Archives for category: Corporate Reformers

The blogger Louisiana Educator describes a meeting in Baton Rouge where leaders of the corporate reform movement worried about the progress of their plans to privatize education in the state. Time is running out.

This is a chilling post.

I hope that its author, experienced educator Mike Deshotels, won’t mind if I excerpt this long introduction. You should read it all.

A small private meeting was held in Baton Rouge a couple of weeks ago including representatives of several highly influential power brokers who are dedicated to a major overhaul and privatization of our K-12 education system. These groups were very concerned that much of the Jindal reform legislation has either been declared unconstitutional by the courts or is still tied up in litigation. They are frustrated that the supporters of our public education system are fighting back against their sweeping “reforms”. They figure that they have only the rest of the Jindal administration in which to push through revisions of the law that will keep their reforms intact.

They are concerned that only a relatively small number of teachers are on a pathway to being fired as a result of the sloppy implementation of the new VAM evaluation by Superintendent John White. They believe also that the new laws should be identifying many principals and even local superintendents who should be fired. The firings are not happening quickly enough!

They are concerned that the privatization of our K-12 educational system is not happening fast enough. They are frustrated that many of the new voucher schools have turned out to be run by small time swindlers who knew almost nothing about education and who had no business running schools. They feel their cause has received bad publicity when it was revealed that some voucher schools were teaching about dinosaurs and humans existing at the same time.

This is a mighty hoax being perpetrated on the people of the state. Let them know. Stop the privatization movement now.

A friend in a conservative think tank said it was time for me to write a post praising John Arnold for giving $10 million to keep Headstart alive during the federal government shutdown.

Arnold was an Enron trader who left with $3 billion before the Enron scam collapsed, destroying the pensions of everyone who worked there. Other Enron executives went to jail, but Arnold got out before the collapse and is now using his fortune to advance privatization of public schools and to attack pensions of public sector employees nationally.

At first, I thought, what a nice gesture on the part of a man who fleeced so many Enron investors. I am glad he is using a tiny part of his vast fortune to do some good.

Then I read this article by David Sirota. Sirota, who has become one of the nation’s finest investigative journalists, said that Arnold was buying good PR and diverting public attention from his efforts to impoverish millions of retirees by slashing their pensions. Oh, well, at least their grandchildren will be able to go to a Headstart center.

My friend on the right said I was becoming too cynical. But I don’t think that is quite right.

How should one feel about a man who walks away with $3 billion from a corporation that looted its stockholders, whose major executives went to jail, whose employees lost their life savings? How should one feel about his efforts to cut the pensions of people who have retired on $40,000 a year?

My view: outrage is a human and appropriate response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In case you missed the last week of the long-running drama and comedy series, called “Corporate America Wants to Love Public Education to Death,” EduShyster fills you in. 

You will laugh and cry as you watch leaders of the movement tear their hair out as they argue about whether the mighty scam perpetrated by the virtual charter schools are truly “reform” or are they, well, scams.

You will snicker as you see the break-up of true lovers in the parent tricker biz in California.

You will laugh as you review the efforts of the “P” (privatization) movement say they never ever heard of the word, and all they are saying is give P a chance.

This is one of her best. She just gets better and better all the time.

How does she do it?

I have heard this expression hundreds of times.

Sometimes at staff development, they show cartoon figures building a plane in mid-air.

Note that the engineers are wearing parachutes.

Note that the passengers–students and teachers–have no parachutes.

Bear in mind that the idea of building a plane as it is in mid-air is insane.

The next time you hear this expression, do one of these things:

Get up and walk out.

Hiss loudly (no one ever knows who is hissing)

Boo loudly (riskier than hissing)

Do not quietly sit by while your leader spouts idiotic platitudes.

Protests are gathering steam against high-stakes testing. Parents, students, and educators are organizing to fight the data-driven mechanistic view of schooling that is ruining education.

Politicians follow, they don’t lead. Most have no idea of the damage done by NCLB and Race to the Top. They think that “reform” is positive. They don’t know that the language has been distorted to hide the barrage of damaging policies now harming our community public schools and hurting children.

When our grassroots movement grows large enough, they will hear us. And they will rush to get in front of the parade.

This reader wrote:

“You are not overly optimistic Diane. The ground IS shifting, the tide turning! Western New York students are opting out of tests already this year. Like many other students, my kids are refusing any test used to evaluate a teacher. This is our way of protesting current education “reform.” But this battle will be won with everyone using their voice, and showing opposition, in their own way. The Partnership for Smarter Schools does not promote opting out or public protest. They are committed to bringing about real, common sense reform through legislation. They are playing an important role in the fight against the use of standardized, high stakes assessments.”

Two years ago, after the resignation of their superintendent, the Ogden, Utah, school board chose one of its own members to take over as the leader of the schools. Brad Smith, a lawyer, may be the only superintendent in the state who has never been a teacher and has no credentials.

This is innovative, for sure. Nations like Finland and Korea would never allow a non-professional to take over a leading role in the profession. It demeans all those who worked so hard to darn credentials.

Things did not go well for Superintendent Smith. Last spring, angry parents crowded into a meeting to complain about budget cuts, overcrowded classes, and layoffs for librarians (aka “media specialists”). Smith boasted that there had been more change since he took over than in the previous two decades, but a local university professor responded that students’ lives are harmed by too much disruption.

