Michael Elliott is an excellent film-maker whose children attend public schools in New York City. He understands the fight against high-stakes testing. Here is a short video he created to tell the story about how parents feel about PARCC.
Liza Featherstone explains why her child will not take the state tests. She does not want her child subjected to endless test prep. She does not want teachers evaluated by her son’s test scores. She wants what the school offers:
“Studying ancient China, the third-graders at my son’s school made lanterns, clay plates and terra cotta masks. They learned how to write Chinese calligraphy. They wove silks.
“My son, Ivan, and his team made a papier-mâché model of the Great Wall as viewed from space. The kids displayed their works in a breathtaking “China Museum” for parents and younger children.”
According to those who were there, about 1,000 parents, educators, and other citizens packed the statehouse in Indianapolis to let the Governor and Legislature know that they support State Superintendent Glenda Ritz, and they don’t want their 1.3 million votes for her to be nullified by petty politics.
Here is a video and text from the Indiana Coalition for Public Education.
Here is Cathy Fuentes Rohwer speaking to the crowd in a riotous speech that had everyone cheering. Cathy wrote a passionate letter that ran on this blog. Cathy said what every teacher and parent knows: “My child is not college-and-career-ready because he is a child!” She also said: “Standards don’t educate children, teachers do!”
Here is the text of her great speech. “We can’t afford a three-tiered system of charters, vouchers, and public. We tried segregation and it didn’t work.”
Here is the video of Phyllis Bush’s wonderful speech.
And if you want even more, here are articles about the rally:
http://in.chalkbeat.org/2015/02/16/photos-ritz-supporters-rally-at-statehouse/#.VOj8jkK4mCR
http://www.journalgazette.net/…/Disdain-shown-for-Repub…
http://thestatehousefile.com/supporters-rally-superintendent-ritz-public-education/20256/
http://www.wthr.com/story/28117025/statehouse-rally-today-to-support-superintendent-ritz
http://www.idsnews.com/article/2015/02/rally-for-ritz-to-take-place-in-indy-today
http://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/rally-for-ritz-packs-the-statehouse
Rocky Killion is an amazing superintendent in West Lafayette, Indiana. To begin with, he produced a wonderful documentary about the assault on public education, called “Rise Above the Mark.” You can go to the website to find out how to order a copy to show in your community (it is also for sale on amazon.com). He is very critical of the testing-gone-wild culture that has been foisted on public schools in Indiana and across the nation. He is very sensitive to the damage done to education, to children, and to teachers. His colleagues named him Indiana’s Superintendent of the Year for 2015.
Now he is furious because the computers that give the state test–the ISTEP–froze during a practice run. That was just too much.
“It’s inhumane what we are doing to the kids, what we are doing to the educational environment, we lost so much instructional time today, it’s ridiculous,” Killion told WTHR-TV in Indianapolis on Feb. 12, after computers froze during a dry run for ISTEP last week.
The Superintendent of the Year for 2015, as named by the Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents, followed it with this: “I would prefer all of my students’ parents withdraw and become home-schooled during ISTEP, and then we can re-enroll them…..
Killion wasn’t backing away this week.
He repeated the same advice Monday during a visit to West Side schools from Glenda Ritz, Indiana’s superintendent of public instruction. (Ritz didn’t jump on board, instead calling on parents get their kids ready for ISTEP days.)
And on Tuesday, Killion clarified the statement, saying he wasn’t necessarily advocating the withdraw/home-school/re-enroll plan.
“Since there’s no legislative mechanism, that’s the only opt-out workaround that I know to tell parents,” Killion said. “Typically, when I’m asked a question, I try to come up with the correct answer, and that’s what’s happened in this case.”
The journalist writing the column is critical of Killion and so is this legislator:
State Sen. Brandt Hershman, R-Buck Creek, wasn’t pleased to hear a superintendent “encouraging people to willfully thwart (the) system.”
“It’s just the latest episode in his series of irresponsible and provocative comments that bear little to no relevance to the school system he’s supposed to be leading,” Hershman said Tuesday, a day when the Senate was dealing with a bill that would strip some of Ritz’s authority and a resolution to shorten ISTEP that had doubled in length since last year.
“I think we test too much, and the ISTEP is not perfect, but testing is required under federal and state law,” Hershman said. “His comments represent a flawed example of leadership in education policy.”
Killion’s answer: “The only thing I’ve said is what I said in the interview when a reporter asked me how can parents opt out of ISTEP. That’s the only thing I’ve done.”
Martin Luther King, Jr., said: “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”
Welcome to the honor roll, Rocky Killion!
Anthony Cody was first to feature a leaked document that advised reformers how to mollify parents who are angry about testing.
But it is well worth reading EduShyster’s hilarious explication of the same document.
