Archives for category: Common Core

A reader sends this information:

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/parenting&id=7147532

SEATTLE (AP) – December 1, 2009 (WPVI) — The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is giving the National PTA $1 million to teach parents about education reform. [Common Core]

http://www.missourieducationwatchdog.com/2013/02/pta-receives-more-money-to-push-common.html

ALEXANDRIA, VA, Feb 15, 2013 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) — National PTA announced today that it received a one-year $240,000 grant from the GE Foundation [General Electric] to further its efforts on the Common Core State Standards.

Here it is in one neat package: the Obama reform program, drafted by the Broad Foundation and published in April 2009.

Please review the names of those who participated in drafting the plan. Many will be familiar to you. Here you will find the agenda for Race to the Top, which was revealed to the public three months later. These are the people and these are the policies that forged a strong link between No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. Here is the framework that saddled the nation with more high-stakes testing, more privatization, more closing schools, more layoffs, attacks on tenure, and other policies that lack any research or evidence.

Michigan is debating the Common Core, which it already agreed to adopt.

The curious thing in the debate and in the article is the repeated claim by “experts” that the Common Core will fix all the disparities and problems in American education. It will close the gap between low-perming and high-performing students and lift the performance of American students to the top on international tests.

What is the evidence for their views? How do they know? The standards have been imposed without any test of their value, their feasibility, or their consequences for real-live students. No one actually knows how they will work. What we do know is that full implementation will cost billions of dollars. States are buying new technology and new materials for Common Core even as they are laying off teachers, guidance counselors and librarians.

Will anyone remember these promises of Utopia a decade from now? Who will be accountable if they are wrong?

Can higher, more rigorous standards substitute for the massive disinvestment in education that is occurring in state after state?

This article in The Economist recounts the anxiety and confusion surrounding the adoption of the Common Core. Officials say it is a great thing, but parents are not so sure.

He writes:

“Why has New York decided to subject students to these exams well before the standards have been fully implemented in the classrooms? (Most states are holding off until 2015.) My daughter is a strong math student, and loves taking tests, but when she was given a practice test over the winter holiday that contained high-level work with fractions, division with three-digit numbers and even a dab of algebra, her eyes grew wide. Nothing like this had ever appeared in a lesson in her third-grade classroom. Her teacher has been scrambling to teach these concepts over the past few weeks to get the 8-year-olds ready, but it’s bound to be too little, too late. The teachers are not at fault: much of the content on the practice exams was a surprise to them as well. With school ratings and teacher evaluations hinging on the results, everyone has an investment in this perverse and premature exercise.”

Arne Duncan is concerned about the backlash against the federal government’s heavy-handed imposition of the Common Core.

At a speech to business leaders in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, he urged their support for Common Core.

He probably forgot that the U.S. Department of Education is legally prohibited from being involved in any matters that prescribe curriculum or instruction to the nation’s public schools.

This blogger is not happy with the Common Core.

He says it discourages creativity. He thinks it is about preparing workers and consumers, not thinkers.

And there is this too:

“The Common Core is one reason my sixth-grade daughter has yet to read a novel in ELA. It’s also a reason she no longer has time to get to the school library. The Common Core’s emphasis on nonfiction would be fine if it emphasized good nonfiction. My favorite authors are nonfiction geniuses. Annie Dillard, Jon Krakauer, James Herndon, Jonathan Kozol, Robert Pirsig, David Sedaris, Natalie Goldberg, Anne Lamott, and, lest we forget, Thoreau. They write nonfiction at its best, but that’s not what my girls are being fed.

“The nonfiction of the Common Core consists of shorter pieces, often articles, much like what workers will be expected to read on the job. So, there’s no room for To Kill a Mockingbird, The Catcher in the Rye, Speak, or Of Mice and Men. What good is all that novel crap anyway?

“Creativity is a valuable commodity, but the Common Core does not promote creativity. My daughters are about to embark on eight days of testing. Eight days of pissing away ninety minutes at a time on tests that will teach them mostly to dislike school. I don’t want data from these tests. I don’t need it. I know my kids and so do their teachers.”

Technical issues plague the tests.

Not ready for prime time.

This is a parody but it is uncomfortably close to reality.

The humorist known as Students Last has compiled a reading list to prepare children for failure on the tests.

Just listen to all the bigwigs warning about high failure rates, ripping off the Band-aid and sink-or-swim in the deep end of the pool. That’s enough to create a sense of dread and high anxiety.

The only thing missing from the reading list is a manual for nervous parents and an advice book on how to organize a mass resistance movement.

Aaron Pallas, a sociologist at Teachers College, is a sharp observer of educational issues.

In this article, he comments on a joint statement by the leaders of education in New York City and State, hailing the Common Core and the new Common Core tests. Their article appeared in the New York Daily News, where they proclaimed the advent of the new standards and the joy they are bringing back to learning. And now the new Common a core tests will let everyone know whether our none-year-olds are college-and-career-ready.

For most parents of young children, this is doubtless a burning issue, especially since no one can be sure what careers will exist 10 years from now.

What did they forget to say: the introduction of new tests means there is no trend line, no way of basing teacher evaluations on scores. Pallas writes, in part, supplying his own version of the text that wasn’t there:

“Because this year’s assessments are a completely different baseline than previous state assessments, it would be inappropriate to treat the difference between last year’s scores and this year’s scores as evidence of student growth in achievement. Therefore, we are suspending the use of student growth percentiles and value-added models to estimate teachers’ contributions to their students’ learning as a required element of the Annual Professional Performance Review of teachers and principals across New York state for at least one year.”

Dennis Walcott and other city and state officials in New York announced that they expect test scores to fall by 30% this year because of the switch to the Common Core.

They keep saying, almost too gleefully, how hard the test is. (Reader, remember that the test is “hard” only because state officials decided to raise the passing mark.)

Walcott said, “It’s time to rip the Band-Aid off, and we have a responsibility to rip that Band-aid off.”

Readers, I have been trying to figure out what that statement means.

Clearly, the chancellor thought it was profound so he said it twice.

What is the Band-aid?

What wound is it protecting?

Why is it good to rip it off?

Doesn’t it inflict pain when you do that?

Why would the chancellor want to inflict pain on so many children?

I welcome your deconstruction of this deep exclamation.