Archives for category: NYC

Mark D. Naison is a professor at Fordham University, where he teaches African-American studies. He is principal investigator of the Bronx African American history project. He writes a blog, “With a Brooklyn Accent.” This is his latest:
Not Every Bronx Tale Has a Geoffrey Canada Ending

In his memoir, Fist, Knife Stick Gun, Geoffrey Canada describes growing up on Union Avenue in the Morrisania section of the Bronx as a harrowing experience- a place where bullies terrorized young people and where no institutions , certainly not the local public schools, offered refuge or protection. It was only when Canada’s family moved to the suburbs that he was able to find a modicum of safety and was able to find a school which could inspire him and where his talents could develop.

This Bronx experience, Canada claims, inspired his future work as an educator, including his pioneering efforts to develop a holistic model of child development through the Harlem Children’s Zone which insulated young people from the violent world ready to claim them and gave them a mixture of education and social services which would enable them surmount numerous hurdles, academic and personal, and emerge college ready upon graduation from high school.

As a coach, and community organizer as well as an historian, I find much to admire in Canada’s model. But unlike Canada, I am not as quick to write off our urban public school system as a failure, and the teachers in it as heartless, insensitive, and more concerned with protecting their jobs than helping the young people they work with.

And ironically, some of my reluctance to accept Canada’s analysis comes from having done extensive oral histories from people who grew up in the same neighborhood that Canada did, and sometimes on the same block.

To put the matter bluntly, I have interviewed at least 40 people who grew up within 
5 blocks of where Canada did, who attended local public schools, and participated in after school programs in local schools, churches and community centers, who became successful professionals in a wide range of fields ranging from journalism and the arts to education and social work. Among those I interviewed who fit that category are Amsterdam News sportswriter Howie Evans, musicians Valerie Capers and Jimmy Owens, film maker Brent Owens, community center director Frank Bolden, insurance executive Joseph Orange, talent agent Bess Pruitt, and current and former school principals Harriet McFeeters, Henry Pruitt, and Paul Cannon ( current principal of PS 140)

All of these individuals, in their oral histories, describe encounters with very tough kids and neighborhood gangs, one of them, Evans, was actually in a gang; but each of them were able to find teachers in the local public schools who nurtured their talents and when necessary protected them from harm. Some were regular classroom teachers, others were coaches and music teachers, a few ran after school programs in public schools or local parks. One individual, Vincent Tibbs, the director of the night center at a local elementary school, PS 99, received mention in numerous oral histories for running a program which sponsored dances, talent shows, and sports leagues; Howie Evans actually credits Mr Tibbs with saving his life by refusing to let him leave the center to participate in a gang fight. 

The positive experiences these individuals had in schools and community centers led a number of them to decide to become teachers, social workers, and school administrators when they grew up, many of them in neighborhoods similar to the ones they grew up in.
One of them, Paul Cannon, runs a remarkable public school about 6 Blocks from where Canada grew up which is open 7 days a week, has Sunday basketball for neighborhood parents, and where the entire school culture, including an innovative “Old School Museum” is organized to honor community history.

In short, not everyone who grew up in Morrisania felt so abandoned by the local public school system that they had to circumvent it entirely in order to nurture, inspire and protect young people living in low income communities. The Canada model is an intriguing one, but it is not the only vehicle we have to educate children in poor and working class families. Some public schools were effective when Canada was growing up and some are as effective, or more effective, right now than Canada’s Promise Academy, even without the extra funding.

In the political arena, all eyes are on the Presidential race.

But in New York City, candidates for Mayor are lining up supporters. The election is 2013, when Mayor Bloomberg’s rocky third term ends.

It appears that the favorite of the charter school hedge fund crowd is Christine Quinn, City Council speaker. Quinn, a close ally of Mayor Bloomberg, seems likeliest to keep his policies intact. To say that parents do not like his school-closing policy would be an understatement. The brute fact is that there is a lot of money on the privatization side of the agenda.

