Archives for category: Privatization

I was tempted to call this post “the outrage of the day.” It is hard to read it without a sense of blood-boiling rage. It was written by Stacy Erwin Oakes, a Democratic legislator from Saginaw.

Governor Rick Snyder wants to eliminate public education. He wants a state where every family shops for an education provider. As this article shows, his latest gambit was an effort to dissolve the state’s school districts.

That would set in motion the free market of consumer choice he wants.

But he couldn’t convince even his own allies in the legislature. One by one, they said, “not my district.” In the end, only two luckless districts were marked for dissolution.

Read it and you will understand in part the ideology that is determined to privatize public education.

Read it and you will understand the importance of educating the public and getting involved in the political process. That is, throw the rascals out.

Here is a correction I just received.

Please read the article, especially the correction at the end, which says:

Correction: We initially reported that Robert J. Hall, publisher at Interstate General Media, parent company of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Daily News, and Philly.com, was a PennCAN funder. The PennCAN funder appears to be a different Robert. J. Hall. We apologize for the error.

An earlier post described a secret GOP poll that acknowledges Governor Corbett’s weakness and recommends that he could gain popularity by attacking the Philadelphia teachers’ union. The strategy is that he can portray himself as a “leader” and “reformer” trying to solve the Philadelphia fiscal disaster by blaming the union.

New documents reveal that the poll was paid for by a pro-voucher group called PennCAN, which is affiliated with the pro-privatization 50CAN and the original group ConnCAN.

The story says:

“PennCAN funders include: the William Penn Foundation, which was heavily criticized for its support of “school choice” during the brief tenure of Jeremy Nowak; Robert J. Hall, publisher at Interstate General Media, parent company of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Daily News, and Philly.com; and Michael O’Neill, who contributed $100,000 to pay for Boston Consulting Group’s controversial “Blueprint” for transforming Philly schools.

“PennCAN has also received funding from Janine and Jeff Yass, the latter being one of three partners at the Bala Cynwyd-based hedge fund Susquehanna International Group and major givers to causes supporting school vouchers and similar free-market inspired reforms. In 2010, they donated an astronomical $5 million to support the quixotic gubernatorial bid of state Sen. Anthony Williams, a high-profile supporter of school vouchers.”

This commentary was written by a retired superintendent of schools.

Pennsylvania’s Tragic Betrayal of its Public Schools

By Joseph Batory, Former Superintendent of Schools, Upper Darby School District, Drexel Hill, PA

With regard to the inadequate funding of Philadelphia Public Schools, the city’s politicians have been and continue to lacking in political courage and moral fiber. Far too many of them are much too self-serving and most of them do not even understand what the fiscal insanity that continues to cripple the schools and the children of their city.

Likewise, the recent array of superintendents has each been far too meek and without the commitment to confront the system’s financial deficiencies.

But the worst villain of all has been the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In the early 1990’s, Pennsylvania government consciously destroyed its Equalized Subsidy for Basic Education (ESBE) formula. That method of State funding once used to bridge the wide gaps between poorer and more affluent school districts. The ESBE formula each year had utilized factors of community wealth and pupil population to drive out annual subsidies to school systems that were both objective and fair. Unfortunately, the growing costs of this ESBE formula to the state budget caused its ultimate demise as cowardly politicians prioritized re-election agendas instead of the common good.

Since the removal of the ESBE formula by the Pennsylvania legislature, billions of dollars have been denied to school districts across the Commonwealth.

When the ESBE formula was dropped, many impoverished school systems received only a fraction of what the ESBE formula would have generated. Without a funding formula, this has gone on year after year. This has created havoc at the local level.

State politicians have also violated the Pennsylvania Constitution which mandates that the Commonwealth “maintain and support a thorough and efficient system of public education” and they’ve been in denial for many years like they had no part in this incompetency.

Over the years, there have been numerous and diverse education coalitions across Pennsylvania that rose up against the betrayal of schools and children by a bipartisan political establishment without conscience.

Tragically, unlike many other states nationally, Pennsylvania courts—whether as a matter of political control or apathy— have consistently dismissed challenges to the Commonwealth’s obvious inadequate funding of schools. Almost all states pay a larger percentage of overall public education costs than Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth’s approximate rank is 45 out of 50 in the nation on this measure. On average, other states contribute 47% of total education funding, but in 2006 (sadly…the most recent statistics available), Pennsylvania contributed only 36% (National Center for Education Statistics) as its share of public education funding statewide. To counter this reality, Harrisburg’s political “spin doctors” work overtime to obfuscate the issues, assassinate dissenters and confuse the public.

The last Philadelphia superintendent who tried to fight for the rights of the city’s children was David Hornbeck. He publicly decried the State’s lack of any adequate financial commitment to its public schools. For daring to do this, he was politically executed and run out of office. Small wonder that his superintendent successors just ran with whatever funds the political establishment granted them rather than advocating the educational needs of school children.

