Archives for category: Poverty

A reader, noting the plan to privatize 40% of the schools in Philadelphia, had this to say:

WILLIAM PENN is rolling over in his grave, I’m sure.

It occurred to me that :

John Dewey must be rolling over in his grave as he sees our national leaders using standardized tests to impose rankings and ratings on students, teachers, principals, and schools, while many abandon the arts to reach their targets.

Horace Mann must be rolling over in his grave as he sees corporations descending on the schools to make a profit and to privatize as many as possible.

Henry Barnard must be rolling over in his grave as he sees a Democratic governor in his home state of Connecticut handing public schools over to private managers and calling it “reform.”

Thomas Jefferson must be rolling over in his grave as he sees Bobby Jindal giving public funds to voucher students to attend religious schools in Louisiana.

Lyndon B. Johnson must be ruling over in his grave as he sees his beloved Elementary and Secondary Education Act, meant to equalize resources and help poor kids, turned into a club to impose testing and privately managed schools.

Martin Luther King, Jr. must be rolling over in his grave as he sees Wall Street hedge fund managers and billionaires say that they are leading the civil rights movement of our day, as they attack unions and privatize public schools.

Who else is rolling in their grave?

A retired teacher writes about her experiences teaching in an inner-city school in Hartford, Connecticut:

I retired last June, after nearly 38 years of teaching at M. L. King Elementary School, in Hartford, CT. ,one of the poorest mid-sized cities in the nation.   As I listen to the President, educational leaders, media commentators, and many in the concerned public, I am always distressed by the degree of blame and scorn heaped upon “failing” city schoolteachers and their “obstructionist “ unions.  While I believe that the expressed concerns regarding the state of education in our poorest communities are valid, the solutions seem to be leaving many of our most vulnerable students even further behind.

I began my teaching career with a Masters in Urban Education, from Columbia University.  Over the years, I earned 90 college credits beyond my masters, all in efforts to improve instruction.  My last year of teaching, as in most other years, I was at school daily until 5, 6, 7, or even 8:00 PM.  In addition, I took work home at night, and over the weekend as well.  There are countless other teachers just like me. With all of our training, experience, and effort, we faced “failure” on a daily basis.

With the advent of “magnet”, and “charter” schools, I watched the population of King School decrease by more than half.  It had been, for years, a stable community school, with parents, children, and sometimes grandchildren being taught by the same teachers who spent their entire professional lives serving this community.  Out of district families often requested special permission to attend the school.  Over time, the student population of King School has decreased by more than half, with numbers of students leaving to attend “choice” schools.  Unfortunately, many, if not most of the students and families who left, were those who had greater economic, educational, emotional, and social advantages.  It takes time, knowledge, and energy for parents to apply to these choice schools. The application process is now on line.  Those families without time, computer skills, or even basic literacy are excluded.  Those students left behind require more resources, yet in the current decentralized, competitive school model, they receive far less.

Despite all of these disadvantages, Martin Luther King School teachers have demonstrated marked improvement on test scores for two consecutive years. They are no longer considered a “failing school”. Yet in spite of these efforts, teachers were recently told that their school will be shut down.  Not immediately, but phased out over three or four years. King School will be replaced by a charter school.  Teachers will gradually be laid off.  The nine teachers who are being cut this year have been informed that they might not have the option to transfer to another Hartford Public School. It seems to me that we have stepped through the looking glass, with all reason and fairness having evaporated.

