Archives for category: Education Reform

Best news of the day!

The charter-friendly State Board of Education turned down Rocketship expansion plan, after 25 speakers denounce it. Chair of board voted to support.

“In a 9-1 vote, the board agreed with the California Department of Education’s recommendation to deny the charter organization’s petition to establish a new school in San Pablo near Richmond, which the West Contra Costa Unified school board and Contra Costa County board of education had also denied. Citing concerns about the charter school’s financial and educational plans, some board members said Rocketship – which operates 10 schools in San Jose, one in Antioch, one in Concord and one in Redwood City where the company is headquartered – may be trying to expand beyond its capacity. Board President Michael Kirst voted against denying the appeal.

“Board members said they were especially concerned about problems associated with the Rocketship Futuro Academy charter school, which opened in Concord two years ago, with the State Board’s approval. The California Department of Education has sent six letters of concern to the school, which is located in the Mt. Diablo district, related to finances and other issues. Rocketship said they expected new philanthropic support which would improve the school’s finances.

“Chief Deputy Superintendent Glen Price, who was sitting in for State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, said the California Department of Education was concerned about the lack of students with disabilities in Rocketship schools, lack of information about its English learner program, high suspension rates among some student groups, and its governance model, which includes charter school board meetings held in San Jose. Price, who lives in Contra Costa County, said meetings that far away were “counter to all of our objectives for parent and stakeholder engagement.””

Even with the billionaires’ support, charter schools are becoming toxic.

Resistance works.

Charter schools divert money from public schools.

Yesterday we learned that Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill to ban for-profit charters. This sounded great, but there are very few for-profit charters in California other than K12 Inc. Even K12 Inc.’s CAVA (California Virtual Academies) won’t close until their charter comes up for renewal. It can go on ripping off students, families and taxpayers until then.

The fact that the California Charter Schoools Association celebrated the ban is evidence that it will do nothing to curtail the graft and corruption that is commonplace in the California charter industry.

How timely that Steven Singer explains that there really is no difference between for-profit and non-profit charters. They all drain resources and the students they want from public schools, undermining them and threatening the future of public education.

He writes in part:

“Stop kidding yourself.

“Charter schools are a bad deal.

“It doesn’t matter if they’re for-profit or nonprofit.

“It doesn’t matter if they’re cyber or brick-and-mortar institutions.

“It doesn’t matter if they have a history of scandal or success.

“Every single charter school in the United States of America is either a disaster or a disaster waiting to happen.

“The details get complicated, but the idea is really quite simple.

“It goes like this.

“Imagine you left a blank check on the street.

“Anyone could pick it up, write it out for whatever amount your bank account could support and rob you blind.

“Chances are you’d never know who cashed it, you’d never get that money back and you might even be ruined.

“That’s what a charter school is – a blank check.

“It’s literally a privately operated school funded with public tax dollars.

“Operators can take almost whatever amount they want, spend it with impunity and never have to submit to any real kind of transparency or accountability.

“Compare that to a traditional public school – an institution invariably operated by duly elected members of the community with full transparency and accountability in an open forum where taxpayers have access to internal documents, can have their voices heard and even seek an administrative position.

“THAT’S a responsible way to handle public money!

“Not forking over our checkbook to virtual strangers!

“Sure, they might not steal our every red cent. But an interloper who finds a blank check on the street might not cash it, either.

“The particulars don’t really matter. This is a situation rife with the possibility of fraud. It is a situation where the deck is stacked against the public in every way and in favor of charter school operators.”

The Gates Foundation has a new idea: it is putting $92 Million into “networks.” For the Gates Foundation, this small amount is more like a tip than an investment. The writer for “Inside Philanthropy” interviewed me, and I said that the Gates Foundation has a consistent record of failure in education policy, and it should consider investing in children’s health, an area that it actually knows something about. As you can see in this article, the writer was straining to find the good in this latest foray into education. It is still not clear what the $92 Million will do, although it’s likely to add a new layer of administrators.

Leonie Haimson, the leading education activist in New York State, is no fan of Gates’ latest foray into education.

She writes here about the latest Gates’ plan to remake public education. To read her post with all her links, go to Leonie’s Blog, https://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com.


This week, Bob Hughes, appointed director of the Gates Foundation K12 division in 2016, made his first big move. He announced $92 million in grants for his new Networks of School Improvement initiative to be given to 19 organizations, collaboratives and districts. New Visions, the NYC-based organization that Hughes ran before coming to the Foundation, received the second largest grant at $14 million – to work with 75 NYC schools, as yet unidentified.

This grant was more than the amount given to the entire Baltimore system of public schools – despite New Visions’ spotty record.

Though Hughes admitted that there’s not much evidence behind the theory of network improvement, he’s determined to push forward nonetheless:

“I don’t think the research base is fully developed, and that’s one reason we’re making these investments,” said Hughes.

I suppose a lack of evidence never stopped the Gates Foundation before.

Asked by EdWeek reporter Steven Sawchuk how the results of this new initiative would be evaluated,
Hughes replied that “the foundation is still formulating its research approach.” And:

“We don’t have details for you, but we remain deeply committed to a third party evaluation of all our work and transparency about the results of those evaluations so we can enable the field to understand what we do well and what we don’t do well,” he said.

Yet it appears that The Center for Public Research and Leadership (CPRL) at Columbia Law School has already been chosen by Hughes to evaluate the program.

As the CPRL website notes, “In January 2018, CPRL received a two and one-half year grant to report on the research underlying the NSI [Networks for School Improvement] initiative and to use the research to design and conduct a formative evaluation of the initiative’s initial implementation.”

Sure enough, the Gates Foundation lists a grant for $1.9 million over 31 months to be awarded “Columbia University” for “evaluation” purposes.

The first Gates-funded CPRL study was a literature review of network impacts. The findings were described by Sawchuk this way:

A Gates-commissioned review of the research on the topic from Columbia University’s Center for Public Research and Leadership noted that there are more studies on the norms and conditions needed to support healthy networks than on how they affect K-12 outcomes; most of the 34 studies were case studies or qualitative, rather than quasi-experimental designs that sought to answer cause-and-effect questions.

