Archives for category: Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania is overrun with cyber charters. There are 16 of them competing for customers, sucking money out of real public schools, supplying a terrible education. Some are under investigation. The legislature protects them because of campaign contributions.

Meanwhile public schools are suffering due to budget cuts while these sham schools make profits.

They have extracted $4 billion from the state’s taxpayers in inflated costs, padded enrollment data, and legislative beneficence. This is legal graft.

Cyber charters are profligate in wasting taxpayer dollars. A recent article on the Huffington Post reported that they spent nearly $100 million on advertising over a five year period. The biggest cyber charter, K12, spent more than $20 million in the first eight months of 2012.

In Ohio, home of rapacious and ineffective cyber charters, it costs the cyber operator $3,600 per student. But the corporation collects $6,300 per student. This leaves lots of dollars for profit and advertising.

Would it surprise you to know that the owners of the Ohio cyber charters give major campaign contributions to the governor and legislators?

Rebecca Poyourow, parent activist, wrote a terrific op-ed calling on Governor Corbett to stop the cuts that are devastating the schools.

In 2011-12, the governor cut $1 billion from the schools, and the cuts hurry Philadelphia the most. Class sizes soared, parents chipped in to replace staff, after-school programs were eliminated, even basic supplies had to given to the school.

While parents and teachers are pinching pennies, the state-appointed school reform commission continues throwing away money, she says. “We know that our actions, while laudable, will amount to very little if our schools are persistently and pervasively underfunded. We also know that our efforts to support our kids’ schools are undermined every time the School District and the School Reform Commission make spending decisions that squander what resources Philadelphia does have on charter expansion ($139 million last year), a questionable new cyber charter venture ($15 million proposed), and new contracts with testing companies ($11 million), as well as other contracts and programs that add little benefit to our children’s education.”

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/inquirer/20130510_Education_cuts_taking_a_toll.html#K57glBaz413ITu3S.99

A new report from the state auditor general shows how charters and cyber charters are overpaid, while the public system–which most children attend–get the short end of the stick.

“PA cybercharters avg cost of $10,145 was $3,500 more than national average of $6,500.

“PA charters spent avg $13,411 per student, about $3K more than national average of $10K.

“Fixing PA’s Charter School Formula Could Save $365 Million a Year in Taxpayer Money.”

http://www.auditorgen.state.pa.us/department/press/wagnersaysfixingpa%E2%80%99scharterschoolformula.html

A proposal to turn the public schools of York, Pennsylvania, into an all charter district was overwhelmingly rejected.

Do you think someone told them that the Néw Orleans Recovery School District is the lowest rated district in Louisiana?

The Lancaster school board unanimously rejected a charter for the Academy of Business and Entrepreneurship Charter School.

The school wanted a charter for K-12 but intended to open only with K-4.

The charter pons ores plan to appeal o a state board, which can overturn the local decision.

Earlier articles noted that this charter is part of the Gulen network, the nation’s largest charter chain, which is affiliated with a reclusive Muslim cleric who lives in the Poconos but controls a political movement in Turkey. Typically the boards of Gulen schools are composed entirely of Turkish men, and many of their teachers are Turkish.

Yinzercation, a terrific blog in Pennsylvania, describes a concerted effort by citizens to define great public schools.

What would you change?

This is their vision:

“What is your vision for great public education? If you could wave your magic wand today and create the perfect public school in your neighborhood, what would it look like? At the Rally for Public Education last month, over 320 people from our grassroots movement thought about just this as they filled out postcards addressed to Governor Corbett, answering the questions, “I came to the rally today because …” and “If our priorities were in the right place, and everyone paid their fair share, our public schools could/would …”

From those postcards, messages on Facebook, the blog, Twitter, and in conversations with others in our movement, a common vision for public education has begun to emerge. We shared some of our insights with the coalition that produced the Vision Statement for Pittsburgh schools, distributed Monday evening at the PIIN town hall meeting. Today, A+Schools released its own Vision Statement focused on the city school board races. The grassroots vision is broader than these two, more detailed, and includes elements relevant to schools both in and outside the city of Pittsburgh.

Having a vision statement is useful as a framework for guiding our work. It identifies our shared priorities and reminds us of what we are working towards. Here is what our movement’s shared vision for great public schools is starting to look like. What would you add?

A Vision for Great Public Schools

Every child has the right to a great public education. As parents, students, teachers, and community members we are committed to great schools for all children. That means we are focused on equity, on the experience of the whole child, and on the larger role schools serve in our neighborhoods. We seek adequate, equitable, and sustainable public funding as well as public policies that support our public schools. We believe public education is a public good.

Our shared vision for our public schools:

A rich, engaging, and culturally relevant curriculum for every student with full art, music, library, science, history, and world language programs in addition to reading and math.

Safe, orderly, respectful and nurturing learning environments.

Appropriate facilities and adequate books and materials in every school.

Smaller class sizes (research shows any reduction in class size produces positive learning results and there is no magic threshold that must be reached before students benefit: our goal should be class size reduction, not expansion, as it currently is).

Meeting the needs of every child with a qualified and high-quality teacher in every classroom, using truly differentiated instruction.

Restoration of tutoring programs.

Early childhood learning opportunities and full day Kindergarten so every child has a solid foundation.