As a superintendent of schools during the 1990’s in nearby Upper Darby, I also fought with State politicians of both parties daring to suggest publicly that they were ignoring their Constitutional responsibility and hurting the neediest schools and children via insufficient school funding. Most of these politicians denied any funding inadequacies regularly telling constituents that school districts like Philadelphia and my District in Upper Darby had plenty of money.

Ironically, on November 15, 2007, The Philadelphia Inquirer, published a page one independent report from the GoodSchoolsPa organization validating the terrible betrayal of Pennsylvania’s public schools and the children they serve for a long period of years by its state politicians.

Here are some of the findings of that study : Pennsylvania was currently underfunding public education by $4.8 billion. And Pennsylvania ranked 45th among the 50 states in the percentage of school funding that comes from the State. This analysis noted that to correct the situation by equalizing what is spent for each student in Pennsylvania and allowing the state’s poorer public schools to just “catch up” to the statewide adequate cost per pupil, many school districts in Pennsylvania were entitled to money. In that context, Philadelphia’s public schools were owed $1 billion from the state and Upper Darby (my old school district) was entitled to $54 million.

Hard to believe things could get any worse. But now we have the tyrannical reign of Governor Tom Corbett. The Harrisburg political buzzword of “fiscal responsibility” is an absurd concept in the context of the education our young people. Money has always mattered in business and industry and government whenever America has been serious about anything! Saving a dollar now on underfunding schools in Pennsylvania will very likely result in spending exponentially more dollars in the future when a more undereducated population is contributing less to the economy and/or filling up the prisons. Governor Corbett’s theoretically conservative policy can be more accurately described as fiscal irresponsibility.

The Commonwealth’s political betrayal of public schools is a national disgrace. It is a legacy of infamy!

Ken Previti, a retired teacher, has been watching the evolution of school “reform,” and he wonders when the public will catch on to the schemes and fear-mongering. What is it all about? Sell-sell-sell.

Just doing what business does. Monetizing the children.

A reader commented on an earlier discussion with these thoughts:
***************************************************************************

“”Does anyone else feel like we are basically being ignored?” – 2old2tch

While I applaud the sentiment and aspirations of this letter I am saddened with the weak tea rhetoric and carefully qualified points in academic insider language. This is how academics exchange views at conferences. Arne Duncan is not an academic and he has yet to show any respect for or interest in anything academics have to say.

Offering a long list of research citations is great if your are publishing in a peer-reviewed journal. Otherwise they indicate a false belief in the authority of the research, which the reform movement has largely ignored and dismissed all along. This high flown rhetoric doesn’t stand up well to Duncan’s canned talking points outside of academia.

A non-academic reading this might well ask: So what exactly are they saying? What exactly are they asking for? Where’s the beef?

Can we get a plain-spoken English translation, something like: You are destroying public schools and the teaching profession. Standardized testing is out of control, cruel, and useless in determining success of students and teachers. Your “Race to the Top” creates losers as well as winners. These programs have been tried over and over and always fail — why are you still promoting them?

If the purpose was to convince other academics then it serves that purpose well, a preaching to the choir moment. If the purpose is to impact and change wrong-headed policies then the audience should be much broader and the language much less academic and their tone much more forceful. That’s how the game is played today.

“Does anyone else feel like we are basically being ignored?” – 2old2tch

“Yes.”

Philadelphia has had a disastrous year of school closings, budget cuts, and a report recommending privatization of large numbers of public schools. Now, as parent activist Helen Gym reports, the situation is even more dire after massive layoffs. The state of Pennsylvania and the mayor of Philadelphia seem content to let private corporations take over public education  in the city. This is an ominous sign, not only for Pennsylvania, but for other urban districts. This is purposeful abandonment of a basic public function.
Gym writes:
For those watching Philadelphia’s tragic schools situation from afar, hope you might consider a few pieces from Parents United for Public Education.
 
Topping off a dreadful year that saw 24 school closings, and the stripping away of all educational supports from schools (guidance counselors, arts, music, sports, extracurriculuars, librarians, no books and supplies), last week the District laid off an unprecedented 3,783 staff members out of little more than 19,000 staff members, nearly 1 in 5 personnel.
 
Parents United’s response: This is not a school: http://parentsunitedphila.com/2013/06/07/this-isnt-a-school-parents-united-statement-on-district-layoffs/
 
Last night Mayor Nutter appeared on “All In with Chris Hayes” about the Philadelphia budget. Not only did the Mayor, who heads up the controversial US Conference of Mayors, make a miserable case for Philadelphia schools, he made a feeble case for public ed and raised questions about whether public money should go to public schools. Read our response here: http://parentsunitedphila.com/2013/06/11/is-this-our-mayor-2/
 
Thanks for sharing!
 
