Archives for category: Corporate Reformers

The candidates endorsed by the Network for Public Education and the Connecticut Post won a stunning upset victory over the Democratic machine candidates in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

This is another loss for the corporate reformers who tried to abolish the elected board and give control to the mayor.

“The challenger slate won by a two to one margin over the party’s endorsed slate, easily winning in all districts, in unofficial and incomplete results.

Andre Baker Jr, Howard Gardner and Dave Hennessey received 3,409 votes, 3,284 votes and 3,308 votes, respectively.”

If the challengers prevail in the November election, Superintendent Paul,Vallas may be out. That is, if he survives a court challenge over his lack of credentials to serve.

Bill de Blasio won an amazing victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary. Not long ago, he was in fourth place but last night he ran decisively ahead of former Comptroller Bill Thompson (the UFT’s candidate) and Christine Quinn (who was tarnished by her close association with Mayor Bloomberg).

In exit polls, voters said their leading concerns were jobs and education. Of the three leading candidates, de Blasio was the sharpest critic of the mayor’s education policies.

The election was a clear repudiation of Bloomberg’s strategies of test-based accountability, closing schools (despite community opposition), and charter schools. .

The New York Times polls showed that only one in four New Yorkers approved of Bloomberg’s education policies. The Quinnipiac poll showed approval at only 22%.

One thing is clear:

The national reform movement just took a big hit. New Yorkers rejected it as stale and oppressive. They don’t like the status quo. They want change. They want leadership that cares more about children than about data. They want leadership that values education more than testing.

A public school parent and former local school board member, Bill de Blasio is poised to bring a fresh vision to the city’s schools.

While the adults struggle over the future of education in Bridgeport, Connecticut, the students are tested and tested and their voices are seldom heard.

This student’s voice will be heard, thanks to Jonathan Pelto.

The student feels buried in a deep hole while adults keep shoveling dirt on him.

Today is Election Day for the school board in Bridgeport. Time to elect those who extend a helping hand, not a test or a shovel full of dirt.

Wendy Lecker extends her analysis of reformer actions and policies and how they purposely do the opposite of what they say.

In part 1, she quoted Orwell’s definition of doublethink:

“To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality.”

— George Orwell, 1984

Orwell’s definition of “doublethink” explains Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s education reform strategy. His playbook consists of starving our neediest children of educational basics, while claiming he is “helping” them prepare for the 21st century.

In part 2, she quotes Orwell: “”War is peace. Slavery is freedom. Ignorance is strength.”

What reformers say and do are opposites:

Reformers say they want creativity and critical thinking as they impose more standardization and punish nonconformity. They say they don’t want teachers to teach to the test, but make the tests more consequential than ever.

Lecker writes:

“The Common Core’s roll-out intensifies the homogenized, test-focused approach to instruction. In one needy Connecticut district, children were handed identical “contracts” with the following expectations: “all children will grow by at least one level on the Common-Core aligned rubric each trimester;” and “all students will improve their reading levels by at least two years by the end of the school year.” The Common Core rubric and tests define learning.

“Regimentation is the reformers’ ideal of a teacher-student relationship. In his campaign to expand the charter school empire in Connecticut, Commissioner Pryor handed two public schools over to Jumoke/FUSE charter chain. The teacher attitude there is exemplified by this fifth grade teacher at Bridgeport’s Jumoke-controlled Dunbar school. Her opening line to her 10-year-old students was: “While I am teaching, I want to see you in ready position … feet flat on the floor, hands folded on the desk and eyes on me.” In the normal world, rapt attention is the result of engaging teaching. This teacher foists that responsibility on the child. The lesson here is: compliance above all. You need not be actually engaged — just act the part.

“Even superintendents are being whipped into compliance. Pryor handed down a ready-made Powerpoint with Common Core “talking points” that principals and teachers are to present at all school open houses.

“In a recent Orwellian twist, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has issued “guidance” mandating that states cease the use of modified assessments. Thus, students with disabilities must now take the exact same tests as everyone else.