A full-time librarian in every school so that students can use their libraries, learn critical information searching skills, and find support for their classroom learning (new research unequivocally demonstrates the learning benefits for students with a full time librarian).

The return of rest time and playtime for Kindergartners.

The return of adequate, daily recess for all students.

A full and varied athletic program.

Restoration of student transportation.

Reducing the focus on and time spent on test prep and high-stakes-testing; changing the culture from “achievement” to “learning.”

Serving the special education needs of all our children.

Mental health, community based programs, and wrap around services for children and families.

Nurses and social workers in our schools every day of the week.

Bully prevention programs in every school.

Disciplinary policies applied equitably to all students; the use of alternative / in-school suspensions and positive behavior programs.

Attracting and retaining excellent teachers by supporting their work with enhanced professional development and paraprofessional staff who help create the best learning environment.

Support struggling schools most in need without threatening to close them down.

Recognition and accommodation of school-specific needs (for instance, a parent engagement specialist at one school, a tutor at another).

Making local schools hubs of community life, in which parents and community members can engage in meaningful dialogue with educators and collaborate to help our children learn and grow.

This means an emphasis on preserving neighborhood schools and recognizing that school closures rip the fabric of communities.

Ensuring all schools have an open-door, welcoming policy that encourages family engagement in student learning.”

Dr. Gene Glass is a distinguished scholar with a long career in educational research and statistics.

He recently co-authored a critical review of virtual charter schools, published by the National Education Policy Center.

In response, an operative from Jeb Bush’s so-called “Foundation for Educational Excellence” created a website with Dr. Glass’s name, ridiculing him and impugning his integrity by implying he was bought by teacher union money. The smear site is called http://geneglass.org/.

Because the corporate reformers are motivated by money, they assume everyone else is. They can’t understand that some people work from ideals higher than Mammon.

None of Dr. Glass’s critics acknowledged that CREDO studied charter schools in Pennsylvania and found that the worst student academic performance was in virtual charter schools. But no one from Jeb Bush’s shop created a website to ridicule CREDO because it is funded by the Walton Foundation and led by researcher Margaret (Macke) Raymond, who is on the faculty at Stanford and affiliated with the conservative, free-market Hoover Institution.

This is Gene Glass’s bio (Wikipedia):

“Gene V Glass (born June 19, 1940) is an American statistician and researcher working in educational psychology and the social sciences. He coined the term “meta-analysis” and illustrated its first use in his Presidential address to the American Educational Research Association in San Francisco in April, 1976. The most extensive illustration of the technique was to the literature on psychotherapy outcome studies, published in 1980 by Johns Hopkins University Press under the title Benefits of Psychotherapy by Mary Lee Smith, Gene V Glass, and Thomas I. Miller. Gene V Glass is a Regents’ Professor Emeritus at Arizona State University in both the educational leadership and policy studies and psychology in education divisions, having retired in 2010 from the Mary Lou Fulton Institute and Graduate School of Education. Currently he is a Senior Researcher at the National Education Policy Center and a Research Professor in the School of Education at the University of Colorado Boulder. He is an elected member of the National Academy of Education.”

Tim Slekar gave a powerful speech to a meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Watch it.

If all of us spoke out, we could stop this train wreck that dares to call itself “reform.”

A teacher who heard him wrote this letter:

Dr. Slekar,

You won’t believe what I just did!

I stood before my school board at a public meeting and asked them to
consider opting out of standardized testing!

I was asked to speak on the writing process in 8th grade, but as the meeting
went on and teacher after teacher and administrator after administrator
praised the achievements we were reaching with test prep, computer programs
and data, something snapped. I said to myself, if I’m going to be here I
might as well tell the truth.

So when it was finally my turn, I said I had good news and bad news. The bad
news was that there’s an elephant in the room we haven’t been addressing. I
told them I had severe reservations about high stakes standardized testing
and went on to explain them. I told them 8th graders conservatively take 7-9
standardized tests: PSSA Reading, PSSA Math, PSSA Writing, PSSA Science,
Three GRADE tests, Keystone Algebra and Keystone Literature! I told them
there was no academic study showing this was effective – in fact just the
opposite. I told them these tests don’t measure learning, only achievement.
I told them how parents, teachers and school boards were opting out. And I
told them about you and much more.

When I was done, most of the board agreed with me. They thanked me for
speaking out. My principal slapped me on the back and said it had to be
said.

I asked the board to please meet with you and consider it.

I have my doubts they’ll follow through, but this is a big step. Would you
mind if I sent them your contact info? I’d love to get us all sitting down
at a table or to have you address the board at a public meeting. Would you
be wiling?

My school district is Steel Valley in Munhal. We’re pretty close to
Pittsburgh.

Anyway, I just wanted to share this with you. I feel good for speaking out
but would like to build on this. Unfortunately there were hardly any members
of the public there and NO media.

Thanks again.

Yours,

Steve

A report by the York County Community Foundation proposes that the answer to the county’s educational needs is an all-charter school system. York county schools have below average performance and many students are impoverished.

The study group cited the inflated claims of New Orleans charter boosters and decided that York county could achieve great things by copying the New Orleans model.

Had they done a bit more research, they would have learned that the New Orkeans Recovery School District is the lowest ranked district in the state of Louisiana, and that two-thirds of its charter schools received a grade of D or F for academic performance.

Eliminating public education does not solve the problems of poverty.