Archives for category: Education Reform

The Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University issued the following statement:

We at the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University denounce the continuous assault by the Trump administration on the communities that we are committed and dedicated to serve. We reject the harmful actions of President Trump’s divisive policies and hateful rhetoric, which are in direct conflict with our mission – to develop, share, and act on knowledge that improves the conditions and outcomes of schooling in America, especially in communities of color and schools serving children historically marginalized by inequitable systems – and our four guiding principles: “results matter,” “equity matters,” “communities matter,” and “learning matters.”

We join a long list of organizations, individuals, and entities that have taken unwavering positions against President Trump’s direct attacks against democracy and human decency and have resisted rhetoric that has caused deeper divisions of fear and anxiety against some of our country’s most vulnerable communities. President Trump has signed a set of executive orders laced with xenophobia and rooted in lies and misrepresentations that only serve to intensify fear, anxiety, and hatred towards the undocumented population, Muslims, the transgender community, and other targeted groups.

Refugees and immigrants – documented and undocumented – and their children belong to our communities. They are students, parents, teachers, volunteers, interpreters, home-school liaisons, day care owners, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, after-school providers, district administrators, school board members, city councilors. They are activists who lead campaigns to make our schools work better for everyone.

These executive orders were designed to destabilize our communities and incite fear, and they directly interfere with the work of schools, school systems, and the community-based organizations that help young people thrive. The communities that we work with have seen increases in bigotry and discrimination. Some of our parent leaders are afraid to travel to attend meetings and trainings. Families are no longer seeking out services – and even keeping their children out of school – because they fear Immigrant and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. Children are grappling with the trauma of being separated from their parents and other family members.

Children who are not in school because of the fear ICE has imposed on their families cannot learn. ICE raids on homes and near schools make it increasingly unsafe for parents to attend school meetings and events or speak out on behalf of their children. This disenfranchises our parents as full partners in schools – when we know that deep family engagement is crucial for strong schools and strong communities. Teachers cannot teach and fully attend to their students’ trauma and anxiety at the same time. The increases in racist, xenophobic, homophobic, anti-Semitic, and Islamophobic bullying and hate speech – which are a direct result of this administration’s rhetoric and policies – poison school cultures and threaten many students beyond those directly impacted by the orders. Schools, districts, and community organizations are spending valuable time and resources to protect students and families at the expense of their work to expand opportunity and improve education.

Therefore, we condemn this administration’s rhetoric and policies that have harmed and will continue to harm so many people in the communities we work with, and we commit to remain vigilant to oppose any future hateful and hurtful policies. We will continue to work with our partners and allies to resist these policies wherever they are implemented, and to help make schools safe havens from hate and xenophobia.

The Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
March 15, 2017

The Washington Post has some of the details of the DeVos-Trump budget for the U.S. Department of Education. It is a bloodbath for public schools and teacher education, and a bonanza for school choice and privatization.


“The Trump administration is seeking to cut $9.2 billion — or 13.5 percent — from the Education Department’s budget, a dramatic downsizing that would reduce or eliminate grants for teacher training, after-school programs and aid to low-income and first-generation college students.

Along with the cuts, among the steepest the agency has ever sustained, the administration is also proposing to shift $1.4 billion toward one of President Trump’s key priorities: Expanding charter schools, private-school vouchers and other alternatives to traditional public schools. His $59 billion education budget for 2018 would include an unprecedented federal investment in such “school choice” initiatives, signaling a push to reshape K-12 education in America.

The president is proposing a $168 million increase for charter schools — 50 percent above the current level — and a new $250 million private-school choice program, which would probably provide vouchers for families to use at private or parochial schools. Vouchers are one of the most polarizing issues in education, drawing fierce resistance from Democrats and some Republicans, particularly those in rural states.

Trump also wants an additional $1 billion for Title I, a $15 billion grant program for schools with high concentrations of poor children. The new funds would be used to encourage districts to adopt a controversial form of choice: Allowing local, state and federal funds to follow children to whichever public school they choose.

That policy, known as “portability,” was rejected in the Republican-led Senate during deliberations over the main K-12 education law in 2015. Many Democrats see portability as the first step toward federal vouchers for private schools and argue that it would siphon dollars from schools with high poverty and profound needs to those in more affluent neighborhoods.”

Trump’s newest, latest, revised travel ban was blocked by a federal judge in Hawaii.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Latest Travel Ban Nationwide – The New York Times
https://apple.news/A7jUmVo8QQayXR9s-5i5dQw

John Oliver breaks all my blog rules about cussing, but I forgive him because he explains things so clearly.

In this episode, he explains the Republican effort to replace Obamacare with Trumpcare.

It is a complicated subject, but he makes it comprehensible while being very funny.

Fox News reports that Trump voters will face large increases in the cost of medical coverage under the plan proposed by Trump and the GOP.


Raising a political problem as much as a financial one, newly released budget estimates show elderly Americans could be hit hard by premium hikes under Republicans’ ObamaCare repeal bill — affecting a key constituency for President Trump.

