Archives for category: Indiana

Indiana legislators have passed so much anti-public school legislation this year that they are feeling “reform fatigue.”

Of course, they expanded the state voucher program. That way, as many children as possible can escape going to a community school, even if they are in kindergarten. The good news is that 10 Republican senators voted against the bill, maybe they ere public school graduates and didn’t want to see their school destroyed.

By a narrow vote, they dropped the requirement that superintendents need to be an educator or have a master’s degree. This is called lowering standards.

The House and Senate disagree about Common Core. The Chamber of Commerce strongly supports it.

The most useful thing they did was to toss out Jeb Bush’s beloved A-F report cards, because no one understood what the ratings meant.

When Glenda Ritz took over outgoing Superintendent Tony Bennett’s office, she was surprised to find some very expensive teleconferencing equipment. But it didn’t work, because it was only partially installed.

Turns out that Bennett was so sure of his re-election that he installed a system costing $1.7 million from Cisco. Unfortunately it is incompatible with the current technology.

So all Ritz has is three very elegant blinds.

For $1.7 million.

Wonder how many teachers that might have paid.

Students at Indiana University’s education school will go on strike on April 11 and 12 to protest the excessive and toxic testing in K-12.

As they say in their statement, they are the children of No Child Left Behind.

Read the entirety of their statement.

Here is an excerpt:

“As striking students at Indiana University, we are struggling against the corporatization of our school, lack of diversity on campus, and ever-increasing tuition and fees which are fast making an education here inaccessible to all but the most privileged. As we begin these important conversations here at IU we also recognize their systemic nature. We stand in solidarity with others throughout the nation working to rescue education from those who seek to profit from it. We recognize the bravery and commitment of the teachers, students, and parents in places such as Garfield High School in Seattle and the Project Libertas in Indianapolis, who have taken stands against the absurdities inherent in standardized testing.”

Here is a commentary on the strike in The Nation.

And here is a petition to support the Indiana students.

This came from a teacher in northern Indiana:

Dear Indiana Politician:

I am a public school teacher. I am a breast cancer survivor. I dreamed as a little girl of the day I would be a teacher. I never dreamed as a woman that I would one day be a cancer survivor. So now I am both and proud that I am.

I write to you today as both, for you see there are times these days that my role as an educator are more challenging, more stressful, more worrisome than my days as a cancer patient/survivor. I never ever in my wildest imagination dreamed that I would one day be in a fight for my life. I also never ever dreamed I’d be in the fight of a lifetime to save my students’ joy of learning, my public schools, my profession.

I didn’t just wake up one day, and my lump was there. It had been there all along, undetected. The same holds true for vouchers and their expansion. They have been there all along, mostly undetected. But now, they have metastasized at unparalleled speed.

With my cancer diagnosis I worked closely with my team of doctors, my cancer experts. I always felt as though my input mattered. Together we made sound decisions.
Yet the educational reform (and all that it encompasses) rages across our country out of control without many, if any, educational experts weighing in. Those educational experts valued by teachers are dismissed by those making legislation in favor of individuals with business savvy and big bucks but no expertise—no experience—in the classroom. Why would educators be left out of the decision-making process?

Even clinical trials are observed to see how well they are working. Yet the voucher program expansion of HB 1003 goes unchecked, willy-nilly, into unchartered territory without regard to how it will affect public education, financially or otherwise. What started out as a way to afford impoverished children an educational opportunity they may not otherwise have had seems to have become lost in this whole process. Today voting constituents feel that the focus is more on profit, not students. Communities are no longer buying into the façade that public schools are failing. They are beginning to follow the money.

I have seen how my having cancer affects those around me. I have seen and, sadly, continue to see how the siphoning off of public funds from public schools affects my students, my colleagues, my district, my neighborhood, my community, my city. More choice for students receiving vouchers results in less choice for my students.

The lessons learned as a cancer patient/survivor are plentiful. Perhaps the most important lesson is that I learned not to let the cancer define who I am.

In the same manner I will not allow all that is happening in education define who I am as a teacher. I know what kind of teacher I am, for I hold that belief in my heart. Teaching is much more than my career; it is my passion. Everyday I enter my classroom believing I am a master teacher, for if I didn’t hold true to that claim, I shouldn’t be there.

Even more importantly, I refuse to let all that is happening in education define my students, my school, my district, my community. My students have so much potential. My students’ lives are more complicated than I can ever begin to imagine. They overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles and are successful because they meet their challenges. If you could see my students, you would know what I mean.

It is time to exam how well the voucher program in place is working before expanding it even further. Every dollar diverted from public schools is another blow to public education upon which this great country of ours is founded. When public school funding is lost, my students lose out! It is not a fair and level playing field. When public schools lose, we all lose. The public is becoming aware of the injustice of what is happening to their public schools and their students.

My physicians saved my life. Be a Hoosier politician who saves public education—not one who dismantles and helps privatize it. Give all students the same educational opportunities. Our future, our democracy, depends on public schools. It’s time to bring back the joy of learning for all students! I applaud those of you who have taken a stand in support of public education even it has meant that you must face the ire of your political party. I know that can’t be easy.

Please vote NO! on HB 1003. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once stated, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Thank you,

Donna Roof

In Indiana, new legislation would offer vouchers to children who never attended a public school. This eliminates the fiction that vouchers are going to “save children from failing schools.”

This is a message from Julian Smith in Induana. He offers a sample letter. Or, write your own.

Subject: Fwd: Two Minute Task #8 HB 1003 Vouchers

As you are probably aware, HB1003 will be coming to the Senate floor for a vote next week.

This is a battle we can and must win. These guys may want a reason to vote no, and blitzing them with a compelling thought may make a difference if we do this together, share with others, and ask them to do the same. The contacts, meetings, and emails have already had positive effects. Let’s keep the pressure on right up to the vote.

Feel free to copy and paste if you’d like, but please make sure they hear from you and anyone you know that has an interest in saving our public schools. It may be more effective to copy/paste to each senator individually, so they don’t see a big group of senators in the address line and realize that they have been targeted.

Miller s24@in.gov
Bray s37@in.gov
Crider s28@in.gov
Steele s44@in.gov
Waltz s36@in.gov
Hershman s7@in.gov
Delph s29@in.gov
Leising s42@in.gov

Dear Senator ____________________,

I’m writing because I oppose HB1003 and the further expansion of the voucher program. If enacted it will have serious negative effects for public schools. I would remind you that the way this was originally packaged and promoted to the Senate was with the understanding that “public schools would have the first shot”, Gov. Daniel’s words, and as a savings to the state. Offering vouchers to children that have never been counted in public schools amounts to a new expense to the state and reduces dollars available to already struggling to catch up traditional public schools.

We have yet to establish whether or not the program is producing any benefit, as some students initially utilizing a voucher have returned to a traditional public school. Accelerating the program at this point does not make sense. Let’s slow down and first evaluate the program we now have in place.

Thank you,

(Sign your name)

Click send

Copy/ Paste/Repeat

Senator Grooms s46@in.gov has already gone on record as opposed. You might send him a quick thank you to help insure he doesn’t have a change of heart.

Back in the early 1990s, when the charter school idea first began to spread, there was a simple way of explaining the concept. The charter schools would be accountable for results. If they didn’t get the results, they would close. Period. The deal was called “accountability in exchange for results.” Advocates said it was impossible to close a public school that didn’t get results, but it would be easy to close a charter school.

This is not the way things are working out.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel recently announced the closing of 54 public schools in Chicago. Mayor Bloomberg has closed well over 100 public schools. Parents, students, and teachers have objected loudly, but they are routinely ignored.

As Karen Francisco reports in the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette, it is not easy to close charter schools. One authorizer realizes they are failing to deliver results and withdraws sponsorship, and the charter schools goes shopping and finds another sponsor. These, she says, are “zombie schools.” They are failing but they will not die. They refuse accountability, but some other sponsor picks them up.

It turns out to be easy to close public schools; the mayors don’t care what poor black and Hispanic parents say. But it is hard to close charter schools because they have powerful political friends and campaign contributors.

 

 

 

 

http://www.jg.net/article/20130402/BLOGS13/130409943

This is a very interesting read about how Finns think about education.

They think about education, not just schooling. They think about how different institutions interact to shape young people. As Lawrence Cremin (my mentor and the author’s) taught, education is a network of institutions.

Finns care about equality, not as an abstraction but a reality. They make sure that everyone has health care and education. Teachers are highly respected. And they don’t understand our obsession with choice.

This is a good read.