Smith managed to find the funding to retain 7 out of 20 media specialists, but parents worried that veteran teachers were leaving the district.

Some community members complained that the source of the budget shortfall was not teachers’ salaries but administrative bloat.

Despite community concerns, the board voted two weeks ago to renew Smith’s contract. The head of the Democratic Education Caucus was baffled by the superintendent’s bonus in a time of austerity.

She said: ““We’re hearing of classroom sizes of 38, and even as high as 45 in core classes,” she said, noting national recommendations were for 26 in a secondary class. Irvine also criticized Smith’s performance-based bonuses.

“Based on an article in the Standard recently, we discovered the superintendent has received bonuses in the last years upwards of $50,000 total. How can this be when this year librarians have been eliminated, teacher and staff assistants have been either eliminated or cut full time to part time?”

Clearly, Ogden has decided to utilize a business plan. The superintendent has no education background. Class size doesn’t matter. Librarians don’t matter. The voices of concerned parents are ignored. As long as those test scores go up, the school board will declare success. After all, trained seals can perform no matter how many are in the pool.

This reader wants to know:

“I think at some point they have to be able to point to some tangible benefit of “reform” to the majority of people. It’s been more than a decade. Every year it’s just more mandates and less funding. The funding that does come isn’t towards anything that we find “valuable”. I didn’t ask for an elaborate school grading system that changes every year and I think testing kids in order to evaluate teachers is nutty. I don’t really consider the relationship between my kid and his school to be adversarial or “competitive”. He’s not a “consumer” at school, considering his “options”. He’s an 11 year old. Hopefully they’re working together.”

I just learned that Rob Miller, principal of the Jenks Middle School in Oklahoma, is under investigation for possibly encouraging parents to opt out of a field test.

According to the Tulsa World:

Jenks Public Schools participated in and encouraged a movement to opt students out of field tests last April, an Oklahoma State Department of Education investigation found.

In a July 7 report provided to the Tulsa World this week in response to an open records request, the state said it had evidence that Jenks Middle School Principal Rob Miller “initiated a movement to opt out ‘teachers and students’ from all field tests administered at Jenks Middle School. This occurred while on ‘school time’ and through school district email,” the report says.

The parents at the school say that the decision to opt out of field testing was their own, and they acted without the principal being involved:

In April, the school received a flurry of opt-out forms from parents asking that their children not be subjected to field tests, which are used by testing companies to evaluate questions for future use.

They do not count in either a student’s grade or in a school’s state grade.

“Our kids are being used as unpaid subjects by CTB/McGraw-Hill (a testing vendor) without our consent or permission,” PTA President Deedra Barnes said at the time.

She said the opt-out movement was led by Jenks parents who were frustrated by too much testing and who had heard of similar efforts by parents throughout the country.

After hearing about the opt-out initiative, the state Education Department on April 24 requested numerous records under the Open Records Act related to testing from Jenks Public Schools.

The state received 529 pages of documentation, including 216 redacted email communications, as well as around 800 student opt-out letters, according to its report.

But there may be another reason that Principal Miller is under investigation. On his blog, he wrote critically about the State Superintendent Janet Barresi, a member of Jeb Bush’s Chiefs for Change and former dentist.

Worse, he wrote a dazzling review of Reign of Error.

He started his review with a quote tweeted by the Tulsa World’s education writer, Andrea Eger: “The truth is like a lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself. – St. Augustine”

Principal Miller went from there to write: “Diane is a lioness of truth who roars with authority, credibility and conviction. She leads a pride of like-minded Americans who believe that corporate reformers have gone too far and that overemphasis on testing and grading of schools has damaged public education and by extension, millions of students and teachers nationwide.”

The parents in Jenks Middle School say they initiated the opt out. In the emails cited in the story, Miller says he tried to dissuade the parents, but he did not seem to be giving them direct orders not to opt out. He walked a fine line.

Trust the parents. Oklahoma should not punish this conscientious educator who is trying to walk a fine line, both to obey his superiors and to listen to his parents.

Will he be punished for (perhaps) expressing his own thoughts? He knows the test doesn’t count.

Is there freedom of speech and freedom of conscience in Oklahoma? Or is obedience to authority, even when authority is wrong, the highest value?

Principal Miller, I hope your parents and community stand with you. Can Oklahoma bear to debate what is right and what is true?

You are my hero.

Mark Naison, one of the founders of the Badass Teachers
Association, explains
in a few words the harsh truth
that will not be
discussed at NBC’s Education Nation by its lineup of CEOs and
rightwing governors: The more teachers are scripted and rendered
voiceless, the less likely it is that talented people will want to
be teachers or remain in the classroom. Why can’t they understand
that they are destroying the teaching profession, not attracting
the “best and the brightest”? They may come for two or three years
while they are waiting to decide where to go to graduate school,
but meanwhile the profession as such will no longer exist.

In this post, Jonathan Pelto combines two excellent articles by a retired principal in Connecticut.

The veil is lifting over the misappropriation of the honorable word “reform.” Across the nation, it has become a synonym for more testing, more privatization, and dependence on inexperienced “teachers” who will almost all be gone within three or four years.

This principal has the wisdom of experience.

Will we be the first nation in history to mock experience and turn education over to non-educators?