to stigmatize schools, not improve them.

What’s more, he defends teachers. Picking on teachers is a favorite ploy of the state’s politicians. Given that North Carolina is a right to work state and teacher pay is nearly the worst in the nation, this ploy looks like bullying.

Bullying is bad when kids do it in school, why is it okay for the president pro tem of the state senate to bully teachers? Phil Berger seems to think that the schools will improve if teachers have no right to due process, if they can be fired for any reason at all. He confuses tenure for university professors (which is close to an ironclad guarantee of lifetime job protection) with due process rights for teachers, which guarantees nothing more than the right to a hearing before they can fire you.

Berger wants to eliminate due process. He wants teachers to be fired if their students get low test scores. Teachers of kids with disabilities and teachers of English language learners will be axed. Students can withhold effort and fire their teachers. Does Berger have a plan to recruit teachers to work in a state where teachers are public enemy #1?

A teacher writes:

I went to a meeting today and had my eyes opened – WIDE. As a teacher at a ruraL schoo, we are a little behind on this VAM thing. Needless to say at district wide meetings I get to meet teachers from all over, some from much larger suburban districts. They already have their pay based on students’ and the school’s improvement on tests.
WELL, the teachers have figured the whole student improvement thing out- DISTRACT THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS OUT OF THE STUDENTS DURING THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR TEST – Yep, that is exactly what many of them are doing. Play music, talk on the phone, talk to other teachers very loudly, clean the room…do what ever you can to lower your students scores at the beginning and then have a silent, well ordered room, with hints everywhere at the end of the year, Success. The test isn’t fair, why should teachers have to play fair

No more career teachers in North Carolina. That’s the goal of legislation introduced by Phil Berger, the President Pro Tem of the State Senate in North Carolina.

The experienced, high-performing teachers would get a four-year contract.

Others would get shorter contracts.

No tenure for any teachers.

Lots of performance pay built in.

Bonuses would be tied to new teacher evaluation programs now under development.

Apparently, Senator Berger has no idea that merit pay has never worked anywhere.

Nor does he know that there is no successful teacher evaluation program anywhere, despite the hundreds of millions expended on creating one.

His goal seems to be to make North Carolina teachers teach to the test at every possible moment of the school day.

North Carolina was once a progressive state.

No more.

Teacher salaries in North Carolina now rank 46th in the nation.

School spending has fallen to 48th.

This is sad. Sad for the children. Sad for the teachers.

 

Supporters of corporate reform have several phrases they favor to persuade skeptics that resistance is futile.

One is to say that “the train has left the station.”

In other words, you have no choice. (Even though they prattle on about why kids need choice and how choice is the civil rights issue of the decade, they don’t think any educator or citizen should be able to choose to say no to their bad ideas.)

You must surrender or be fired.

Or they say, in states that were dumb enough to win Race to the Top funding, “the law is the law.” Even if the law is wrong, you must obey.

Even if value-added assessment has been rejected by dozens of research studies, you cannot refuse to obey.

Even if value-added assessment is inaccurate, you must not fight it.

You are allowed to argue about whether you want it to count for 20% or 30% or 50%, but not to insist that it is an absurd way to measure teacher quality.

Here is my take: Don’t comply with what you know is wrong.

Don’t agree with what you know to be unethical and demeaning, to you as a professional and to your students.

Don’t quibble around the edges.

Mobilize, organize, fight back. Get teachers and parents to understand that what the federal government has mandated has no research to support it. It is wrong. Do not compromise with what is wrong.

Obama’s former budget director Peter Orszag recently wrote an article claiming that teachers should be judged by the test scores of their students. He read about the Raj Chetty study and the Gates MET study, and that was good enough for him.

From what he writes, it is clear that he knows nothing of the research critiquing those two studies. Hundreds of millions of scarce dollars are being wasted to make VAM work. It is not working anywhere. The tests are not designed to measure teacher quality.

VAM is junk science.

Not to worry, Orszag is a banker so he knows how to evaluate teachers.

Here, Mercedes Schneider examines Peter Orszag’s assertions.

This is a stunning analysis of the relationship between labor unions and the Democratic Party.

It is a must-read.

Many in education have been baffled by the bipartisan consensus around Republican ideology. Micah Uetricht is not baffled. He says without hedging that “Democrats have swallowed the Right’s free market orthodoxy whole. Much of the party appears to have given up on education as a public project.”

Teachers unions, he writes, have been unable to articulate a coherent response to their abandonment.

That is, until last September, when the Chicago Teachers Union went on strike. He writes:

“The union has been unafraid to identify the education reform agenda pushed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel and his party nationally as an attempt to exacerbate inequalities within the education system, strip teachers of power and erode their standards of living, and chip away at public education as an institution, and to call such Democrats enemies. Rather than continuing an insider strategy that has netted so little for the rest of labor over the years, the CTU has entered into open opposition with the neoliberal wing of the party.”

This is an important development. And this is an essay you must read.

A letter from a NYC teacher:

I am a Nationally Board Certified Teacher (2003, 2013) teaching in NYC. Two years ago, I was intimidated to leave my first NYC school due to test scores on the grade 8 ELA exam. My students passed but didn’t make enough progress. This school was an “A” school in a very depressed neighborhood. Unfortunately, I did not love data enough and I refused to view multiple-choice questions as text.

I chose to assess my students differently: Where are they now? Where are they going? What do they need to know to get there? How can I help them reach their goal? I asked myself these questions daily. I chose community texts, intensive writing workshops, and art to help my students reach their goals. More than anything, I wanted them to experience a type of learning that had nothing to do with worksheets or tests. I wanted to provoke and inspire.