CPRL is headed by Columbia Law professor James Liebman, who was appointed head of the NYC Department of Education’s Accountability Office under Joel Klein, despite the fact that he had no K12 education experience either as a teacher, administrator or researcher.

Liebman made a mess of the School Progress Reports at DOE, instituting a volatile, unstable system in which school grades wildly veered from year to year. A blog post by Professor Aaron Pallas in Edweek was memorably entitled, “Could a Monkey Do a Better Job of Predicting Which Schools Show Student Progress in English Skills than the New York City Department of Education?” Under Liebman’s direction, DOE efforts were statistically inept and I would not trust his ability to undertake a credible evaluation.

Liebman also commissioned the expensive ARIS data system, which lived up to none of its promises. It was rarely used by parents or teachers and was finally ditched in 2015 after costing the city $95 million.

In any case, I hope the Gates Foundation has not decided against commissioning an evaluation from a more experienced, credible organization like RAND. RAND recently released a highly critical analysis of the results of the Gates-funded Teacher Evaluation Initiative and before that, a skeptical evaluation of the Gates-funded Next Generation Learning Challenge schools, those that feature “personalized [online] learning.”

John F. Pane, senior scientist at RAND and the chief author of the latter study frankly pointed out to Ed Week, the evidence base for personalized learning is still “very weak.”

Hughes himself doesn’t have the greatest reputation for transparency. In 2005, he tried to suppress a Gates-funded research study that contained negative findings about the New Visions Gates-funded small schools initiative in New York City, a study that was subsequently leaked to the NY Times .

In 2007, it was revealed that New Visions threatened these small schools that they would not receive their full Gates grants unless they chose New Visions as their DOE “partnership support network” and paid the organization a fee in return.

“I thought, ‘Oh, my God, what a huge conflict of interest,'” a principal said. “We have to join their PSO and pay them for support in order to get this grant that we qualified for?”

Only time will tell, but the hints of insular cronyism in these decisions by Hughes to award grants to New Visions and to Jim Liebman’s outfit do not bode well for the future.

This is an informative overview. My question is: what’s the theory of action here? What is the strategy, what are the goals? “Networks” have a nice ring, but what is Gates trying to accomplish? How will it help students and teachers? It sounds very squishy.

From the Washington Post:

Bob Woodward’s new book reveals a ‘nervous breakdown’ of Trump’s presidency

President Trump and Bob Woodward discuss Woodward’s new book, “Fear,” before its publication. (The Washington Post)
By Philip Rucker and
Robert Costa
September 4 at 11:08 AM
John Dowd was convinced that President Trump would commit perjury if he talked to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. So, on Jan. 27, the president’s then-personal attorney staged a practice session to try to make his point.

In the White House residence, Dowd peppered Trump with questions about the Russia investigation, provoking stumbles, contradictions and lies until the president eventually lost his cool.

“This thing’s a goddamn hoax,” Trump erupted at the start of a 30-minute rant that finished with him saying, “I don’t really want to testify.”

The dramatic and previously untold scene is recounted in “Fear,” a forthcoming book by Bob Woodward that paints a harrowing portrait of the Trump presidency, based on in-depth interviews with administration officials and other principals.

Woodward writes that his book is drawn from hundreds of hours of interviews with firsthand participants and witnesses that were conducted on “deep background,” meaning the information could be used but he would not reveal who provided it. His account is also drawn from meeting notes, personal diaries and government documents.

ADVERTISING

Woodward depicts Trump’s anger and paranoia about the Russia inquiry as unrelenting, at times paralyzing the West Wing for entire days. Learning of the appointment of Mueller in May 2017, Trump groused, “Everybody’s trying to get me”— part of a venting period that shellshocked aides compared to Richard Nixon’s final days as president.

The 448-page book was obtained by The Washington Post. Woodward, an associate editor at The Post, sought an interview with Trump through several intermediaries to no avail. The president called Woodward in early August, after the manuscript had been completed, to say he wanted to participate. The president complained that it would be a “bad book,” according to an audio recording of the conversation. Woodward replied that his work would be “tough,” but factual and based on his reporting.

[Exclusive audio: Phone call between President Trump and Bob Woodward]

A central theme of the book is the stealthy machinations used by those in Trump’s inner sanctum to try to control his impulses and prevent disasters, both for the president personally and for the nation he was elected to lead.

Woodward describes “an administrative coup d’etat” and a “nervous breakdown” of the executive branch, with senior aides conspiring to pluck official papers from the president’s desk so he couldn’t see or sign them.

Again and again, Woodward recounts at length how Trump’s national security team was shaken by his lack of curiosity and knowledge about world affairs and his contempt for the mainstream perspectives of military and intelligence leaders.

At a National Security Council meeting on Jan. 19, Trump disregarded the significance of the massive U.S. military presence on the Korean Peninsula, including a special intelligence operation that allows the United States to detect a North Korean missile launch in seven seconds vs. 15 minutes from Alaska, according to Woodward. Trump questioned why the government was spending resources in the region at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re doing this in order to prevent World War III,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis told him.

After Trump left the meeting, Woodward recounts, “Mattis was particularly exasperated and alarmed, telling close associates that the president acted like — and had the understanding of — ‘a fifth- or sixth-grader.’ ”

In Woodward’s telling, many top advisers were repeatedly unnerved by Trump’s actions and expressed dim views of him. “Secretaries of defense don’t always get to choose the president they work for,” Mattis told friends at one point, prompting laughter as he explained Trump’s tendency to go off on tangents about subjects such as immigration and the news media.

Inside the White House, Woodward portrays an unsteady executive detached from the conventions of governing and prone to snapping at high-ranking staff members, whom he unsettled and belittled on a daily basis.

Chief of Staff John F. Kelly frequently lost his temper, Bob Woodward writes in “Fear: Trump in the White House.” (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly frequently lost his temper and told colleagues that he thought the president was “unhinged,” Woodward writes. In one small group meeting, Kelly said of Trump: “He’s an idiot. It’s pointless to try to convince him of anything. He’s gone off the rails. We’re in Crazytown. I don’t even know why any of us are here. This is the worst job I’ve ever had.”