“Identical tests, identical goals, identical results and identical behavior may work with automatons. However, as Steve Nelson, director of New York’s Calhoun School, recently observed, real children are not standard. They develop at different rates and learn in different ways. If we seek to develop creative innovative thinkers who can thrive in the real world, we cannot park them in front of a computer to learn and practice disembodied skills, nor have them taught by automatons parroting scripted lessons.

“To suggest that these reforms are “good for our children” is the most Orwellian claim of all.”

The first part of her two-part series is here.

Paul Horton, who teaches history at the University of Chicago Lab School, wrote the following essay for this blog:

“Democracy and Education: Waiting for Gatopia?

“John Dewey arrived at the University of Chicago in the middle of the Pullman strike. He wrote his wife, still in Ann Arbor, that he had met a young man on the train who supported the strike very passionately: “I only talked with him for 10 or 15 minutes but when I got through my nerves were more thrilled than they had been for years; I felt as if I had better resign my job teaching and follow him around until I got a life. One lost all sense of the right or wrong of things in admiration of the absolute, almost fanatic, sincerity and earnestness, and in admiration of the magnificent combination that was going on. Simply as an aesthetic matter, I don’t believe the world has seen but a few times such a spectacle of magnificent, widespread union of men about a common interest as this strike business.” (quoted in Westbrook, 87). This sense of “magnificent, widespread union” represented the definition of Democracy to Dewey; it was the very core of his writing, work, and public advocacy.

“Later, after he had moved to Columbia University in New York, he had a major disagreement with a very articulate student, Randolph Bourne, about the media pressure to get involved in WWI. Bourne argued then and later in an unfinished essay entitled, “War is the Health of the State” that states thrived on war because war consolidated the state’s power and allowed it to repress any kind of dissent. Dewey was an outspoken advocate of American entry into World War I, but began to question his support after seeing several of his colleagues at Columbia fired for their outspoken opposition to the War. These serious doubts turned into deep regret when he saw that the Espionage Act was used to repress freedoms of speech and press. Respectable citizens, including many thoughtful journalists and political leaders like Eugene V. Debs were routinely thrown into jail. His serious doubts began to trouble him more deeply as he witnessed the Federal response to the postwar Red Scare of 1919, when many American citizens were deported without constitutional due process. He was so disturbed by all of this that he helped found the American Civil Liberties Union that sought to protect due process and other constitutional rights. (Ryan, 154-99)

“From the early 1920’s forward, Dewey became a vocal and articulate public spokes person for Democracy in all American institutions. He founded and led an AFT local at Columbia and often spoke at labor and AFT functions. He believed with every cell of his body that American Schools had to be the incubator of American Democracy. As the shadow of fascism descended over Europe, he became a fellow traveller with the United Front to defend the world from an ideology that had nothing but for contempt for Democracy or any notion of an open society. For Dewey, education that allowed the organic evolution of free speech and the discussion and respect for all points of view in the classroom inoculated American students from the threat of fascism.

“If he were alive today, Professor Dewey would be shocked by what he would see. In part, Dewey’s whole philosophy of Education was developed to countervail the corrosive influence of capitalism on communities and the gross economic power of giant corporations. He sought to defend individual growth and creativity and nurture the sense of public responsibility that was under assault from the pulverizing individualism of the dominant ideology of big business backed Social Darwinism.

“Dewey’s vision is now a major target of major foundations that are funding the push to privatize American Education. Major Wall Street investors and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Eli Broad Foundation, the Walton Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, among others, are working together with the Obama Administration to destroy what is left of public education in this great country. Combined, these corporations control approximately 50 billion dollars in assests.

“I will not take the time here to unpack the strategic plan coordinated by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and three people within the Department of Education who have turn their strategic plan into a public policy called “The Race to the Top.” You should read Diane Ravitch’s new book to get a clear picture of how this has all been done very legally with the help of the best lawyers that money can buy, millions of dollars thrown at the Harvard Education Department, and with tens of millions of dollars to hire the best Madison Ave. Advertising and PR firms and the best web designers (go to “PARCC” or “Common Core” online). What you need to know is that none of the people behind this plan have any respect for public schools or public school teachers.