I can’t help but compare my teaching experiences to those of my sister, who works in a nearby suburban school.  She earns more money than the teachers in Hartford. She works in a brand new building, with state of the art equipment.   While she is a hard working teacher, she works far fewer hours.  She does not have to deal with an enormous amount of paperwork documenting her efforts to improve instruction for large numbers of academically deficient students.  Her students are overwhelmingly well cared-for, and it is highly unlikely that any of them have encountered drug dealers or traumatic violence in their neighborhoods.  These children have, for the most part, grown up with respect, and in turn, have been taught to respect others, particularly their teacher.  She has a wealth of supplemental materials she may need, at hand.  She’s never had to spend her own money on crayons, markers, copy paper, or other critical supplies.  When school begins in the fall, she is treated to a teacher’s luncheon, provided by the school PTA.  She has well-educated parent volunteers in her classroom every day, to assist her students while she delivers small group reading instruction.  At holiday time, she comes home with bags full of gifts given to her by the children, and their parents.  At the end of the school year, she gets expensive gift certificates, cooperatively given by the parents in her class, as a thank you gift for all she has done.  Most importantly, she is not blamed for her students’ failure to meet proficiency.  They are usually all at, or above proficiency.  She is a member of a teacher union that bargains for improvements in teachers’ pay and working conditions  (amount of preparation time, additional duties, etc.).  It is a source of counsel and support,  should she be harassed or mistreated.

Many teachers in Hartford are presently trapped, due to an economic situation which has resulted in few teacher openings, but this will soon change.  The “baby boom” generation of teachers is about to retire, and cities and towns will be in competition to hire the best and the brightest.  It doesn’t take an Ivy League education to see the stark disparity in the respect afforded teachers throughout the state and the nation.  When my generation entered the ranks of teachers determined to fight the “War on Poverty” in our cities, we understood that resources were unevenly allocated, and we’d no doubt have to work harder than our suburban counterparts.  At the same time, we worked collaboratively with administrators and, for the most part, received respect (if not appreciation) from the society at large.

In this brave new world of high stakes testing, and teacher accountability (note that there is little to measure parent, community, or student accountability), I fear for our most vulnerable children.  Who will choose to subject themselves to the very vulnerable position of teaching in our poor urban districts?  The disparity in pay, resources, and most importantly respect, will lead teachers to more stable careers in suburban school districts.  Our city children will be left further and further behind.  The tragedy of lost potential will only be magnified.

This teacher admits that he has not ended poverty.

But that doesn’t mean that he has been lazy or had nothing to do.

This is what he does every day.

This is typical of a teacher’s life today. I didn’t know I was suppose to end poverty. My bad. I’m already overwhelmed here in DC. Sorry. I ‘ll add poverty abatement to the list. Thanks for reminding me. In addition, I ‘ll also be mentoring, counseling, teaching, motivating, tutoring, breaking up fights, cheering on and at times being a surrogate father to three-quarters of my students. I do a few other things at school. I also have a life and a wife. I also need to eat and sleep. Plan and grade. Take a college class. Update my website. Make a few phone calls, attend a few meetings, send out and respond to a few emails. So before I forget. When will you join me in this care-free and under-worked profession? My door is always open. By the way, DC Public Schools is always in need of subs. Come on. You can apply online. I’m waiting.

This New York City teacher has been beaten down and out by ten years of reform that ended in more segregation and demoralizing actions by those at the top.

My advice to you: Don’t leave. There will be a new mayor. Maybe it will be someone who recognizes the damage of the past decade of endless and pointless reform and bragging. Stay and fight for the  kids. Don’t let them push you out. Your students need you!

After 10 years of teaching in NYC public schools, I’m quitting because I’ve become discouraged and can no longer deal with the upheavals that the so-called “reforms” bring to the everyday task of teaching. I’ve literally shed blood, sweat, and tears during these years of teaching at a school where the majority of the students live below the poverty line. Poverty Is the problem! NYC schools are segregated. How shameful that this is the case in this great city, and how unfair to students, teachers, and administrators.

This reader has some good ideas for StudentsFirst’s next campaign, now that the Olympics is over:

It really disgusted me how Rhee compares education in the US to being in the Olympics and how we wouldn’t want countries like Luxembourg and Hungary to get more gold medals than us, yet they are beating us in education. I mean, seriously?
Luxembourg?

Luxembourg has a $80,119 GDP and is one of the most wealthy of countries. Their children learn 3 mandatory languages in school, and they only have a 4.5% child poverty rate. Of course, those students are going to be more successful.

Hungary, on the other hand, only has a $19,591 GDP. However, when I looked at comparisons in literacy and math, the U.S. and Hungary were close in many areas, usually with the U.S. edging Hungary out a little. Hungary has a 10.3% child poverty rate.