Reince Priebus, Kelly’s predecessor, fretted that he could do little to constrain Trump from sparking chaos. Woodward writes that Priebus dubbed the presidential bedroom, where Trump obsessively watched cable news and tweeted, “the devil’s workshop,” and said early mornings and Sunday evenings, when the president often set off tweetstorms, were “the witching hour.”

Trump apparently had little regard for Priebus. He once instructed then-staff secretary Rob Porter to ignore Priebus, even though Porter reported to the chief of staff, saying that Priebus was “‘like a little rat. He just scurries around.’”

Few in Trump’s orbit were protected from the president’s insults. He often mocked former national security adviser H.R. McMaster behind his back, puffing up his chest and exaggerating his breathing as he impersonated the retired Army general, and once said McMaster dresses in cheap suits, “like a beer salesman.”

Trump told Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, a wealthy investor eight years his senior: “I don’t trust you. I don’t want you doing any more negotiations. … You’re past your prime.”

A near-constant subject of withering presidential attacks was Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Trump told Porter that Sessions was a “traitor” for recusing himself from overseeing the Russia investigation, Woodward writes. Mocking Sessions’s accent, Trump added, “This guy is mentally retarded. He’s this dumb Southerner. … He couldn’t even be a one-person country lawyer down in Alabama.”

At a dinner with Mattis and Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, among others, Trump lashed out at a vocal critic, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). He falsely suggested that the former Navy pilot had been a coward for taking early release from a prisoner-of-war camp in Vietnam because of his father’s military rank and leaving others behind.

Mattis swiftly corrected his boss: “No, Mr. President, I think you’ve got it reversed.” The defense secretary explained that McCain, who died Aug. 25, had in fact turned down early release and was brutally tortured during his five years at the Hanoi Hilton.

“Oh, okay,” Trump replied, according to Woodward’s account.

With Trump’s rage and defiance impossible to contain, Cabinet members and other senior officials learned to act discreetly. Woodward describes an alliance among Trump’s traditionalists — including Mattis and Gary Cohn, the president’s former top economic adviser — to stymie what they considered dangerous acts.

“It felt like we were walking along the edge of the cliff perpetually,” Porter is quoted as saying. “Other times, we would fall over the edge, and an action would be taken.”

After Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad launched a chemical attack on civilians in April 2017, Trump called Mattis and said he wanted to assassinate the dictator. “Let’s fucking kill him! Let’s go in. Let’s kill the fucking lot of them,” Trump said, according to Woodward.

Mattis told the president that he would get right on it. But after hanging up the phone, he told a senior aide: “We’re not going to do any of that. We’re going to be much more measured.” The national security team developed options for the more conventional airstrike that Trump ultimately ordered.

Then-White House chief economic adviser Gary Cohn tried to temper Trump’s nationalistic trade views. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Cohn, a Wall Street veteran, tried to tamp down Trump’s strident nationalism regarding trade. According to Woodward, Cohn “stole a letter off Trump’s desk” that the president was intending to sign to formally withdraw the United States from a trade agreement with South Korea. Cohn later told an associate that he removed the letter to protect national security and that Trump did not notice that it was missing.

Cohn made a similar play to prevent Trump from pulling the United States out of the North American Free Trade Agreement, something the president has long threatened to do. In spring 2017, Trump was eager to withdraw from NAFTA and told Porter: “Why aren’t we getting this done? Do your job. It’s tap, tap, tap. You’re just tapping me along. I want to do this.”

Under orders from the president, Porter drafted a notification letter withdrawing from NAFTA. But he and other advisers worried that it could trigger an economic and foreign relations crisis. So Porter consulted Cohn, who told him, according to Woodward: “I can stop this. I’ll just take the paper off his desk.”

Despite repeated threats by Trump, the United States has remained in both pacts. The administration continues to negotiate new terms with South Korea as well as with its NAFTA partners, Canada and Mexico.

Cohn came to regard the president as “a professional liar” and threatened to resign in August 2017 over Trump’s handling of a deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. Cohn, who is Jewish, was especially shaken when one of his daughters found a swastika on her college dorm room.

Trump was sharply criticized for initially saying that “both sides” were to blame. At the urging of advisers, he then condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis, but almost immediately told aides, “That was the biggest fucking mistake I’ve made” and the “worst speech I’ve ever given,” according to Woodward’s account.

When Cohn met with Trump to deliver his resignation letter after Charlottesville, the president told him, “This is treason,” and persuaded his economic adviser to stay on. Kelly then confided to Cohn that he shared Cohn’s horror at Trump’s handling of the tragedy — and shared Cohn’s fury with Trump.

“I would have taken that resignation letter and shoved it up his ass six different times,” Kelly told Cohn, according to Woodward. Kelly himself has threatened to quit several times, but has not done so.

Woodward illustrates how the dread in Trump’s orbit became all-encompassing over the course of Trump’s first year in office, leaving some staff members and Cabinet members confounded by the president’s lack of understanding about how government functions and his inability and unwillingness to learn.

At one point, Porter, who departed in February amid domestic abuse allegations, is quoted as saying, “This was no longer a presidency. This is no longer a White House. This is a man being who he is.”

Such moments of panic are a routine feature, but not the thrust of Woodward’s book, which mostly focuses on substantive decisions and internal disagreements, including tensions with North Korea as well as the future of U.S. policy in Afghanistan.

Woodward recounts repeated episodes of anxiety inside the government over Trump’s handling of the North Korean nuclear threat. One month into his presidency, Trump asked Dunford for a plan for a preemptive military strike on North Korea, which rattled the combat veteran.

In the fall of 2017, as Trump intensified a war of words with Kim Jong Un, nicknaming North Korea’s dictator “Little Rocket Man” in a speech at the United Nations, aides worried the president might be provoking Kim. But, Woodward writes, Trump told Porter that he saw the situation as a contest of wills: “This is all about leader versus leader. Man versus man. Me versus Kim.”

