Archives for category: Los Angeles

Los Angeles negotiated a sweet deal for Apple, promising to buy an iPad for every student at a cost that will eventually total at least $1 billion.

Forget the fact that the iPads are financed in large part by borrowing money from a 25-year construction bond issue, and that many schools will not get the repairs and upgrades they need.

Forget the fact that the iPads are loaded with Pearson content that is not yet complete.

Forget the fact that Los Angeles agreed to pay more for the iPads than their retail cost.

Forget the fact that the iPads will be obsolete in three years and the Pearson content is licensed for only three years.

Here is the question: How will Los Angeles pay for new iPads in three years? How can it afford to pay for the iPads it just agreed to buy? How will Los Angeles pay to repair its crumbling schools? Where will it find the money to reduce class sizes, some of which are staggering?

And behind it all is a lingering question: If the Common Core testing must be done online, and if every district in California is required to buy computers and establish the necessary bandwidth for Common Core testing, how many billions of dollars will be spent nationally to pay the cost of Common Core testing? If Los Angeles spent $1 billion, what will it cost for the nation?

One begins to understand why the tech corporations are so enthusiastic about Common Core.

 

Los Angeles has decided that the best way to improve the language skills of students who don’t speak English is to segregate them with others who don’t speak Emglish.

A group of 17 principals objected to the plan to segregate English learners, Many teachers also opposed segregating the students by language.

Thousands of educators and parents oppose the new policy. “In recent weeks, a group of southeast L.A. principals have mounted a rare challenge to district policy, teachers have flooded their union office with complaints, and parents have launched protest rallies and petition drives urging L.A. Unified to postpone the class reorganizations until next year.

“Kids with little or no English are going to be segregated and told they’re not good enough for the mainstream,” said Cindy Aranda-Lechuga, a Granada mother of a kindergartner who gathered 162 parent signatures seeking a postponement and spoke against the policy at an L.A. Board of Education meeting last week. “Kids learn from their peers, and they’re not going to be able to do that anymore.”

“Marking the latest chapter in California’s fierce language wars, the furor over class placements for those learning English raises the controversial question of which is more effective: separating students by fluency level or including them in diverse classes. Critics are also upset that the change is coming two months into the school year, after students have bonded with classmates and teachers have developed classroom lessons and routines. Opponents blame the district and local schools for the disruption.

“Although the district adopted segregated classes as official policy for all schools in 2000, it has not been widely practiced or enforced, according to officials from both L.A. Unified and the teachers union.”

But that changed this year. L.A. Unified settled a complaint by the federal Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, which contended that the district had failed to provide adequate services to students learning English.

Katherine Hayes, the district’s chief research scientist, told teachers last week that district data show that students placed in classes with peers of similar language level progress more rapidly toward fluency than those in mixed-level classes. But she added that the question had not been widely studied and more research was needed.

Norm Gold, an independent educational consultant who has worked in the field of English language development for more than 35 years, said that although studies are mixed, they tend to skew toward separating students based on their English ability.

“My experience tells me, in addition to research, that there is an absolute necessity for doing this kind of grouping,” he said — adding, however, that students should be moved in a timely manner to new classes as their fluency improves.

 

Norm Gold, an independent educational consultant who has worked in the field of English language development for more than 35 years, said that although studies are mixed, they tend to skew toward separating students based on their English ability.

“My experience tells me, in addition to research, that there is an absolute necessity for doing this kind of grouping,” he said — adding, however, that students should be moved in a timely manner to new classes as their fluency improves.

The power elites of Los Angeles won again. Read this editorial in the Los Angeles Times. even his strongest supporters are concerned about his ill-planned $1 billion commitment to buy iPads whose content is unfinished.

But to really get the story at ground level, read the comments.

This blogger writes about the well-orchestrated circus at the crucial LAUSD board meeting. This carrying daisies–a symbol of allegiance to the leader–were well represented and gained preference to speak. Who was missing? Teachers and administrators: they were at work. Parents: who cares what they think?

Superintendent John Deasy made a deal to buy an iPad for every student in the district, at a cost of $1 billion.