The United States has a $48,386 GDP. Much higher than Hungary, but much lower than Luxembourg. The U.S. also has a 22.4% child poverty rate, second only to Mexico, which has 26.2. (I got these statistics from NationMaster.com)

To me, one of the greatest factors in education is poverty! It’s kind of like the little dirty secret that keeps getting swept under the rug. The U.S. needs to start addressing this. The school I teach at has a 75% free and reduced lunch population. These kids are more worried about the next meal than the next test. According to the US Census Bureau, “more than one in five children in the United States (15.75 million) lived in poverty in 2010. 2010. More than 1.1 million children were added to the poverty population between the 2009 ACS and the 2010 ACS. The 2010 ACS child poverty rate (21.6 percent) is the highest since the survey began in 2001.”

If StudentsFirst really cared about putting their students first, they would put their money into addressing the poverty issue instead of making insulting advertisements like the one with the out of shape Olympian.

I don’t know if reformers want to hear from an experienced teacher, but in case they do, here is a sound proposal:

After 39 years in education and living through many policy changes I can tell you from personal experience that children’s standard of living influences their success with school curriculum more than ANYTHING else. In my opinion we need to focus on reducing the number of children in poverty and invest in parent education and early childhood education.

This reader will not be silent.

I had a principal who stood up for teachers and students. She had 29 years experience, 11 years as a principal at this school. She was forced to “retire” one year short of full vestment or face firing because we failed to meet our AYP goal by 7 points one year and 5 points the year before.

The school maintained a “B” grade from the state for 4 out of 7 years (the grade was “C” the other 3) and the year she was fired we actually missed AYP by only 3 points (special education and ELL students made AYP) making marked progress every single year in every single category. This all happened in a school with the largest special education population in the county, 93% free/reduced lunch, and 34% English language learners. It didn’t matter.

Once she was labelled as a maverick and a troublemaker her days were numbered. This woman made sure every single one of our 680+ students had shoes, glasses, food to eat on weekends and at school, uniforms to wear, and opportunities they would not have otherwise. She knew the name of every single student in the school. knew their parents, and knew their academic standing. She supported students and teachers with an amazing level of skill and was a master of finding funding for whatever needs arose. I was privileged to be hired by her and work for her for 9 years.

The principal hired to replace her came in from out of state and in her first year oversaw the firing and/or forcing out of 16 senior staff members including the head custodian and the school nurse through transfer or retirement. Her second year saw another 21 longtime employees leave the school through transfer or retirement. She then resigned and moved out of state again. I transferred since it was clear that anyone with more than 3 years experience or over the age of 30 was no longer welcome — we were actually forced to resign from all committees and not allowed leadership roles to “allow younger people a chance at growing”.

A school that had served a very troubled, gang-infested, impoverished neighborhood well and with honor and dignity for 3 generations was torn apart, institutional memory was destroyed, longstanding traditions ended, longterm faculty and support personnel, many of whom had attended this very school themselves as children and whose children also attended are gone and replaced by new, inexperienced teachers with a high churn rate and an ever-increasing number of student transfers.

This is what cemented my commitment to fight and to stand up for what is right. I realize that I have paid and will pay a price for my advocacy but I could not sleep at night if I did not at least try. I’m lucky in that I am only financially responsible for myself; I couldn’t take the risks to do this if I had children or a spouse to support.

A teacher in Philadelphia wrote a terrific article explaining why her school is “incredible.”

The state labeled it “low-performing.”

Now her students will be allowed to “escape” to another school.

But, she points out,

A staggering 95 percent of our students come from poor families, nearly 30 percent are learning English, and at least 16 percent have special needs. You will never hear me use those numbers as excuses, though. I tell anyone who will listen that my students are some of the most intelligent, engaging, enthusiastic, and resilient children in Pennsylvania.

She describes the many successes of her students, each of whom has achieved a personal triumph this year and concludes:

 Each and every child in my classroom had his or her own successes. Will those successes be reflected in their test scores? I hope so. But even if they are not, that doesn’t diminish their triumphs.

Yet when these students come back to school in September, they will hear that they go to an underachieving school, and that they can go to a “good” school. What message will they take away?