“Like Anthony Cody, I have been insulted several times by Secretary Duncan’s Press Secretary and friends of our president who are not open to any imput from experienced teachers. Indeed, I was the subject of a veiled threat from Mr. Duncan’s Press Secretary that I describe here: http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2013/04/paul_horton_of_common_core_con.html.

“In another case, a good friend of the President told me when I protested the Chicago School closings: “who do you think you are kidding, only 7 or 8 percent of those kids have a chance anyway.” Several weeks later when I raised the same subject again, he gave me the Democrats for Education Reform standard line that inner city schools failed because teachers have failed. He was not interested in hearing about poverty and resource starving of schools. I called him on this. The first quote sounded eerily like what Mr. Emanuel communicated to Chicago Teacher’s Union President, Karen Lewis, in a famously closed door, expletive filled meeting.

“What all friends of public teachers and public Education need to understand is that Mr. Duncan and the Obama administration listen to no one on this issue. What Republicans and Tea Party activists need to understand is that this is not about Government corruption, it is about the fact that when it comes to Education issues, we do not have a government. Governments must read and respond to petitions: our Education Department does not seek to communicate with any citizens except by tweeting inane idiocies about gadgets and enterprise. What we have is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsoring the overthrow of the public school system to bulldoze a path to sell billions of dollars of product. Other companies like Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill and Company, and Achieve, Inc. are just coming in behind the bulldozers.

“We must teach the rest of our society that democracy still matters in schools and everywhere else. The time for talking is over! We need to get into the streets and get arrested if necessary. Most importantly every one of us needs to call the same senator or congressman every day until NCLB and RTTT are dead, Arne Duncan does not have control over a penny, and all stimulus money that has yet to be distributed, is given by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the districts around the country that are the most underserved to rehire teachers and support staff. Not a penny should go to charter school construction, IT, administration, or hiring consultants from the Eli Broad Foundation, the Gates Foundation, or McKinsey. Not a penny should go to Pearson Education, McGraw-Hill or any form of standardized testing. All state superintendents who took trips from any Education vendor should resign, and no state should hire an administrator or superintendent at any level who does not have proper accredited certification and ten years of exemplary classroom teaching.

“Now is the time to preserve the legacy of John Dewey and teach the rest of the country about Democracy in Education or wait like sheep for Gatopia to numb us all!”

This comment was just posted in response to an earlier piece today:

 

I’m also a money manager and have noticed the same phenomena remarked upon by your correspondent.

It is certainly true that moneyed oligarchs, their children, or their friends never have to suffer the consequences of the education mayhem they are unleashing. They are chefs that do not eat the cooking. They know the answers and are not interested in the facts of what is actually happening.

The main impulse for what they do is self-aggrandizement. For example, when you create a charter school, you typically create a board so that your friends can burnish their resumes and feel like they are giving back. If you give enough money, like a Bruce Rauner or a Pritzker, you get your name engraved and maybe even displayed in lights outside. Of course, you also get clout with city by having created a nice shiny object that the mayor can point to come election time.

How do you stop this? I don’t think you’ll ever change the minds of the top dogs, but if you change the narrative among the people they associate with, then you will start to see “education reform” as no longer being something that people want to automatically be associated with. Make it controversial and toxic. For example, get the message through that all of the reforms don’t actally work and are counterproductive. Spread publicity about the fraudsters, shysters, and boodlers in the “education reform” industry. Continually remind them of the deeply disparate racial impact of their policies, and that most minority communities seem to want their community schools and don’t see them as failures. Get them to interact face to face with the people they’re hurting by spreading information, canvassing, marching, and protesting in wealthy communities, for example in Lincoln Park and Lakeview in Chicago.

 

Kay McSpadden is a high school teacher in York, South Carolina, and also a columnist for the Charlotte Observer.

In this post, she writes about the students she has taught, the difficult lives they lead, the courage they display.

Even as the kids are grappling with hard lives, the legislators in North and South Carolina are wreaking destruction on one of the few stable institutions in the children’s lives: Their school.

She writes about her students:

“In this rural school district where the majority of students qualify for free or reduced lunch, my students often write about how hard their lives are, about their parents who are absent because of work or divorce or restraining orders or death, about how poor health and homelessness and bad choices keep them from a more hopeful future.