The money will mostly be drawn from a 25-year construction bond issue approved by the voters on the assumption that the money would be used to repair the city’s schools. The iPads will be obsolete in 2 or 3 years, but voters will be paying the cost for 25 years.

The iPads are loaded with content from Pearson. The license for the Pearson content expires in three years, at which time the district will have obsolete iPads without content.

Meanwhile, as this teacher writes,

“More and more people are realizing that this iPad deal could ultimately bankrupt the district since the general fund is at rock bottom and has left our district with 40-50 kids in a class, no librarians, less counselors and less custodial and office services. The only pot of money big enough to fund the resupply of iPads and updated software is the general fund, and those costs don’t even address the massive numbers of extra support staff and professional development needed to keep the tech project going.”

I am a teacher at LAUSD, and I am extremely disappointed with the LAUSD Board of Education for extending the contract to this abusive, destructive, deceiving superintendent. He truly does not care for the public education of the community he is supposed to serve. Most of the LAUSD teachers and principals, if not all, are aware of this. We see it on a daily basis as his policies and destructive “reform” touches each school community, especially the teachers that have to deal with such destruction of our profession. And by destroying our profession, he is destroying the education of all its students we are to teach. I am, from the bottom of my heart, via your powerful and informative blog, calling on our Union (UTLA) President Warren Fletcher to prepare and organize the teachers and all its members for a STRIKE to demand, first and foremost, an end to this superintendent and all those he placed in leadership positions affecting the teaching profession. We cannot continue to work and suffer this horrible working environment. We need and deserve a true leader who values teaching and learning, not this arrogant and destructive superintendent. I fear that he will continue to destroy many more teaching professionals and students as he has been doing. We teachers need to organize and help to fight to put an end to him as the LAUSD superintendent. ALSO, DIANE, PLEASE, PLEASE, DO NOT PUBLISH MY NAME FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE PUBLISH THIS AS ANONYMOUS.

After days of turmoil–will he or won’t he?–the Los Angeles Times reports that Deasy and the board are negotiating the terms of his resignation.

Maybe.

If it happens, it will be a very soft landing.

Stay tuned.

Dear Board Members,

As you are well aware, friends of Superintendent Deasy in the business community and the charter corporate community plan a massive rally to show you how badly L.A. needs Superintendent Deasy.

Please do not forget that you were elected by the people of Los Angeles to use your own judgment, not to be swayed by billionaires and their minions.

Superintendent Deasy let it be known that he probably would resign. This in retrospect appears to have been a clever ploy to mobilize the corporate leadership that backs him.

I don’t know Superintendent Deasy, so I don’t now judge him as a person.

What I do know about him is that he does not have the support and confidence of those who do the daily work of educating the district’s children.

You cannot be a leader if the troops don’t trust you.

A leader must be able to inspire, encourage, and support those he leads. Superintendent Deasy has not been able to do this.

If he wants to go, let him go.

Do not allow yourselves to be pressured into capitulating.

If you capitulate,  you make yourselves puppets; you place him in charge of the district, and the board becomes an afterthought.

If you allow yourselves to be browbeaten, you will find that John Deasy has become your boss.

This corrupts democracy. The billionaires who tried and failed to buy the elections last spring will have won, even though they lost at the polls.

Time to defend those who elected you.

Benjamin Herold of Education Week has written an excellent overview of the confusion surrounding Los Angeles’ iPad purchase for every student in the district.

The cost–anticipated ultimately to be in excess of $1 billion–is one concern at a time when classes are overcrowded, and many schools are in need of repair, and thousands of teachers were laid off.

The uncertainty about how the iPads will be used, whether at home or in school; the uncertainty about the quality of the Pearson content; the certainty that the license on the Pearson content will expire in three years; the confusion about whether it was proper to divert funding from a 25-year construction bond to purchase tablets…..all of this and more should be closely scrutinized.

Instead, the district and its leadership will be bogged down in an extended discussion of John Deasy’s future; whether he resigned or only threatened to resign; whether the business community and the mayor can prevail; whether Deasy will ultimately make the board powerless by asserting that his power base is stronger than theirs, even though they were elected by the people.