It would never cross my mind to call a student “bad.” But now the state is labeling entire schools — and, in turn, communities — “bad.” That is distressing not only because I know my colleagues and I are committed to excellence, but also because it will be one more way society is telling our students they are unworthy.

 

 

 

A reader posted the following comment.

As a public school teacher on the Northshore across the lake from New Orleans, educated in parochial schools for most of my elementary and high school years, I have been wanting to discuss the truth of education in the State of Louisiana for years, but it cannot be discussed publically, even though most people know the truth, a person could get killed or maimed at worst or at best, fired from a teaching position by openly speaking the unspeakable in today’s irrationally violent world. Under federal mandatory desegregation in 1969, I student taught English IV at a public high school in a Northshore Parish. Prior to this law, schools across the State were segregated into all black or all white public schools—“separate but equal” they called it. My senior high school class was composed of 10 white students and 10 black students, as were all of the other classes in the school. My white students could all read and write at grade level able to do “A, B or C” work. Half of my black students could not read or write at all, two of them could read and write at junior high level, two of them at elementary level and one of them could do B and C work in my class. I was horrified by the levels of illiteracy and low skill levels among my black students. Teachers were not provided with remedial materials to help the students learn at their level nor any books or handouts that would enable the non readers and writers learn the alphabet, the sounds of the letters, nor how to put the sounds together so that they could even begin to make sense of reading and writing. As a secondary level teacher, I was not even given any training to reach students who were not at grade level. I did the best I could bringing in albums of Shakespearian plays and sonnets, so that my lowest level students could get something out of the material by hearing it read, even though they could not pass the written tests on it. No one had ever heard of the accommodation for “Tests Read Aloud” that our immigrant population is given on classroom and standardized tests today. Consequently, all through the 1970’s due to the academic problems, also resulting in behavior issues black students experienced in school system, plus the fact that the majority of students did not have anything to eat before coming to school, they were not making much progress academically. These conditions caused the parents of white students to pull their children out of the public school system and put them in private or parochial schools, so that their children could receive a good education without all the social problems black children brought with them into the classroom. At that time most black children could not attend schools that required tuition because their parents did not have the financial ability to do so since most did not have jobs that paid a middle class wage to do so. In addition, the values of many black parents regarding education, which extended to their children, were not as high as white parents, I think mainly because most of them were not very well educated themselves and could not help their children with homework or did not have time to help them due to other social problems that continue to plague the black community in Louisiana—namely single parent households, drug addiction, poverty, a lack of values shared by the white middle or upper class communities, violence and multiple levels of abuse in the home. The lack of parental support, a stable family structure, and a healthy home environment that supports learning are the main reasons black students are under performing in Louisiana schools today, as well as the inability of many black students to speak standard American English, which many teachers do not insist upon in the classroom out of fear of being called racist at worst or politically incorrect at best. Bobby Jindal does not have the courage to face the real problem in education in Louisiana. He is taking the coward’s way out through scapegoating, blaming public schools and teachers for the failure of some black students to pass culturally biased standardized tests, one of the primary measures in assigning schools a passing or failing grade based on their AYP. The main problem is that when a public school becomes predominately black, with students and teachers alike, the standards are usually lowered and students are socially promoted, even though they cannot pass their course work or earn a basic score on standardized tests. How do I know this not having taught in public schools that have this particular demographic problem? I taught at a New Orleans community college for several years and in one of my classes had a large group of black students from the New Orleans projects, who insisted that I lower the standards in my class so that they could all get “A’s and B’s” for their final grade. They were physically and emotionally threatening in attempting to take control of the class, but I did not cave in as their public school teachers had to have done in order to get through the school year alive. What Bobby Jindal needs to do if he wants change education in Louisiana that will last for generations to come is to have the courage to educate the black community on what it will take for their children to perform well in school and to mentor them until they are able to adopt and embrace a value system that supports their children’s education, and thus, bring them out of the impoverished conditions that keep them like crabs in a bucket into a more productive standard of living. He needs to generate higher paying, skilled jobs for the black community, especially for the women who are usually the sole support of their families, so that they can support their children preparing them for a successful life in the middle class. Through education many black people in Louisiana have done just that over the last four decades, but many more have yet to enjoy that success. Bobby Jindal does not have the courage to do this because he does not have the heart to uplift anyone but himself. His education reforms have not been done for the people of Louisiana, but for himself, so that he can add another feather to cap, putting another initiative on his resume, so that when the time comes that he is seeking the status of President of the United States of America, the unconscious masses of voters in our country may believe he will be able to do something beneficial for them. Just about everyone in the State of Louisiana knows that Bobby Jindal has his eye on the Presidency and whatever he does as Governor of our State is merely a stepping stone to get out of the swamp into the Oval Office. Because the ‘separate but equal’ condition of education in Louisiana has been going on for more than 40 years, superficially changing form very slightly over the years, it is not going to permanently change anytime soon especially though a voucher program that is doomed to failure because the majority of private or parochial schools can see through this smokescreen and are not willing to accept the burden of educating black children from households that do not support the prime values of education. All teachers across the United States know that students who perform well in school are those who have 100% support from their parents. This is not the case for many black children in Louisiana, nor in other impoverished areas of our country. I would like to hear your plan for permanently changing these conditions that plague education and our society all across America because I believe, unlike Bobby Jindal, you have the intelligence, experience in education and heart to dream big.