They are not self-pitying but matter-of-fact – which is, in itself, heartbreaking.

One girl wrote that for years she worried she was also doomed to divorce because all the adults she knows – from grandparents to aunts and uncles to her parents – have separated.

“Then one day I had an epiphany,” she wrote, putting to use a word she said she had learned in an English class. “I don’t have to be like them. It was liberating, realizing that I can make my own destiny.”

Her pluck and resilience might seem remarkable except that so many of my students echo it – from the girl who was sexually assaulted as a toddler to the teenager who lost a brother to drug use. Despite catching the school bus before 6 a.m. and not getting home until 12 hours later – and despite not always knowing where they will sleep when they do – the students I know show up most days glad to be at school.”

Why do they come back day after day?

“They know that the adults there care about them – from the cooks to the principals, the custodians and the attendance monitor, the teachers and aides and librarians and secretaries and resource officers. All of us keep coming back because we make a difference in the lives of children. No one works long in education who doesn’t believe that.”

Meanwhile, back in the state capitols, the adults are making life worse for the young people:

“The governors and the legislatures of both states have decided that corporations rather than children should be their priority, and their actions prove that – cutting resources for public schools, diverting money to vouchers and charters, forcing schools to eliminate essential staff and programs, devaluing the work teachers do to improve their skills and earn advanced degrees, keeping their wages low, encouraging inexperienced and temporary teachers to rotate in and out of their school districts, evaluating teachers with invalid metrics, emphasizing standardized testing.

I don’t blame anyone for bowing out of the classroom. At some point in the future I may have to do the same.

But for now my students keep me there. Too many of them have already been let down by the adults in their lives, the ones who know them personally as well as the ones in Raleigh and Columbia who make decisions that add to their suffering. I want to be like the other committed adults who work in my school, people who make it a place where every child belongs, where every child matters.

 

 

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/08/30/4276767/difficult-times-for-teachers.html#.UiJRAhYgtWh#storylink=cpy

 

 

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/08/30/4276767/difficult-times-for-teachers.html#.UiJRAhYgtWh#storylink=cpy

 

 

Now here is a first for this blog. A comment that appeared
on the blog by Robert Rendo was picked up and posted by blogger
Jonathan Pelto. It was indeed a brilliant statement, and somehow I
failed to turn it into a post. So
I am taking the post from Jonathan Pelto’s blog
and
posting it here so everyone can read it. Rendo explains how Common
Core and the high-stakes testing mandated by No Child Left Behind
and Race to the Top have degraded schooling and education. Here is
a sample: In fact, we have stepped a long way back into a
new epoch of factory style education, where every student is a
widget, and every widget is hyper-inspected along the conveyor belt
to see if its frame will hold up once sold to the consumer, who is
now the future employer. And if the person hired to do the assembly
messes up just a few times, they are fired and replaced. This
process happens knowing full well the conveyor belt is moving at 45
MPH, up from 10 MPH several years ago.
Who can
really produce that many widgets when the belt is rolling by so
quickly? It conjures up the imagery of the classic factory
chocolate making scene from “I Love Lucy”.
But
it’s anything but cute or funny.
Students are
not widgets. Teachers are not robots. The process of teaching and
learning is a humanistic endeavor. There are bonds to be forged,
even while measuring situations and outcomes with data. The data
used to help contribute indispensably to that human bond.
Presently, the bonding has been devalued, thrown aside, and the
data has become the new humanism.

Progressive Magazine has created a wonderful new website
called Public
School Shakedown
to cover the news about the
privatization movement. Please subscribe to stay informed about the
shams, scams, frauds, boondoggles, and assorted scandals connected
to today’s faux-reform movement. And to keep Public School
Shakedown alive, subscribe to the reborn Progressive Magazine,
which understands what is happening and is helping us to inform the
public.

Dora Taylor, a teacher and blogger in Seattle, was teaching a class about the the history of architecture from Egypt to the Roman Empire when a light went on in her head.

She asked herself: Is there a connection between education and the war in Syria?

Why do we always have billions to go to war but when it comes to reducing child poverty, there is no money, we are flat broke?