The question is whether any of the candidates will stand up for public education and block the insertion of charters into public schools that are already overcrowded.

The New York City Department of Education decided a few years ago that Jamaica High School, with its grand building and long history, deserved to die. Its test scores were too low. There was no point in trying to figure out why or to offer help. And so the DOE announced that Jamaica was a failing school. Parents began to withdraw their children or to select other high schools. Enrollment fell. Many faculty, remembering better times, held on. The city was determined to close the school and replace it with small high schools and charters. It is very desirable space in the borough of Queens.

A state report was recently released that documents how a school is swiftly put to death. First, declare it to be a failing schools. Then take away the programs that attract and develop good students. In time, no one will be left who cares about what once was the school, because the school that everyone once knew is dead, even if a few classes remain.

With the heart cut out of the school, it is comforting to learn from the state report that the school continues to “use data to drive and improve instructional outcomes.”

This is the key section in the state report:

· The following findings are based on information ascertained from various stakeholders including parents, teachers, students, administrators as well as school and district documents:

o No honors or advance placement classes are offered to students o The school no longer offers calculus, chemistry or physics
o Only three electives are offered to students: Law, Accounting and

Latin American Literature. Prior to the implementation of the phase out model, elective courses offered to students were: African American Literature, Film, Geography, Forensics, Sociology, Psychology, Computer classes (Word, Excel, visual basic, PowerPoint) and Creative Writing

o Off­track classes, which were offered to students not meeting Regents requirements, are no longer available

o Students are not able to complete specialty programs: Business, Computer Science, Engineering and Finance Institutes, or Art Institutes

o Students are not offered SAT prep courses
o Two teachers, who are not certified in special education, are

teaching students with disabilities.
· The school uses data to drive and improve instructional outcomes. 

A comment by Long Island principal Carol Burris, who has written for this blog:

MY AP worked there. They started bringing over the counter registration kids into the schools, including those recently released from incarceration and still wearing restraining leg chains on their ankles.

A reader explains precisely how four straight years of budget cuts have hurt his school and limited the education of its students.

As regular readers of this blog know, I do not usually print the names of commenters because teachers typically worry about reprisals, and in most cases, I don’t know the name of the person who posted the comment. But this writer signed his comment, so I’m posting his name.

 

The city and the teachers’ union went to court to battle over the city’s plan to “turnaround” 24 schools by firing thousands of teachers.

The judge listened to the arguments, retired to her chambers, and returned seven minutes later to say that she was sustaining the arbitrator’s decision. The city may not lay off the teachers. It violates their contract.

This battle involves more than 3,000 teachers and 30,000 students. No one is sure how the schools will be staffed when schools opens in a few weeks. No one knows which teachers have found other jobs and which will return.

The schools, having been labeled as “failures,” have suffered enormous blows to their reputation in the community. If past experience is any guide, parents will be reluctant to enroll their children in a school that has been targeted for closure and that is now on life support for another year.

Just keep saying to yourself, that is reform, this is not reform, this is reform, this is not reform.

Or just call it chaos.

A  high school in the Bronx has figured out how to be high performing.

It’s not hard.

It pushes out kids with low test scores.

It expels them.

It works!

107 students started as freshmen, but only 58 graduated.

The Bronx Health Sciences High School has a 95% graduation rate.

Studies will  point to it as an example of how an inner city school can succeed.

Who knows, maybe a special on 60 Minutes or Fox News is not far behind.

 

 

Every year, as part of its customer service, the New York City Department of Education asks parents what they would like to see changed.

Every year since the question has been asked, parents have chosen as their top priority: Reducing class size.

In 2007, when the survey was initiated, the Mayor minimized parent concerns by lumping together all other choices as if they were one, to say that parents had many concerns.

This year, when the Department presented its slide show of the results, it left “class size” out of the slide.

Wonder why.

The Huffington Post article linked in the first sentence is nearly an exact copy of the post on the NYC Parent blog in the second link.