The Congressional Budget Office report released Monday shows 64-year olds making $26,500 would see premiums increase by an estimated 750 percent by 2026.

Under current law, they pay $1,700. But according to CBO projections, under the new bill, this group would have to pay almost $14,600—more than half their income.

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney pushed back Tuesday when asked about a Politico report suggesting the “clear losers” of the American Health Care Act would be Trump voters between the ages of 50 and 64, right below the Medicare eligibility age of 65.

The AARP disagreees with Mulvaney.

Angie Sullivan teaches first- and second-grade students in a Title 1 school in Carson County, Nevada. She sends her email reports to legislators and journalists. She is the conscience of Nevada.

She writes:


Attached is a report I put together in an attempt to review what data I could find on Nevada Connections Academy.

I did include some research on the parent corporation also for background which may or may not give you insight into the Nevada Connections Academy.

Opened in 2007 – Nevada Connections has never been successful.

Ten years later the Nevada Charter Authority is attempting to shut down this charter because of poor graduation rates.

Ten years.

I have been studying this information for months and have yet to see any accountability by Nevada Charters. Claims that they can be closed are not backed by real evidence. Nevada Charters close due to bankruptcy and fraud. They do not close due to severe and consistent academic under-performance.

As you review the data – you will notice that in most years and most grade levels half or more of the students are failing.

Graduation rates have been abysmal.

If I am reading the hard to understand reports correctly, in 2016 Nevada most likely paid $6,000 X 2400 = $14,400,000 to Nevada Connections Academy for High School Seniors and 40% or 914 graduated.

Total enrollment in Nevada Connections Academy was report at 2,851. Overall the Nevada Tax Payer spend $17,106,000 for less than half its students to be proficient.

The school also has a swinging door with half its students turning over. Due to lack of regulation and oversight – plus the “missing” students every year at testing time – I have to ask if the Nevada Tax Payer is paying for students not even in the program any longer.

nevada graph

Understandably parents and students do not want their charter school to close.

Parent and students do not want my public school to close either. Yet, I am held accountable. My school can be turned around or taken over by the Achievement School District. This failing charter has been doing poorly for 10 years and what has happened?

Nothing.

Parent and students base their “choice” of school on things other than standardized testing and numbers. I understand this very well. And they will protest if this school is closed. However, I am using this an example which is fairly similar to half of Nevada’s Charters which are on the lowest performing list.

Half of Nevada’s charters are on the lowest performing list. The worst graduation rates in the state are in the State Public Charter School System.

This charter is one of many in Nevada not doing well.

Half of Nevada’s charters are on the lowest performing list.

Parents need access to charter information at the same level public schools are required to give information to parents. In an annual report published on-line. Charters which spend on marketing to produce enrollment numbers need to be giving their data and graduation rate information to student prior to enrollment. No one should have to dig around in the Nevada Report Card for a month to try to determine if a school is academically achieving. If these charters are actually serving students not expected to graduate – if they are alternative schools – they should tell parents up-front the likelihood of graduating from these schools.

Charters need to be audited. Public schools have the SAGE Commission. Charters should have a similiar body which looks at return on investment and other financial measures.

I just attempted to watch an audit or something like an audit on-line from the charter authority.

https://manage.lifesizecloud.com/#/publicvideo/975a6334-1f01-4734-9678-cc6042d30f29?vcpubtoken=2021a45f-3957-40df-97a4-8cc8d9196bdb

Besides cheerleading for charters – I’m not sure the audit produced much information. It certainly did not expose anything I have discovered in the last few months. Watch the video for yourself and ask yourself if the Nevada Charter Authority is able to hold any of Nevada’s Charters accountable with the information presented.

Due process is the reason charters are not closing?

Perhaps there is simply zero political appetite to close a perpetually failing charter?

While charters may protest accountability in the name of freedom and choice. . . this needs to be balanced by accountability to the tax payer who pays the bills.

It is not fair to have a strict accountability system for public systems while charters are allowed to run amuck in the state of Nevada.

The unfairness of a legislated system that turns public schools into charters but does nothing about all the failing charters spending million in tax payer money in the state – is foul.

The Nevada Charter System is a failing school system in the state. That is clear according the data.

If Nevada Connections cannot be closed after 10 years of failure, which charter will ever be held accountable?

Angie

See the whole report here.

Recently Trump and DeVos gushed over the Florida tax credit voucher program and featured a graduate of one student who graduated from a voucher school.

This inspired Mercedes Schneider to look at the academic record of Florida’s voucher schools. It is not impressive.

Voucher schools are supposed to save students from failing schools. But most of the state’s voucher students do not come from F-rated schools or even D-rated schools. Most come from schools rated A, B, or C.

She looked at the school that produced the young woman who attended Trump’s first address to Congress. She is surely a fine young woman but her school is not. It is certainly no model of success.

She writes:

“Let us consider the gain scores of Esprit de Corps Center for Learning, the school that Denisha Merriweather attended via tax credit.