She begins:
“Can we talk about testing? And by *talk* I mean the thing where parents offer up reasonable, legitimate and likely heartfelt concerns, which testing advocates then deflect by changing the subject and *pivoting to a higher emotion.* That’s right reader—it’s time for another edition of Say This, Not That.Today’s topic: testing. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, you’ll gasp in amazement as our *testing talk* is transformed to appeal to different audiences. But watch out for weeds and rabbit holes!”
Thanks to your generous contributions, added to those raised by BATs and many others, this billboard is now driving around Long Island, the hotbed of parent anti-testing sentiment.
Highway billboards will soon loom over major roads into Albany and other cities.
The funds were raised by New York State Allies for Public Education (NYSAPE), a coalition of 50 parent and teacher groups across the state.
Parents and students are the most powerful participants in the education debates for a simple reason: No one can fire them. Furthermore, they are not simply kibitzers or think tank pundits: Their lives are involved in the decisions about education. Here is a thoughtful comment by a parent in New Jersey, where the rebellion against high-stakes testing is in full swing:
I think it is extremely important for all educators to take the high road on this and not let justified anger cloud the logical arguments. I would encourage the NJEA President, Wendell Steinhauer, to sharpen his criticism and clearly articulate parental as well as educator concerns. I would also encourage him to have his association develop their own professional development / educational programs for teachers, working with schools. We all have many things to learn – it is a continuous process. Partnership with the “other side” – for the worthy goal of providing a wonderful education for our children – that would be difficult for Governor Christie to make less of.
I informed my local board of education during public comment that my son (6) will not be sitting for the PARCC testing (if it is still around) when he reaches third grade. I am quite serious as I feel PARCC and everything behind it is not in the best interest of any student – any teacher – any grade. Testing 8 year olds for career readiness is in itself inappropriate. Basically Common Core attempts to centralize everything – and this robs the spirit from the classroom. I feel this process it is hurtful to students for several reasons not limited to these:
1. PARCC will be administered on computer rather than paper which places pressure on our youngest of students to learn keyboarding (my son is already learning in first grade) and be exposed to computers even before they have had the experience and develop the proper motor skill to form letters correctly. The computer forms letters perfectly at the push of a button. In the perfect world I would prefer students be on computer much later. Students would benefit by working with real materials rather than inundating elementary schools with I-pads, laptops, “smart-boards” and all the other hardware “sugaring” up classrooms our youngest occupy. Tight school budgets are spending yet more on hardware just to accommodate computerized PARCC. It would make much more sense to give just one test on paper. A school’s network infrastructure, computer operating systems, and labs are not designed as a professional testing center is – and should not be. Tests of this kind are documents that require paper and are more practical on paper. Give an appropriate and elegant test once per year on paper and get the results to their teachers in a week. Perhaps that might be helpful.
2. The type of questions I found on PARCC in taking a practice test caused me a huge headache as they were twisted and confusing. I would not subject a young mind to such an assessment. In addition, activities in the classroom should not be centered on what is on this test. This robs the classroom of spontaneity – teaching moments – and valuable digression into areas of interest. A one size fits all top down totalitarian style mandated test is counter to our land’s free and open spirit.
3. Data collection – I will not have 400 points of data collected on my son and held in a database of a private company (already under investigation) for unknown future use. Centralizing this is an invasion of my son’s privacy and disrespectful. I will not have a third party testing company hold his data. Every parent needs to be concerned about this – it is Un-American! More than enough data to inform instruction can be obtained in various ways within the school itself.
4. Two tests per year are given. Massive amounts of instructional time is lost. Two tests because they will be used to evaluate teacher performance. This is flawed logic. There are way too many variables in the lives of students that can have dramatic effects on how they do in school. In addition, over evaluate a staff and you will have no time to inspire – no energy to motivate. Yet more tests, in most cases, are also administered for the so called “Student Growth Objectives“ – one more bad idea gone wild. Administrators have more than enough information within the building to inform instruction. In addition, local school districts are surrendering to a micromanaging overreach by the federal and state governments – as are teachers. What will be next? Teacher lesson plans from headquarters? We are going down a dangerous and undemocratic road.
An educational leader, in my opinion, must be a catalyst – must be the cause of positive excitement about the world – like of the world, real curiosity, knowing of the world! The American poet and philosopher Eli Siegel stated “The purpose of education is to like the world through knowing it“ and I wholeheartedly agree. I hope Mr. Hespe and other leaders will respectfully find out more about his important philosophy and extremely effective teaching method.