Thanks to Leonie Haimson, parent advocate, who is a tiger on the subject of class size.

One of the much-hyped new ideas of our time is the “School of One.” This is a new use of technology in the classroom.

It was declared a success in 2009 by Time magazine before it was ever implemented anywhere.

It was created by TFA alum, Broad-trained, ex-Edison, ex-NYC DOE executive Joel Rose and implemented on a pilot basis in the New York City public schools.

There are two different stories embedded in The School of One.

There is the story of the business of education, and School of One is a cutting-edge venture in edu-business.

The other is whether it is pedagogically sound. On this count, Gary Rubinstein has posted an informative review.

Randi Weingarten, president of the AFT, and Michael Mulgrew, president of the UFT (New York City local of AFT), have some good advice for Mayor Bloomberg: Help schools that struggle, don’t close them.

Interesting that this opinion piece appears, no doubt by coincidence, in the New York Daily News on the same day that a news story reports the failure of Bloomberg’s closing schools strategy. According to the news story, Bloomberg’s new schools did worse on the state reading tests than the “old” schools that he hasn’t closed yet.

Weingarten and Mulgrrew call the Mayor’s attention to the Chancellor’s District created by Rudy Crew when he ran the school system. He created a non-contiguous district of the city’s lowest performing schools and then saturated them with support and resources. Some (though not all) of the schools showed impressive progress.

Will the Mayor take the suggestion from Weingarten and Mulgrew? Hmm. It would mean turning his back on ten years of school closings. It would mean admitting error. 140 schools closed and replaced by schools that mostly did no better.  It would mean that the Federal Government’s turnaround (close schools and fire teachers) strategy is wrong.

The data don’t support more of the same. Is the Mayor listening? Is Arne Duncan listening?

The New York Daily News (owned by billionaire Mort Zuckerman, who also owns U.S. News & World Report) often runs editorials applauding the “reforms” of the Bloomberg administration. Its editorials are anti-union, anti-teacher, and consistently supportive of the policy of closing schools that have low test scores.

But the New York Daily News has excellent reporters who don’t follow the editorial line. They just report the news. And the story today is stunning.

The headline summarizes the story: “Bloomberg’s New Schools Have Failed Thousands of City Students: Did More Poorly on State Reading Tests than Older Schools with Similar Poverty Rates.”

This analysis shows the abject failure of the policy that has been the centerpiece of the Bloomberg reforms for the past decade.

Closing schools and replacing them with new schools is also the centerpiece of the Obama-Duncan “turnaround” strategy.

Here is an excerpt from the news story. Note that the grandmother of a student in Brooklyn makes more sense than the six-figure bureaucrats who run the New York City Department of Education. Tanya King of Brooklyn for Chancellor!

…When The News examined 2012 state reading test scores for 154 public elementary and middle schools that have opened since Mayor Bloomberg took office, nearly 60% had passing rates that were lower than older schools with similar poverty rates.

The new schools also showed poor results in the city’s letter-grade rating system, which uses a complicated formula to compare schools with those that have similar demographics.

Of 133 new elementary and middle schools that got letter grades last year, 15% received D’s and F’s — far more than the city average, where just 10% of schools got the rock-bottom grades.

“It’s crazy,” said Tanya King, who helped wage a losing battle to save Brooklyn’s Academy of Business and Community Development, where her grandson was a student.

The school opened in 2005, then closed in 2012.

Instead of closing struggling schools and replacing them with something else that doesn’t work, King says, the city should help with extra resources to save the existing schools.

“You have the same children in the school,” she said. “What’s going to be the difference? Put in the services that are going to make the school better.”

Her grandson Donnovan Hicks, 11, will be transferred next fall for the seventh-grade into another Bloomberg-created school, Brooklyn’s Peace Academy, where just 13% passed the state reading exams this spring.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/bloomberg-new-schools-failed-thousands-city-students-article-1.1119406#ixzz21M3o9hBP