“In 2014-15 , 44 students completed assessments that produced gain scores. (The researchers cautioned about the stability of gain score results when the number of students tested is below 30. Thus, Esprit de Corps meets the 30+ test-taker condition.)

“In 2014-15, Esprit de Corps’ average gain score was -3.66 national percentile ranking points in reading and -13.52 in math.

Its average gain score from 2012-13 to 2014-15 (three years) was -0.65 national percentile ranking points in reading and -2.69 in math.

“In an effort to obtain more information on Esprit de Corps’ math gain score history, I consulted a few more FTC reports from previous years.

“According to the 2013-14 FTC report, Esprit de Corps fared better in 2013-14: 0.03 in reading (remember, a zero gain is right at the national average) and 6.9 in math (calculations based on 43 student assessments). However, its three-year average gain scores (2011-12 to 2013-14) in both reading and math were -0.65 and -2.69, respectively, which indicates lower gains in previous years, especially in math.

“In 2012-13, Esprit de Corps had only a slightly negative math gain score (-1.3), and a slightly positive reading gain (1.3). Still its three-year combined gain score in math (2010-11 to 2012-13) was notably negative (-4.3). Three-year reading was close to zero (0.3). (Score based on 47 student assessments.)

“In 2011-12, Esprit de Corps’ math scores were again especially low (-12.4), and its reading gains were also negative (-2.6) based on 47 student assessments. And again, its three-year average gain in math (2009-10 to 2011-12) was particularly low: -3.8. Its reading gain was negative but close to zero: -0.20.

“Esprit de Corps has an arguably established history of negative gains in math, as confirmed by its three-year scores from 2009-10-to-2011-12 to 2012-13-to-2014-15.

“This school-level reality complicates pitching Florida vouchers via tax credits as an across-the-board, superior public school alternative based on test score outcomes.

“Nevertheless, it seems that the push for vouchers in the DeVos era is one conveniently deaf to evidence and infused with the superiority of ideology.”

Last night, I waited in great anticipation for the start of the great blizzard of 2017. I enjoy big weather events, especially if I am physically safe. I like to watch thunderstorms. I was excited to wait for the howling winds and rapidly falling snow we were promised. I read this article, which made me laugh out loud (for the first page or so). It is about losing things, misplacing your keys, your wallet, your cell phone. That is the kind of thing I do often. I have attached an electronic device to my wallet and keys (called Tiles) to help find these things when they are lost. After hearing what Kellyanne said about being under surveillance by your microwave, I wonder if my keys and wallet are watching me. But I digress.

I saw the first snowflakes about 1 am, then went to sleep. When I woke up, I saw we were not getting a blizzard. The track of the storm shifted west, sparing us 2′ of snow. What we got was ice, snow, and slush. So much for the science of forecasting. Since I am in the midst of reading “Weapons of Math Destruction,” I understand that there are many variables that could not be predicted with certainty. So, bringing it back to education, I thought about how absurd the concept of VAM (value-added measurement or modeling) is. If weather scientists can’t accurately predict a weather event just a few hours before it happens, why do economists think they can accurately measure something as elusive as “teacher quality” by aggregating changes in student test scores over a period of years without accounting for the hundreds and thousands of unmeasured variations in students’ lives, th classroom, the school, etc.?

See how easy it was to go from the blizzard that fizzled to the flaws of teacher evaluation?

Time to check my chicken soup.

I have been bombarded by people in Hawai who are concerned that Michelle Rhee and her husband, the former Mayor of Sacramento Kevin Johnson, have arrived to advise state officials about education reform. Several sent this article.

I recall that Mr. and Mrs. Johnson were invited five years ago to lecture at the University of Hawaii on the subject of ethics in education.

I am hoping to visit Hawaii for the first time next January or February and check out the water supply. Or is it something they are smoking?

In case you live in the South or Southern California, you may never have the experience of waiting for a blizzard. Many years ago, when I was a child in Houston, weather forecasting was not a science, and we didn’t get much advance warning about hurricanes and storms. Now they warn us several days in advance. We watch the forecasts to see if the track of the storm changed. We shop to stock up a few meals. We watch and wait. It is supposed to arrive in New York City tonight after midnight. Today was a beautiful, sunny day. Hard to believe that in a few hours the white stuff will blanket the city.

So what do you do? First, you walk the dog. She’s 80 pounds and very frisky. She loves snow. She burrows in, puts her face in it, rolls in it. For her, it’s a champagne bath. Well, that’s tomorrow.

Tonight, I watched a fascinating show on PBS about Justice Scalia and one of his law clerks, who completely disagreed with his beliefs. I don’t know if it is based on a true story. The writing was brilliant. What a great clash of ideas and principles it was. I recommend it to you if it is repeated. Maybe if enough Republicans watched, they won’t cut the funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

I bought the fixings to make chicken soup tomorrow when the blizzard is howling.

I hope that everyone has a shelter tomorrow.