At the end of of my third year, I was slammed with my first formal observation the day after Spring Break. I was informed in an email about 12 hours before the start of the next school day. As my pre-observation was three months earlier, I made sure to send a lengthy and detailed email to my AP prior to the lesson. This was a gamble in itself since my administration was so terrified of email that they usually reprimanded us for using it. They preferred handwritten memos. The AP sat in the back of the room and did not make eye-contact with me. She simply typed.

Immediately following the observation, I was called down for a meeting. The AP who did the formal was not in attendance. The principal told me I did not make tenure. I asked why and how I was evaluated. He said nothing of my formal observation, my three years of teaching, or the countless handwritten memos that stated I was doing a great job (I saved all of them). Instead, he showed me data. Data from the three-day tests he made us give four times a year. These tests were photocopies of old NYS tests. Only the multiple-choice sections were used. Data from the Accelerated Reader (AR) program we struggled to implement. How does a student take an online test without an Internet connection? How do they read without even three titles they could enjoy on their reading level? They don’t. And so my principal also used a lack of data against me. And of course there is VAM. I am “Lucky Number 7.” Once published, that score would hurt his school.

I won’t lie. I cried. I cried because I had spent ten years teaching in functioning public schools in Orange County, FL and Montgomery County, MD. I cried because I was so exhausted fighting for my right to teach and the students’ right to learn. In previous schools, I was treated like a professional. I had working relationships with my administrators. All of us were about changing the lives of our students and we did it together. For ten years, I was inspired, motivated, and supported.

For days after that meeting, my principal would stand outside my room and watch me teach. He would come inside and examine my unit plans, which needed to be aligned to the CCS. He would glare at me if my eighth-graders spoke in the hallways or while walking down five flights of stairs to lunch. During that time, I actually received a memo that said, “Monitor your students at all times. I saw Clara push Timmy during line-up.”

I quickly secured a new position.

On my last day there, we had to wait in line to hand in our classroom keys. I passed my keys to the school secretary and the AP passed me my formal observation paperwork. It was signed, but not one box was checked. I had never known such insidiousness could exist in a place for children.

My current school is a large, “failing” NYC high school. The two APs I work with care about their teachers and students. Through them, I have learned so much about teaching city kids–without lowering my standards or testing them into oblivion. Together, we are building something better for our students. That feeling of support, of community, of compassion is priceless.

Brian Ford writes to express his admiration for Bruce Baker’s work. Baker is at Rutgers in New Jersey. He has published many valuable statistical analyses of school finance, charter schools, and the teaching profession. He is especially good at debunking inflated claims.

Brian Ford writes:

I always liked Bruce Baker, but now he is a bit of hero for me after his recommendations in his

“A Not So Modest Proposal: My New Fully Research Based School!”

http://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/tag/1464 (list of Bruce Baker blog posts with links)

There are a lot of good recommendations, but my favorite:

“Hire and keep only those teachers who have exactly 4 years of experience

“First, and foremost, since the research on teacher experience and degree levels often shows that student value-added test scores tend to level off when teachers reach about the 4th year of their experience, I see absolutely no need to have teachers on my staff with any more or less than 4 years experience, or with a salary of any greater than a 4th year teacher with a bachelors degree might earn.””

It would go well with Mark Naison’s

“Why School Boards Love Temporary Teachers”

http://www.laprogressive.com/school-boards-love-temporary-teachers/

“All over the country, school districts who do not have a teacher shortage — the most recent is Buffalo, New York — are trying to bring in Teach for America corps members to staff their schools.

Why any school district would want to bring in teachers who have been trained for five weeks and have no classroom experience to replace teachers with years of training, experience, and mentoring would seem to defy common sense unless one considers the budgetary considerations at stake.

“Since few Teach for America teachers stay beyond their two-year commitment in the schools they are assigned to, there is a huge saving in pension costs for using them over teachers likely to stay till they are vested. Having a temporary teaching force also gives a school board greater flexibility in assigning teachers, and in closing old schools and re-opening new ones. It also, in the long run, will totally destroy the power of teachers unions in the district, allowing for costs savings that can be invested in increased testing and evaluation protocols.”

Please read the link in this comment. Kafkateach has been trying, again and again, to find out what her VAM score for 2011-2012 was. No one will tell her. No one knows. It is being calculated. It is being recalculated.

If it takes two years to find out what your evaluation score is, what value does VAM add?

Will someone be sure to let Arne Duncan and Bill Gates know?

 

She writes:

 

The new and improved teacher evaluations in my district have proven to be nonexistent. It’s March 12th 2013 and we still have yet to receive evaluations and our VAMs for the 2011-12 school year. The state, the district, and the union have been tossing around the stinking pile of value added bogosity like a hot potato. Nobody wants to accept responsibility for the data. Millions of public school dollars have been wasted on designing an evaluation system that is so flawed, cumbersome, and complicated it can’t even be used. You can read more about my quest for VAM herehttp://kafkateach.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/the-quest-for-vam.

 

For more than a week in September, the nation was astonished to see thousands of Chicago teachers on strike.

The media treated it as an old fashioned dispute over wages and hours, which it was not.

Many of us who follow education issues knew that the teachers were striking against nearly 20 years of nonstop ill-considered “reforms” imposed on teachers by politicians and uninformed policymakers.

The bottom line: Enough is enough.

This excellent article explains the teachers’ strike and puts it into a larger context.