One happy note: Pearson is happy with Los Angeles’ decision to give Pearson control of the content of the iPads.

I hope you can gain access to the article behind Education Week’s paywall. Here is a sample:

But the new software from the publishing giant Pearson that has been rolled out in dozens of schools is nowhere near complete, the Los Angeles Unified School District is unable to say how much it costs, and the district will lose access to content updates, software upgrades, and technical support from Pearson after just three years.

The situation is prompting a new round of questions about an initiative already under withering scrutiny following a series of logistical and security snags.

The Common Core Technology Project, as Los Angeles Unified’s iPad initiative is formally known, is among the first attempts in the country to marry digital devices with a comprehensive digital curriculum from a single vendor. The ambitious effort makes the 651,000-student school system a bellwether for districts seeking a soup-to-nuts solution that implements the new Common Core State Standards, increases students’ access to technology, and moves away from paper textbooks.

“I think it’s the front end of a wave,” said Karen Cator, the CEO of the Washington-based nonprofit Digital Promise and a former director of the U.S. Department of Education’s school technology office.

But just weeks before the Los Angeles school board decides whether to authorize the initiative’s second phase—expected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars—implementation problems related to the new digital curriculum are rearing their head.

Pearson’s Common Core System of Courses, meant to eventually become the district’s primary instructional resource in both math and English/language arts for kindergarten through 12th grade, currently consists of just a few sample lessons per grade, resulting in widespread frustration and confusion among classroom teachers.

In addition, the amount the district is paying to Pearson remains a mystery, leading to increasingly pointed questions from the school system’s divided school board, which called a special meeting to discuss the overall iPad initiative next week.

 

A leading member of the bar and a member of the California Board of Regents is urging the Los Angeles school board to retain Superintendent John Deasy, who recently threatened to resign. The letter was signed by George Kieffer, a Schwarzenegger appointee to the state Board of Regents in 2009. Business leaders are working hard to hold on to Deasy, despite his poor relations with the educators of Los Angeles and the recent iPad fiasco. Even the mayor weighed in to support Deasy.

Clearly, the power structure wants Deasy. And they don’t care what educators think about his leadership.

The letter read:

Dear Members of the Board of Education:

This letter is to inform you of the tremendous sense of disappointment, approaching anger, that the Los Angeles community is feeling today because of the inability of the School Board to develop a plan with Superintendent Deasy to move forward together for the benefit of the students of the Los Angeles Unified School District (“LAUSD”).

LAUSD has seen important gains across the board in student achievement over the last few years. Under LAUSD Superintendent Dr. John Deasy’s leadership, the District has improved student test scores and other student success indicators such as the number of students accessing college preparation courses. It has also seen decreases in student drop-out rates and truancy rates.

The District is embarking on a massive roll out of professional development and technology tools that will prepare teachers and students to implement the new, and highly more rigorous, state education Common Core standards and student assessments. Further tests to Dr. Deasy’s leadership will be presented as the District prepares to develop its Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), as part of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) that was passed by the State Legislature and signed by the Governor earlier this year. The LCFF is a much needed step in the right direction to ensure that all California schools receive equitable funds from the state.

All of these and other important initiatives are crucial to ensure students are succeeding academically and graduating prepared for college and 21st century competitive careers.
We believe that John Deasy has the unique skills and commitment necessary to move the district forward on each of these topics. The leadership of the business community and the non-profit community strongly supports Superintendent Deasy and we encourage the School Board to meet with him immediately to work out a plan to continue his tenure as our Superintendent of Schools.

In the next few months, and for the first time in several years due to an increase in funding, the Board will make critical decisions about the budget and technology programs. It will be very difficult to make good decisions for our children if we do not have a strong and experienced leader in the Superintendent’s office.

Firing Superintendent Deasy, or making his life so miserable that he has no choice but to leave, is not in the best interests of the students of Los Angeles. We urge you to pull the board together and make every effort to retain one of the top Superintendents in the country.

Sincerely,

________________________________
Sent by: Lucy Smith
Secretary to George Kieffer
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP