Archives for category: Education Reform

Today, the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee will consider the nomination of Betsy DeVos as U.S. Secretary of Education. DeVos and her family have devoted many millions of dollars to destroying public schools and turning the clock back by more than a century. She wants the government to pay tuition at religious schools, voucher schools, for-profit schools, any alternative to public schools is her goal.

 

American public education is one of the essential institutions of our democratic society. The guarantee to everyone in this country that they could attend a free public school was a hard-fought victory. First, it required persuading the public to tax themselves to pay for schools for the children of the community. Second, it required separating the schools from religious institutions, which had long been the source of education. Third, it meant expanding access to all: to boys and girls, to children of all races and cultures, to children whose first language was not English, and to children with disabilities.

 

None of of these changes came easily.

 

And the struggle to provide good schools is ongoing, since so many states base school funding on property taxes, which privileges those who are already advantaged.

 

DeVos is ignorant of the history of public education in America and the role of public schools in our society. Her hostility to public schools should disqualify her from consideration for this position.

 

 

img_3801

 

 

Here are the eight richest men in the world. 

 

They have as much money as the bottom half of all those in the world.

 

Whats wrong with with this picture?

 

Whats wrong with our our tax structure?

 

 

Jaime Franchi of the Long Island Press shared with me this engaging blend of audio, video, and music, all about the life of Dr. King. She says it was inspired by hip hop and “Hamilton.”

 

Watch and listen.

Just when I thought I had read everything I needed to know about the DeVos family, along comes this brilliant investigative article by Zack Stanton of Politico. Stanton shows how powerful the DeVos family is, how it works as a tightly coordinated unit, and how it uses its vast wealth to smash the union movement, force school privatization, control the Republican Party in Michigan, and extend its reach to Louisiana, Indiana, Wisconsin, New Jersey, and other states.

 

The DeVos family, along with the Koch brothers, are the epitome of dark money, the spawn of Citizens United, which removed limits on political spending, enabling billionaires to buy state legislatures.

 

Dick DeVos ran for the governorship and lost in 2006. The family learned that it was better to work behind the scenes.

 

“Thanks to the DeVoses, Michigan’s charter schools enjoy a virtually unregulated existence. Thanks to them, too, the center of the American automotive industry and birthplace of the modern labor movement is now a right-to-work state. They’ve funded campaigns to elect state legislators, established advocacy organizations to lobby them, buttressed their allies and primaried those they disagree with, spending at least $100 million on political campaigns and causes over the past 20 years. “The DeVos family has been far more successful not having the governor’s seat than if they had won it,” says Richard Czuba, the owner of the Glengariff Group, a bipartisan polling firm in Michigan. “They have, to some degree, created a shadow state party. And it’s been pretty darn effective.”

 

“Buoyed by the success in Michigan, the DeVoses have exported a scaled-down version of that template into other states, funding an archipelago of local political action committees and advocacy organizations to ease the proliferation of charter schools in Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Iowa, Virginia and Louisiana, among others. At the same time, DeVos-backed PACs have transformed the nature of American political campaigns. By showing the success of independent PACs that answered to a few deep-pocketed donors rather than a broad number of stakeholders associated with a union or chamber of commerce, for instance, the DeVoses precipitated the monsoon of independent expenditures that has rained down upon politicians for the past decade. In the process, they’ve reshaped political campaigns as well as the policies that result from them.

 

“Ten years after she watched her husband give a concession speech, Betsy DeVos was unveiled as President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for secretary of education. Across the country, public-school advocates and teachers’ unions expressed almost unanimous horror: One of the most effective advocates for breaking down the rules and protections for public schools and teachers would soon be the nation’s most powerful education policymaker.

 

“But people who’ve been watching the DeVoses closely knew they were seeing something else as well: One of the nation’s most ambitious, disruptive and downright unusual political families finally had a seat in Washington….

 

“The DeVos family is Dutch, thoroughly so. All four of Richard DeVos’ grandparents emigrated from the Netherlands, and today, the family continues to observe the tenets of the Christian Reformed Church, a Calvinist denomination. Calvinism believes that God has decided our souls’ fates before we are born, assigning them to heaven or hell. It is a duty of practitioners to show their faith in God’s plan by displaying self-confidence, as though they know they have been chosen for blessings in the afterlife. One way to display this confidence is through entrepreneurship (one of the bedrock texts of sociology, Max Weber’s 1905 Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, is expressly about the link between Calvinism and economic success)….

 

“Across those efforts, one constant is the DeVos family’s devout Christian beliefs, and the indivisibility they see between Christian and Calvinistic notions and their conservative politics. “The real strength of America is its religious tradition,” Richard DeVos wrote in Believe!. “Too many people today are willing to act as if God had nothing whatsoever to do with it. … This country was built on a religious heritage, and we’d better get back to it. We had better start telling people that faith in God is the real strength of America!” In the mid-1970s, DeVos made major donations to the Christian Freedom Foundation and Third Century Publishers, an outlet that printed books and pamphlets designed to strengthen the ties between Christianity and free-market conservatism; among those products was a guidebook instructing conservative Christians how to win elections and help America become “as it was when first founded—a ‘Christian Republic.

 

“Though they aren’t quite as large or wealthy as the DeVoses, the Prince family—even further west, in Holland, Michigan—shares one big trait in common with their in-laws: the idea that patriotism and politics are inseparable from Christianity. Elsa Prince Broekhuizen, Betsy’s mother, donated $75,000 to the successful 2004 ballot measure to ban same-sex marriage in Michigan; four years later, she gave $450,000 to an identical initiative in California. Betsy’s brother, Erik Prince, founded Blackwater, the military contractor that gained notoriety in 2007, when its employees fired into a crowd of Iraqi civilians, killing 17. (In 2009, two former Blackwater employees alleged in federal court that Prince “views himself as a Christian crusader.”)

 

“Throughout his adult life, Betsy’s father, Ed, donated handsomely to two religious colleges in Michigan, Hope and Calvin, the latter being his wife’s beloved alma mater in Grand Rapids. But his most important contribution—one that has shaped much of the past three decades of conservative politics—came in 1988, when Prince donated millions in seed funding to launch the Family Research Council, the conservative Christian group that became one of the most potent political forces on the religious right. “Ed Prince was not an empire builder,” Family Research Council President Gary Bauer wrote to supporters after Prince’s sudden death in 1995. “He was a Kingdom builder.”

 

“In the 1960s and ’70s, Ed and Elsa Prince advanced God’s Kingdom from the end of a cul-de-sac just a few miles from Lake Michigan. There, they taught their four children—Elisabeth (Betsy), Eileen, Emilie and Erik—a deeply religious, conservative, free-market view of the world, emphasizing the importance of self-reliance and sending them to private schools that would reinforce the values they celebrated at home, small-government conservatism chief among them….

 

“When Dick and Betsy DeVos are asked why they’ve chosen to mount a personal crusade for education reform, they often cite their family’s charitable giving, which puts them into contact with scholarship applicants. For years, the DeVoses read reams of personal essays filled with wrenching stories of dire finances and an abiding hope in the transformative impact of education. Those stories, the DeVoses have said, made it clear that something had to change.

 

“But there’s another reason why Dick and Betsy DeVos want to change America’s schools. They see it as the literal battleground for making a more Christian, God-centered society.

 

“In 2001, Betsy DeVos spoke at “The Gathering,” an annual meeting of some of America’s wealthiest Christians. There, she told her fellow believers about the animating force behind her education-reform campaigning, referencing the biblical battlefield where the Israelites fought the Philistines: “It goes back to what I mentioned, the concept of really being active in the Shephelah of our culture—to impact our culture in ways that are not the traditional funding-the-Christian-organization route, but that really may have greater Kingdom gain in the long run by changing the way we approach things—in this case, the system of education in the country.”

 

“Dick DeVos, on stage with his wife, echoed her sentiments with a lament of his own. “The church—which ought to be, in our view, far more central to the life of the community—has been displaced by the public school,” Dick DeVos said. “We just can think of no better way to rebuild our families and our communities than to have that circle of church and school and family much more tightly focused and built on a consistent worldview.”

 

Folks, if Betsy DeVos is confirmed, which is likely, we will have a major battle on our hands to protect public education and to maintain a separation of church and state. She is not a normal candidate for Secretary of Education. She is a religious zealot and a radical extremist. She will speak of her admiration for all successful schools, including public schools, but don’t believe it. She is a determined foe of public education.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valerie Strauss writes today that Trump heaped scorn on Jeb Bush during the primaries, but Jeb is the big winner in Trump education policy. Betsy DeVos is a close friend of Jeb and was a member of Jeb’s board. Jeb promotes charters, vouchers, digital learning, and Common Core. The person likely to be appointed as DeVos’ guide to policy issues is Hanna Skandera, who worked closely with and for Jeb and is now State Commissioner of Education in New Mexico. Skandera is an enthusiastic supporter of the Common Core, as are all of those slated to lead the Department.

 

“Bush as much as anyone led the corporate school reform movement — treating public schools as if they were for-profit businesses — turning Florida into a testing ground when he became governor of the state in 1999. He created a “Florida Formula” of schools reforms that became a model for other states, including state “report cards” that assign letter grades to schools based largely on test scores and widespread school choice right after he became governor of Florida in 1999.”

 

Jeb says public schools are government monopolies and he has led the campaign to smash the monopoly.

 

 

Last spring, Salon published an article by Kali Holloway about Campbell Brown and her transition from news anchor to “education reformer” and “charter propagandist.” The article was posted before California’s highest court threw out the Vergara case, whose plaintiffs claimed that teacher tenure was racially discriminatory. It also was posted before a judge in Minnesota tossed out Campbell Brown’s copycat effort to kill teacher tenure in that state.

 

Nonetheless, the article accurately depicts Campbell Brown’s contempt for public schools, teachers unions, and teachers. Facebook announced that it plans to hire her as its face to the news media. It is important to know her low opinion of public education, a basic democratic institution, and the people who work to educate our children. As the article shows, Brown did not want to disclose the funders of her website, The 74, claiming that they might be harassed (as if!).

 

The article says The 74 is funded by: The Dick and Betsy DeVos Family Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Jonathan Sackler (of OxyContin producer Purdue Pharma) and the Walton Family Foundation.

 

 

Leonie Haimson reports at the NYC Parents Blog that more than 2,000 parents and educators signed a petition calling on Mark Zuckerberg not to hire Campbell Brown because of her hostility to public schools and their teachers. Zuckerberg’s wife Priscilla Chan has often credited the public schools she attended and her teachers for her success in school and in life. Perhaps Mark Z. could talk to his wife about this important matter.

 

In addition, if you open the link, you will read the letter than Lily Eskelsen Garcia, president of the NEA, wrote to Mark Zuckerberg on the same topic.

 

The petition, which to date has 2045 signatures, says:
Mr. Zuckerberg:

 

Campbell Brown is the last person you should hire to head the Facebook news team if youwant to combat the damaging proliferation of fake news. She has relentlessly promoted the corporate takeover of education through her various organizations, and attacked public schools and public school teachers at every turn, by spreading misinformation. She is also extremely close to Donald Trump’s controversial appointee to head the Department ofEducation, Betsy DeVos, and has received funding from her. We urge you to hire a journalist instead who is trustworthy, non-partisan and objective — that is, if you want to ensure that Facebook becomes a respected outlet for real news rather than fake news in the future.

 

The petition is followed by the names and comments of those who signed. You can add your name too.

 

 

 

 

Our reader Greg B offers the following history lesson:

 

 

Republicans should revise Cato’s admonition “Carthago delenda est” (Carthage must be destroyed) to “Obama delenda est” and make it their party’s motto. Two points, one aside, and one comment:
My family has been self-insured for the past 18 years and our annual premiums went down by more than $18,000 in the first year of the Affordable Care Act and we got better insurance. In my experience, its most virulent opponents know nothing about it. I’ve also found that some who get their insurance through the ACA don’t realize that it IS Obamacare. Yesterday I saw a post on the Crooks and Liars website listing some tweets confirming this including: “I’m not on Obamacare. My health insurance is through the ACA (Affordable Care Act), which was what they had to come up with after Obamacare crashed and burned as bad as it did. So I’m gonna be fine.”

 

(As an aside, I think the President’s decision to embrace the term “Obamacare”—I do not use this term at all—was a great strategic blunder. It unnecessarily personalized and politicized a seminal public policy issue. Consider, as David McCullough describes in his biography of Harry Truman, that Truman expressly wanted his idea to be called the Marshall Plan. He knew that attaching his name to it could be politically toxic and therefore convinced George Marshall, whose reputation among Republicans and Democrats alike was impeccable, to allow his name to be used for the policy. Or, think about who much more difficult, in the early days, it would have been to institutionalize Social Security had it been called Roosevelt Social Insurance.)
Secondly, I suspect, especially after Donald’s (we should no longer refer to him by his last name, it drives him crazy) “presser” yesterday when he said “repeal and replace” of the ACA would take place simultaneously, that his endgame strategy is one of rebranding, not reforming or changing. Just as he licenses his name to make most of his money, he will, I strongly believe, do all he can to do the same with public policy. Much has been written about the coming age of kleptocracy he will bring. The most valuable asset he can bequeath his children is his name with the added value of the cachet of the presidency. In order to increase its value, Donald will unconsciously (because I’m sure he has no idea who Cato or what Carthage was) follow Cato’s dictum with respect to the Obama legacy. Much like the Stalin-esque practice of scrubbing history of facts, his rewriting of history will focus on eliminating as many traces of anything that goes counter to his desired narrative and rewrite past history to inform the future.

 

When I was a government teacher in the 1980s, the Cold War guided foreign policy and our greatest fear was nuclear war with the Soviet Union, I spent time teaching about Stalin, using Orwell’s “Animal Farm” as a text to explain to students that the scrubbing of history and desecration of language of was just as great a threat as the Soviet bloc military threats posed. For the final exam, I used the opening page of Milan Kundera’s novel “The Book of Laughter and Forgetting” to ask the students to write an essay comparing the passage with what we had learned over the past semester. I share it here because I think it speaks to a central tenet of Trumpism, which, sadly has many echoes in the dark ages of Stalin:

 

“In February 1948, Communist leader Klement Gottwald stepped out on the balcony of a Baroque palace in Prague to address the hundreds and thousands of his fellow citizens packed into Old Town Square. It was a crucial moment in Czech history—a fateful moment of the kind that occurs once or twice in a millennium.

 

“Gottwald was flanked by his comrades, with Clementis standing next to him. There were snow flurries, it was cold, and Gottwald was bareheaded. The solicitous Clemintis took off his own fur cap and set it on Gottwald’s head.

 

“The Party propaganda section put out hundreds of thousands of copies of a photograph of that balcony with Gottwald, a fur cap on his head and comrades at his side, speaking to the nation. On that balcony the history of Communist Czechoslovakia was born. Every child knew the photograph from posters, schoolbooks, and museums.

 

“Four years later,” however, “Clementis was charged with treason and hanged. The propaganda section immediately airbrushed him out of history and, obviously, out of all the photographs as well. Ever since, Gottwald has stood on that balcony alone. Where Clementis once stood, there is only a bare palace wall. All that remains of Clementis is the cap on Gottwald’s head.”

 

It is chilling to think that a relic of history in 1948 is as relevant today, in 2017, as it was then. The fate of the Affordable Care Act is about more than health care.

Just in from  law professor Zephyr Teachout:

 

Diane:

 

Donald Trump is not selling his businesses. Therefore, he will be violating the foreign bribery/emoluments clause of the Constitution.

 

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 specifically prohibits anyone holding office in our government to receive either “emoluments” or gifts from foreign states. Emoluments, in this part of the Constitution, means “payments.”

 

Trump’s lawyer, during today’s press conference, misinterpreted the plain meaning of the emoluments clause of the Constitution in a way that makes the phrase “emoluments” equivalent to “gifts” and therefore superfluous.

 

We have no reason to trust Trump on this. A bribe from Kings Louis XIV to Charles II for war neutrality between their countries was uncovered by parliamentary investigation, and the same will be required here: Congress must exercise its basic Constitutional responsibility and refuse Trump’s ability to accept any foreign payments absent full disclosure, review, and approval.

 

Thousands of people signed our petition yesterday to support Elizabeth Warren’s new bill to take on presidential financial corruption. Now we need to call Congress and ask our representatives what they’re going to do about Trump’s violations of the emoluments clause of the Constitution.

 

Can you call your Member of Congress and ask them what they’re going to do about Trump’s financial conflicts of interest?

 

 

 

Until now, it has been customary for those elected president of the United States to divest himself of his assets or put them into a blind trust, overseen by an independent person. This guaranteed that the president’s actions would never have any financial benefit to himself or his family.

 

The president is also expected not to hire any member of his family for any position. This is a matter of law. The law was passed after John F. Kennedy named his brother Robert as Attirney General.

 

Donald Trump’s unusual family business empire challenges these understandings, policies, and laws. His holdings and deals are worldwide. His son-in-law Jared Kushner also has an international business empire. In the absence of full disclosure, it is impossible to know to what extent their business interests are mixed up with policy decisions or to what extent they have separated from their business empires.

 

John Cassidy of the New Yorker has tried to sift through the issues. 

 

It is worth reading.