Archives for category: New York

There is no link for this story, but ipt out leaders are buzzing with the news that children with cognitive disabilities will be tested online this spring. In the past, these children were give performance assessments in line with their IEPS. One parent called this “cruel and unusual punishment” for these vulnerable children. A personal call to a high-ranking state official confirmed that this decision was made by State Commissioner MaryEllen Elia, without consulting the Board of Regents.

No, it is not “all about the kids.

Despite a major effort by state and federal officials to threaten or cajole parents to let their children take the tests, despite a media campaign by corporate reformers to persuade parents that testing is good, the New York opt out movement is back again. A Twitter site created by reformers (@optoutsowhite) mocked the opt out as being the white suburban moms that Arne Duncan ridiculed. A parent (@africaisacountry) responded with #optoutmademewhite.

Carol Burris reports here on the first returns.

The effort to stop opt out failed, she writes.

“The campaign had little, if any, effect. In some schools, only a handful of students took the test. Eighty-seven percent of the students in Allendale Elementary School outside of Buffalo, New York opted out. Eighty-six percent of test eligible students in the Long Island district of Comsewogue refused the test, and 89 percent of students in Dolgeville in the Mohawk Valley said “no.”

“Long Island continues to be the hotbed of testing resistance. Newsday reported that 49.7 percent of all Long Island students refused the test Tuesday even though the Newsday editorial board has repeatedly urged parents to have their children take it. Patchogue-Medford Superintendent Michael J. Hynes characterized Opt Out as “a thunderclap” sent to Albany. Seventy-one percent of the students in his district refused the Common Core tests.

“There is also evidence that the Opt Out movement is gaining ground with parents of color, with many no longer willing to buy the spin that taking Common Core tests will improve their children’s life chances.

“Ninety-seven percent of the more than 1,000 students who attend Westbury Middle School in Nassau County are black or Latino, and 81 percent are economically disadvantaged. On Tuesday, 50 percent of those students were opted out of the tests by their parents. Last year, the number was 2 percent.

“Last week, Westbury parents filled a forum sponsored by Long Island Opt Out in order to learn how to refuse the test. When a district official tried to convince those in attendance that testing helps improve educational opportunities for minority students, one mother pushed back. “Don’t you dare tell parents that these tests will help them… these tests tear our kids down. They don’t lead to success.”

Jamaal Bowman is the principal of Cornerstone Academy for Social Action, a highly regarded middle school in the Bronx. Ninety nine percent of his students are black or Latino and 84 percent are economically disadvantaged. Last year, only 5 of his students refused the test. On Tuesday, 25 percent opted out.”

Jaime Franchi of the Long Island Press has established a reputation for in-depth reporting on education. She does it again, with a comprehensive analysis of New York’s opt out movement.

After the historic opt out of 2015, where some 240,000 students did not take the tests, Governor Cuomo made a concerted effort to tamp down parent anger. He appointed a task force to make recommendations about the Common Core standards and tests, which John King had botched. He promised that the tests would have no stakes for students or teachers, at least for a while. The state commissioner took steps to alternately warn and placate parents.

Despite the efforts to court parents, the opt out leaders decided they were being played. They thought the moves by Cuomo were a facade. And they determined to continue their fight in 2016.

No one knows whether there will be more or less or the same number of opt outs. What matters is that parents across the state realize that there is power in numbers. They cannot be ignored.

Norm Scott, a retired New York City teacher, blogs at EdNotes Online. He posted today the onslaught against opt out in the mainstream media in New York City. Norm taught in low-income schools for many years. He was also the producer of one of the first anti-reform films: “The Inconvenient Truth About ‘Waiting for Superman.'”

 

 

I seriously doubt that any of the people who wrote these articles understand that the tests provide no useful information to teachers or parents. I wonder if any of them have school-age children. Teachers are not allowed to see the answers or to learn what their students got wrong. Parents get nothing more than a number (1, 2, 3, 4) and a percentile ranking. Do we really need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to rank students yet learn nothing about their instructional needs? Do they know that the tests were designed to fail the majority of students? Can they explain why?

 

 

Norm Scott writes:

 

 

Every single link in today’s Rise and Shine is an assault on Opt-out.