I believe that we are presently in a situation where teachers and students are not lifted up – but instead, insulted through SGOs, endless data collection, performance rubrics, and more. A once more collegial relationship is being replaced by a corporate style data collecting and crunching top down management – (a la McDonald’s) filling out endless computerized evaluations of teachers digitally warehoused by a centralized and privatized third party company. If more weight were given to supporting and lifting our teachers – more resources given to motivating, exciting, and further educating them – it would, in my opinion, be very wise – as our students, our children, my child, would benefit. We are missing that boat all should be on – parents, teachers, administrators, elected, BOE members, and our children.
I intend to be a vocal critic / advocate for my son and all his classmates at PTA meetings, BOE meetings and even council meetings in my own town. I hope more and more parents will object to mandating of Common Core / PARCC / teacher over- evaluation, and hope that the state reconsiders how it sees its schools, its teachers, and all its young residents across a most uneven (and unfair) financial spectrum. What is desperately needed is people centered decisions and laws – not profit centered.
I believe Dr. Maria Montessori saw children as individuals and respected the differences – and different rates of development found in each young mind – this is needed – not a one size fits all (profit centered) approach. Most importantly, in order to have schools be more successful everywhere, the state must work hard to close the huge financial gap within and between communities and lift communities rather than attempting to privatize schools in the most needy areas. That is no solution and an ugly cop out by our government that increasingly seems to be on the side of the profiteers – not the people.
David Di Gregorio, Parent
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Someone gave Anthony Cody a copy of a secret training document created by public relations consultants to corporate reformers. The document is only six pages; it is printed in bright colors. Its purpose is to show reformers how to answer complaints about testing.
Is there too much testing? Agree, yes , there is too much testing but the new Common Core tests will solve that problem.
Whatever the complaint, answer by saying the new tests are better, the new tests are different, the new tests solve that problem. No more teaching to the test. Why ? Because the new tests are better, the new tests are different, the new tests solve that problem. Teachers want more time for creative teaching? No problem. Because the new tests are better, the new tests are different, the new tests solve that problem.
Helen Gym, the articulate and tireless parent advocate for Philadelphia public schools, is running for City Council.
Here is a 30-second video of Helen.
She has already been endorsed by the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers.
Here is the speech she delivered at 5 pm today.
Helen Gym: Campaign Announcement
February 9, 2015
I stand here filled with gratitude to see so many of you here. I have given a lot of speeches over the years but it is a lot easier to give a speech about an injustice that must be fought, or students who need to be supported than it is to talk about… myself. But standing here, seeing so many friends and so many people that I respect, calms my nerves a little a bit, and makes me realize how lucky I am, and how lucky we all are, to live in a city with communities like this one.
Although I have lived here for almost thirty years, I wasn’t born in Philadelphia. I grew up in Ohio, the daughter of Korean immigrants. We didn’t have much, but I was fortunate enough to grow up in a neighborhood that had public parks where I could play, a public library where I could read, a public rec center where I could swim, and most importantly, public schools where I got a great education. That education formed me, like it formed so many of you. It unlocked the possibilities of the world. It was a social contract, and it influenced how I think about the possibilities, not just the limitations, of government throughout my life.
I moved to Philadelphia for college, met and married a wonderful man, and immersed myself in this city. I taught at Lowell Elementary School in Olney. I joined amazing organizations in this city – like Asian Americans United. I became a mother and started raising my three children in this city, and I worked alongside so many amazing mothers and fathers dedicated to re-envisioning our public schools.
I helped found the Philadelphia Public School Notebook, to raise up their voices as well as those of teachers, school staff and students. I helped found a school that breathed life into culture and practices that value multilingualism, community and served many immigrant families. I founded Parents United for Public Education with parents like LeRoi, Gerald, Robin, Tomika and Rebecca. Together we’re rejecting a punishing narrative of blame and failure – and we’re making sure the mentality around our children and our schools comes through a framework of human dignity, justice and love for our children and those who care for them.
Over the years, together we have fought to make this city—our city— a better place to live. We might not have been in the halls of power, but we organized, we fought, and we achieved real, tangible victories.
We refused to let the School District operate behind closed doors, as it outsourced the decision to close our public schools. Just last week, we finally shone a light on what schools were originally slated to close. And one glance at that list made it ever more clear—as if we didn’t know before—just how dangerous it is to hand over the governance of a public institution to a small group of out-of-touch, out-of-town consultants, paid for by undisclosed millionaires.
We stood up for neighborhoods like Chinatown, fighting tooth and nail to keep stadiums and casinos out of one our most vibrant, yet threatened, immigrant neighborhoods.
We stood up to patronage at the Parking Authority, and as a result, we—the citizens of Philadelphia—made the Parking Authority pay their fair share and deliver millions of desperately needed dollars every year to the School District. Why? Because we refused to accept the status quo. We refused to accept that that was just the way things were. We refused to allow cynicism to rob children of their right to decent funding.