This is a thoughtful analysis of the dreadful voucher decision in Indiana yesterday.

It says, “The plaintiffs in the voucher case alleged the program violates three sections of the Indiana Constitution: Article 8, Section 1, which requires a “general and uniform system of Common Schools”; Article 1, Section 4, which says citizens can’t be forced to support a place of worship or ministry; and Article 1, Section 6, which forbids spending state money to support a “religious or theological institution.”

In a 5-0 decision, the state court rejected their case.

The schools getting the vouchers may require students to participate in religious exercise, and they typically do.

The schools getting vouchers may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national origin, “But they are free to discriminate on the basis of religion, gender, disability, sexual orientation, test scores, IQ, family income, parental politics or just about any other criteria you can imagine.”

It is hard to square this decision with the language of the state constitution.

The radical choice ideologues in Indiana don’t like public education. Left in power, they will destroy it.

Indiana voters booted out State superintendent Tony Bennett because of a strange coalition: Democrats who disliked his all-out assault on teachers and public education, allied with Republicans who disliked his fierce advocacy for the Common Core.

Now the struggle against the Common Core continues in that state, as advocates like the rightwing Stand for Children run an advertising campaign to support the actionable standards, while locals continue to oppose them.

John Stoffel went to his school board in Indiana and delivered this message. Would you do the same in your district?

 

Stoffel said:

 

A little over two months ago, tragedy unfolded at Sandy Hook Elementary.  By the next school day, my school had safeguarded every reasonable security measure.  Today, our district is still hammering out policy to best ensure our children’s safety.

In years of teaching elementary here, I have always believed our children are nestled safely inside the walls of our schools.  However, this year I have become greatly concerned that, while physically safe, we are suffocating each child’s innate curiosity and natural love of learning through excessive, high-stakes testing.

This exponential growth of high stakes testing has created a frenetic, stressful, and wasteful environment that is not conducive to learning.  For example, my students took two hours of interim, predictive tests over the last two weeks. By the time we get results and remediation could occur, the ISTEP applied skills testing window will already be upon us.  Further, even if remediation was possible, no research supports interim, predictive tests, except research done by the vendors who sell them. 

In fact, with the feverish pace we have started assessing our students; we have actually ignored sound research that the testing is harmful.

Last week I had to administer to students a test of 40, multi-digit multiplication problems which were to be attempted in one minute.  Brain research shows that these math tests actually result in the altering of neurological pathways as a protective avoidance to stressful, mathematical problems, even later in real life applications.  Still, the need to collect data trumped the maxim: “First, do no harm.”

Perhaps even more demoralizing, as a teacher, is that excessive testing has spirited-away the ability to meet the needs of the whole child.  Recess has been cut to a bare minimum.  Most social studies and science has been axed. Classroom meetings and current events have gone extinct.  Even reading aloud to students, with all its richness in virtue, cannot fit in to the demand of many testing or test-prep days.

Last fall, my school received a “D” rating from then State Superintendent Tony Bennett.   No one in Bennett’s Department of Education (DOE) could explain exactly how our school received a “D”.  Now, everyone from the statehouse to current State Superintendent Glenda Ritz has expressed the A-F grading system is flawed.

I have voiced my concern about the current educational practices to which our grade of a “D” has led. I have been told our school still must show evidence to the state that we are attempting interventions to improve ISTEP scores.

Under those same pretenses, then, let me ask this:

Can you imagine a doctor diagnoses your child with cancer, though he has no evidence, then recommends and demands immediate, intense chemotherapy? Can you imagine being forced to purposely intervene with toxins to slowly poison your child even though you know the diagnosis is wrong?

Now, back to my school – how are we attempting to “cure” our “D” letter grade from the state? More testing.  More data-analysis.  As a teacher, let me assure you these interventions are toxic.

Current State Superintendent Glenda Ritz must adhere to the detrimental laws put in the books during Tony Bennett’s regime.  She has asked current legislators to rework these laws to makes schools accountable in a manner that supports, not forsakes, or schools.

Let me conclude with handing you a copy of a Resolution on High-Stakes testing, which appeals for a drastic reduction to high-stakes testing.  I would appreciate our school board’s consideration of such a resolution at some future date to send a message to legislators to work with our current state superintendent.  This would serve as the beginning point to eliminating all unnecessary testing as a means to improve our schools.

 

Thank you.