 

 

Eva Moskowitz: Opt-out movement will leave students unprepared
“I really believe in the tests – I seem to be the only one left standing,” the Success Academy CEO said Friday afternoon, against the backdrop of thousands of children singing to pop songs whose lyrics were changed to extoll the virtues of learning and test preparation. Read more.

 
And follow up with these:

 

 

With state tests set to begin Tuesday, some are predicting that the opt-out movement will continue to grow, even though the consequences of those tests have diminished. Wall Street Journal

 
Plenty of New York City principals and parents still see the tests as a normal, and even helpful, part of a child’s school experience. New York Times

 
Some teachers have gone further in encouraging students to opt out by sending anti-testing information home to parents. New York Post

 
The nonprofit High Achievement New York has launched a counter-campaign, with the tagline “Say Yes to the Test.” New York Daily News

 
Al Sharpton says he opposes the opt-out movement because the test results help shine a light on educational inequality. New York Post, Politico New York

 
Upper West Side parents are still worried that opting out will hurt their children’s chances of admission to a selective middle school. DNAinfo

 
Success Academy CEO Eva Moskowitz said Friday that she seems “to be the only one left standing” supporting state tests, just after thousands of her students gathered for a “slam the exam” pep rally. Chalkbeat

 
Three Success Academy charter schools didn’t have copies of the tests last week, worrying school officials. New York Daily News

 
Editorial: Parents, you’ve been heard. Now have your kids take the damn tests. New York Daily News

 
Editorial: It’s “pathetic” to see education leaders across the city and state pander to the opt-outers. New York Post

The New York state legislature approved a budget deal that pleased the charter school industry and threw in some extra funding for wraparound services. Advocates of equitable funding were disappointed, however, because the budget deal is far from what the courts agreed was necessary to supply equitable funding in New York City.

 

 

The budget includes $175 million in funding to help struggling schools offer services like health care and after-school programs. That money will be targeted carefully at schools that need it most, not just at needy districts, Cuomo said.
“The priority should be the schools that need the most help in this state,” Cuomo said.
The details of the community school funding are still unclear. Advocates said some of the $175 million could be included within the Foundation Aid, the $600-million-plus portion of the education spending that favors low-income districts.

 

 

Charter schools got a big boost. The budget deal included $54 million to increase the amount charter schools receive per student, a number double what Cuomo proposed. That amounts to a $430 increase per student next year.
The increase earned plaudits from charter advocates, but is unlikely to please the state’s teachers union, whose executive vice president called the increased support for charter schools a “radical, last-minute change” in an email to members on Wednesday.
Officials did not mention a number of other proposals that have been floated during the budget negotiations on Thursday night, including a measure to withhold funding from charter schools that fail to serve a high percentage of high-needs students. In January, Gov. Cuomo had also proposed un-freezing the formula that determines most charter school funding for New York City charter schools, rather than simply increasing per-student spending.
‘Receivership’ and teacher evaluations: No changes

 

Cuomo left the impression that two education measures that dominated the attention of state lawmakers last year were left untouched: the “receivership” law that outlines how low-performing schools could be put under the control of an outside leader or group, and the teacher evaluation law.
Last year, lawmakers increased the weight of state test scores in teacher evaluations. But after that sparked significant backlash, the Board of Regents passed an emergency regulation that decoupled test scores from evaluations.
The governor said the receivership law was not changed and that education funding will still be dependent on districts creating teacher evaluation plans, signaling no major changes to either law snuck into the budget deal.
Cuomo’s unwillingness to revisit either receivership or teacher evaluations is one sign of how unpopular the two issues have become.

 

 

The Education Law Center was quick to express its disappointment in the budget:

 

 

Ten years after the final Court of Appeals ruling in Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State (CFE), New York has once again failed to live up to its constitutional duty to fund public schools adequately so every child has the opportunity for a sound basic education.

 

 

Chronic underfunding of the Foundation Aid Formula has left New York $4.4 billion behind in the amount of Foundation Aid promised in 2007, in the wake of the landmark CFE lawsuit. The consequence is that school districts continue to struggle with too few teachers; large class sizes; inadequate services, staff and programs for at-risk students; and stark deficiencies in resources for English language learners, students with disabilities and other vulnerable children.

 

It is way past time for the Governor and Legislature to recommit to providing the funding the State itself says children need – and must have – for a sound basic education. New York’s elected leaders had the opportunity this year to begin repaying the debt owed to the state’s students. The Assembly proposed such a plan, including a $1.1 billion increase in Foundation Aid for this year with the full amount phased in over four years.

 

 

Unfortunately, the Senate and the Governor rejected the Assembly’s plan. The final budget provides $627 million in Foundation Aid, an amount insufficient to redress the severe shortages in essential resources in schools across the state. At this rate of increase, it would take an additional seven years to fully phase-in Foundation Aid. The budget also makes no commitment to phase-in Foundation Aid over the next several years, forcing yet more children to endure educational deprivation in their classrooms and schools.

 

 

“It is hard to fathom how the Governor and Legislature, for the eighth straight year, could fail New York’s public school children, despite the Assembly’s best efforts,” said David G. Sciarra, Executive Director of the Education Law Center (ELC) and co-counsel in Maisto v. New York, the court challenge to inadequate school funding in New York’s small city school districts. “Once again, New York children must look to the courts to secure their fundamental rights in the face of ongoing legislative and executive inaction.”

 

 

With the State budget again falling far short of affording children a constitutional sound basic education, all eyes are now on the Albany State Supreme Court where parents and children await a decision in the Maisto case.

 

 

One bright spot: The Legislature heeded ELC’s warning issued yesterday not to arbitrarily put 70 schools back into a “failing school” receivership program after they had been properly removed from the list by State education officials.

 

 

“We appreciate that the Legislature did not accept the Governor’s proposal to punish students and schools that have demonstrated improvement under the State’s accountability system,” Mr. Sciarra said. “We will, however, remain vigilant to keep this issue off the table in the remaining months of the legislative session.”

 

 

Press Contact:

 

 

Sharon Krengel
Policy and Outreach Director
skrengel@edlawcenter.org
973-624-1815, x 24

 

 

Bianca Tanis, who is a parent, a teacher, and a leader of the opt out movement, warns of the dangers of the tests that start next week.

 

 

She writes:

 

 

The New York State Common Core tests are almost upon us and promises of sweeping changes to NYS tests and standards are rampant. The NYS Education Department is urging parents to opt back in and the media has reported that education officials are “bending over backwards” to address the concerns of parents and educators.

 

While the State has made some minor changes to this year’s tests (and promises more in the future), the fact remains that young children will still be subjected to reading passages years above grade level, test questions with more than one plausible answer, tests that are too long, waste valuable resources, and worst of all, tests that engender feelings of frustration, failure, angst, and confusion in our youngest learners.

 

Manufactured Crisis

 

Claims that untimed tests will alleviate stress on children are unfounded and misleading to parents. Giving a child more time to struggle with an inappropriate test rather than just fixing the flawed system is misguided and will create a logistical nightmare for the schools forced to accommodate this band-aid solution. Teachers will be pulled from classrooms to monitor student conversations during lunch breaks to ensure that 8-, 9-, and 10-year old students are not talking about the tests. At a time when our schools are being starved of funding, this is a gross and needless misallocation of resources.

 

In fact, very little has changed for children, and these damaging tests continue to threaten our children now and into the future. How much damage? A quarter million students are being labeled, annually, as failures. The transition to “college-ready” graduation requirements in 2022 will result in the loss of more than 100,000 graduates per year. Use this calculator to assess the impact on your school district: http://tiny.cc/DistrictCCR.

 

Unless we demand an immediate paradigm shift, many students will not only be labeled failures at 8-, 9-, and 10-years old, they will not graduate. We are not just talking about struggling students and students with special needs facing a graduation crisis.

 

 

 

In an attempt to placate and undercut the opt out movement this spring, New York Commissioner of Education MaryEllen Elia promised significant changes in the tests.

 

Testing expert Fred Smith says the promised changes are insignificant, in fact, “illusory.”

 

Although the state has dropped Pearson and hired a new test vendor named Questar, Pearson is still in charge of the 2016 tests.

 

 

New York State Allies for Public Education–an alliance of 50 parent and educator organizations across the state and a leader of opt out–issued a press release calling for passage of four critical bills that would reduce the stakes attached to standardized tests. NYSAPE successfully organized the boycott of state tests last year that shook up the state’s policymaking machinery, leading Governor Cuomo to form a task force to propose measures to fix the standards and tests. In addition, the leadership of the New York Board of Regents has changed hands, with a friend of the parent groups now Chancellor. Other states and parents groups could learn from NYSAPE, which is on the case 24/7.

 

 

More information contact:
Lisa Rudley (917) 414-9190; nys.allies@gmail.com
NYS Allies for Public Education (NYSAPE) http://www.nysape.org

Calling on the Assembly & Senate to Pass Legislation to Repair Public Education

On March 20th Assemblyman Todd Kaminsky sponsored four bills that seek to offer relief to the children of New York. At a crowded press conference Assemblyman Kaminsky unveiled four legislative bills that seek to bring common sense back to education in New York State.

Assemblyman Kaminsky’s bills are an important start that will fix the damage done to education in New York State. NYSAPE and its coalition members back Assemblyman Kaminsky’s plan to decouple teacher evaluations from test results, end over-testing, empower parents, create needed alternative pathways to graduation for students, and make education about our children.

We are calling on all New Yorkers to contact their Assembly and Senate representatives to support Assemblyman Kaminsky Education legislation by taking action here:
In summary here is what the four legislative bills say:

A09626- Immediately decouple teacher evaluations from test results and direct the Board of Regents to establish a committee to research and develop an alternate, research-based method for teacher evaluations, which will ensure that students and teachers both have better experiences in the classroom.

A09578 – Repeal State Takeover of Failing Schools and put the school reform process back in the hands of local educators, parents, and other stakeholders who are in the best position to understand the specific needs of the school district.

A09584 – Reduce testing by directing the Board of Regents to establish a committee to shorten the length of tests and find ways to increase their transparency. Additionally, tests would be given to students, parents and teachers so that they can be used to improve the manner in which teachers teach and students learn.

A09579 – Create an alternate pathway to graduation by establishing a Career and Practical Education (CPE) pathway to a high school diploma which would provide a valuable alternative for students who do not wish to take – or are unable to pass – the Regents exams. By teaching practical life skills and training students for a career, a CPE pathway will better prepare all New York students for a future following high school.

“As we work towards meaningful changes in our education system, our laws must be corrected to allow for this positive change in direction for our children’s education. This legislation will allow for a move towards research based policies that parents and educators have fought so hard for. The legislature, Board of Regents, and State Education Department, have identified the significant problems that have grown out of misguided education reforms. This legislation is an absolute necessity to right the wrongs of the Education Transformation Act and bring child centered education back to our classrooms.” – Jeanette Deutermann, Long Island parent and leader of Long Island Opt Out.

“What Assemblyman Kaminsky has done here is about our children and something that parents have been advocating for. As a public educator, and parent, I am grateful that he is seeking solutions that are about and for our children. I am calling in all lawmakers to join with Assemblyman Kaminsky in righting a ship that has sailed grossly off course.”
– Marla Kilfoyle, Long Island public education teacher and parent.

“Assemblyman Todd Kaminsky’s bill proposals aim to put children at the center of public education policy. His bills will provide the autonomy and flexible school communities must have to meet the diverse needs of all children, while creating a system that moves away from punitive and draconian policies toward a more nurturing and supportive infrastructure. I strongly support Assemblyman Kaminsky’s Bill proposals.” – Jamaal Bowman, father, and principal of CASA Middle School in the Bronx.

“It is imperative to pass this package of legislation that will reverse the laws that have stolen our classrooms and to make sure every child in New York has access to graduating with a high school diploma.” – Lisa Rudley, Westchester County public school parent and founding member of NYSAPE.

Parents in New York are thrilled by the ascent of Dr. Betty Rosa as Chancellor of the New York Board of Regents.

 

They know that she is knowledgeable, experienced, and sensitive to the needs of children with disabilities and English language learners.

 

They know she has openly supported the parents who opt their children out of state testing that is too long, developmentally inappropriate, and invalid. Whereas the previous chancellor, Merryl Tisch, vocally supported the Common Core and the high-stakes testing, Rosa has made her skepticism clear. Tisch insisted that the state tests provide important information to help children, but parents and teachers know that a score of 1, 2, 3, or 4 is not useful information, nor is it helpful to know what percentile rank your child or student has.