And when the SRC tried to put two neighborhood schools into the hands of private operators, over the objections of the parents and teachers of those schools, we stood with them, we demanded their voices be heard. And together we won.
And so, I come back to where I started, and why I am so energized to see you all here. Those victories were not my victories. They were the victories of powerful, passionate and vibrant communities, of this community. This is our moment. I believe it. This is our moment to bring a new, community-based agenda to inhabit City Hall. And so, it is with humility —and with excitement!—that in front of you all, in front of my community, that I announce my campaign for City Council at Large.
You know, people sometimes ask me if I am angry. You know what? I am. Aren’t you? We live in a city with a crippling rate of poverty. We live in a city where teachers – teachers! – are being demonized and scapegoated by those who purposefully seek to underfund and in some cases dismantle our public school system. When we know that schools which succeed depend on the partnership of dedicated professionals, how does it make sense to start a war by firing on your own soldiers? We live in a city where a child died of asthma—asthma—in a city school where no nurse was on duty, and where college applications plummeted among our most vulnerable students because we laid off school counselors. We live in a city where we incarcerate at rates that shock the senses, where family lives are destroyed, families torn apart, and young lives upended by a school to prison pipeline that is as toxic as it is immoral. As the saying goes, if you are not angry—if you are not outraged—you are not paying attention.
But, I am hopeful, too. I am hopeful because I know that we can make this city a better place to live for all of us, whether you have lived here all your life, or whether you moved here recently, and like me, fell in love with this wonderful place and have put down your roots.
And, there is reason for hope, because as our communities have pushed, there have been real victories that have demonstrated what happens when we fight—paid sick leave will finally become a reality; business taxes have become more progressive; the Land Bank was created to put vacant land back to productive use; sensible criminal justice policies have stopped the jailing of our citizens for minor marijuana possession. We’ve finally stopped police from being used as immigration enforcers; and, a 21st century minimum wage was delivered to city contractors and, for the first time, subcontractors.
And, on top of all of that, after decades of loss, our City is growing. The cyclists riding to work each morning and night, whether they are the most recent generation of immigrants to settle in South Philadelphia, or entrepreneurs creating a tech boom on North Third Street, are daily reminders that this is a place where people want to live
But this city can do more. So much more. And it is time for all of us to unite and to escalate our fight.
Fight to make the lives of working Philadelphians better by raising wages and benefits, and improving working conditions.
Fight to get the vacant land of Philadelphia working, by ensuring that the Land Bank has power, is supported, and spurs development in our communities while ensuring sensible, transparent land policies and supporting uses like community gardens.
Fight for our parks, from the Wissahickon to Wissinoming, and our rec centers, from Susquehannah to Snyder and Cottman to Cobbs Creek.
Fight for community-based policing that respects and listens to communities.
Fight for economic policies that encourage small businesses and entrepreneurs, create a skilled workforce, and make sure that everyone pays their fair share.
Fight for a walkable city that protects pedestrians and cyclists alike.
Fight for transparency, so that the days of buying access and doing business behind closed doors finally come to a close.
Fight for our immigrant communities, to end abusive deportation practices and to ensure that English proficiency is not a requisite for a responsive government.
Fight for those policies that we all understand our city should have. And when someone tells us it cannot be done, to ask why, to organize, and to demand better.
And… to fight for our public schools. You know, if there is one good thing that we have seen from the chaos that Tom Corbett and the SRC rained upon our schools, it is this: our citizens have refused to be divided. They have refused the sick game of choosing between affordable health care for our teachers and books for our children.
Turn, after turn, after turn, Philadelphians have been told that those are the choices we have. We have refused. Instead, our students at schools from SLA to Constitution to Masterman walked out of school in defense of their teachers, we chased Tom Corbett out of Central High School, and last November voters sent Corbett home after one term.
But, oh let me tell you, do we need to fight for our public schools. Education is the battle ground on which we must stake our claim, for it is the clearest expression of the choice before us, between a society, on the one hand, that privileges the few and tolerates inequity and poverty, versus a vision of a beloved community that is far different.
A vision in which public education is a compact between all of us who believe in a just, civil society.
Public education binds generations, it invests families of all economic classes in the success of our city, and in each other.
So I will fight, as I have fought, as you have fought, to defend that most cherished institution, and the biggest symbol of our commitment to a just, equitable and prosperous society.
That is why I am running for City Council.
All that I have done, all that we have done, has been from standing together and demanding change. It is from the power of our communities. It comes from something very deep within us that demands a moral agenda to the deep moral crisis plaguing our city and our nation.
I cannot do this without you. I ask that you stand with me now, and stand with each other, to make this place a city that are we proud to call home, and proud to hand to our children.
Thank you.