Helen

 
Helen Gym
Parents United for Public Education

Parents United for Public Education is an all-volunteer collective of public school parents working to put schools and classrooms first in budgets and budget priorities. 

This just in.

Here is the flyer in downloadable form:

Education supporters plan huge grassroots rally at Mich Capitol June 19th

Grassroots power in action!

Please join us on the Capitol lawn beginning at 11:30 am on Wednesday, June 19th. We’re still working on lining up our speakers for the event, but we’ve already confirmed the following superstar advocates for public education:

Sen. Gretchen Whitmer (Senate Minority Leader)

Sen. Bert Johnson (D-Highland Park)

Rep. Brandon Dillon (D-Grand Rapids)

John Austin (President, State Board of Education)

Thomas Pedroni (Associate Professor, Wayne State Univ)

Superintendent Rod Rock (Clarkston Community Schools)

Jeff Kass (Ann Arbor Public Schools Teacher & Poet)

Sherry Gay-Dagnogo (Education Chair, National Congress of Black Women)

Steven Norton (Michigan Parents for Schools)

John Stewart (former member MI House of Representatives)

Mary Valentine (former member MI House of Representatives)

Stephanie Keiles (Plymouth-Canton Community Schools Teacher & Michigan Friends of Public Education)

Betsy Coffia (Save Michigan’s Public Schools)

K-12 Students Representing School Districts Around Michigan

And Master of Ceremonies … Tony Trupiano (Progressive Talk Radio Show Host/Night Shift with Tony Trupiano)

WHO ARE WE?
Save Michigan’s Public Schools is a non-partisan grassroots network of concerned citizens. Our goal is to connect parents, students, educators and communities across Michigan and raise awareness of threats to public education.

We believe a free, quality public education is the cornerstone of a democratic society. We believe every child in Michigan deserves access to equal and excellent educational opportunities through public education. We believe public education must be locally-controlled, fully-funded, delivered by highly qualified professional teachers, and devoid of corporate involvement.

To this end, we support policymakers and public officials who reject the corporate, profit-motivated takeover of public schools, massive school closures, and meaningless high-stakes testing. We support wise policies and laws that forward sound, research-based, evidence-based solutions to support and improve our existing public school system.

The Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette points to signs that the corporate reform movement is losing steam. Indiana is an epicenter of school privatization and teacher-bashing, yet even there the movement seems to be lagging. The epic defeat of state superintendent Tony Bennett was one clear indication of public opposition to his reforms. The failure of efforts to strip power away from his successor, Glenda Ritz, is another.

More signs of the movement’s weakening:

*The rebellion against the Common Core;

*The widespread criticism of state testing;

*The activism of grassroots groups like the Northeast Indiana Friends of Public Education, and its leader, Phyllis Bush, who is a member of the board of the Network for Public Education;

*The victory of Monica Ratliff in Los Angeles over a corporate funded candidate who raised more than $2 million compared to Ratliff’s $52,000.

*News coverage is turning more critical, as evidenced by John Merrow’s continuing scrutiny of Michelle Rhee’s claims.

*Parents are joining the backlash against privatization and misuse of testing.

As the “reforms” are shown to be ineffective and in many cases inspired by financial motives,, expect the backlash to grow stronger.

David Lentini is a lawyer and school board member in Maine. I am always happy to read his informed comments. In this one, he responds to an earlier post that explained that the radical group ALEC is trying to bypass and extinguish local school boards in their pursuit of privatization.

Lentini writes:

I’ve been sounding this alarm for a long time now; it’s good to see other, more expert, commentators reaching the same conclusion.

Still, as a school board member I also fear there are many ways boards will disappear ALEC or no. Too many boards are under siege trying to balance state and federal budget cuts, increasing child and family poverty, parents and unions with unrealistic expectations, and a “school-industrial complex” that has become the province of administrators and consultants who dominate discussions with technical gobbledegook. Boards are thus left with fighting nasty, frustrating battles and having little to no direct impact on setting educational policy.

This year, my board is losing two members who have lost patience with the process. Another member who was just re-elected has openly expressed regret for returning, and I doubt I’ll run for re-election. The trend over the decades to treat education as a science (which is false), the increasing centralization at the state and federal level created by more and more funded and un-funded mandates, and the inability of the public to really confuse education with jobs-training, will, I fear, kill local control sooner than later.

To keep our local boards, we then have to acknowledge that local control has a real function in defining education that must be respected. We need to remove the noise of the politicians and “experts” who hawk faddish policies, ideas, and technologies as educational silver bullets. Most of all, we need to return to an understanding of the function education that is broader than just “getting a good job”.

Education is about creating and maintaining a culture; that’s why local control is so important. Only local boards can identify and define the issues of their communities and define educational policies to meet those issues. The question is do we want to hold on to this vision?