 

Rosa has also actively supported vigorous state action to protect the mostly-minority children of East Ramapo, whose school board is dominated by orthodox Jews whose own children are not in public schools and who have starved the public schools of resources to keep taxes low.

 

“Bravo, Betty,” lohud commenter Teddy Gross said on an article reporting the chancellor-elect’s support for the testing opt-out movement.

 

The chancellor-elect expressed support for opt-out parents, just weeks before the grade 3-8 assessment tests are to begin. Citing her own two, now grown children, Rosa told the Capitol Pressroom radio show that one of her kids found testing stressful. “As a family, we would make a decision about my two children,” she said Tuesday, expressing concern about whether she could be certain that the tests had “an entry point where my child would feel successful with it.”

 

 

While Rosa has criticized both tying teacher evaluations to test scores and Common Core, Tisch championed a rapid-fire implementation of Common Core standards and bought into high-stakes testing. Their backgrounds also couldn’t be more different: Tisch has devoted much time, and family wealth, to civic and philanthropic endeavors; Rosa, the first Latina chancellor, was born in New York City but raised partly in Puerto Rico, and later worked as a teacher and administrator. One overlap: Both have Ivy League Ph.Ds.

 

The state has already made changes to this year’s standardized testing regimen, with shorter tests and unlimited time allowed. The Regents also voted to stop using state test scores for teacher evaluations for the next few years — only data-centric Tisch voted against the move.

 

Who is Betty Rosa? Read her official biography here on the Regents’ website.

 

 

 

A parent in New York asked me to recognize the wisdom and courage of the district’s teachers.

I am glad to do so and to place the Corning Teachers’ Association on the honor roll of this blog for supporting the rights of parents and the interests of students.

 

 

Here is her letter:

 

 

“The Corning Teachers’ Association sent the following position statement to all members. As a parent in the Corning-Painted Post School District, I am grateful for their courage to share facts regarding NYS Grades 3-8 standardized testing.
“The CTA memorandum is an example of what needs to happen across NYS if teachers want REAL change instead of relying on empty promises outlined in the NYSED “tool kits”, flyers, and rhetoric from Commissioner Elia.
“Until there is REAL change in NYS classrooms, the opt outs MUST continue. Teachers supporting parents who are refusing the NYS standardized tests are supporting children and the future of public education.
“Will you please consider posting the CTA Position Statement on your blog? It is with hope that teacher associations in other school districts across NYS will have the courage to do the same.

“THANK YOU for all that you do every day to support children and educators!

“Kind regards,

“Lynn Leonard

“M E M O R A N D U M

 

“TO: Members of the Corning Teachers’ Association
FROM: CTA Executive Council
DATE: March 18, 2016
RE: New York State grades 3-8 Testing Position Statement

“We, the members of the Corning Teachers’ Association believe in academic rigor supported by engagement and the enchantment of learning. We believe that it is our responsibility to provide sound educational practices for our students, and we are to be held accountable to these practices.

 

“We believe that a strong curriculum provides time and resources for social and emotional development, practical skills, project-based and authentic learning opportunities, deep exploration of subject matters as well as a focus on social and cultural concerns. Our ultimate goal is to foster a high-quality public education system that prepares all students for college, careers, citizenship and lifelong learning, thus strengthening our social and economic well-being.

 

“We believe that the large amount of learning time that is lost through administration of these high-stakes test is not what is best for children. Mandated New York State standardized testing is an inadequate, limited and often unreliable measure for student learning. While we acknowledge that the test results are currently not tied to a teacher’s evaluation, teachers are still not given the professional freedom to design or score such tests. The delayed results are not available for use to drive further instruction or give meaningful feedback to the stakeholders.

 

“We believe that New York’s children belong to their families. We support the right of parents and guardians to choose to absent their children from any or all state and federal-mandated testing. We support the right of teachers to discuss freely with parents and guardians their rights and responsibilities with respect to such testing.

 

“The Corning Teachers’ Association will, to the best of its ability, protect and support members who may suffer the negative consequences as a result of speaking about their views of such testing or about the rights and obligations of parents and guardians with respect to such testing.”