Yesterday, readers of this blog had a homework assignment. I asked  you to read David Berliner’s important article about education and inequality.

Today, I wish to share with you a letter that he wrote to a list of people who read the article. I am reprinting it with his permission.

I thought you  might want to read it because it contains an inspiring message.

Those of us who think that the current so-called reform movement is destructive of education values can take hope: All of us, doing what we can, when we can, where we can, will make a difference.

If  you want to write him, his email is online. Google him. He is at Arizona State University.

David Berliner writes:

I want to thank so many of you for your kind words. Nothing makes a writer feel better than having someone actually read what they wrote and take a moment to say they liked it! Thanks.

In the flurry of emails that I was copied on, a few readers have commented that this kind of response to the world we live in is not enough to change very much, and that is surely true. It’s just my way of helping, as  inadequate as it may be. But it’s the kind of thing that if enough of us do, and circulate, and inform, might eventually lead to greater receptivity to change. It also allows us to look in the mirror in the morning and think that at least we did something!
 
When The Manufactured Crisis was published by me and Bruce Biddle, I received a short note of appreciation from Noam Chomsky, which I proudly hung on my wall. I wrote him back and asked how he manages to keep up his scholarly critiques in the face of enormous opposition to his views, and he kindly wrote back a short note that said something like this: 
“If you do nothing, nothing will happen.
If you do something, chances are nothing will happen.
But if you do something you can at least look at yourself in the mirror.”
 
That’s a good personal goal, and allows for hope that more can happen. 
 
The rebellion against high-stakes testing which is now occurring didn’t start when Paul Wellstone announced that NCLB would be a failure. The little book I wrote with Sharon Nichols, “Collateral Damage,”  got very little play even though we documented early on the problems with NCLB and the fact that you cannot test your way out of the problems our schools have. But we and Wellstone and dozens of others who had little effect contributed to the arguments that Diane Ravitch got to make in a way that finally found an audience. Her powerful writing, her credentials and past history, and her personal commitment finally got the attention of a lot of people who had ignored a lot of others who said similar things.  Now the rebellion against NCLB is on, the cheating we predicted and the gaming we documented based on the ubiquity of Campbell’s law is now understood to be widespread, and there is retreat from the nonsensical expectation that there will be “100% success for all by 2014, as waiver after waiver is given. 
 
I like to think that each bit of scholarship and each letter to the editor, and each voice at a school board meeting and each sign at a protest march that doesn’t have much of an effect in itself, lays the foundation for someone to make the mark when the time is right. Each little act of scholarship and letter writing and act of protest prepares the way for the next, and the zeitgeist eventually changes. 
 
Its the little bit of optimism I cling to in a world just made for pessimists! And by contributing a little bit to the fight for change, each of us gets to look in the mirror and feel a little less unhappy.
Cordially, and with great admiration for all you do,
David