The book also details Trump’s impatience with the war in Afghanistan, which had become America’s longest conflict. At a July 2017 National Security Council meeting, Trump dressed down his generals and other advisers for 25 minutes, complaining that the United States was losing, according to Woodward.

“The soldiers on the ground could run things much better than you,” Trump told them. “They could do a much better job. I don’t know what the hell we’re doing.” He went on to ask, “How many more deaths? How many more lost limbs? How much longer are we going to be there?”

The president’s family members, while sometimes touted as his key advisers by other Trump chroniclers, are minor players in Woodward’s account, popping up occasionally in the West Wing and vexing adversaries.

Former White House senior adviser Stephen K. Bannon, second from left, former national security adviser H.R. McMaster and former chief of staff Reince Priebus, right, in 2017. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Woodward recounts an expletive-laden altercation between Ivanka Trump, the president’s eldest daughter and senior adviser, and Stephen K. Bannon, the former chief White House strategist.

“You’re a goddamn staffer!” Bannon screamed at her, telling her that she had to work through Priebus like other aides. “You walk around this place and act like you’re in charge, and you’re not. You’re on staff!”

Ivanka Trump, who had special access to the president and worked around Priebus, replied: “I’m not a staffer! I’ll never be a staffer. I’m the first daughter.”

Such tensions boiled among many of Trump’s core advisers. Priebus is quoted as describing Trump officials not as rivals but as “natural predators.”

“When you put a snake and a rat and a falcon and a rabbit and a shark and a seal in a zoo without walls, things start getting nasty and bloody,” Priebus says.

Hovering over the White House was Mueller’s inquiry, which deeply embarrassed the president. Woodward describes Trump calling his Egyptian counterpart to secure the release of an imprisoned charity worker and President Abdel Fatah al-Sissi saying: “Donald, I’m worried about this investigation. Are you going to be around?”

Trump relayed the conversation to Dowd and said it was “like a kick in the nuts,” according to Woodward.

The book vividly recounts the ongoing debate between Trump and his lawyers about whether the president would sit for an interview with Mueller. On March 5, Dowd and Trump attorney Jay Sekulow met in Mueller’s office with the special counsel and his deputy, James Quarles, where Dowd and Sekulow reenacted Trump’s January practice session.

Woodward’s book recounts the debate between Trump and his lawyers, including John Dowd, regarding whether the president will sit for an interview with special counsel Robert. S. Mueller III. (Richard Drew/AP)
Dowd then explained to Mueller and Quarles why he was trying to keep the president from testifying: “I’m not going to sit there and let him look like an idiot. And you publish that transcript, because everything leaks in Washington, and the guys overseas are going to say, ‘I told you he was an idiot. I told you he was a goddamn dumbbell. What are we dealing with this idiot for?’ ”

“John, I understand,” Mueller replied, according to Woodward.

Later that month, Dowd told Trump: “Don’t testify. It’s either that or an orange jumpsuit.”

But Trump, concerned about the optics of a president refusing to testify and convinced that he could handle Mueller’s questions, had by then decided otherwise.

“I’ll be a real good witness,” Trump told Dowd, according to Woodward.

“You are not a good witness,” Dowd replied. “Mr. President, I’m afraid I just can’t help you.”

The next morning, Dowd resigned.

Rahm Emanuel will not run again.

With Chicago enduring daunting levels of gun violence, a $36 billion public worker pension crisis and discontent in some corners of the city’s African-American population with his leadership, polls showed Emanuel faced a difficult, but not insurmountable, path to re-election.

A poll commissioned by one of Emanuel’s campaign backers and published last month showed that the mayor had backing of about 32 percent of voters in the crowded field – and a 19-point lead over his closest competitor, former police superintendent Garry McCarthy, but not enough to face avoid a runoff. The poll was conducted by New York-based Global Strategy Group.

Emanuel, a former congressman who served as chief of staff in the Obama White House and a senior aide in the Clinton White House, last faced voters in 2015, several months before the release of a controversial police shooting video of Laquan McDonald.

The Emanuel administration was forced by court order to make the video public 400 days after the fatal shooting of McDonald and several months after the mayor had won re-election. The mayor’s critics argue that Emanuel, who saw his support erode in the city’s large African-American community following the video’s release, would not have won re-election had it come out earlier.

Emanuel said he did not watch the video, which appears to show that the 17-year-old McDonald was veering away from officers when he was shot 16 times by officer Jason Van Dyke, until it was set to be publicly released.

The officer was charged with first-degree murder on the same day of the video’s release.

Emanuel made his bombshell announcement one day before jury selection was set to begin in Van Dyke’s trial.

Will Chicago finally get a mayor who cares as much about the public schools as Rahm cared about charter schools?

Will the school closings end?

Will the public get to have a role in public education and the choice of the school board?

From In the Public Interest:

1) National/Revolving Door News: A Trump official who spent his time shilling for private prisons gets a new job working for the GEO Group. “In January, Government Executive reported that Frank Lara, then the bureau’s assistant director for correctional programs, sent a memorandum with the subject line ‘increasing population levels in private contract facilities’ to agency leaders. In it, Lara tasked facility leaders with identifying inmates for transfer to private facilities, saying it would “alleviate the overcrowding at Bureau of Prisons’ institutions and maximize the effectiveness of private contracts.” A few months later, Lara announced his retirement. Earlier this month, he began working at the GEO Group as its director of operations.” Eric Young, president of the union local that represents bureau correctional officers [AFGE CPL-33], called Lara’s move, “The biggest damn conflict of interest that I’ve ever seen.”

2) National/Washington: As of Friday, 62 people were on strike at the GEO-operated Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, activists told ThinkProgress. “On Saturday, organizers held a rally near the detention center, demanding an end to what they called retaliation by staff against the people held there. The demonstrations, which began on August 21 and will continue until September 9, have been held in prisons in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, California, Ohio, Indiana, New Mexico, Florida, and Texas, according to the Incarcerated Workers Organizing Committee.” Inmates in Halifax, Nova Scotia, said, “We recognize that the staff in the jail are workers who are also facing injustice. We are asking for a more productive rehabilitative environment that supports the wellbeing of everyone in the system. These policy changes will also benefit the workers in the jail.”

Journalist Chris Hedges has weighed in on the national strike, pointing out that “prisons in America are a huge and lucrative business,” citing billion dollar corporations such as GEO Group, CoreCivic, Aramark, Global Tel Link, Corizon Health, and JPay (“a subsidiary of the telecommunications firm Securus Technologies, which is owned by the private equity firm Abry Partners.”) Private corporations “exploit prison labor in at least 40 states. In some cases these workers are paid next to nothing.”

3) National/Washington: How Big Tech Swallowed Seattle. “This has made the city seem like a model for urban revitalization, a sort of developer’s Valhalla. And yet, as cities try to crib from Seattle, the town itself is full of doubt and anger. The turbocharged growth has exacerbated traffic, despite huge investments in public transit. Housing prices have shot up faster than in any major city in the U.S. for most of the past two years. Homelessness has reached crisis levels. Formerly subdued City Council meetings routinely devolve into shouting matches. (…) All this suggests that the bragging rights of landing the deal could be quickly followed by a pit-in-the-stomach moment once residents learn what’s gone on in Amazon’s hometown. Seattle has had the ‘jubilation of great success,’ says Richard Florida, an urban studies professor at the University of Toronto. Now the city’s ‘getting punched in the face with it.’”

4) National: In a Labor Day message, AFT President Randi Weingarten points to the importance of the statehouses. “These states can serve as a check on the dangerous and reckless policies of this administration. And they’re where we’ll be able to move an agenda of investment in public education instead of austerity and privatization, to strengthen unions, to make healthcare and college more affordable, and to rebuild the middle class.” See also Unmasking the Hidden Power of Cities, a report by LAANE, In the Public Interest, and the Partnership for Working Families: “Privatization, the extraction of public wealth, increasing financialization of the economy, deregulation, and tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy translate to sweeping private control over vital public goods (i.e., education, infrastructure, clean air and water) and weaken the pillars of American democracy.”

5) National: Thom Hartmann on the dangers of privatization: “Do we really want an America where our infrastructure is merely a profit center for Mitt Romney-style investors?”

6) National: The Veterans Administration is attracting private firms pushing dubious PTSD treatments, Reveal’s Jaspar Craven and Suzanne Gordon report. “The acting assistant deputy undersecretary for health for patient care services, Dr. Marsden McGuire, warned against ‘quackery’ and medical claims ‘made falsely, with ill intent.’ He said he’s received complaints from VA psychiatrists who have been urged to adopt dubious treatments. He then recommended that the agency invest its limited resources in those treatments most likely to help.”

7) National: Teachers are leaving privately managed charter schools, both for-profit and non-profit, at an “alarming rate,” according to a new study. “Using national data from the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey, they found the odds of attrition at for-profit EMOs 38 percent higher and at nonprofit CMOs 24 percent higher than at regular charter schools. They also found the odds of migration 97 percent higher for EMO teachers and 58 percent higher for CMO teachers.”

8) National: Taxpayers are subsidizing huge corporate pay gaps, a new study by the Institute for Policy Studies reports. “More than two-thirds of the top 50 federal contractors and the top 50 federal corporate subsidy recipients paid their CEO more than 100 times their median worker pay in 2017. By contrast, the U.S. president’s salary equals just five times the pay of the average federal government employee. The typical American believes CEO pay should run no more than six times average worker pay.” The Geo Group, which runs immigrant family detention centers, “took in $663 million in Justice Department and Homeland Security contracts in 2017. Geo CEO George Zoley pocketed $9.6 million that year, 271 times more than his company’s median employee pay of $35,630.”

9) National: Clare Coffey, who teaches kindergarten at a small Catholic school in the Philadelphia area, urges material support for prisoners on strike over a number of issues, including slave wages and the profit-gouging of prisoners and their families by private corporations and prison officials on telephone, visitation and electronic communication services. “We that are financially stable should provide a community kitty for those who don’t have family support on the outside. This shouldn’t just fall on one or two of us but should be a responsibility of all of us that are financially stable.” [See “Burritos or not, I’m not eating today”]

10) National: Wendy Lecker, a columnist for the Hearst Connecticut Media Group and senior attorney at the Education Law Center, writes in the New Haven Register that political support for public education and opposition to school privatization and underfunding is spreading:

“Last week, six Republican Oklahoma house members who voted against tax increases for teacher raises were ousted in primary races. Of the 19 Republicans who voted against teacher pay raises, only four will be on the ballot in November. In Georgia, democratic gubernatorial primary winner Stacey Abrams openly declares that she doesn’t want to be Georgia’s ‘education governor’—she wants to be Georgia’s ‘public education governor.’ She advocates increased investment in public schools and opposes privatization schemes that drain resources from them. On Tuesday, Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum won a surprise victory in Florida’s Democratic gubernatorial primary. Gillum credits his public school education for much of his success in life and supports increasing investments in public schools, including raising teachers’ starting salary to $50,000. Educator David Garcia, the Democratic candidate for governor in Arizona, vowed to ‘end destructive privatization schemes that drain money out of classrooms, and … to invest in our teachers and classrooms once again.’ Longtime public school supporter Ben Jealous is Maryland’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Teachers are running for office across the nation, including a former National Teacher of the Year, Waterbury’s Jahana Hayes, who won the primary for the U.S. House of Representative in Connecticut’s fifth congressional district. Public education, an issue usually ignored by politicians, is suddenly taking center stage in political campaigns.”

11) National/International: The rolling saga of shoddy performance by large consulting firms engaged in government contracting continues. Boston-based Bain & Company has launched a “deep and extensive” internal investigation into work it did for the South African revenue service. “The company’s overhaul of the SARS operating model was blamed by senior officials testifying at the commission chaired by retired judge Robert Nugent for the destruction of the tax agency’s capacity—which contributed to the hole of about R50bn in revenue collection for 2017-18.”

12) California: The Sacramento Press Club will be hosting a debate next Tuesday, September 11, at 5 pm between the two candidates for Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tony Thurmond and Marshall Tuck. The two candidates “agree that the time has come to review California’s quarter-century-old charter school law, while disagreeing over how best to handle the impact of charter school growth on the financial health of school districts.”

13) California: The question of what was done with the $28 million proceeds from the sale of Adelanto’s correctional facility to the GEO Group has become a political football. “By fiscal year 2015, when General Fund expenses were $12.8 million versus income of only $8.2 million, the city had wiped out about $27 million in cash reserves, or nearly the entirety of the prison sale proceeds, according to Cheng.”

14) California: A troubled Salinas charter school has reopened under tighter controls after risking closure by the school board. “Trustees also installed Alberto Jaramillo, principal of Virginia Rocca Barton Elementary School within AUSD, as the eighth board member for the nonprofit Under Construction Education Network, which governs Oasis. The move was made possible by the school’s memorandum of understanding with the district, a staff report read.”

15) California: A Highland charter school has opened in a former Kmart. “Freshman Christian Dull said it appears to be working. ‘It’s definitely a different environment,’ Dull said. ‘It’s not really a school, kind of.’”

16) Colorado: Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jared Polis told a crowd in Grand Junction over the weekend that “one of the biggest potential risks to western Colorado is the privatization of public lands. Once our public lands are carved up, there’s no going back to our heritage and our way of life in western Colorado.” For more see Steven Davis’ recent book, In Defense of Public Lands: The Case Against Privatization and Transfer.

17) Florida: James Burns, an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning in Florida International University’s School of Education and Human Development, urges Floridians to stand up for public education. “Florida has long spearheaded an educational race to the bottom as a laboratory for every aspect of the radical privatization agenda in education. Charter schools operate essentially without regulation. Right to work laws have obliterated public sector unions. Teachers fear for their jobs while children stress out over oppressive testing and the threat of being held back. We as citizens have a choice about the kind of schools we want. Do we want schools that churn out compliant cogs for the machine? Or do we aspire to create and support public schools that cultivate the intellectual and affective capacity of our children who can reconstruct the world as more just and peaceful? Let’s build the schools we need.”

18) Illinois: Early last month, Gov. Rauner (R) signed HB 4508 which means any publicly owned water system in Illinois can now be targeted by profit-driven private water companies. The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) has some suggestions for What Now? “Here is what you need to know if your municipality is approached by the private companies: The power to privatize your water system lies with your local elected officials; The private water company will offer your municipality a very good price, since their customers will foot the entire bill; Ask your local elected officials to consider alternatives to privatization; Understand that publicly owned water systems will still have rate increases; Push your representatives in Congress for water infrastructure funding.”

19) Iowa: Republican Governor Kim Reynolds’ administration “has given Iowa’s for-profit Medicaid insurers a big, sloppy pay raise.” The Des Moines Register says “they have denied care to Iowans, shunned transparency, starved health care providers by refusing or delaying reimbursements and done everything they can to boost their profits while wringing more money from taxpayers.”

20) Louisiana: Nepotism cases have regularly cropped up in the Bayou State’s charter schools. But in recent years, the education department “has adopted anti-nepotism policies similar to state laws that were already on the books.”

21) Massachusetts: Maria Belen Power of Green Roots, an organization that works for environmental justice in Chelsea and surrounding communities, says Gov. Baker’s stewardship of MBTA has been a failure. “Through its push to privatize the MBTA, continued inadequate service, and lack of genuine and constructive engagement with riders, the MBTA continues to neglect communities that rely on it. (…) The Governor’s push for MBTA privatization is the wrong approach. Touted inaccurately as a sure way to save money, privatization is a profit-making opportunity for corporations who can then cut corners, provide poor service, and pass on the bill to taxpayers. Our communities need deep investment in public transportation that can provide reliable service while also ensuring fair wage union jobs for our families and friends.”

22) Michigan: A Muskegon Heights charter school is under fire for its principal having purchased $25,000 in gift cards. “The Muskegon Heights Board of Education voted 6-0 in favor of a resolution expressing its disagreement with the PSA board’s decision not to suspend Garcia. The resolution passed on Aug. 27 cited Garcia’s spending of the $25,000 on gift cards as well as the school system’s nearly $1 million deficit budget for 2017-18. Community members who spoke at the Aug. 27 meeting also called for Garcia to be suspended. The Michigan Department of Education is looking into the spending on the gift cards, and whether it violated state law, MDE Spokesman Martin Ackley said earlier.”

23) Missouri: Apparently not satisfied with their efforts to sell off Lambert International Airport (which just did very well, thank you very much, over the Labor Day weekend), the privatizers are at it again in St. Louis, this time aiming to cash in on trash collection, and getting a boost from the Post-Dispatch’s business columnist. But Paul Thompson comments “it would be far better for St. Louis to better manage the public collection, which would reduce costs and improve service,” and he’s right. For more see In the Public Interest’s report, Is Your Waste Contract Putting Your Municipality At Risk?, and check out Germà Bel and Mildred Warner’s Privatization of Solid Waste and Water Services: What Happened to Costs Savings?

24) Montana: “Dark Money,” a film about “the efforts of Montanans of all types to keep big, out-of-state, secret corporate money from controlling their politics & lives,” has just been released.

25) New Jersey: A Newark charter school network is facing charges that it improperly suspends students with disabilities “at a disproportionately high rate, violating their rights. (…) The complaint alleges that North Star Academy gave suspensions to 29 percent of students with disabilities during the 2016-17 school year. The network disputes the complaint’s allegations and says the actual figure was 22 percent.” At the Newark public schools, “just 1.3 percent of special-education students and 1.1 percent of all students were suspended in 2016-17, according to the attorney’s analysis of state data.”

26) Pennsylvania: About 150 residents packed a special meeting of the Chichester School Board to hear a proposal for a new charter school—but the applicant never showed up. “Even though Jolly was not present, residents were given the opportunity to comment. Every individual who spoke was in opposition to the charter school. ‘I am firmly opposed to a charter school going into the district,’ said Michele Lauginiger to loud applause. ‘I don’t think it’s beneficial to any of the children in our district. We, as taxpayers spend a lot of money in taxes to enhance the education the children receive here. This isn’t going to benefit anybody but outsiders who are going to reap the benefits.’”

27) Puerto Rico: At a forum on public education in Bayamon, Michael Elsen-Rooney of The Teacher Project at Columbia Journalism School tells us there was “lots of chatter and worry about the arrival of charter schools, recently made legal in PR.” Mercedes Martinez, the president of Teachers’ Federation of Puerto Rico, warned about charters in the U.S. expelling the most challenging students, citingSuccess Academy Charter Schools’ “got to go list” as an example. “Audible gasp in the crowd when she explains it.”

28) Tennessee: Randy Stamps, executive director of the Tennessee State Employees Association, takes on Terry Cowles’ zombie-like defense of the privatization of state jobs even after Gov. Bill Haslam says “Honestly, the truth is we haven’t brought up outsourcing once since that and we won’t ever again. We thought it was a great idea, the schools that wanted to use it could use it, but we made it really clear that they can make the decision not to do it. The other campuses didn’t do it as well at Martin and Chattanooga and Memphis. We get it. And we’ve moved on.” Says Stamps: “It appears as though Mr. Cowles hasn’t moved on.”

29) Texas: Texas AFT and Texas State Teachers Association are suing the Texas Education Agency and its commissioner over the handling of a law that allows school districts to let charter school operators take over struggling public school campuses. “The lawsuit says Morath ‘departed from his own agency’s rules’ in announcing a rule that ‘limits the safeguards’ the Legislature implemented to protect teachers and other employees in such takeovers. Texas AFT President Louis Malfaro says in a news release that Morath ‘made an unlawful power grab to have complete authority over approving these charter takeovers.’”

30) Texas: Public education advocate Diane Ravitch points us to an article by Glenn W. Smith, an opinion writer for the Austin American-Statesman, that “eviscerates the sinister motives behind the A-F grading of schools,” which Texas Republicans want to introduce. “This plan was promulgated by Jeb Bush and his team of privatizers,” Ravitch explains. “My home state of Texas is the home of [No Child Left Behind] accountability. Nearly 20 years after that law was passed, we are still waiting for ‘no child [to be] left behind.] Fortunately, we now have a federal law in which Congress promises that ‘Every Child’ will Succeed. More snake oil. Comply or die.”

31) Texas: Kate Ross Apartments, Waco’s oldest public housing complex, “could be torn down and rebuilt during the Waco Housing Authority‘s transition to a privatized affordable housing system.”

32) Wisconsin: Controversy remains over how much Lakeland taxpayers will have to pay for the district’s charter school operations. For charter school governance board president and Lakeland Times publisher Gregg Walker, “the proposed budget represents a win-win-win for the students, the school district and for taxpayers. Not everyone saw it that way, however. Hazelhurst resident Robert Collins raised questions both about transparency and the ultimate costs to taxpayers. Collins recounted a past school board meeting when then board member Tom Gabert said the school would likely have to tap its fund balance to pay for charter school costs because the LUHS district was at its levy limit. ‘After reading articles, I got concerned about just what is the share to the taxpayer,’ Collins said. ‘What is going to be the Lakeland area’s obligation to the taxpayer to run these two schools for three years? Before you vote whether to go ahead, the least you should expect is a budget.’ Collins said Walker told him last spring there would soon be a published budget and full transparency but that five months later he was still waiting for the budget to be printed. Collins also said Walker had promised no one’s taxes would be raised. ‘Well, I don’t know about you folks, but when he says nobody’s taxes are being raised, if you take it from the general fund, 100 percent of your contribution, where did that money come from?’ he asked the board. ‘The taxpayer. It didn’t just float down and you have a general fund. It’s already monies that have been taxed to the taxpayer.’ Those dollars would have to be diverted from other projects, Collins said.”

33) International: The Ontario government, now under Premier Doug Ford, is moving ahead with plans to privatize Toronto’s subway system. He has appointed an advisory panel. “The president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, which represents TTC workers, called on Toronto residents to stand together to protect the public transit system. ‘To improve the TTC, the government should fund it properly—not break it apart,’ Frank Grimaldi said. ‘A divided system raises issues of accountability and integration while taking the first step in a slippery slope towards privatization, delays and fare hikes.’”

34) International: Eli Friedman, Associate Professor of International and Comparative Labor at Cornell ILR, reports that anti-school privatization protests in Hunan, China have been met with repression. One Twitter report said tuition is up 10 times. [Video]

35) International: Private equity groups continue to trade education companies like they’re properties on a Monopoly board. “The investment firm for Switzerland’s wealthy Jacobs family has agreed to acquire global private schools group Cognita from Bregal Investments and KKR, the partners said on Monday, without giving financial terms. (…) Cognita operates more than 70 schools in eight countries, including Britain, Singapore, Chile and Brazil, educating more than 40,000 children, a joint statement said. Cognita was formed in 2004 by private equity firm Bregal and the late Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools in England. KKR took a 50 percent stake in 2013.”

36) Revolving Door News: Harley G. Lappin, who went from being director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to being a member of the board of directors of CoreCivic, just cashed out some shares in the company for $397,567.53. But don’t worry, Harley still “owns 47,846 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $1,219,594.54.”

37) Revolving Door News: Rikardo Hull, who spent a decade at the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission playing “a key role in helping to develop Pennsylvania’s markedly successful water regulatory climate,” is joining the National Association of Water Companies (NAWC) as its new Executive Vice President of Strategy & Regulatory Affairs.

38) Think Tanks: Nnimmo Bassey, director of the ecological think tank Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) at the Sustainability Academy, says the oceans and coastal waterways are being privatized by commercial interests. “The creeks, rivers and swamps of the Niger delta, for example, have all be privatized by the oil companies through pollution. Our continental shelf and deep waters have been partitioned and are effectively owned by the oil companies because of the security zone (often up to 5 km radius) around their installations that are cordoned and closed to fishers, including areas with endemic fish species. So, our waters are also privatized through security cordons for unhindered extractive activities. This is a clearly objectionable privatizing of the commons.”

Legislative Issues

1) National: President Trump’s plans for privatizing the U.S. Postal Service, which he is keeping under wraps until after the midterms, are drawing opposition in Congress. H.Res.993, opposing privatization, now has 147 co-sponsors from both parties. Will he enable for-profit companies to handle first class mail?

2) Louisiana: The state, whose largest city’s school system (93% charters for New Orleans) has just been brought out of emergency administration and transferred to public control, is witnessing a tug of war between charter school interests and advocates for tighter legislative and public control. Caroline Roemer, executive director of Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools, says there is “an alarming trend” for lawmakers to add charters to almost every education bill. “Long gone are the days that we could assume charter schools would be excluded from bills that address traditional school district issues like teacher leave, curriculum and school operations,” Roemer said. “We believe those little instances and inclusions in bills would start creating death by a thousand paper cuts.”

In the Public Interest
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
United States

unsubscribe

Linda McNeil is a professor at Rice University and an eloquent spokesperson for children and teachers. She has done important research about the negative effects of high stakes testing.

Her thoughts for this day:
http://educatingallourchildren.blogspot.com/2018/09/honor-americas-teachers-on-labor-day.html?m=1

As we celebrate America’s workers this Labor Day, let’s be sure to honor our children’s teachers: teachers who every day inspire our children’s minds, spark their curiosities, (wipe their noses and search for missing mittens), nudge hesitant writers, cheer on insecure readers, seek out the child on the sidelines, and then do it all over again the next day. And the next.

Honoring our teachers means voting for candidateswill restore the massive funding cuts that have starved many of our schools and made being a teacher even more financially precarious than it has traditionally been in many of our states.

Honoring our teachers means marching with them when they feel they have to march and rally and petition to get politicians’ attention – then following up with our own messages to those politicians so they can’t claim the “teachers are just complaining.”

Honoring our laboring teachers means volunteering in their classrooms, learning first-hand what they need to do their jobs well for our children and grandchildren, then joining our voices to theirs to make these needs persistently known.

Honoring the teaching profession means becoming so politically active and effective that no teacher has 7 classes of 24 to 42 students (yes, that’s a teacher I know here in a Houston public high school), that no charter chain takes one more dollar from our public schools, that no US secretary of education gets one piece of voucher legislation through Congress, and that no more billionaires use their wealth to try to “buy” our public schools (yes, that’s you, Los Angeles and Little Rock).

And if we truly honor our teachers, we will follow the lead of the students of Marjorie Stedman Douglas High School and the thousands of other youth and their families around the country in working tirelessly for good, strict gun safety and gun control laws so that no teacher ever has to protect her students from a shooter and no teacher ever ever is expected to have — or use — a gun at school. Ever.

Honoring our laboring teachers means joining forces w them to protect the public’s schools and, by so doing, protect our democracy.

Thank a teacher, hug a teacher – then go to work on their behalf!

The Marion P. Thomas Charter High School kicked out students for minor dress code violations.

Strangely, the story about the expulsions appeared in an Atlanta newspaper, not a New Jersey one.

The students are all African American, as is the staff. It is a segregated school.

“Video uploaded to Facebook shows several Marion P. Thomas Charter High School students hanging out at a public park in their school uniforms after they say they were booted from school over dress code violations. One teen explained he was kicked out simply for having white soles on his shoes…

“It wasn’t just the handful of students at the park who were kicked out, however. Students claim more than half the school was sent home for the alleged violations. Concerned, the man, who describes himself as a youth worker, marched over to the school to confront the staff about their so-called punishment.

“In video of the incident, the man is heard questioning school officials about why so many kids were kicked out into the streets for something so arbitrary as not having a belt or all-black sneakers. A front desk receptionist explains the students were told go home and get the items, and then return to school.

“This is crazy. … Get those things from where? What if they don’t have it?” the man asked. “I’m at the park working with kids, and I see like 50 children walk into the park saying they can’t get into school because they don’t have all-black shoes. I have a problem.”

“That’s saying that because they’re poor, you can treat them like this,” he said of the kids, whom he described as “his scholars.” “You will not do this.”

“Things quickly escalate as the man repeatedly demands to speak to the principal or someone else in charge. He then criticizes school staff, which is all Black, for willingly kicking African-American students out of class over simple dress code violations.

“Y’all are too calm!” he shouts. “It’s all Black people in here and y’all kick Black kids out into the street. What if one of them gets hurt in the park? It’s homeless people sleeping in there. Why are are all these kids in the street?! You are culpable!”

“The man, visibly frustrated, continues asking for who’s in charge of making the dress code policy. That’s when leaders ask him who his scholar is, suggesting he needs to have a child who attends the school in order to make a complaint.“

After the fallout from the video of the incident, the school said it was implementing a new process for dress code violations but did not say what it would be.

That headline is like saying, “Flash! Water is Wet!”

Yet there are many elected officials who disparage that money matters. They say thatclass size doesn’t matter. They ignore real world problems of staffing schools and teaching kids with widely varying needs.

A new study finds that spending more does matter. When affluent parents spend large sums to send their children to a private school or to live in an expensive neighborhood, they are paying for small classes, well-maintained facilities, and a stable, experienced teaching staff.

We are unwilling to pay the price to provide similar resources to all children, even when we know that it matters.

I watched Senator JOHN McCain’s funeral, from start to finish.

It was inspiring.

I was especially moved by the spirit of shared values. The missing goon was at his private golf club, tweeting furiously about our enemy, Canada.

For a few hours today, it seemed that sanity and comity had returned. The madman was not invited, even though his daughter and son-in-law and his chief of staff were.

Mercedes Schneider watched too.

Encouraged by a Funeral

She too felt the whiff of a better world, a normal world, a world not run by an angry bitter fool.

For a few precious hours, we could pretend he did not exist.